{{talk header}}

{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes|1=

{{WikiProject India |class=list |importance=mid |cinema=yes |cinema-importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Business|class=list|importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject Film|class=list|Indian=yes|listas=Highest-Grossing Indian Films, List Of}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tamil films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Telugu films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Punjabi films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Telugu films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tamil films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Bollywood films|talk=no|date=26 July 2015}}

{{copied|from=Bollywood|from_oldid =670957198|to=List of highest-grossing Indian films||to_diff=672526653|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&type=revision&diff=672526653&oldid=672526378|date=July 21, 2015}}

{{oldafdfull| date = 20 December 2012 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = List of highest-grossing Indian films worldwide }}

{{auto archiving notice|bot=lowercase sigmabot III|small=yes}}

== Highest Grossing Movies in Kannada ==

Respected Sir,

According to recent news statement published in International Business Times, Kirik Party has grossed 45 crores and is nearing to 50 crores. I request you to kindly update the page with correct information. Necessary link related to news statement has been attached with this request.

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/rakshit-shettys-kirik-party-inches-closer-rs-50-crore-mark-box-office-75-days-719391

Thank u <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Shrinayakwiki|Shrinayakwiki]] ([[User talk:Shrinayakwiki#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Shrinayakwiki|contribs]]) 03:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Respected sir,

According to Kannada box office and several news articles recently hebbuli movie has crossed the gross of 50 crores so I would like u to edit the info [[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 01:45, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

:You will need to provide solid references. Before you respond, see [[WP:RS]], and more specifically, [[WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources]] to get a better idea for what sources are and are not considered reliable. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 03:30, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

::Sir i am requesting u just pluck off raajakumara which has no official declarations on collection but u still included it please understand we ade getting betrayed

::[[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 16:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

:::{{ping|Suraj Sudeep}} I don't know what you mean by "official declarations", since 1) we don't use [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]] as definitive sources of controversial information like finances, since a director/producer/actor/distrubutor/etc. would have every reason to inflate their "official" values and 2) There is no such thing as "official" film financial data in Indian cinema. Everything is an estimate. So whatever point you are trying to make is unclear, and the lack of references doesn't shed a whole lot of light on the matter. Regards, [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 05:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

::::Sir you have changed the collection of Kannada movie maanikya but in the Wikipedia page of the movie maanikya it is stated with source that it has earned 43.5 crores so I would like you to change the same accordingly [[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 12:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

:::::{{ping|Suraj Sudeep}} - I believe you're referring to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&diff=774583884&oldid=774565246 this edit], which was made by user Tevar shaa, not by me. To answer your question, when we consider a film's gross, we're talking ''only'' about money made at the box office. We're not interested in secondary revenue streams like satellite rights sales, music rights sales, etc. The 43.5 crore value at [[Maanikya]] was erroneously including these values and has been fixed in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maanikya&diff=774585301&oldid=774584612 this edit]. According to [https://web.archive.org/web/20140809224553/http://www.indiaglitz.com/-nbsp-nbsp-read-full-story-raquo--hindi-news-111652 Indiaglitz], the film grossed about 35 crore rupees. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 12:53, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

::::::Ok sir then u have the proof for hebbuli to cross 50 crores but why haven't u updated yet

::::::http://m.dailyhunt.in/news/india/kannada/filmibeat+kannada-epaper-filmikan/syaandal+vud+na+aal+taim+rekaard+udis+maadidha+hebbuli-newsid-65099533?ss=wsp&s= [[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 17:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

:::::::I've never heard of dailyhunt.in and don't see it as an approved source at [[WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources]]. However, if the content is being derived from Filmibeat, which the logo on the page would seem to suggest, I'd be averse to using this source as a reference, since Filmibeat is expressly indicated as an unreliable source. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 17:06, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Sir i still have another proof for hebbuli crossing 50 crores

http://uk.blastingnews.com/entertainment/2017/03/hebbuli-2-weeks-14-days-collection-in-karnataka-till-date-001531701.html [[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 14:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello bro last year blockbuster mukunda murari has completed a gross of 50 crores as stated in your wikipedia page so please change [[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 05:24, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

:{{ping|Suraj Sudeep}} You mean the unexplained, unsourced addition that was made in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mukunda_Murari&type=revision&diff=776211755&oldid=773397407 this edit]? I don't think so. Please bring reliable sources to the talk page if you want other editors to consider changes. See [[WP:ICTF#Guideliens on sources]] for examples of what are and are not suitable for inclusion. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Here is the proof the famous box office tracker has told that hebbuli has collected 100crores

https://mobile.twitter.com/rameshlaus/status/858678794877411328 [[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 15:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

:{{Ping|Suraj Sudeep}} When the information is released by a reliable mainstream publication, then the content may be changed. I don't know who this person is or what makes him an authority on Indian film finances. For all I know, he could be a shill for producers and promoters. I've never heard of Cinema Pesalam. Please familiarise yourself with our [[WP:RS|reliable sources guidelines]] and look at [[WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources]] for examples of suitable and unsuitable sources. You need to start bringing quality references to talks page and articles, please. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

https://www.cinestaan.com/articles/2017/may/2/5590/amala-paul-joins-rs100-crore-club-as-kannada-film-hebbuli-goes-strong-at-box-office

The above link shows that hebbuli has completed 100 crores [[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 06:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello freaking page editor i have provided u all the major sources og tthe collection of 100 crores by hebbuli but u have not edited it sk may i have a complaint registered against u or shall i report u to Wikipedia as a senseless editor

[[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 17:50, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

http://m.gulte.com/movienews/57798/Divorced-Lady-Joins-100-Cr-Club

This is the 2nd linl for 100 crore collection by hebbuli

[[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 17:50, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

== Highest grossing Indian franchise and film series ==

{{ping|Taniya94}} Your pet project, the Highest grossing Indian franchise and film series table you created, has been flagged for cleanup since November.

#Is there a reason why we're using US dollars in the table when everything else in this article is in Rupees? Previous discussions at [[WP:ICTF|the Indian cinema task force]] suggest the vocal community doesn't find much value in focusing on US dollars.

#The "highest-grossing film" column should probably become "highest-grossing film in franchise" just for clarity

#The figures in parentheticals are odd, especially with the references wedged inside the parens. Maybe another column for the references would be a better way to present this data?

Thank you, [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

I agree, it would be much more sensible if the box office figures were in Rupees as there is always a constant fluctuation of the USD vs INR value.

~[[User:Rajan51|Rajan51]] ([[User talk:Rajan51|talk]]) 14:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

**If you can make it in INR from USD, then please do it. But this table includes the list of every film released under a franchise, so, do not delete the list. Please see, [[List of highest-grossing films#Highest-grossing franchises and film series]]. [[User:Taniya94|Taniya94]] ([[User talk:Taniya94|talk]]) 14:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

== Highest opening movies in india ==

Bahubali- conclusion- 145cr [[User:Pasyavula gopi|Pasyavula gopi]] ([[User talk:Pasyavula gopi|talk]]) 10:27, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

:{{ping|Pasyavula gopi}} Unsourced declarations are not terribly helpful. Please provide a reference. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

== Bahubali 2, Tamil? ==

So, the debate starts again and it is decided that Bahubali is a Tamil-Telugu biilingual. Only thing is, the Tamilians write it the hero’s name as Magendira/Amarendira Bagubali and non-Tamilians read it as Makenthira/Amarenthira Pakupali. Wonder what sort of a movie is that when you can’t even write it’s name in the language it is shot.<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:182.65.47.223|182.65.47.223]] ([[User talk:182.65.47.223#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/182.65.47.223|contribs]]) </small>

:What is your question/suggestion? [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Question is simple. Why is it tagged as a Tamil movie? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/182.65.47.223|182.65.47.223]] ([[User talk:182.65.47.223#top|talk]]) 06:49, 30 April 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

::Because according to sources it was filmed simultaneously in Telugu and Tamil. The language column is not intended to equate to "ethnic ownership". [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 13:58, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

You have seriously messed up the narative, my friend. Most of the Rajanikanth and Kamal Hassan movies are shot as bilinguals and if what you claim is the basis for deciding the language of a movie, then, the article needs a serious rejig. Reveling in false pride is a non-issue for us but, the reality is that, this page is not for chauvinisms and chest thumpings, be it Hindi or Tamil or whatever. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:182.65.47.223|182.65.47.223]] ([[User talk:182.65.47.223#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/182.65.47.223|contribs]]) </small>

:::1) Please sign your posts with four tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. This appends a signature and time stamp so that other editors know who said what and when. 2) I have no idea what you're going on about, re: "the narative". The film was shot in two languages. What do you want the encyclopedia to do? Pretend that this fact does not exist? Or would you prefer instead that we add a column to label each film by ethnic film industry? The latter is not likely to happen, since it's a bit ridiculous and would only be helpful in cases where films are produced in two different languages. If your original complaint is that since Baahubali was produced in two languages, there are inconsistencies with how character names are represented, it would seem that the simplest solution would be to create a table in the cast list with character names for each language. The remainder of the content, like the plot section, would probably be wise to focus on the Telugu names rather than giving both. Based on previous discussion at [[WT:ICTF]] that is my personal guess for what community preference might be. If I'm misinterpreting your query/position, feel free to clarify, but I genuinely don't know what it is that you want to see changed. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:02, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Bahubali is not a tamil film , it is not shot in both languages instead it dubbed into tamil, no point of showing it as a tamil film. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bala Sudheer|Bala Sudheer]] ([[User talk:Bala Sudheer#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bala Sudheer|contribs]]) 08:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Merger of some articles ==

There has been a proposal to merge [[List of highest-grossing Indian films in overseas markets]] (since July 2016) and [[List of highest-grossing Telugu films]] (since August 2016). It's been almost a year and I propose that someone merge it soon. If there was an agreement earlier about not merging the above mentioned articles into this one then the templates should have been removed. I also would like to propose the merger of the article [[List of highest domestic nett collection of Hindi films]] into this one (or a deletion of that article) since it's very poorly written and doesn't serve much of a purpose. - [[User:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:green">'''Jayadevp'''</span>]][[User talk:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:red">'''13'''</span>]] 13:45, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

== Timeline of highest grossing movies ==

I would like to propose that a new section be included with the name "'''Timeline of highest-grossing films'''" just like in the article [[List of highest-grossing films]]. It would be very informative. It can be started with films since the year 1990 then be expanded to include the earlier films. - [[User:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:green">'''Jayadevp'''</span>]][[User talk:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:red">'''13'''</span>]] 13:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

:1) Also what about films like [[Mughal-e-Azam]] ? In that case ]]Highest-grossing films adjusted for inflation]] will make sense [[User:Mrkks|Mrkks]] ([[User talk:Mrkks|talk]]) 21:52, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Mrkks

::{{ping|Mrkks}} The bulk of the financials for Indian films are based on guesses, rumours, unverified claims, and lies. Establishing definitively that a film from 1960 is one of the highest-grossing films in Indian cinema (adjusted for inflation) would be a monumental feat, and one based almost entirely on conjecture. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 04:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

:{{ping|Jayadevp13}} I understand what you are going for with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&diff=778332750&oldid=778321043 the timeline of highest-grossing movies], but I have some questions/notes:

:*How does a reader [[WP:V|verify]] that ''Hum Aapke'' held the #1 spot from 1994 to 2001? While there are references to indicate the individual gross values, where are the references that say "''Hum Aapke Hain Koun..!'' was the highest-grossing Indian film of all time until it was overtaken by ''Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham'' in 2001." That specific verified claim is crucial to the list being meaningful in any way, because without those assertions, all there is in the table are a series of meaningless numbers, and we're asking readers to assume that the ''lack of any contrary information'' equates to an indisputable fact.

:*Does Box Office India even chart films that aren't in Hindi? Where is ''Dasavathaaram'' in [https://www.boxofficeindia.com/worldwide-total-gross.php?year=2008 this BOI box breakdown for 2008]?

:*If ''Dasavathaaram'' is missing from ''that'' BOI list, how does a reader know that in all the other years of BOI charts, no Tamil, Telugu, or Malayalam film ever charted as #1? Again, we're asking readers to assume that a lack of contrary information equates to a factual assertion.

:*An example taken from your inspiration [[List of highest-grossing films#Timeline of highest-grossing films]] uses [http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/80025/Jurassic-Park/misc-notes.html this reference], which says explicitly: "[Jurassic Park grossed] $705 million within 115 days of its initial theatrical release, making it the all-time international box office champ. The previous record holder was Spielberg's own "E.T." (USA/1982), which eventually grossed $701 million." That is a clear declarative statement that doesn't leave much room for confusion. It tells us what the previous record was, and it tells us what the new record was. That is the level of clarity required for this list.

:There is a significant lack of information in the Indian version of that table, and these issues would have to be fixed if there's any hope of keeping that list. I also consider this a supremely difficult task, given the lack of centralised auditing of financial figures, as well as the media's tendency to only be interested in films produced in their own language. I have no idea how this can be accomplished. Regards, [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:08, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

::{{ping|Cyphoidbomb}} Thank You for taking your time to research about it and write all those points.

::*With regard to your first point, what I thought of (at the time of editing the article) was that people could compare the table with the [[List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films#Highest-grossing_films_by_year|Highest-grossing films by year]] table and see. To elaborate what I mean, the highest-grossing film of 1994 ''Hum Aapke Hain Koun..!'' had grossed {{INR}}127.96 crore and the highest-grossing film of 2001, ''Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham'' had grossed around {{INR}}135.53 crore. Between them all the movies had grossed less than the earnings of ''Hum Aapke Hain Koun..!'' in 1994. My belief was that people can infer this from the [[List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films#Highest-grossing_films_by_year|Highest-grossing films by year]] list.

::*No, the website Box Office India doesn't track the earnings of movies which are not in Hindi. You can also see that from the absence of [[Baahubali: The Beginning]] from this [https://www.boxofficeindia.com/worldwide-total-gross.php?year=2015 Top Worldwide Grossers 2015] list. Now this is problem. How to show in the [[List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films#Highest-grossing_films_by_year|Highest-grossing films by year]] table that a particular year's highest grossing movie was not in Hindi.

::*With regard to your fourth point, finding that kind of references will be very tough especially since there is a lack of centralised auditing of financial figures, just like you told. That was the reason I took the ''Highest-grossing films by year'' table as a reference to compare and make a new table (don't know if Wikipedia policies allow it). If it is allowed then we can mention at the start of the section that this table is derived using data from the previous table. I hope you understand what I am trying to convey here.

::What do you suggest I should do now? Should I (or you) remove the list which I created until definite sources can be established? Might be possible for movies which released after 2009 (for example ''3 idiots''). I highly doubt that it is possible for movies which were released earlier. With regards. - [[User:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:green">'''Jayadevp'''</span>]][[User talk:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:red">'''13'''</span>]] 03:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

:::{{ping|Jayadevp13}} and {{ping|Cyphoidbomb}} I personally think that this is a [[WP:LISTCRUFT]] which does not enlighten anybody any more than the list of Highest-grossing films by year that is just above. I respect your good intentions Jayadevp13, but as I said, the list does not have much significance as of date. If you can at least add more details - say take back the timeline to 1960, it will probably merit remaining. I am removing the forked list for now. Feel free to revert with a reason. [[User:Jupitus Smart|<b><span style="color:#f45342;">Jupitus</span> <span style="color:#05ad83"><i>Smart</i></span></b>]] 06:45, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

:::{{ping|Jayadevp13}} I think it was a solid, constructive effort, but we just don't have the sourcing yet to justify its inclusion. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:03, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

== [[Yajamana (film)|Yajamana]] gross ==

It is highly unlikely that Yajamana actually grossed 42 crores (somebody even removed the citation that was present for the same). The earlier reference was to some book, and the grammar in the page in which the dubious figure was mentioned, makes me apprehensive about the reliability of the book. No other source mentions the number and it should probably be removed from the Highest Kannada movies list. [[User:Jupitus Smart|<b><span style="color:#f45342;">Jupitus</span> <span style="color:#05ad83"><i>Smart</i></span></b>]] 15:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

:{{ping|Jupitus Smart}} I've been experiencing a great deal of trouble from Kannada film values lately... Looks like the reference was removed [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&diff=777148093&oldid=776919768 here] by {{u|Sitush}}, who cited [[WP:MIRROR]] as a rationale. Sitush, any chance you could expound a bit? How do you know Wikipedia was the source of that content? Regards, [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

::Stuff published by Diamond Pocket Books is often very dodgy. The specific instance you mention was briefly referred to in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics/Archive_63#Gyan_.2F_Kalpaz_.28again.29 this thread] and I did some spot checks at the time that seemed to confirm the book's author was taking info from Wikipedia. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 16:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

:::{{ping|Sitush}} Thanks for the explanation, esteemed colleague. {{P}} [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

::::That solves that. [[User:Jupitus Smart|<b><span style="color:#f45342;">Jupitus</span> <span style="color:#05ad83"><i>Smart</i></span></b>]] 17:06, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

== Bahubali - issue with the posted Language ==

Please understand that Bahubali is a telugu film , not tamil. [[User:Veda chaitanya|Veda chaitanya]] ([[User talk:Veda chaitanya|talk]]) 05:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

: Please see the archives discussions of this talk page. If memory serves, the film was shot in both languages (not dubbed into one as is common practice). We treat the film as both Tamil and Telugu. [[User:EvergreenFir|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir|(talk)]] 06:01, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

It should be a "Telugu" film or "Telugu,Tamil and Hindi", but why it is showcased as "Telegu & Tamil" film? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/106.51.129.221|106.51.129.221]] ([[User talk:106.51.129.221#top|talk]]) 15:15, 1 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:There is no ampersand (&) between Telugu and Tamil in the article, so your quotation is not representative of what the article says. "Telugu,Tamil and Hindi" would not be appropriate, since the movie was not ''filmed'' in Hindi. It was filmed in Telugu and Tamil, though. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 04:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

With the above explanation and references that I found later, I now accept Bahubali as a "Telugu and Tamil" movie (as all other languages are dubbed versions only like Hindi, Malayalam, English and Korean. My apologies for demanding this movie as Hindi movie earlier in the initial post.<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:49.207.55.5|49.207.55.5]] ([[User talk:49.207.55.5#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/49.207.55.5|contribs]]) </small>

== [[Chaar Sahibzaade: Rise of Banda Singh Bahadur]] figures ==

The movie is currently 3rd in the Punjabi list. It has 4 references, three of which are from reliable sources which however does not mention the given numbers. The 4th reference is from a blog site called dekhnews [http://www.dekhnews.com/about-us/] which is the source for the number. I don't think the site can be considered reliable. Should the movie be removed from the list. [[User:Jupitus Smart|<b><span style="color:#f45342;">Jupitus</span> <span style="color:#05ad83"><i>Smart</i></span></b>]] 18:51, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

== Baahubali 2:the conclusion hindi ==

Baahubali 2 movie has been released in hindi also add that in the language out of 625 cr gross worldwide hindi has grossed 300 cr my request is that many people trust wikipedia so please update proper information source you can find in the collection reference itself[[User:V1234robot|V1234robot]] ([[User talk:V1234robot|talk]]) 11:17, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

:{{not done}} - {{ping|V1234robot}} It's unclear what you are asking to be changed, and since you haven't provide a reference of any sort, that makes interpreting your request somewhat difficult. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

::"Baahubali 2 Tuesday 5th Day Box Office Collection, Grossed 700crore At Worldwide Markets". BollywoodMozo. 3 May 2017. Retrieved 3 May 2017. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:V1234robot|V1234robot]] ([[User talk:V1234robot#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/V1234robot|contribs]]) </small>

:::{{ping|V1234robot}} "BollywoodMozo", whatever that is, is not a reliable source. See [[WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources]] for a sample of good and bad sources. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:22, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 3 May 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Bahubali and bahubali 2 movies are telugu movies and dubbed into tamil, hindi and malayalam. I can see it is mentioned as Telugu and Tamil whereas kabali as only tamil. [[User:Venkisree|Venkisree]] ([[User talk:Venkisree|talk]]) 09:46, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> The two cinematic parts of ''Bahubali'' were simultaneously shot in both [[Telugu language|Telugu]] and [[Tamil language|Tamil]] languages. regards, [[User:DRAGON BOOSTER|<span style="color:blue;size=2">DRAGON BOOSTER</span>]][[User talk:DRAGON BOOSTER|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2"> ★</span>]] 11:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

== Talk: Hebbuli Kannada Movie to be in top grossing kannada movie with 42 crores ==

Hebbuli Kannada Movie to be in top grossing kannada movie with 42 crores per 13 days collection report.

<ref>http://uk.blastingnews.com/entertainment/2017/03/hebbuli-12th-13th-day-box-office-collection-at-the-karnataka-bo-001529181.html</ref>

[[User:Vinaybang31|Vinaybang31]] ([[User talk:Vinaybang31|talk]]) 10:11, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

{{tref}}

:{{not done}} - {{ping|Vinaybang31}} "Blastingnews" is not a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. See [[WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources]] for some examples of ones that are and are not useful. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

I have a reliable source for hebbuli completing 100crores

https://www.cinestaan.com/articles/2017/may/2/5590/amala-paul-joins-rs100-crore-club-as-kannada-film-hebbuli-goes-strong-at-box-office [[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 06:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

:{{ping|Suraj Sudeep}} What exactly makes this source reliable? [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 02:06, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 3 May 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

For Bahubali Movies, Hindi language also need to be included. [[User:Manyugarg|Manyugarg]] ([[User talk:Manyugarg|talk]]) 16:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> {{Ping|Manyugarg}} Why? Hindi is a dub, not the original language of production. According to sources, the film was shot in Telugu and Tamil. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 03:55, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

::Then why not add more detail which shows this income is because of Dub. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Manyugarg|Manyugarg]] ([[User talk:Manyugarg#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Manyugarg|contribs]]) 16:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:::{{Ping|Manyugarg}} I don't understand what you're asking. The gross values presumably indicate worldwide gross. This means the box office values of all theatrical releases worldwide, including dubbed releases. ''This is the default assumption that most people should have about what "worldwide gross" means.'' At [[List of highest-grossing films]] there is no special column indicating how much money ''Captain America: Civil War'' made from its Cantonese dub, but I guarantee that value is factored into the $1,153,304,495 figure. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 02:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 3 May 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Baahubali: The conclusion is listed as an bilingual Telugu and Tamil movie.

Please note it is only dubbed into Tamil and other languages and it is an original Telugu movie.

So please edit the Title to Baahubali: The conclusion [[User:Jaswanthyarlagadda|Jaswanthyarlagadda]] ([[User talk:Jaswanthyarlagadda|talk]]) 18:23, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> {{Ping|Jaswanthyarlagadda}} According to sources, the film was shot in both Telugu and Tamil, not dubbed in Tamil. You would need to bring reliable sources that contradict this position. See [[WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources]] for a broad list of sources that are and are not considered reliable. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 03:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

== Baahubali collections are not correctly mentioned in Telugu and Tamil ==

Both Bahubali 1 and 2 collections are not correctly mentioned in both Telugu and Tamil lists. Baahubali 2 collections are listed in Hindi list even though it is a dubbed version. Please correct it. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/27.49.85.159|27.49.85.159]] ([[User talk:27.49.85.159#top|talk]]) 12:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:As of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&oldid=778654387 this version] of the article, I don't see Baahubali 2 in the Hindi list, so maybe this was already fixed. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:49, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 4 May 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Bahubali: The Conclusion is a telugu movie(dubbed into tamil,hindi, malayalam) [[Special:Contributions/121.241.140.120|121.241.140.120]] ([[User talk:121.241.140.120|talk]]) 13:20, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. If you're requesting that we indicate that Tamil is a ''dub'', that's not consistent with reports that the film was ''shot'' in Tamil, not dubbed. If that thought is incorrect, you'll need to bring references to prove that. <!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:46, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

== Telugu gross collections error? ==

The collections for Tollywood is out of order and needs to be fixed.

Order should go like this:

1. Bahubali 2

2. Bahubali 1

3. Khaidi 150

4. Srimanthudu

5. Magadheera (+dubbing)

6. Janata Garage

7. Sarainodu

8. Attharintiki Daredi

9. Gabbar Singh

10. Eega

[[User:SourinSP|SourinSP]] ([[User talk:SourinSP|talk]]) 14:07, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

:{{ping|SourinSP}} {{not done}} [http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/mahesh-babu-gifts-swanky-car-to-director-koratala-siva-115092200256_1.html This source] says ''Srimanthudu'' grossed 200 crore worldwide, which would be more than the 164 crore worldwide asserted by [http://www.hindustantimes.com/regional-movies/khaidi-no-150-chiranjeevi-s-blockbuster-mints-rs-164-cr-worldwide/story-w8lXnfOaGTFMLh6LIDPSfJ.html this source] to ''Khaidi 150''. So it's unclear why we'd flip the positions of those. If you want to see anything changed, you're going to have to bring references and strong arguments for why the current order is not accurate. Simply providing a list and asking us to blindly adhere to it isn't going to work. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:45, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

::Even if Srimanthudu is in fact higher that Khaidi 150, Gabbar Singh shouldn't even be on this list. Looking at this: sourcehttps://www.google.com/amp/m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/telugu/movies/news/Gabbar-Singh-50-days-collections-list/amp_articleshow/14525905.cms

::It made less than Srimanthudu let alone Sarainodu. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:SourinSP|SourinSP]] ::([[User talk:SourinSP#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SourinSP|contribs]]) 19:11, 6 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:::{{ping|SourinSP}} That reference is describing distributor share figures, not gross. [http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/gabbar-singh-highest-grosser/1/209129.html This source] puts the gross at 150 crore. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 22:24, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

::::This contradicts some of your claims, though:

::::http://www.ibtimes.co.in/janatha-garage-box-office-collection-will-jr-ntrs-film-beat-sarrainodu-srimanthudu-693653 <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:SourinSP|SourinSP]] ([[User talk:SourinSP#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SourinSP|contribs]]) 01:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:::::I haven't made any claims. I've only double-checked the sources that are already in the article. Don't know what to tell you. This is an inherent problem with Indian film financials--there are no absolute figures. Everything's a guess. Everything's subject to exaggeration. I'm sure that for every figure in the article, there's another figure that's several crore higher or several crore lower. Do we disregard an otherwise reliable source simply because another otherwise reliable source has a figure that's closer to what we personally wish it to be? [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 02:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

::::::Multiple sources exist for Srimathudu's 200 crore gross figures - [http://www.catchnews.com/regional-cinema/1-year-of-srimanthudu-8-interesting-facts-about-the-mahesh-babu-shruti-haasan-blockbuster-srimanthudu-movie-news-1470571120.html] (Catch News - not a reliable source, though accepted as one here), [http://movies.ndtv.com/regional/from-mahesh-babu-to-srimanthudu-director-with-love-1220314] (NDTV), [http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/telugu/Mahesh-Babus-hit-film-Srimanthudu-to-premier-on-Zee-Telugu-on-Sunday-November-8/articleshow/49673801.cms] (Times of India) and the Business Standard reference mentioned above. Just because IBT does not think so, I don't think the figures should be brought down. And anyway, our list does not match with the list of Top Telugu movies provided by IBT, making it futile to match figures.[[User:Jupitus Smart|<b><span style="color:#f45342;">Jupitus</span> <span style="color:#05ad83"><i>Smart</i></span></b>]] 05:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 5 May 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

{{subst:trim|

Bahubali 2:The conclusion is a bilingual movie(made in both telugu and tamil) and it was dubbed in other indian languages.But in the list of highest grossing movies,I could see the language section to have Malayalam and Hindi added as well.It is a wrong information.It needs to be changed.

<ref>

</ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baahubali_(franchise) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:PraveenKumarMurugaiah|PraveenKumarMurugaiah]] ([[User talk:PraveenKumarMurugaiah#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PraveenKumarMurugaiah|contribs]]) </small>

:[[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:DRAGON BOOSTER|<span style="color:blue;size=2">DRAGON BOOSTER</span>]][[User talk:DRAGON BOOSTER|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2"> ★</span>]] 07:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

{{tref}}

With the references given below, I now accept Bahubali as a "Telugu and Tamil" movie (as all other languages are dubbed versions only like Hindi, Malayalam, English and Korean. My apologies for demanding this movie as Hindi movie earlier. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/49.207.55.5|49.207.55.5]] ([[User talk:49.207.55.5#top|talk]]) 14:01, 6 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Semi-protected edit request on 5 May 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Technically, Dangal has booked 9000 something screens in China so its still running. Ref-http://www.deccanchronicle.com/entertainment/bollywood/020517/after-aamirs-dangal-salman-khans-tubelight-to-release-in-china-in-a-big-way.html (Screen Info from NDTV). So put Dangal in that greeny color.[[Special:Contributions/31.215.112.31|31.215.112.31]] ([[User talk:31.215.112.31|talk]]) 07:36, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

:[[File:Pictogram voting wait.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Already done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> I believe someone has already taken care of this. I see Dangal in green. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:02, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 5 May 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

in the list of highest grossers of malayalam film,movie "the great father" is missing,which has collected 50 cr so far . please add in that list"

1.http://www.kboupdates.com/2017/04/its-official-now-the-great-father-touches-50-crore-mark-from-world-wide-boxoffice/

2. http://mollywoodtimes.com/2017/04/22/the-great-father-touches-the-50-crore-mark/

3. http://filmfaktory.in/official-great-father-touches-50-crore-mark

film producer's official page stating the collection of 50 crores

4.https://www.facebook.com/AugustCinema/photos/a.141682375905619.34908.131506503589873/1490684801005363/?type=3&theater5.

and link of kbo updates which tracks malayalam movie collection reports

5.https://www.kboupdates.in/the-great-father-bo.html

[[User:Anupmenon0007|Anupmenon0007]] ([[User talk:Anupmenon0007|talk]]) 09:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:DRAGON BOOSTER|<span style="color:blue;size=2">DRAGON BOOSTER</span>]][[User talk:DRAGON BOOSTER|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2"> ★</span>]] 09:52, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

:We wouldn't use producer claims per [[WP:PRIMARY]], as a producer/director/actor/distributor would have every reason to exaggerate. Especially given the competition between Mammootty and Mohanlal. No indication kboupdates.in qualifies as a reliable source per [[WP:RS]]/[[WP:UGC]]. Who runs it? Who's the editor-in-chief? What are there qualifications? Demonstrate they have an established reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Etc. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 13:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

: http://www.manoramanews.com/news/entertainment/2017/04/23/mammootty-move-to-50-crore-club.html

Can this be used as a reliable source?, References from this source has been included in many similar Wikipedia pages. [[User:Ananth sk|Ananth sk]] ([[User talk:Ananth sk|talk]]) 19:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

:: {{ping|Ananth sk}} Read the 2nd line in the reference and then read what Cyphoidbomb has mentioned above. You will get your answer. [[User:Jupitus Smart|<b><span style="color:#f45342;">Jupitus</span> <span style="color:#05ad83"><i>Smart</i></span></b>]] 04:55, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

== Rank grouping ==

In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&type=revision&diff=778695575&oldid=778674702 these edits], {{u|Betty Logan}} was kind enough to make some table formatting changes that group various ranks based on a film's gross. Example:

;Before

{| style="margin:auto; margin:auto;" class="wikitable sortable"

|+

|-

! Rank

! Movie

! Year

! Director

! Studio(s)

! Worldwide gross

|-

| 1

|''[[Mungaru Male]]''

| 2006

| [[Yogaraj Bhat]]

| E. K. Entertainers

| {{INRConvert|50|c}}–{{INRConvert|75|c}}

|-span style="background:#b6fcb6; width:50px; border:1px solid #aaa;"

|2

| style="background:#9fc;"|* ''[[Kirik Party]]''

| 2016

|[[Rishab Shetty]]

| Paramvah Studios

| {{INRConvert|50|c}}

|-

| 3

| ''[[Mr. and Mrs. Ramachari]]''

| 2014

|[[Santhosh Ananddram]]

| Jayanna Combines

| {{INRConvert|50|c}}

|- style="background:#b6fcb6; width:50px; border:1px solid #aaa;" span

|4

| style="background:#9fc;"|* ''[[Raajakumara]]''

|2017

|[[Santhosh Ananddram]]

|Hombale Productions

|{{INRConvert|40|c}}

|-

|5

|''[[Doddmane Hudga]]''

| 2016

| [[Duniya Soori]]

| Ajay Pictures

| {{INRConvert|40|c}}

|-

|6

| ''[[Sangolli Rayanna (film)|Krantiveera Sangolli Rayanna]]''

| 2012

| Naganna

| Sri Sangolli Rayanna Cine Combines

| {{INRConvert|40|c}}

|-

|7

|''[[Uppi 2]]''

| 2015

| [[Upendra (actor)|Upendra]]

| Upendra Productions

| {{INRConvert|40|c}}

|-

|8

|''[[Kotigobba 2]]''

| 2016

| [[K. S. Ravikumar]]

| Rambabu Productions

| {{INRConvert|35|c}}–{{INRConvert|38|c}}

|}

;After

{| style="margin:auto; margin:auto;" class="wikitable sortable"

|+

|-

! Rank

! Movie

! Year

! Director

! Studio(s)

! Worldwide gross

|-

| 1

|''[[Mungaru Male]]''

| 2006

| [[Yogaraj Bhat]]

| E. K. Entertainers

| {{INRConvert|50|c}}–{{INRConvert|75|c}}

|-span style="width:50px; border:1px solid #aaa;"

|rowspan="2"|2

| style="background:#9fc;"|* ''[[Kirik Party]]''

| style="background:#b6fcb6;"| 2016

| style="background:#b6fcb6;"| [[Rishab Shetty]]

| style="background:#b6fcb6;"| Paramvah Studios

| style="background:#b6fcb6;"| {{INRConvert|50|c}}

|-

| ''[[Mr. and Mrs. Ramachari]]''

| 2014

|[[Santhosh Ananddram]]

| Jayanna Combines

| {{INRConvert|50|c}}

|- style="width:50px; border:1px solid #aaa;" span

| rowspan="4"|4

| style="background:#9fc;"|* ''[[Raajakumara]]''

|style="background:#b6fcb6;"| 2017

|style="background:#b6fcb6;"| [[Santhosh Ananddram]]

|style="background:#b6fcb6;"| Hombale Productions

|style="background:#b6fcb6;"| {{INRConvert|40|c}}

|-

|''[[Doddmane Hudga]]''

| 2016

| [[Duniya Soori]]

| Ajay Pictures

| {{INRConvert|40|c}}

|-

| ''[[Sangolli Rayanna (film)|Krantiveera Sangolli Rayanna]]''

| 2012

| Naganna

| Sri Sangolli Rayanna Cine Combines

| {{INRConvert|40|c}}

|-

|''[[Uppi 2]]''

| 2015

| [[Upendra (actor)|Upendra]]

| Upendra Productions

| {{INRConvert|40|c}}

|-

|8

|''[[Kotigobba 2]]''

| 2016

| [[K. S. Ravikumar]]

| Rambabu Productions

| {{INRConvert|35|c}}–{{INRConvert|38|c}}

|-

|}

So why is this better? Simple: ''Raajakumara'', ''Doddmane Hudga'', ''Krantiveera Sangolli Rayanna'' and ''Uppi 2'' all grossed 40 crore. So it would be completely arbitrary for us to decide that Raajakumara is #4 when Uppi 2 could also be considered #4. By manipulating a film's placement in the old system, we are effectively giving preferential treatment to Raajakumara, by suggesting that it grossed more, and thus needs to be ranked higher. This totally violates [[WP:NPOV]]. What the new system tells readers, is that there were four films that filled the #4, #5, #6 and #7 spots. They just all happened to gross the same. Note also that this change was discussed [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films/Archive_9#Odd_numbering here] in February 2017, and so [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] was established for the change. If you object to the changes, your recourse is to seek a new consensus through discussion, not to revert the changes. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

::Hopefully this works, though fans of Raajkumara will still try and have their movie as the first among equals. I feel that if the figures are equal, the older movie should be the first among equals, because its easier to gross huge numbers nowadays compared to before thanks to inflation and higher ticker prices. [[User:Jupitus Smart|<b><span style="color:#f45342;">Jupitus</span> <span style="color:#05ad83"><i>Smart</i></span></b>]] 05:36, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

:::{{ping|Jupitus Smart}} I think the films should be arranged alphabetically. This seems the most neutral way to deal with this, and to prevent disruption, but I do understand the merits of your argument. I'll have to think about this. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 05:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

== Highest grossing Malayalam movies ==

Malayalam Nov es [[User:Abi rockzz|Abi rockzz]] ([[User talk:Abi rockzz|talk]]) 14:38, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

:{{ping|Abi rockzz}} What? [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Abbas: Why did you remove Great father from the list @cyphoidbomb? Just search August cinema in Facebook , and they have posted on their fb page that the movie crossed well over fifty crore mark. You are still confused on the evidence people given and still questioning on the evidence we give for the updation of the list.just another stupidity. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Abbas.j63|Abbas.j63]] ([[User talk:Abbas.j63#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Abbas.j63|contribs]]) 18:59, 7 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

::{{ping|Abbas.j63}} 1) [[WP:NPA|Watch the personal attacks]]. 2) I'm not the one who's confused--I'm well versed on Wikipedia guidelines. We don't use [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]] (Directors/actors/producers/distributors/etc.) for controversial claims like a film's finances, because big surprise: these people have every reason to lie. Inflated figures make directors and actors and producers look more attractive. An actor who can brag about his film breaking a financial record is likely to get more work. Same with a director. Not to mention that film companies often inflate figures (''Kabali'' is a prime example) to make the film more attractive to potential viewers, enticing them to be a part of the blockbuster spectacle. This is particularly relevant given the longstanding rivalry between Mammootty and Mohanlal. The producers posting an inflated number makes the film more attractive to Mammootty fans. So it should be fairly obvious why we can't take the producer's claims at face value. We care what reliable published sources that are ''independent'' of the subject have to say. And thankfully, Wikipedia [[WP:NODEADLINE|has no deadline]]. We're not in any hurry to post improperly verified financial figures. Feel free to look at [[WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources]] for an example of the types of references that are considered reliable, along with ones that are not. (List is not all-inclusive. It's a rough list.) [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 19:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 7 May 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

[[User:Thyagu777|Thyagu777]] ([[User talk:Thyagu777|talk]]) 07:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:EvergreenFir|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir|(talk)]] 07:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

== Highes Grossing Kannada Movies ==

Hello Dear,

I see there is no update for this section of Highest grossing Kannada movies for over a month now. From the sources available on inernet, i see the currently running Movie Raajakumar has dose business in the 75-80 Cr. Also i am sure there is increase in the earnings of Kirik Party, which is still running in the theatres. One of souces i can refer to is IMDB, on which it shows Raajakumara has over taken Mungaaru Male by a distance. I am keen to see the wiki too updated. Could you please do the honours.

Thanks so much!!

Warm Regards

Raj V N <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rajdbangy|Rajdbangy]] ([[User talk:Rajdbangy#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rajdbangy|contribs]]) 08:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{ping|Rajdbangy}} Per [[WP:RS/IMDB]], IMDb is not considered a reliable source. It is [[WP:UGC|user-contributed]]. Please see [[WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources]] for a general list of the types of sources that are and are not considered reliable. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 18:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 7 May 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Please add Chinese/Mandarin in languages under Dangal top grossing movies [[Special:Contributions/103.24.23.42|103.24.23.42]] ([[User talk:103.24.23.42|talk]]) 23:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> Language column indicates the language the film was shot in, not dubs. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 23:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 8 May 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

in highest malayalam movie grossers, where is " THE GREAT FATHER" which crossed 50 crore box office.

here is the link of malayala manorama news channel, which reported this collection

http://www.manoramanews.com/news/entertainment/2017/04/23/mammootty-move-to-50-crore-club.html

some removed it intentionally.please check [[Special:Contributions/117.246.229.197|117.246.229.197]] ([[User talk:117.246.229.197|talk]]) 06:51, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

:See discussion below. [[User:Altamel|Altamel]] ([[User talk:Altamel|talk]]) 01:44, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

== Some one removed an entry from the wiki article ==

{{request edit|D}}

in the top grossers of malayalam movie list, there was the movie" The Great Father " which crossed 50 crore mark,

here is the link of official reputed news channel

http://www.manoramanews.com/news/entertainment/2017/04/23/mammootty-move-to-50-crore-club.html

the above link is of indias reputed news channel malayala manorama..pls edit the article <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Anupmenon0007|Anupmenon0007]] ([[User talk:Anupmenon0007#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Anupmenon0007|contribs]]) 07:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC)</small>

:See discussion below. [[User:Altamel|Altamel]] ([[User talk:Altamel|talk]]) 01:44, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 8 May 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

{{redacted|copyright violation}}

Here is the collection details.

Kerala – 33.1 Crore (30 days )

GCC – 19.05 Crore (14 days )

ROI – 7.90 Crore (29 days )

ROW – 63 lakh (Australia, UK, US, Canada )

Total World Wide Gross – 60.68 Crores

{{redacted|copyright violation}}

So here is a kind request that please update the top grossing malayalam movies list. [[User:Imthiyaz07|Imthiyaz07]] ([[User talk:Imthiyaz07|talk]]) 12:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

:Ref please [[User:King Prithviraj II|King Prithviraj II]] ([[User talk:King Prithviraj II|talk]]) 12:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> This edit request is for the film The Great Father. The redacted content was lifted verbatim from http://www.kboupdates.com/2017/04/the-great-father-raked-60-crore-from-world-wide-boxoffice/, so that is the reference. Imthiyaz07, '''do not copy and paste content into Wikipedia in the future'''. Copyright violations will not be tolerated. I'm not aware of any reason why KBOupdates should be considered sufficient as a reference. Who runs it? What are their qualifications? What expertise does the editorial team have in Indian film finance tracking? Who considers them reliable? [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

== To edit the Highest Grossing Malayalam Movies ==

Malayalam Movie [[The Great Father]] has collected 50cr world wide and it has been officially reported by the actor producer and the co stars. I will provide variable sources.The sources i provided are mainly used for the other movie <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Muhammed.suhail|Muhammed.suhail]] ([[User talk:Muhammed.suhail#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Muhammed.suhail|contribs]]) 13:26, 8 May 2017 (UTC)</small>

<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianmovieplanet.com/great-father-50-crore-club/|title=Great father reached 50 crore club|first=Sarun|last=Sasidharan|publisher=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.manoramanews.com/news/entertainment/2017/04/23/mammootty-move-to-50-crore-club.html|title=Mammootty will open another 50 crore club in Malayalam|date=23 April 2017|work=[[Manorama News]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://mollywoodtimes.com/2017/04/22/the-great-father-touches-the-50-crore-mark/|title=The Great Father touches the 50 Crore Mark.|date=22 April 2017|work=[[Mollywood Times]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://onlookersmedia.in/latestnews/great-father-enters-50-crore-club/|title=The Great Father enters 50 crore club!|first=Richy|last=Yesudas|publisher=|date=22 April 2017|work=[[Onloolers Media]]}}</ref>

{{reflist-talk}}

== Worldwide Gross of PK : Rs 743 crore ==

Worldwide Gross of PK from Two sources: 743 crore

first source: <br/>

http://www.boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=2914 <br/>

text here '''Bahubali 2 - The Conclusion has hit 1000 crore GROSS Worldwide box office in ten days. The film had gone past the Worldwide record of PK at 743 crore a few days back. Dangal was 718 crore Worldwide but now with its China run it can go over 900 crore but its not catching Bahubali - The Conclusion.'''<br/>

second source:<br/>

http://www.boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=2904<br/>

text here '''Bahubali 2 - The Conclusion which has smashed all box office records has also taken the Worldwide crown in just six days. The film has gone past the Worldwide record of PK at 743 crore with business close to 800 crore. Dangal was 718 crore Worldwide. PK at 743 crore and Dangal at 702 crore. '''<br/>

PK was released in Hindi only <br/>

The worldwide gross should be changed from 792 to 743 --[[User:Rashkeqamar|Rashkeqamar]] ([[User talk:Rashkeqamar|talk]]) 14:07, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

:{{ping|Rashkeqamar}} And your explanation for why we should ignore the two reliable sources that are already present in the article[http://www.ibtimes.co.in/worldwide-box-office-collection-salmans-sultan-set-beat-baahubali-dhoom-3-global-earnings-687525][http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/salman-khans-sultan-earns-rs-500-crore-at-international-box-office-2923539/], delete the 792 crore value and replace it with the lower 743 value is what, exactly? Is it that BoxOfficeIndia's estimates are more in line with your personal point of view, and so we should change the data to adhere to your perspective and ignore all other points of view? The entirety of Indian film financials are based on estimates, so there is no singular authority that anyone can describe as scientifically precise. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

:: {{ping|Cyphoidbomb}}, In Overseas Gross of Indian Films including Hindi,Telugu ,Tamil films the data is consistent, but only in case of domestic gross in India(due to entertainment tax and also due to producers' stating more collection at times), the gross collection vary 3-10 crores range. The sites which you mentioned, ibtimes and indianexpress are ''NOT'' trade websites, they quote data from trade websites, like Boxofficeindia.com like TimesofIndia do , as here<br/>

::http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/box-office/baahubali-2-the-conclusion-worldwide-box-office-collection-day-10-film-creates-history-by-crossing-1000-crore-mark/articleshow/58571727.cms<br/>

::So, the data should be taken from a trade website who deals with collection from every territory and quote its figure on its site consistently. In this case, Boxofficeindia.com is site which gives data for '''Hindi films and Hindi-Dubbed films''' . it is much better than Bollywood Hungama, which is not quoting regional collections and takes data from producers. so Boxofficeindia.com should be given priority. there was data differences 3-4 years back in Krrish 3 collections when producers exaggered the worldwide figures of film by 60 crores from actual {{INR}} 187 crores to {{INR}} 255 crores.--[[User:Rashkeqamar|Rashkeqamar]] ([[User talk:Rashkeqamar|talk]]) 14:30, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

:::{{ping|Rashkeqamar}} Your proposal to prioritize BOI over all others would require consensus agreement from members of [[WP:ICTF|the Indian cinema task force]] at Wikipedia, since reliable sources are generally considered reliable until there is some reason to not consider them reliable. The proposition to give one site more weight than another in a matter of ''opinion'', seems to be in conflict with [[WP:UNDUE]]. Now if you were proposing that the data should be presented in the form of a ''range'' (ex: 743–792 crore) that would be doable. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

== Formatting of the lists ==

After looking at [[List of highest-grossing films]](which is a featured list), it seems like there are several areas where this list can be improved. For example, it seems useless to mention the Producer/production house of the movie as that information only obfuscates what the reader is actually looking for(that is not done on the featured list as well). Hoping for a fruitful discussion. I put this on the top because I felt that this would be a massive change to the article. Thank you. [[User:Aravindreddy96|Aravindreddy96]] ([[User talk:Aravindreddy96|talk]]) 16:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Aravindreddy96}}, thank you for opening a discussion. I've moved your comment to the bottom, because that's where editors expect to see new discussions. One glaring difference between this article and [[List of highest-grossing films]] is that at the featured list article, virtually all of the films are in English. Previous discussions at this article seem to prefer the inclusion of languages for one reason or another. Though some are motivated by a desire to have their ethnic film industry receive "credit", I think there is merit in knowing which languages are more likely to gross more money. It tells an interesting story when a film like Baahubali, which was filmed in Telugu and Tamil, dominates an industry where Hindi is the primary breadwinner. I'll let others weigh in on whether or not Studio and Director belong in the table. I think there's probably more value in including director than studio. Given how inherently unreliable Indian film financial data is, it is dubious that this list will ever achieve any of our quality benchmarks. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

:: {{ping|Cyphoidbomb}} Although I agree with you that there is merit in knowing about which languages gross more money in the Indian cinema, the question here is whether or not that offsets the degradation of the article by obfuscating more important data(i.e the rank of the movie and the total gross). I genuinely feel that the list would look much cleaner without the language column. Although your point about Baahubali is correct, this is a rare exception rather than the norm. [[User:Aravindreddy96|Aravindreddy96]] ([[User talk:Aravindreddy96|talk]]) 17:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

::: Well, your response seems to be predicated on an unfounded position that the article is both degraded and obfuscated by the inclusion of language, which I don't think it is. I'm not aware of any regular editors or casual readers complaining about the complexity of the data. In fact, one editor wants to ''increase'' the data in these tables by adding inflation adjustments. An aesthetics argument should probably be based on previous complaints, rather than an arbitrary drive to conform this list to another. Though I do understand the argument for uniformity, Indian cinema has demonstrated that it is different than western cinema. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 04:15, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

== The Great Father final discussion ==

All the people interested in changing [[The Great Father]]'s discussion, please read this. Some of you include - {{ping|Anupmenon0007}}, {{ping|Abbas.j63}}, {{ping|Abi rockzz}}, {{ping|Imthiyaz07}}, {{ping|Muhammed.suhail}}, {{ping|5ana1234}} among other newbies who have formed accounts to update The Great Father's figures. Here are some information for you :

* {{ping|Cyphoidbomb}} is the admin who generally patrols pages about Indian Movies.

* We only accept [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] as references for movies. For Indian movies the agreed sources include those listed in [[WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources]]. We may accept sources not listed there, though that is not usually done. So that rules out sites like kboupdates, mollywoodtimes, filmfaktory etc.

* We do not accept [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]] as references. So that rules out facebook pages of actors/producers/directors etc. However we may also not accept the figures if we are presented a news report from reliable sources where the source for the information is explicitly mentioned to have come from such people (actors/producers/directors) etc.

Now let us look at the references we have for the 50 crore figure, which we all know is not correct (the details are mentioned in [[Talk:The Great Father]]). However what you or I know is immaterial as we only look at sources and usually add the figures presented, if they meet the criteria :

* http://www.manoramanews.com/news/entertainment/2017/04/23/mammootty-move-to-50-crore-club.html - Malayala Manorama is a reliable source. However in the 2nd line of the reference it is clearly mentioned that the information was released by the Producers failing our criteria for [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]]. Some people had a doubt that why was [[Munthirivallikal Thalirkkumbol]] allowed to use a reference from Manorama. Hopefully this answers that.

* The other reference is form The News Minute - http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/mammootty-s-great-father-biggest-hit-2017-so-far-60966. [[The News Minute]] is not considered a reliable sources and is not included in the list above. We generally don't accept references from newspapers with a workforce of 12 people. And even if we are tempted to do so, the article itself mentions that the content is sourced from Digital Native. Searching for Digital Native does not provide any proper hits. So when we don't trust The News Minute itself, how can we trust Digital Native (which is the original source) which nobody has heard of. Anyway I won't be reverting The News Minute edits and will leave that for Cyphoidbomb to decide, as this information is available in English.

And since you are all here, let me also take this opportunity to provide some suggestions. Mammootty's movies have very bad Wikipedia pages because fans like you are not interested in adding good information but are only interested in adding bloated figures. See how well the pages of Mohanlal's new movies are written and how informative they are- [[Munthirivallikal Thalirkkumbol]], [[Pulimurugan]], [[Oppam]]. Even his flop movies like [[1971: Beyond Borders]], [[Kanal (2015 film)]], [[Loham]] and [[Peruchazhi]] have long informative articles. And now take a look at [[The Great Father]], [[Thoppil Joppan]], [[Puthan Panam]] , [[White (2016 film)]] and [[Utopiayile Rajavu]] all of which are small uninformative articles which do not even have a plot (story) section.

If the time you spend in fighting for improving The Great Father's box office figures can be used for writing the plot for the movie, you would have done something worthwhile at that. Even if you add the 50 crore figure now, almost every reader knows that the numbers are fake and it will not have any impact. But if you improve articles of Mammootty's movies, it will have an impact on every reader. Cheers. And thanks for reading the long post. Do not form any more new sections and if you have to say anything comment below. [[User:Jupitus Smart|<b><span style="color:#f45342;">Jupitus</span> <span style="color:#05ad83"><i>Smart</i></span></b>]] 18:05, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

==Need Years wise Currency Conversion in Highest-grossing films by year ==

I suggest adding a Currency conversion of year collections to present date so that it will easy for viewers to compare and view to data easily.

e.g. Collection of 18Cr(1990) in present date approx {{INRConvert|18|c|year=1990}} Sanjan Kumar Patel 19:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

*'''Comment''': Consensus could be construed to already exist [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force/Archive_6#PROPOSAL:_The_INRConvert_template_should_be_cut_from_various_list_articles here] for the ''full removal'' of INRConvert templates from this article, and another discussion about INRConvert in general can be found [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force/Archive_5#Use_of_.7B.7BINRConvert.7D.7D_in_infobox here]. The prevailing attitude toward INRConvert seems to be that we are arbitrarily converting Indian rupees to US dollars, which promotes pro-US bias. Why not Euros? Why not Yuan? 2) The use of the default INRConvert template is problematic for older films, because by default the template converts a number to the present-day equivalent of Rupees and US Dollars. 3) The inflation adjustment switch helps even the data out, but we're still presenting US values. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 02:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

:{{ping|Cyphoidbomb}} Agree with your point about why we only convert the INR to USD. Actually, my point is that we should convert the collection value to an approx collection(exact is impossible) value in present date.

i.e. ₹18 crore in 1990 is (equivalent to ₹124 crore in 2017) so is there any template exist which will do this only show equivalent INR value. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sanjanind|Sanjanind]] ([[User talk:Sanjanind#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sanjanind|contribs]]) 04:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)</small>

::{{Ping|Sanjanind}} '''Please sign your posts using four tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>'''. If you're having trouble finding the tilde key on your keyboard, click the pen and signature icon at the top of the edit window. Or click the four tildes that appear at the bottom of the edit window to insert the tildes at the end of your comment. Note that this is a requirement. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:01, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 9 May 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=y}}

Please Change

Baahubali 2 : The Conclusion - languages to Telugu,Tamil to Telugu, Tamil and Hindi

and same holds true for

Baahubali: The Beginning - languages to Telugu,Tamil to Telugu, Tamil and Hindi

Because Both movies were released in Hindi as well, and has also contributed significant share in amount.

Reference

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/box-office/baahubali-2-the-conclusion-box-office-collection-day-10-films-hindi-version-surpasses-500-crore-mark-worldwide/articleshow/58572333.cms [[User:Mohitsharmaniit11|Mohitsharmaniit11]] ([[User talk:Mohitsharmaniit11|talk]]) 06:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:EEp --> ''Bahubali'' and ''Bahubali 2'' are two cinematic parts simultaneously shot only in [[Telugu language|Telugu]] and [[Tamil language|Tamil]]. They were released in Hindi as dubbed versions. regards, [[User:DRAGON BOOSTER|<span style="color:blue;size=2">DRAGON BOOSTER</span>]][[User talk:DRAGON BOOSTER|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2"> ★</span>]] 07:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC).

== Semi-protected edit request on 9 May 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

The language for Bahubali 1 and 2 is Telegu AND Tamil [[User:Lebroned|Lebroned]] ([[User talk:Lebroned|talk]]) 06:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

:[[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:DRAGON BOOSTER|<span style="color:blue;size=2">DRAGON BOOSTER</span>]][[User talk:DRAGON BOOSTER|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2"> ★</span>]] 07:28, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

== Franchise ==

We must focus on some development in the franchise screen it shows a lot of movies still running and appears as Baahubali beginning is still running . How to clear those green colored cells.. And we must include dollar alongside according to me..

[[User:Nabeelgm|'''^∞'''😃 '''''Nabeelgm''''' 😃'''^∞''']][[User_talk:Nabeelgm|(Talk)]]

*[[User:Nabeelgm|Nabeelgm]] ([[User talk:Nabeelgm#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nabeelgm|contribs]])

Nabeel Gm 08:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC) Nabeel Gm 08:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 9 May 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Please remove Baahubali from 'Highest Grossing Tamil films' section. Both Baahubali part 1 and 2 are Telugu films. [[User:Nani4215|Nani4215]] ([[User talk:Nani4215|talk]]) 09:40, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> Baahubali was filmed in Tamil, and thus, it is a Tamil-language film. You seem to be focused on ''industry'', which is beyond the scope of what this article is intended to track. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

== Comment by Akhil Manne ==

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C_XicQAXoAMobSc.jpg

this is link of highest grossing movies in kanndada official by Karnataka film chamber

update it sir please

rajakumaraa first Kannada movie to gross 50 crores for first time in Kannada industry <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Akhil Manne|Akhil Manne]] ([[User talk:Akhil Manne#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Akhil Manne|contribs]]) 15:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)</small>

:{{ping|Akhil Manne}} I assume your request is that we indicate Rajakumaraa (or however it's spelled) be ascribed a gross of 46 crore? Also, the reference you cited doesn't contain a date, so that makes it hard to format a proper citation. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:50, 9 May 2017 (UTC)