4shobhit1987 (talk | contribs) |
TheRedPenOfDoom (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 578: | Line 578: | ||
Plz update the bajrangi bhaijaan collections.they remain same from past 5 days. Movie collects 70 to 80 crores from domestic marke t.so update it. |
Plz update the bajrangi bhaijaan collections.they remain same from past 5 days. Movie collects 70 to 80 crores from domestic marke t.so update it. |
||
all update you can find from bajrangi bhaijaan wiki page.Imnew user so idint know how to edit.so plz update the figures.plz and categories like highest opening day,highesy weekend.highest week collections.are to be shown.plz do it.and make this page cool |
all update you can find from bajrangi bhaijaan wiki page.Imnew user so idint know how to edit.so plz update the figures.plz and categories like highest opening day,highesy weekend.highest week collections.are to be shown.plz do it.and make this page cool |
||
:{{not done}} [[WP:DEADLINE|Wikipedia is not a second by second cash receipt scroll. ]] -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 13:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:09, 26 July 2015
![]() | This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Updation of Baahubali's gross
I request you to update baahubali gross numbers as of the 24th of july which is 401 crores tanks - Nyankitty5023 Nyankitty5023 (talk) 22:45, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Adding one more source : http://www.forbes.com/sites/robcain/2015/07/25/indias-baahubali-punches-out-401-crore-62-6-million-gross-in-15-days/
- Please use the template as used before and it would be preferable for people to put all this in one place rather than repeating this every few hours. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:51, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Dasavatharam
Why the hell are you not adding Dasavatharam in this list. Because it also grossed $31 millions
Please add Kamal Haasan's Dasavatharam in this list, cause dasavatharam also collected $31 millions. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.114.109.110 (talk) 04:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Provide a source. There's already too much game-playing with people just guessing and changing the numbers without explanation. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:32, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
3 Idiots and other older films
There's a huge problem on this list when it comes to writing the USD totals. A few films like 3 Idiots were released before the Indian rupee significantly got weaker. The 3 Idiots USD total should be $83 million, which puts it much higher on the other list. And other films released earlier should have adjusted totals as well. Nothing's adjusted in the USD list and that means great error. Also, Enthiran's grossed $71 million.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A03F:9B:600:7598:111E:F976:5B8C (talk) 19:55, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- The ranking is in terms of rupees so while there's a difference in US figures, that doesn't change anything. As to Enthiran's gross, if you can provide a reliable source for that, then update it. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Merge discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
There are numerous different articles about one basic thing - revenues of Indian films. All this needs to be consolidated and properly defined, as the current maintenance of several such articles is a mess, an article maintenance problem, and there is bound to be plenty of contradictory details among them all. In the merged article, the top-grossing films would be centralised, ideally with separate columns for domestic and global returns. The "Hundred Crore Club" concept could be mentioned, as this seems to have sources, but it boils down to a list of top-grossing films. Furthermore, it might be appropriate and clearer to rename this article to List of highest-grossing Indian films. This multi-way merge will take some work, but is clearly justified in view of the current redundancies. Dl2000 (talk) 04:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Partial Support as per the reasons given above by Dl2000 but I oppose the merging of Bollywood figures into that of all the Indian films. Please wait for the discussion at the article's talk page to complete. - Jayadevp13 05:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- support - although the "100 crore club" article probably could survive as a text only article that talks about the concept of the "club" - not lists of the individual films, etc.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support per Jayadevp and TRPoD above, just the films, and not the Bollywood figures. Ruby Murray 12:54, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support: My suggestion is, the final version of merged article should contain only CBFC certified films. Not be biased an bollywood or kollywood or tollywood or any other, since it could raise some issues/disputes. I oppose for the concept of 'Hundred crore club', it seems additional glorification for the films more than the revenue mentioned. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 13:20, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Partial Support Well, it's a good idea to merge related articles into one and make it accessible to internet user in on go, however, Bollywood is the oldest among its local contemporaries with its own rights, figures, values and representation, therefore, I'm of the opinion as User:Jayadevp13 of representing just the films in List of highest-grossing Indian films but Bollywood figures. Bolly. figures should be represented in List of highest-grossing Bollywood films itself. Salman 11:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsujata (talk • contribs)
- @Dl2000, TheRedPenOfDoom, Ruby Murray, Balablitz, and Samsujata: Added Bollywood highest grossing films by month to the merge list. I thought that I should inform you all about it. The article has been maintained comparatively well till now though. - Jayadevp13 16:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Jayadevp13:
Great!. Good move. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 04:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The most appropiate is to create a page titled "List of highest-grossing Indian films" and merge all these pages!
- Decline. As the major sources like TOI and India Today are mentioning special records of individual industries, what if wikipedia maintain with reliable sources?Phani M (talk) 17:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Strong support There are way too many articles for the grosses achieved by Indian cinema. And considering the fact that there is no official box office source for grosses of Indian films, it is really unnecessary too have these many articles. It would be a good idea to merge all articles into one. NiRinsanity 16:42, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline. i'm completly opposing the merge of an articls
we all telugu people want highest grossing telugu movies we want indiual records of separte languages in indiaAkhil (talk) 16:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Strong Decline These articles represent readers to get an idea about how the box office performance works from time to time. Daan0001 (talk) 13:27, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline. As the major sources like TOI and India Today are mentioning special records of individual industries, what if wikipedia maintain with reliable sources?Ak-Akhil (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Strong Support I support this decision as there are so many similar articles related to the trends , facts, figures of bollywood films.If the articles are merged it would be easier to maintain the current information in the articles.--Param Mudgal (talk) 09:47, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment from merge proposer - It seems much of the merging has proceeded, and Bollywood 100 Crore Club scope has been successfully limited to describing that concept without maintenance of another table. However, there still seems to be outstanding controversy whether to fold List of highest-grossing Bollywood films into List of highest-grossing Indian films. Given that lack of consensus, and the practice of WP:MERGE, an uninvolved admin, or at least an uninvolved editor, should be the closer of this discussion. This has been open for a while, but also consider WP:DEADLINE. Meanwhile, there are contradictory figures in the worldwide grosses between the two articles and these are about to be flagged as such. Dl2000 (talk) 23:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- No Support If this has to be merged, then the list will come as "National" with Hindi, Tamil and Telugu films which has the potential, but let us keep each language as different eventhough a main box can be added only in Hindi page which shows all films as per its collection.
Rajeshbieee (talk) 09:41, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Strong decline I decline the merger proposal as this will be very ignorant idea to categorize Tamil, Telugu, Bengali, Malayalam, Marathi and other non-Hindi Indian movies under the tag of Bollywood. Bollywood is the Mumbai-based Hindi film industry whereas the other industries are different ones. None of us are that much childish not to understand the difference between them! Arka 92 06:02, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Crore vs million/billion numbering system
Shouldn't the figures be expressed in Indian numbering system as opposed to Western numbering system (millions and billions) for the convenience of majority of readers who are likely to visit this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.178.217.152 (talk) 19:45, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- I honestly don't know. Wikipedia has a manual of style for this sort of thing so maybe you should ask at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. I suspect they will advise that you use the Indian system and provide a conversion but it is best to check. Betty Logan (talk) 21:44, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
update
http://www.koimoi.com/box-office-verdict-bollywoods-top-worldwide-grossers/
gross is more confussion. and its not real income because tax is not less
- add the cateagry nett for undererstand domestic real box office collection
- and understand for 100 club,200 club .
--Amt000 (talk) 16:18, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- This is the List of highest-grossing Indian films, not the List of highest grossing and netting films. It appears that the standard measurement is Gross with Nett only sometimes being of interest. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:01, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
@TheRedPenOfDoom: this is not matter of tittle netting.
- in template net option with gross i prefer for better under standing
- any film succes or not succes
it depends net collection not gross
- nett = total gross - tax
- suppose any film bujet 50 and gross collection 70 and net collection 40. then you take 40 to declear flop not 70
--Amt000 (talk) 13:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- have any admin to commentAmt000 (talk) 13:52, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- (note: admins dont have any special say. they just have the power to flip some switches according to community standards -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- the "flop" or "hit" or "super hit" or "average" or "mega flop" or "super colossal block and city and country buster" designations will NOT be included as they are meaningless and purely arbitrary. In addition, such designation on a list of highest grossing is extra meaningless - as the highest grossing films they are all obviously "hits". -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:27, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- @TheRedPenOfDoom: now what you want to sayAmt000 (talk)
- I do not understand your question. but your suggestion is not going to be implemented unless you show widespread reliable sources focusing on nett as much as they are focused on gross. And that aint gonna happen any time soon. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- @TheRedPenOfDoom: http://www.koimoi.com/box-office-verdict-bollywoods-top-worldwide-grossers/ this is source.
i only suggest add nett with gross as like this link . reason on the top Amt000 (talk) 14:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- and you have received your answer. No, 1) it is out of scope of this article and 2) it is not a standard of measurement widely and consistently used by the reliable sources, the sources commonly and widely discuss the gross and occasionally, sometimes, in some circumstances mention nett. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:06, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Kick should come on 5th positon as the worldwide gross of this movie is INR 385 crore, it is not 377 crore.
Source : Stardust Awards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.96.30.103 (talk) 16:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Gross the only one used at most of the lists such as List of highest-grossing films in Canada and the United States, United States box office records, List of highest-grossing films and others. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:06, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Colour accessibility
"Background color [green] indicates films playing in theatres around the world" - per MOS:COLOR, an article shouldn't distinguish information by colour alone. --McGeddon (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
- There is now both an asterisk and a color so I think this is resolved. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:52, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Addaytoday is not a reliable source
I removed the links to this page. This blog has nothing that indicates that it is a reliable source. I hid the listings for Bodyguard and Dabangg until a real source is found. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:06, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- agree not a reliable source WP:RS-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Andraboxoffice.com is not a reliable source
There is no evidence that [1] is a reliable source. It's essentially a blog. The problem is that's the only source for the Telugu section and if removed, there's nothing to be listed. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:21, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- agree not a valid source -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:56, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Koimoi.com
This editor tried to add this page as a source. However, I'm not sure that this should be considered a reliable source. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:01, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Koimoi is generally accepted in the India entertainment articles as a basically reliable source. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:22, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 15 July 2015
Arrambam || 2013 || Sri Sathya Sai Movies || ₹151 crore (US$18 million) || Vishnuvardhan || [1] 117.192.96.182 (talk) 19:31, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Not done We only use reliably published sources with a reputation for fact checking, accuracy and editorial oversight. Indian box office claims are notoriously hard to accurately monitor (The biggest national newspaper gave up on its "box office" column because of the difficulties of verifiable estimates due to external pressure and outright fraud) and so only a very few sources are appropriate for such claims. indianmoviestats isnt one of them. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:21, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
References
- ^ "All Time Highest Grossing Tamil films". indianmoviestats. 12 July 2015.
Include director?
When the individual language lists were merged here, some of them contained the field of "director" . Is that a field that we should institute for all sections of this article or should we remove it? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:59, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'd say remove it. The table doesn't need to be an unweildly mess of title/language/gross/etc. Source shouldn't even a separate column but just added to the end of gross to me. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:02, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Baahubali is a Bilingual
The film Baahubali was shot simultaneously in Telugu and Tamil languages,hence it belongs to both the regions,it would be sensible if baahubali is included in both the highest grossing lists of Telugu and Tamil. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subhakaran91 (talk • contribs) 12:58, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Done here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:03, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
How can you credit Baahubali to Tamil grossing list. Even Sivaji and Enthiran are Bilingual. In Sivaji entire segments are reshot for the Telugu Audience sake. However it was never credited to Telugu industry. How can you give the credit of Baahubali to Tamil. Especially in the Tamil grossing list, you cannot give the credit to Tamil as the production house is completely based in Hyderabad and produces none other than Telugu films. Just stop taking the credit for work which Tamil nadu has nothing to do with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pradeeps369 (talk • contribs) 23:55, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Please remove Baahubali: The Begining from Tamil Highest grossing list. As Baahubali is predominantly Telugu Film just made in Tamil aswell for the Tax evation in Tamil Nadu. Go through this source http://www.filmibeat.com/telugu/news/2015/baahubali-bahubali-10-days-box-office-collections-unstoppable-second-weekend-191241.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pradeeps369 (talk • contribs) 00:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- The chart does not say anything about what industry produced the film, only what languages it was made in. Try looking at the chart headers again - they do not say "Industry", they say "language". I have actually removed Telugu from the entries for Enthiran and I as their Wikipedia articles describe those films as being shot in Tamil and only dubbed in Telugu Cannolis (talk) 00:10, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Keep major language and not simultaneously shot or dubbed. Makes lot of sense in that way to remove Baahubali from tamil; srikrishnak (talk) 10:39, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Ok, if you go to the Highest grossing Tamil films column, it clearly states the movies are produced in Tamil language in the state of Tamil Nadu near chennai. However Baahubali is produced entirely in the state of Telangana near Hyderabad (barring some small schedules). How can you have Baahubali in Tamil high grossing list. And all said don't you really think it is fair to give the credit to Telugu Industry and eventhough it is simultaneously shot in tamil (beacause of tax evasion), what difference does it make from the dubbed version? Let us just stick to the primary language and avoid any confusion (There are lot of articles stating that). At the same time, even we don't want to take credit for Enthiran or I, inspite of them earning huge revenue from Telugu versions
http://www.filmibeat.com/telugu/news/2015/baahubali-bahubali-10-days-box-office-collections-unstoppable-second-weekend-191241.html http://www.firstpost.com/bollywood/baahubali-untouched-rs-300-cr-in-9-days-while-bajrangi-bhaijaan-makes-rs-100-cr-on-eid-weekend-2351890.html
And you can see from the sites that major share was fetched from Telugu version. you can still find techicalities but how can you really credit Baahubali to Tamil. It is one movie what we are proud of and let us at least enjoy it for that Pradeeps369 (talk) 21:01, 21 July 2015 (UTC) pradeep
- It was shot all over, including Europe, as many many films are. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:49, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Please go through this article http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/baahubali-success-an-achievement-in-indian-cinema-vijayendra-prasad/ In paragraph 3 it clearly states, it is celebrated as Telugu cinema's biggest success. It is bilingual flick, i agree to that But it is primarly produced by Telugu Film Industry. Why are you guys turning a deaf ear inspite of getting many requests.. Pradeeps369 (talk) 04:57, 22 July 2015 (UTC) pradeep
Pleas go trough the this article http://www.forbes.com/sites/saritharai/2015/07/20/look-whos-reaping-the-bonanza-from-baahubali-indias-most-expensive-film-ever/ 4th paragraph 4th line, it clearly states that the movie was produced by Telugu film industry Pradeeps369 (talk) 04:59, 22 July 2015 (UTC)Pradeep
And here is one more article which reinforces my arguement http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/baahubali-the-beginning-how-the-battle-epic-is-helping-tollywood-challenge-bollywoods-dominance-over-the-indian-film-industry-10402812.html Title and the 2nd paragarph (Clearly states its a Telugu film)
All of the above articles are from trusted sites Pradeeps369 (talk) 05:05, 22 July 2015 (UTC)Pradeep
- Again, no one cares about the industry but about the languages. As stated at the top of List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films#Highest_grossing_Tamil_films, the films are based primarily but it also includes films produced overseas. No one cares where the film was produced. Adding the separate language was a compromise as the alternate was just to cut them all out and leave it with just the top lists like every other nation does. Sources state both so you having sources that only identify one doesn't change that. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:28, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
I agree that Bahubali has to be under the Telugu cinema section and not in both Tamil and Telugu. What is the meaning of all versions ? The original language section is to be where the movie represents. Every single movie under the Tamil section is made in Telugu, why is it not being represented under Telugu section aswell and only mentioned as (all versions) in brackets ? Similarly Baahubali has the mention of (All versions) beside itslef is that not enough? Why make this additional fuss about it ? Marchoctober (talk) 18:54, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- It's under Teleugu isn't it? Are you arguing for just Tamil, just Telugu or both? Your comment is confusing. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:45, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- The difference between Baahubali and all of these other movies is that Baahubali was, from the start, made in both languages, whereas the others were made in Tamil and subsequently dubbed into Telugu. There is no single "original language" for Baahubali. I have also reverted these two edits on the film's article by Pradeeps369 which appear to be an inexplicable effort to mask the bilingual nature of the film which is well supported by sources linked elsewhere on this talk page by TRPoD Cannolis (talk) 11:41, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- My argument is in support that the article must remain as is, and that Baahubali must be under Telugu section only and the information (All version) as currently present must be retained. Marchoctober (talk) 14:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- And that argument will be ignored as it is not based on any policy and is contradicted by a wide range of reliable sources Forbes to the Guardian to the Times of India to IBN to NDTV to The National . -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:58, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Why ignore the argument, here is an article from your own trusted site "The Guardian" and Forbes, But more recent articles from July 12th 2015 and July 20th Respectively
- And that argument will be ignored as it is not based on any policy and is contradicted by a wide range of reliable sources Forbes to the Guardian to the Times of India to IBN to NDTV to The National . -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:58, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/jul/12/baahubali-the-beginning-review-fantastic-bang-for-your-buck-in-most-expensive-indian-movie-ever-made http://www.forbes.com/sites/saritharai/2015/07/20/look-whos-reaping-the-bonanza-from-baahubali-indias-most-expensive-film-ever/
- Which states it as a Telugu film
- And please i'm not debating with you people. In the page " Baahubali: the Begining" let it be like Telugu and Tamil as it was shot in both languages. But when it comes to grossigs, the credit shall only be given to the Primary language in which it was intended to be shot in. Please don't say no one cares about the industry. In India that is what most people care about,
Tamil Industry - only produces tamil films (might be dubbed into other languages) Hindi - only produces Hindi films (might be dubbed into other languages) Telugu - only produces Telugu films (might be dubbed into other languages), the reason some movies are shot in Tamil is becasue the taxation system in Tamil nadu state, Straight Tamil movie - 0% tax, Dubbed Tamil movie - 15% tax. where as in Andhra pradesh & Telangana (Telugu Speaking states), both straight telugu movies & Dubbed telugu movies are taxed almost equally. Simultaneously shot or dubbed is just for economic reasons and so they are not much different Do not turn deaf ear on this, If you are from India you would be understanding this better. Even i want Wikipedia to show accurate information and that is the point i'm trying to make
And one suggestion: Apart from the language column, Can you please add a column called "industry". In that you can credit the industry from which it was produced like "Bollywood", "Telugu film industry" and "Tamil film industry" etc.. and then we can actually portray accurate information and scenarios So that the article can do justice to all the arguments made in this discussion . Please do not ignore the sensitivities just to honor some minute technicalities. Thanks
- by your own admission "it was shot in both languages" . Story over. and no, we will not add "industry" just to mollify crusaders. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Here comes the arrogant responses. I don't think the admins can be arrogant and turn deaf ear to requests with proper reasons. I'm not suggesting to mollify anything, i'm asking to provide more details. If you want to be technical let us be too technical and give more detailed information to the last bit rather than presenting half baked information. If you can't do that, step aside and let other mature admins handle this page.
- I agree that the sections like Highest_grossing_Tamil_films , Highest_grossing_Telugu_films and Highest_grossing_Hindi_films should infact be renamed as Tamil_film_industry , , Telugu_film_industry and Hindi_film_industry. This makes so much more sense.
@User:TheRedPenOfDoom I think you are in violation the wikipedia's NPOV by pushing your opinions you are indulging in Wikipedia:Tendentious_editing, and trying make the article represent your ideas and opinions, you are accusing users of making wrongs right but infact you are violating the same rule, what problem would you have to represent the information in a more sensible manner as mentioned by the above user, on the article by using industry names instead of languages. Also calling people crusaders and using terms like mollify above does not make you win the argument, infact using terms like mollify and crusaders you are personally attacking other users, please refrain from doing so.
Marchoctober (talk) 00:37, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Do you have any response beyond inappropriate personal attacks? The sections are for "films shot in Hindu", "films shot in Tamil" and "films shot in Telugu". It was shot in both Tamil and Telugu and that's a more logical distinction than the endless bickering over whether a film is "really" a Hindi/Tamil/Telugu industry film (whatever that means). -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- You used "Hindu" instead of "Hindi" , Hindu is a Religion & Hindi is a Language. Your choice of words shows that your knowledge about india is limited, which is fine as you may be from a different country. When so many voices are raised against your traditional approach on categorization can't you just please try to understand the scenario better and why are so many people against your approach. This is not a fanboy enthusiasm, if you can please try to do more research on the film, the directors, crew you can easily come to a conclusion. The problem is not regarding the language of the film but putting the film's grossings under a different language other than the native language
- It was a typo. Don't insult people and don't presume anything. The point is guessing how much of a film constitutes a "Hindi/Tamil/Telugu film industry" film (is it actors? directors? producers? location? when an actor crosses over does the industry change?) just leads to these pages of arguing because it's just original research guessing by the people here. If Punjabi actors do a film in Hindi but shoot it in America with etc., etc., it's just endless fighting here. In contrast, the language used when they shot the film is simple enough. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:13, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- You used "Hindu" instead of "Hindi" , Hindu is a Religion & Hindi is a Language. Your choice of words shows that your knowledge about india is limited, which is fine as you may be from a different country. When so many voices are raised against your traditional approach on categorization can't you just please try to understand the scenario better and why are so many people against your approach. This is not a fanboy enthusiasm, if you can please try to do more research on the film, the directors, crew you can easily come to a conclusion. The problem is not regarding the language of the film but putting the film's grossings under a different language other than the native language
- Do you have any response beyond inappropriate personal attacks? The sections are for "films shot in Hindu", "films shot in Tamil" and "films shot in Telugu". It was shot in both Tamil and Telugu and that's a more logical distinction than the endless bickering over whether a film is "really" a Hindi/Tamil/Telugu industry film (whatever that means). -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 18 July 2015
Padukati raju (talk) 08:55, 18 July 2015 (UTC) please change Baahubali Telugu/Tamil to Baahubali Telugu in list of highest-grossing Indian films
Not done: per Baahubali: The Beginning, it was made simultaneously in both languages. why remove it? Cannolis (talk) 11:14, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Baahubali - The Bilingual Film
Baahubali is not just a Telugu film.
Baahubali is the Bilingual Film which was simultaneously made in Telugu and Tamil.Boxoffice (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- It's listed as both Tamil and Telugu in the table and in both separate tables here. Is there anything more to be done? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:04, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Done Thank you.Boxoffice (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 19 July 2015 a
why Baahubali movie is added into list of highest Tamil grossing movies in Tamil version it collected only just 35 crores where as in Telugu version alone grossed more than 150 crores it is primarily a Telugu film made simultaneously in Tamil by Telugu cast and crew how could you include a movie which just grossed only 35 crores in Tamil into highest grossing Tamil movies list its absolutely rubbish Padukati raju (talk) 18:33, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Not done please present your request in a "Please change XX to YY" or "Please add ZZZ" and provide a reliable source that supports such changes. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:30, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 19 July 2015 b
Bahubali is Telugu movie. Why did u put Telugu/Tamil. Why did Enthiran has only Tamil? It is also released in Telugu. 98.25.28.48 (talk) 21:09, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Not done please present your request in a "Please change XX to YY" or "Please add ZZZ" and provide a reliable source that supports such changes. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:31, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 20 July 2015 a
Baahubali is mainly a Telugu movie simultaneously shot in other language but why did you mention it as Telugu/Tamil instead of Telugu in the list of highest grossing Indian films. I agree it is made in two languages but it should be mentioned only in Baahubali movie page and not in the above list. what do the other people think whether it is mainly a Telugu movie or from other. they should know from which language or movie industry the movie is made. many movies in the list are released in other languages as well but only for this particular movie you are mentioning in both languages so change it to """TELUGU""" as it is the primary language in which the movie is made 107.167.109.55 (talk) 02:49, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Not done please present your request in a "Please change XX to YY" or "Please add ZZZ" and provide a reliable source that supports such changes. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:31, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 20 July 2015
please change Baahubali Telugu/Tamil to Baahubali Telugu in list of highest Indian grossing films reliable source : m.firstpost.com/bollywood/baahubali-untouched-rs-300-cr-in-9-days-while-bajrangi-bhaijaan-makes-rs-100-cr-on-eid-weekend-2351890.html Padukati raju (talk) 11:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Not done: See above. This is the 5th identical request. If it was made in both languages, it will be described as being in both languages. Kindly stop wasting everyone's time. Cannolis (talk) 12:20, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 21 July 2015
Baahubali: The Beginning is a bilingual film made in Tamil AND telugu. Someone keeps deleting it from the tamil section and removing tamil as a language from the top-grossing part.... 68.230.153.159 (talk) 12:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Done thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:13, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
No. of movies listed in each table
In the Global gross figures it should be 20 at all times (currently 21) and 10 each in Hindi, Tamil & Telugu lists. What I am saying is that it should be followed like a fixed rule. Also I suggest that serial numbers be added. It will be easy to know a movie's ranking. What do you all think? Please respond or will go bold otherwise. Thanks. - Jayadevp13 15:19, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- oppose placing rank numbers in the table - doing so requires changing all rows below when a film moves up or down increasing the complexity of nearly every edit for no upside.
- I am fine with a 20 overall 10/10/10/10 per language recommendation. (At several points there has been 21 or another not round number when there are 2 films with the same box office for slot 20.) -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- OK. You are right about about placing rank numbers in table. It will take a lot of effort. - Jayadevp13 17:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 22 July 2015 a
Baahubali is a TELUGU film only. It should not be considered as TELUGU/TAMIL as only the the predominant language is considered. In the case both should be considered, note that many other movies like Enthiraan should also be TELUGU/TAMIL. Please change Baahubali language to only TELUGU for consistency. Buddugubaby (talk) 07:27, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- It was created in both Tamil and Telugu. How is it consistent to ask that Baahubali be put into Telugu only and Enthiraan be Telugu/Tamil? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
I think you misunderstand him. He is requesting you change Enthiraan from tamil to Telugu/Tamil, as it was also a billingual film like Baahubali.
Not done: As I responded in one of the plethora of edit requests above, I made that change, as Enthiran and I were not shot simultaneously in Telugu and Tamil like Baahubali was, they were shot in Tamil only and dubbed into Telugu later. It is preposterous to consider these situations the same. Cannolis (talk) 11:30, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 22 July 2015 b
Like Baahubali, Enthirran and Sivaji are also billingual films. Change those two films from tamil to telugu/tamil to ensure consistency and fair representation. 122.167.204.98 (talk) 07:49, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Not done: as explained above. Cannolis (talk) 11:30, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 22 July 2015 c
why Baahubali movie is in the list of highest grossing Tamil films remove it immediately from the Tamil list. I can't understand why a movie which even didn't gross at least 45 crores in original Tamil language in tn and international markets (leave about share) is included in the list of highest grossing Tamil films that to with figures of 355 crore its absolutely ridiculous. It is not a Tamil movie it is a Telugu movie primarily and then it is made with few dialogues in Tamil simultaneously. Baahubali movie is from Telugu director cast and crew is Telugu but it is being regarded as Tamil movie and is being included in list of highest grossing Tamil films as well. All the official sources regard Baahubali as a Telugu film and even every celebrity from other languages regard it as a Telugu film but this guy says """we do not exclude what the sources have said because we don't agree believe how they have classified the film""" and at the same time he asks for relevant official sources. Many of them are asking and arguing why it is being included in the Tamil list and to remove it from Tamil list but he ignores all the sources provided citing various reasons. A movie which didn't even gross atleast 15% of the total collections is included in the Tamil list. I'm also arguing to remove it from the Tamil list. Padukati raju (talk) 12:03, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Not done: as you keep making unsupported statements, without citing reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:05, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Unfortunately the information was removed in contravention of this response. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:29, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 22 July 2015 d
That per the sources ranging from Forbes to the Guardian to the Times of India to IBN to NDTV to The National identify the film as bilingual Tamil / Telugu. As such both the languages should be identified in the language column in the Global Gross Figures section, and the film should be added back into the Highest Grossing Tamil Films section. Please undo these unexplained edits removing the valid content. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:36, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support re-insertion of content. The comment above arguing against bilingualism provides no sources to justify its removal. I'm an admin but I'm involved here to re-insert it. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support re-insertion. Sources provided the TRPoD very clearly state the film was made simultaneously in both languages, and not in one first and dubbed into another, which is the case for all the other examples the removing user has been drawing incorrect comparisons to. Cannolis (talk) 11:44, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Against re-insertion: Having a single movie in multiple categories of Highest grossings list doesn't make sense. In India either film is simultaneously made or Dubbed doesn't make a difference. Here are the sources more recently written than the sources presented by TRPOD which states the movie is primarly made in Telugu by Telugu film Industry by a Telugu Director from a Telugu Production house The Guardian Forbes The Guardian all these sources clearly focus on the primary language]
108.192.149.255 (talk) 23:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC) pradeep
- of course having a bilingual film be represented in all of the languages it was created in makes perfect sense. Denying a bilingual film from showing in one of the languages it was created in does not make sense. If you have a list of boxes and a list of red items, if you list the red box in the list of boxes doesnt mean that it should not appear in the list of red items - it is still red. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- If i have a 10 - sided box which is painted blue on 9 sides and red on 1 side. If I had multiple options to put in including blue and red boxes, i would rather put them in blue boxes and definitely not in red boxes category
- Ok, if we go to the "Highest Grossing Tamil films" category, the description states as "Tamil cinema, producing films in the Tamil language is based primarily in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu, particularly in the Chennai" . Is this description true for "Baahubali: The begining"? it is rather produced by Telugu Cinema (Tollywood) which is based in the Indian state of Telangana particularly near Hyderabad. This is exactly where it gets complicated. That is the reason i suggest, instead of dividing the grossing lists by languages better divide them by industries like Hindi Film industry (Bollywood), Telugu Film Industry (Tollywood), Tamil Film Industry (Kollywood). So, that it can give accurate representation of the films without leaving anything to imagination.108.192.149.255 (talk) 01:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- It's still a film produced in the Tamil language. That's the definition, rather than the location of the film's shooting. Are Hindi films shot overseas no longer Hindi films because they aren't shot in the traditional Bollywood locations? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:39, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hindi films eventhough shot all around the world, still the production house, Director, Crew, technicians the core of the film stays in Mumbai (Bollywood Hub). Similarly Vishwaroopam is mostly shot overseas yet we call it a Tamil film. Similarly Baahubali, irrespective of where it is shot, the heart of the film, the directors, productions house, lead actors & technicians lies in Hyderabad (Tollywood/ Telugu Cinema industry). Tamil cinema has nothing to do with this film barring few actors and a dialogue writer for tamil.
- None of that matters. What matters is what languages the film was shot in. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:33, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hindi films eventhough shot all around the world, still the production house, Director, Crew, technicians the core of the film stays in Mumbai (Bollywood Hub). Similarly Vishwaroopam is mostly shot overseas yet we call it a Tamil film. Similarly Baahubali, irrespective of where it is shot, the heart of the film, the directors, productions house, lead actors & technicians lies in Hyderabad (Tollywood/ Telugu Cinema industry). Tamil cinema has nothing to do with this film barring few actors and a dialogue writer for tamil.
- It's still a film produced in the Tamil language. That's the definition, rather than the location of the film's shooting. Are Hindi films shot overseas no longer Hindi films because they aren't shot in the traditional Bollywood locations? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:39, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- of course having a bilingual film be represented in all of the languages it was created in makes perfect sense. Denying a bilingual film from showing in one of the languages it was created in does not make sense. If you have a list of boxes and a list of red items, if you list the red box in the list of boxes doesnt mean that it should not appear in the list of red items - it is still red. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 23 July 2015
14.140.242.186 (talk) 04:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC) Bajrangi Bhaijaan --- 800 Cr.
- Please provide a reliable source for that number. It'll be more likely to be done. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, I closed this myself. No source was provided for 800 which is almost double what the current RS say. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:53, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 23 July 2015 b
Please insert the following language at the top of the "Global gross figures" section above the box denoting still running movies along with a Notes section just before the References section with the following. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- This is the top twenty global grossing films from India not adjusted for inflation.[2]
- 1.^ Sholay (1975), for example, could be considered for the list[1] as estimates for its adjusted gross reach as high as ₹3.00 billion (US$36 million).[2]
References
- ^ "The Biggest Blockbusters Ever In Hindi Cinema". Box Office India. Archived from the original on 14 October 2013. Retrieved 13 April 2013.
- ^ Kazmi, Nikhat (12 January 2009). "Sholay adjusted gross". Times of India. Retrieved 23 February 2011.
- I would support inclusion of statement about not reflecting inflation. As well as more history about box office numbers and the rise thereof. The source article has a lot of interesting history of India film that while not appropriate here could go into the Bollywood article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- See List of highest-grossing films (adjusted and non-adjusted sections) for how we could introduce and include an adjusted-for-inflation section to better reflect the older films. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 24 July 2015a
Baahubali 14 days worldwide gross is 385 crore. [1]
References
Min2winit (talk) 11:18, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Denied. It's been updated to 401 now. Someone should have commented that this is an outdated number or else someone else could have mixed it up. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:55, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 24 July 2015 b
[redact cut and paste copy of article]
Sat3787 (talk) 11:27, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Not done do not copy and paste the entire article. make a specific request such as "Please change XXX to YYY" or "Please add ZZZ" . Include the reliably published sources that support the change. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:59, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 24 July 2015
Baahubali has reached 385 crores. But it is mentioned as 365 only. 203.196.171.36 (talk) 14:22, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Not done you will need to provide a reliably published source with a reputation for fact checking and editorial oversight -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Baahubali: The begining collection 401 Crores in 15 day IBTimes
Protected edit request on 25 July 2015 a
List of highest-grossing Indian films Movie Baahubali: The Beginning Worldwide Gross Collection 185 crores. References (http://www.ibtimes.co.in/baahubali-bahubali-2nd-week-box-office-collection-rajamoulis-film-earns-rs-385-crore-14-days-640318) (http://www.boxofficehits.in/collection/bahubali-2nd-week-14th-day-collection-baahubali-total-collection.html) Highest grossing Telugu films Movie Baahubali: The Beginning Worldwide Gross Collection 185 crores. References (http://www.ibtimes.co.in/baahubali-bahubali-2nd-week-box-office-collection-rajamoulis-film-earns-rs-385-crore-14-days-640318) (http://www.boxofficehits.in/collection/bahubali-2nd-week-14th-day-collection-baahubali-total-collection.html) 139.86.9.83 (talk) 04:59, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- I think it's 401 now. This is why we shouldn't do a dozen requests as someone else could have done this and deleted the rest of them. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 25 July 2015 b
Update baahubali collections. Source - http://cinehug.com/telugu/baahubali-collects-447-cr/ Bits darklord (talk) 06:03, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Not done we only use reliably published sources with a reputation for fact checking and editorial oversight -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:10, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 25 July 2015 c
please update the collections of baahubali
103.21.127.79 (talk) 06:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Not done Please make your requests in the form of "Please change XXX to YYY" and provide a reliably published source with a reputation for fact checking and editorial oversight -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:12, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 25 July 2015 d
Baahubali: The Beginning* Grosses Rs 401 Crore.[1], please update the table accordingly.
References
- ^ Shekhar H Hooli. "'Baahubali' (Bahubali) 3rd Friday Box Office Collection: Prabhas Starrer Grosses Rs 401 Crore in 15 Days". International Business Times. Retrieved 2015-07-25.
- Varmapak 07:32, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Thank you for formatting that citation for me, that was very helpful. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:48, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 25 July 2015 e
please change baahubali's collections from 365 crores to 401 crores source:http://www.ibtimes.co.in/baahubali-bahubali-3rd-friday-box-office-collection-prabhas-starrer-grosses-rs-401-crore-15-640452 103.21.127.79 (talk) 15:14, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Denied As below, there's another request below with the same (actually two links) and is actually formatted properly (please change the specific line). You are asking users who don't edit this article normally to make a change so it would be better for you to spend a few minutes, write your request with the proper grammar and spelling, properly capitalize and perhaps link the film name and otherwise make the edit as easy as possible to be done. Else, no one here really cares if the box office results are right to the very day so it's less likely to be done the more repeated disorganized quick-shot requests are made. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 25 July 2015 f
Sir baahubali has earned more than 400 crores till now but its still being shown as 365 crore
115.248.50.29 (talk) 16:02, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Not done Please provide a reliably published source with a reputation for fact checking and editorial oversight that verifies any content you wish to add to the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:20, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Baahubali: The begining collection 401 Crores in 15 day IBTimes
Protected edit request on 25 July 2015 g
please change baahubali's collection from 365crores to 401crores source:http://www.ibtimes.co.in/baahubali-bahubali-3rd-friday-box-office-collection-prabhas-starrer-grosses-rs-401-crore-15-640452 103.21.127.79 (talk) 16:04, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Denied It's request below with the same (actually two links) and is actually formatted properly (please change the specific line). You are asking users who don't edit this article normally to make a change so it would be better for you to spend a few minutes, write your request with the proper grammar and spelling, properly capitalize and perhaps link the film name and otherwise make the edit as easy as possible to be done. Else, no one here really cares if the box office results are right to the very day so it's less likely to be done the more repeated disorganized quick-shot requests are made. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 25 July 2015: Collections of Baahubali need to be updated to 401 crores. (Reliable source included: www.ibttimes.co.in)
|- |-span style="background:#b6fcb6; width:50px; border:1px solid #aaa;" | style="background-color:#9FC"|* Baahubali: The Beginning | 2015 | Arka Media Works | Telugu | ₹401 crore (US$48 million) |[1]
References
2601:40A:8003:8B99:544C:8DE:6705:E271 (talk) 21:43, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Done. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Please update Baahubali's gross figures!
Source - http://cinehug.com/telugu/baahubali-collects-447-cr/ Please update Baahubali's gross figures as to the 25th of July. It should be the 3rd highest grossing film. Thanks!- Nyankitty5023
Not done We are not under any obligation to monitor on a minute by minute or day by day basis any ephemeral content. We are however, under an obligation to utilize only reliably published sources with a reputation for fact checking and accuracy. cinehug is not one of them. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:58, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Baahubali: The begining collection 401 Crores in 15 day IBTimes
Protected edit request on 26 July 2015
Baahubali movie made 401cr world wide gross. See below links for reference.
Please update it. 14.139.69.62 (talk) 04:32, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Repeating the same request a dozen times does not make it happen any faster. In fact , volunteers coming to the page and seeing a dozen requests are MORE likely to say, "Not worth my time to try to sort that mess out" . So please stop. You are not doing yourself any favor, just cluttering up the page. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 04:48, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for troubling, but I do not know the reason why too slow updating after getting valid reference. It's already got update in film's main page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baahubali:_The_Beginning.
- Unlike that page, this page has been fulled protected so that only administrators can edit it (I'm one myself but it would be wrong for me to do repeatedly) in large part because of the number of editors who insist on using every single blog as a "source" and the amount of fighting as you can see over what languages each film should or shouldn't be included in (or just childishly removing languages or movies without explanation). Too many people who aren't interested in having a serious neutral article but instead want something to "win". Before this fighting was across a number of separate pages, which all had completely difference results for that reason and now it's just anarchy when the protection gets removed. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:33, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Done anyways because no one else would touch it. -- Ricky81682 (talk)
Thank you for updating, but I have a doubt, why Baahubali is after 3 Idots? Its showing 3 Idiots collection as ₹392 crore (US$61 million) but Baahubali got ₹401 crore (US$63 million), Is it happened by mistake? or due to any other hidden reason?
- Sorry, didn't see that. Corrected. And please remember to sign your posts for clarity. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 11:47, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 26 July 2015
Baahubali is a telugu film, it should not be in the list of highest grossing tamil films. Please edit this article. JohnnyBlaze007 (talk) 10:55, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- There's no consensus to ignore the fact that the film was shot as a bilingual film as discussed in Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films#Baahubali_is_a_Bilingual amongst other places. I'm going to start an RFC on the issue just to stop the arguing. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 11:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
RfC: How should we classify Baahubali
How should classify the film Baahubali? This is both for the main table and for whether it should be included in any of the subtables.
Tamil and Telugu
- Support both Tamil and Telugu as explained below. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 11:44, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- support per the multiple reliable sources Forbes to the Guardian to the Times of India to IBN to NDTV to The National which identify the film as bilingual Tamil / Telugu. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Tamil only
Telugu
Discussion
- Baahubali: The Beginning was shot in both the Tamil and Telugu languages and then dubbed in various other languages. There is no disputing that amongst the sources. Rather than trying to figure out how much of a film constitutes a Tamil/Telugu (or Hindi or Punjabi)-"industry" film (based on actors/directors/producers/location shot), since it was shot in both Tamil and Telugu originally (and then dubbed elsewhere) it should be listed as both Tamil and Telugu language film. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 11:44, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Bajrangi Bhaijaan gross update
Plz update the bajrangi bhaijaan collections.they remain same from past 5 days. Movie collects 70 to 80 crores from domestic marke t.so update it. all update you can find from bajrangi bhaijaan wiki page.Imnew user so idint know how to edit.so plz update the figures.plz and categories like highest opening day,highesy weekend.highest week collections.are to be shown.plz do it.and make this page cool