{{talk header}}

{{oldafdfull| date = 20 December 2012 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = List of highest-grossing Indian films worldwide }}

{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes|1=

{{WikiProject India |class=list |importance=mid |cinema=yes |cinema-importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Business|class=list|importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject Film|class=list|Indian=yes|listas=Highest-Grossing Indian Films, List Of}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tamil films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Telugu films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Punjabi films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Telugu films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tamil films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Bollywood films|talk=no|date=26 July 2015}}

{{copied|from=Bollywood|from_oldid =670957198|to=List of highest-grossing Indian films||to_diff=672526653|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&type=revision&diff=672526653&oldid=672526378|date=July 21, 2015}}

| counter = 11

}}{{archives|age=30}}

==Mungarumale collected ₹75 crore==

[[File:Information.svg|40px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Tevar shaa|Tevar shaa]]. I wanted to let you know that

According to reports at that time, #Mungarumale was the first film to touch ₹50 crore and even within 300 days [http://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/entertainment/south-masala/mungaru-male-actor-ganesh-shashank/articleshow/46691963.cms? See this].<ref>http://m.indiaglitz.com/mungaru-male-national-record-kannada-news-35125.html</ref>

And ran for 1 year continuously in PVR with packed houses. And went on to run over 865 days and raked over ₹75 crore in its life time in #Karnataka. <ref name="newindianexpress">{{cite web|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/entertainment/kannada/I-broke-down-in-front-of-Ganesh/2016/09/03/article3609524.ece|title='Mungaru Male' the first film to Celebrate 865-days in Karnataka|publisher=newindianexpress}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-ganesh-bal-the-outsider-on-the-inside-1678970|title=Ganesh Bal: The outsider on the inside|publisher=Daily News & Analysis}}</ref>

Actually the the Mungarumale collection is not announced by any primary sources like producer/actor/director/distributors, it is by critic, named [[C.H. Prahlada Rao]], who told to "DNA" <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tevar shaa|Tevar shaa]] ([[User talk:Tevar shaa#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tevar shaa|contribs]]) </small>

{{tref}}

== Malayalam movie Ramaleela ==

Malayalam movie Ramaleela has entered 59cr pls update that.. [[User:Ajayk97|Ajayk97]] ([[User talk:Ajayk97|talk]]) 10:49, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:EP --> Please provide a source for that. [[User:ToThAc|ToThAc]] ([[User talk:ToThAc|talk]]) 16:04, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Ramaleela collect more than 56 crore

[[User:Nabhan nbn|Nabhan nbn]] ([[User talk:Nabhan nbn|talk]]) 15:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

:{{ping|Nabhan nbn}} Still lacks a sufficient reference. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:42, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Ramaleela 50+crore [[User:Nabhan nbn|Nabhan nbn]] ([[User talk:Nabhan nbn|talk]]) 02:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Ramaleela Malayalam Movie Box Office Collection Report - Indian movie planet

indianmovieplanet.com › ramaleela-mala...

Ramaleela 50 crore [[User:Nabhan nbn|Nabhan nbn]] ([[User talk:Nabhan nbn|talk]]) 02:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

== Ramaleela Malayalam Movie Entered 55 Crore Club! ==

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/ramaleela-earns-rs-55-crore-55-days-arun-gopy-says-he-owes-success-specially-dileep-748819

https://www.filmibeat.com/malayalam/news/2017/ramaleela-box-office-collections-the-dileep-starrer-joins-the-55-crore-club-269390.html

http://www.manoramaonline.com/movies/movie-news/2017/11/08/its-official-dileep-ramaleela-enters-50-crore-club.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramaleela_(film)

'''^ Above are the links proving it. Ramaleela Malayalam Movie Entered 55 Crore Club.'''''Italic text'' <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:PuliMurugan|PuliMurugan]] ([[User talk:PuliMurugan#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PuliMurugan|contribs]]) 02:52, 17 November 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{ping|PuliMurugan}} The source of the content is the film's director. We don't use [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]] for controversial content, since a director would have every reason to inflate financial figures, and (big surprise) there is a lot of lying in the world of Indian cinema financials. We use sources that provide independent verification. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 04:58, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

But then how will any movies box office collection be known? Most of the movies like Bahubali are known to everyone by the producer or someone else on how much the movie makes at boxoffice. Malayalam Manorama is a trustable news website. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:PuliMurugan|PuliMurugan]] ([[User talk:PuliMurugan#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PuliMurugan|contribs]]) 18:08, 18 November 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Sir Here is the link which gives clear reference that Ramleela has entered 50cr club.This article is given by Times of India which is the most reliable source.The collection they said is not given by the producer or the director

.

https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/malayalam/movies/news/dileeps-ramaleela-enters-50-crores-club/articleshow/61564289.cms

.

Please take necessary actions[[User:Muhammed.suhail|Muhammed.suhail]] ([[User talk:Muhammed.suhail|talk]]) 10:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Admin can yku please add Ramleela in the list the source is provided above which is by TOI [[User:Muhammed.suhail|Muhammed.suhail]] ([[User talk:Muhammed.suhail|talk]]) 08:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you @Muhammed Suhail... and that link was 1 or 2 weeks ago when the movie collected 50 Crores, Now the movie crossed 55 Crores. http://www.manoramaonline.com/movies/movie-news/2017/11/08/its-official-dileep-ramaleela-enters-50-crore-club.html Manorama Online or Malayalam Manorama is a trustable news channel and website. The movie crossed 55 Crores. Plz Update... Thanks! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:PuliMurugan|PuliMurugan]] ([[User talk:PuliMurugan#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PuliMurugan|contribs]]) 22:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Wait, wait, I'm really confused here. Do both of you live in a mindset where you're unaware of the well-known corruption in Indian film finances? Is that a shocking mystery to you? Because it's certainly not a mystery to me, and I am an outsider who has zero passion for any Indian film. But if you're both aware that Indian film finances are untrustworthy, there's no excuse for asserting that this data, as confirmed by the producers, is the true information. Even Muhammed.suhail's post of [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/malayalam/movies/news/dileeps-ramaleela-enters-50-crores-club/articleshow/61564289.cms?from=mdr this reference] says, "Now we hear that the film has also entered the 50 crores club. 'Ramaleela' is Dileep's second movie after 'Two Countries,' reportedly, to enter the 50 crores club." This is a cautious tip-toeing around information that was leaked to them. This isn't an independent confirmation. Do you believe the producers of Kabali who tried to generate hype that the film made {{INR}}600 crore? Are you comfortable swallowing that data? If not, then please stop trying to republish rumours and producer claims as incontrovertible fact. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 05:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb Then you tell us how much ramaleela movie collected. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:PuliMurugan|PuliMurugan]] ([[User talk:PuliMurugan#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PuliMurugan|contribs]]) 19:46, 21 November 2017 (UTC)</small>

:It made as much money as independent reliable sources have been able to confirm independently. If that number is not available yet, then we publish nothing. [[WP:NODEADLINE|Wikipedia has no deadline]]. We're not under any obligation to act as shills for the producers by regurgitating their financial claims. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:50, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

As you are providing only reliable sources in case of Ezra the source you are provided is not available then how did you add that movie in the List of Malayalam Movies expecting a reliable answer from you sir[[User:Muhammed.suhail|Muhammed.suhail]] ([[User talk:Muhammed.suhail|talk]]) 13:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

:{{ping|Muhammed.suhail}} There is something known as dead url, when a url stops working and dies. This is what happened to the Ezra source. Since most of the users around here must have examined the source and confirmed it's reliability for its inclusion in the article, there is no urgency to remove it. It seems to be a Yahoo News source, from the url. About the gross of Ramaleela, an OR Observation: The actor Dileep was arrested prior to the release of the film, so there is probably a lot of inflation of the figures by the producers as a publicity stunt. [http://www.ibtimes.co.in/dileeps-ramaleela-scores-big-first-weekend-box-office-crosses-rs-10-cr-mark-744142 This] was the latest source I could find which did not use director/producer figures. Also, if the film really has crossed 50 crore, there is bound to be a lot of hype in media, with multiple news reports, not blog reports and reliable sources reporting "reports suggest it crossed 55 crore." [[User:King Prithviraj II|King Prithviraj II]] ([[User talk:King Prithviraj II|talk]]) 16:34, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Ok I understand what you mean i will provide you the source which proves Ezra , The Great Father , MunthiriVallikal Thalirkkumbol reaches 50cr.You can add this source which is stating that these movies collected 50cr

.

http://m.manoramaonline.com/movies/movie-news/2017/11/08/its-official-dileep-ramaleela-enters-50-crore-club.html

.

In the second paragraph it mention about 50cr movies <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Muhammed.suhail|Muhammed.suhail]] ([[User talk:Muhammed.suhail#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Muhammed.suhail|contribs]]) 07:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&diff=812206413&oldid=812165472 this edit] I updated the Ezra reference with an archived copy of the Yahoo article. (It actually came from [http://www.catchnews.com/yahoo/regional-cinema/ezra-prithviraj-starrer-emerges-8th-rs-50-crore-grosser-of-malayalam-cinema-57679.html?utm_source=yahoo&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=website&-also-read Catch News], filtered through Yahoo.) [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:52, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb This is a trustable website. Manorama Online. Please update Ramaleela Final Gross. 55 Crores. http://www.manoramaonline.com/movies/movie-news/2017/11/08/its-official-dileep-ramaleela-enters-50-crore-club.html <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:PuliMurugan|PuliMurugan]] ([[User talk:PuliMurugan#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PuliMurugan|contribs]]) 02:12, November 30, 2017 (UTC)</small>

:{{ping|PuliMurugan}} 1) Please sign your talk page posts by typing four [[tilde]]s like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> This will append your name and a time stamp. This is a requirement. If you post any more unsigned comments, I will just ignore you. 2) I've already explained what the problem is with using content that originates from producers/directors/actors or other [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]]. Either you don't understand for some reason, or you are deliberately ignoring the explanation. Maybe [http://www.livemint.com/Consumer/kSPNxUf87deWBK5lnru0OK/Why-Indian-box-office-collections-depend-on-who-you-ask.html this article] can help paint a better picture of the issue. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 07:01, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

*{{ping|Cyphoidbomb}} I speak Malayalam to an extent, translating the first sentence of the source (ദിലീപ് ചിത്രം രാമലീലയുടെ ബോക്സ്ഓഫീസ് കലക്ഷൻ അണിയറപ്രവർത്തകർ പുറത്തുവിട്ടു) A rough translation would be "Dileep's film Ramaleela's Box Office collection was revealed by the filmakers." This sentence itself shows the figures are primary. [[User:King Prithviraj II|King Prithviraj II]] ([[User talk:King Prithviraj II|talk]]) 18:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

::{{ping|King Prithviraj II}} Thank you for the translation! [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 02:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

:::You are welcome, also, check out the headline of [http://www.ibtimes.co.in/dileeps-ramaleela-enters-rs-50-crore-club-film-crosses-rs-30-crore-mark-kerala-box-office-748332 this source], the 50 crore claim is met with skepticism. [[User:King Prithviraj II|King Prithviraj II]] ([[User talk:King Prithviraj II|talk]]) 15:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

== Starring ==

Its important to add a column representing the leading star/s of every movie. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Vaazan|Vaazan]] ([[User talk:Vaazan#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Vaazan|contribs]]) 15:47, 22 November 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{ping|Vaazan}} Why is that important? And how do we decide who the leading stars are of each movie? What list would we look at for that information? Would we just pick and choose at random? [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

::{{ping|Cyphoidbomb}} For that reason, why don't we follow the table as listed here? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_films . When additional information like multiple production houses can be columned, why not have leading actors columned for every movie. It also helps to catalogue the attribution of the financial success of a movie to them, as it is so with most Indian movies. If this doesn't seem logical, then having the columns reduced without director or production house names is also equally logical, like the link I have posted. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Vaazan|Vaazan]] ([[User talk:Vaazan#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Vaazan|contribs]]) 14:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)</small>

::{{ping|Vaazan}} Again, why do we want this information in these tables? And again, how do you determine who the "leading stars" of every movie are? You're proposing a [[WP:CRUFT|cruft magnet]], i.e. yet another block of information that's going to invite indiscriminate additions. Proof: Since editors have already added directors and production houses to the existing tables, that's given you license to suggest yet another column be added. Nobody's going to agree on who the stars are. This is a recurring issue in Indian film articles. Anyway, the simpler the data in this article, the better.

::Also, please sign your posts with four [[tilde]]s like: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. This will automatically append a signature and time stamp, like this → [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 17:18, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

== Rajinikanth movies are high grossed movies, have proof officially. ==

Hj [[User:Jahir cer|Jahir cer]] ([[User talk:Jahir cer|talk]]) 04:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Kabali & Enthiran movie. Please update. Kabali beat the Baahubali-the beginning record. Check the true box office collection and revise or update. [[User:Jahir cer|Jahir cer]] ([[User talk:Jahir cer|talk]]) 05:03, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

:{{not done}} It's unclear what changes you are requesting, {{u|Jahir cer}}, and you need to bring references when you ask editors to make changes. Thanks. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 17:40, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

== Rajinikanth movies ==

Kabali movie collected more than 950crores approximately. The collection of first 13 days are 650crores, confirmed news by some magazines.

Likewise Enthiran movie also collected 400crores approximately. Please revise this page in tamil cinema or kollywood. [[User:Jahir cer|Jahir cer]] ([[User talk:Jahir cer|talk]]) 04:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

:{{not done}} - {{ping|Jahir cer}} Your unsourced claim that Kabali grossed over {{INR}}950 crore is absurd. [http://www.financialexpress.com/entertainment/rajinikanth-birthday-today-as-superstar-rajni-turns-65-wishes-pour-in/471636/ The idiots at Financial Express], posted high claims of up to 677 crore, but when you read the source, it becomes very clear that they've included included pre-release income, which is ''never'' factored into box office figures. Box office = money made at the box office, through ticket sales. So even from the perspective of the poor journalists at Express Group, the film grossed 477 crore (215 domestic, 262 international). Since you've brought no references to this discussion about the 950 crore claim, there isn't anything else I can say on the matter. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 17:50, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 November 2017 ==

{{edit extended-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Please add Vitamin She in the list of highest grossing films after Karsandas Pay & Use. It has collected 3.5 crores till now. <ref>https://www.facebook.com/VitaminSheMovie/photos/a.788761554506912.1073741828.765028963546838/1389202417796153/?type=3</ref> <ref>https://bollywood.divyabhaskar.co.in/news/ENT-GUC-a-gujarati-film-vitamin-she-successfully-running-on-the-boxoffice-gujarati-news-5666189-NOR.html?version=1</ref> <ref>http://epaper.gujaratimidday.com/epaper/04-08-2017-2-archive-edition-GMD-Live-Page-1.html</ref> <ref>http://weeklycollection.in/2017/07/27/vitamin-she-1st-day-box-office-collection-vitamin-she-gujrati-movie-opening-reviews-and-rating/</ref> [[Special:Contributions/74.82.35.73|74.82.35.73]] ([[User talk:74.82.35.73|talk]]) 10:56, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:EEp --> Which one of these is supposed to be a reliable source for the financial data? Surely not the Facebook link. Surely not the Weeklycollection.in blog. I don't see any financial claims at Bollywood Bhaskar. I don't see anything that resembles numbers on the front page of Gujarati Midday. ?? [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:43, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

== please check again ==

Financial Express & Indian Express confirmed the Kabali movie grossed 650crores in first 13days from the movie release. [[User:Jahir cer|Jahir cer]] ([[User talk:Jahir cer|talk]]) 11:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

:Please stop raising this nonsensical issue over and over. Your previous comments have been responded to. Now you're just wasting people's time. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 21:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

== Premam Malayalam Movie Final Collection ==

As per the reports of TOI Premam has collected 63cr worldwide. Please update this information

https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/malayalam/movies/highest-grossing-malayalam-films-of-all-time/photostory/49755072.cms <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Muhammed.suhail|Muhammed.suhail]] ([[User talk:Muhammed.suhail#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Muhammed.suhail|contribs]]) 23:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== The Great Father Malayalam Movie WorldWide Collection ==

As per wikipedia the more sources added the more can be believed by the user. For The Great Father only one source is provided. I added new topic mainly because of giving another source validating that the movie has collected 50cr

http://m.manoramaonline.com/movies/movie-news/2017/11/08/its-official-dileep-ramaleela-enters-50-crore-club.html <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Muhammed.suhail|Muhammed.suhail]] ([[User talk:Muhammed.suhail#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Muhammed.suhail|contribs]]) 00:09, 3 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{ping|Muhammed.suhail}} This reference has been mentioned at least four other times on this page, and you previously mentioned it on 20 November. Read the comments above if you want to understand why the source is problematic. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 08:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

I am not talking about Ramleela i am talking about The Great Father

In second para it shortly says about the movies that collected 50cr The Great Father is there in the list and it doesnt says that according to produver or actor [[User:Muhammed.suhail|Muhammed.suhail]] ([[User talk:Muhammed.suhail|talk]]) 09:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

== Thupakki Year ==

Dear Editors,

Please do edit the thupakki release year from 2012 to 2016.

Proof - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thuppakki

Thank you very much. [[User:Nithish Singh|Nithish Singh]] ([[User talk:Nithish Singh|talk]]) 12:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

:{{ping|Nithish Singh}} {{done}} I assume you mean that you wanted us to change the release year from 2016 to 2012, right? [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

== 3 Idiots gross ==

The box office gross of ''[[3 Idiots]]'' is flawed. As per the given source, it grossed $30.5 overseas. This has been converted at the exchange rate of 2013 rather than that of 2009- which was the year when the film released. If this is converted at the exchange rate of December 2009(the month of release of the film), the overseas gross would be about {{INR}}140-145 crore. I request this to be corrected. Besides, how does the release of a remake of the film in another language make it a franchise? ~[[User:Rajan51|Rajan51]] ([[User talk:Rajan51|talk]]) 12:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

:The $30.5 million figure is the final overseas gross given in early 2017, so it would be better to use a conversion rate nearer to the date of the source. The last territory it released in was Japan in 2013, which is closest to the date of the source. As for the franchise question, while not a series, licensed remakes fit the definition of a franchise, which is a broader concept than a series. [[User:Maestro2016|Maestro2016]] ([[User talk:Maestro2016|talk]]) 05:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

::The fact that the overseas gross was given in 2017 does not change the year of release in all countries. If the film released in 2013 in Japan, then the collections of Japan alone can be converted at the 2013 rate. This would apply to delayed releases in other countries/territories too. Regarding the 3 idiots franchise, the heading of the table clearly states ''Highest-grossing franchises and film series'' which would mean that for an inclusion, it would have to be a film series ''and'' a film franchise. ~[[User:Rajan51|Rajan51]] ([[User talk:Rajan51|talk]]) 11:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

:::It depends on what exchange rates IB Times were using to convert from local currency to US dollars. For all we know, they could've been using 2017 exchange rates. A 2013 exchange rate makes sense as 2013 is the last time it had an overseas release, and also happens to fall right in the middle between 2009 and 2017. As for the franchise/series, the heading "franchises and film series" means that the list includes both franchises and series, not necessarily that each entry must be both a franchise and series. [[User:Maestro2016|Maestro2016]] ([[User talk:Maestro2016|talk]]) 15:58, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

== vivegam ??? ==

please remove vivegam from tamil films it is a box office flop and actual collection is 112 crore as of november article http://www.catchnews.com/regional-cinema/vivegam-thala-ajith-starrer-emerges-big-flop-final-collections-lesser-than-opening-weekend-collections-of-thalapathy-vijay-s-mersal-88892.html Thank you --[[Special:Contributions/49.206.113.14|49.206.113.14]] ([[User talk:49.206.113.14|talk]]) 18:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

:Vivegam's 160 crore gross was attributed to [http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/ajith-kumar-vivegam-beats-star-wars-most-liked-teaser/1/1048645.html India Today]. Do you normally shun this source in favor of Catch.com, or only when it pertains to Vivegam's gross? Because it could be argued that there is a disparity of opinion, and so both sources should be presented in the form of a range. What do you say to that? [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 05:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

== Spyder (Telugu) ==

Spyder is a Telugu Tamil bilingual movie so please do include the '#+' sign which shows it is bilingual. [[User:Nithish Singh|Nithish Singh]] ([[User talk:Nithish Singh|talk]]) 09:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

==Highest grossing franchise and film series==

Please remove remakes from the film series. These are not from the same production house. [[User:JumboRock|JumboRock]] ([[User talk:JumboRock|talk]]) 14:11, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Exactly! When did 3 Idiots became a franchise??? The story didn't go on... It's just that other adaptations in different languages are made...

== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 December 2017 ==

{{edit extended-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=no}}

Kollywood Tamil Movie

Thuppakki collection is 120 crores

Source : http://www.ibtimes.co.in/photos/all-time-highest-grossing-tamil-films-2881-slide-21713#JrEkSJAutV1IH7kS.97 [[User:Senthil Babu PM|Senthil Babu PM]] ([[User talk:Senthil Babu PM|talk]]) 21:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)