Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films/Archive 9) (bot
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films/Archive 15) (bot
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talk header}}
{{Skip to TOC}}
{{talk header|archive_age=30|minthreadsleft=3|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{Indian English}}
{{Indian English}}
{{oldafdfull| date = 20 December 2011
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes|1=
(UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = List of highest-grossing Indian films in india }}
{{WikiProject India |class=list |importance=mid |cinema=yes |cinema-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Business|class=list|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=List|listas=Highest-Grossing Indian Films, List Of|1=
{{WikiProject Film|class=list|Indian=yes|listas=Highest-Grossing Indian Films, List Of}}
{{WikiProject India |importance=mid |cinema=yes |cinema-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Business|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Film|Indian=yes}}
{{WikiProject Lists|class=list|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Lists|class=list|importance=mid}}
}}
{{banner shell|collapsed=yes|
{{merged-from|Bollywood highest grossing films by month|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}
{{merged-from|Bollywood highest grossing films by month|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}
{{merged-from|List of Bollywood highest-grossing films in overseas markets|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}
{{merged-from|List of Bollywood highest-grossing films in overseas markets|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}
{{merged-from|List of top grossing Marathi films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}
{{merged-from|List of top grossing Marathi films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}
{{copied|from=Bollywood|from_oldid =670957198|to=List of highest-grossing Indian films||to_diff=672526653|diff=https://myarticlelibrary4u.blogspot.com/2019/09/uk-box-office-it-chapter-two-at-top.htmltitle=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&type=revision&diff=672526653&oldid=672526378|date=July 21, 2015}}
{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tamil films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}
{{Top 25 Report|Dec 28 2014 (21st)|Jan 4 2015 (21st)|Jul 19 2015 (23rd)|Jul 26 2015 (6th)|Jul 24 2016 (23rd)|Jan 1 2017 (20th)|Jan 8 2017 (17th)|Apr 30 2017 (3rd)|May 7 2017 (3rd)|May 14 2017 (5th)|May 21 2017 (6th)|May 28 2017 (8th)|Dec 2 2018 (25th)|Dec 9 2018 (14th)|Dec 23 2018 (24th)|Apr 3 2022|until|May 15 2022|Jan 29, 2023 (10th)|Dec 31, 2023 (22nd)|ranks=yes}}
{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Telugu films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}
{{Annual report|[[Wikipedia:2017 Top 50 Report|2017]], [[Wikipedia:2022 Top 50 Report|2022]], and [[Wikipedia:2023 Top 50 Report|2023]]}}
{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Punjabi films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}
{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Telugu films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}
{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tamil films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}
{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Bollywood films|talk=no|date=26 July 2015}}
{{copied|from=Bollywood|from_oldid =670957198|to=List of highest-grossing Indian films||to_diff=672526653|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&type=revision&diff=672526653&oldid=672526378|date=July 21, 2015}}
}}
}}
{{oldafdfull| date = 20 December 2012 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = List of highest-grossing Indian films worldwide }}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(30d)
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
| archive = Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films/Archive %(counter)d
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|counter = 9
| counter = 15
| maxarchivesize = 150K
|minthreadsleft = 3
| archiveheader = {{Aan}}
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(14d)
| minthreadsleft = 3
|archive = Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}
{{section sizes}}
{{Annual readership}}


== Remove the languages of Hindi and Tamil for RRR in Global gross figures ==
== Highest Grossing Movies in Kannada ==

Respected Sir,
According to recent news statement published in International Business Times, Kirik Party has grossed 45 crores and is nearing to 50 crores. I request you to kindly update the page with correct information. Necessary link related to news statement has been attached with this request.

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/rakshit-shettys-kirik-party-inches-closer-rs-50-crore-mark-box-office-75-days-719391

Thank u <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Shrinayakwiki|Shrinayakwiki]] ([[User talk:Shrinayakwiki#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Shrinayakwiki|contribs]]) 03:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Respected sir,
According to Kannada box office and several news articles recently hebbuli movie has crossed the gross of 50 crores so I would like u to edit the info [[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 01:45, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
:You will need to provide solid references. Before you respond, see [[WP:RS]], and more specifically, [[WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources]] to get a better idea for what sources are and are not considered reliable. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 03:30, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

::Sir i am requesting u just pluck off raajakumara which has no official declarations on collection but u still included it please understand we ade getting betrayed
::[[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 16:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Suraj Sudeep}} I don't know what you mean by "official declarations", since 1) we don't use [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]] as definitive sources of controversial information like finances, since a director/producer/actor/distrubutor/etc. would have every reason to inflate their "official" values and 2) There is no such thing as "official" film financial data in Indian cinema. Everything is an estimate. So whatever point you are trying to make is unclear, and the lack of references doesn't shed a whole lot of light on the matter. Regards, [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 05:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

::::Sir you have changed the collection of Kannada movie maanikya but in the Wikipedia page of the movie maanikya it is stated with source that it has earned 43.5 crores so I would like you to change the same accordingly [[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 12:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|Suraj Sudeep}} - I believe you're referring to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&diff=774583884&oldid=774565246 this edit], which was made by user Tevar shaa, not by me. To answer your question, when we consider a film's gross, we're talking ''only'' about money made at the box office. We're not interested in secondary revenue streams like satellite rights sales, music rights sales, etc. The 43.5 crore value at [[Maanikya]] was erroneously including these values and has been fixed in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maanikya&diff=774585301&oldid=774584612 this edit]. According to [https://web.archive.org/web/20140809224553/http://www.indiaglitz.com/-nbsp-nbsp-read-full-story-raquo--hindi-news-111652 Indiaglitz], the film grossed about 35 crore rupees. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 12:53, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

::::::Ok sir then u have the proof for hebbuli to cross 50 crores but why haven't u updated yet
::::::http://m.dailyhunt.in/news/india/kannada/filmibeat+kannada-epaper-filmikan/syaandal+vud+na+aal+taim+rekaard+udis+maadidha+hebbuli-newsid-65099533?ss=wsp&s= [[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 17:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
:::::::I've never heard of dailyhunt.in and don't see it as an approved source at [[WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources]]. However, if the content is being derived from Filmibeat, which the logo on the page would seem to suggest, I'd be averse to using this source as a reference, since Filmibeat is expressly indicated as an unreliable source. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 17:06, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Sir i still have another proof for hebbuli crossing 50 crores
http://uk.blastingnews.com/entertainment/2017/03/hebbuli-2-weeks-14-days-collection-in-karnataka-till-date-001531701.html [[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 14:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello bro last year blockbuster mukunda murari has completed a gross of 50 crores as stated in your wikipedia page so please change [[User:Suraj Sudeep|Suraj Sudeep]] ([[User talk:Suraj Sudeep|talk]]) 05:24, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|Suraj Sudeep}} You mean the unexplained, unsourced addition that was made in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mukunda_Murari&type=revision&diff=776211755&oldid=773397407 this edit]? I don't think so. Please bring reliable sources to the talk page if you want other editors to consider changes. See [[WP:ICTF#Guideliens on sources]] for examples of what are and are not suitable for inclusion. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}
=== '''[http://www.ibtimes.co.in/baahubali-bahubali-lifetime-box-office-collection-prabhas-starrer-earns-rs-302-crore-its-649645 Baahubali box office collection 586.45]''' ===

'''Information given in wikipedia about baahubali box office is wrong.'''

'''1 ibtimes.co.in''' After becoming the third biggest grosser, "Sultan" was expected to beat the lifetime box office collection record of "Baahubali: The Beginning," which earned Rs. 586.45 crore.[ http://www.ibtimes.co.in/worldwide-box-office-collection-will-salmans-sultan-beat-record-baahubali-cross-rs-300-688803 ]

'''2 ibtimes.co.in''' The top three grossers include Aamir Khan's "PK" with Rs. 792 crore gross income, Salman's "Bajrangi Bhaijaan" with Rs. 626 crore and "Baahubali: The Beginning" with Rs. 586.45 crore. [ http://www.ibtimes.co.in/worldwide-box-office-collection-sultan-grosses-rs-550-crore-salmans-film-needs-rs-33-crore-687892 ]

'''3 ibtimes.co.in''' http://www.ibtimes.co.in/worldwide-box-office-collection-salmans-sultan-set-beat-baahubali-dhoom-3-global-earnings-687525

'''4 ibtimes.co.in''' http://www.ibtimes.co.in/baahubali-bahubali-lifetime-box-office-collection-prabhas-starrer-earns-rs-302-crore-its-649645

'''5 From Forbes''' https://www.forbes.com/sites/robcain/2015/07/23/baahubali-catapults-toward-all-time-record-indian-gross/#593eb52953cf

'''6 india.com''' http://www.india.com/showbiz/salman-khans-bajrangi-bhaijaan-vs-prabhas-baahubali-collections-who-won-race-at-box-office-498206

'''7 indianexpress.com''' http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/telugu/baahubali-2-vs-baahubali-1-what-box-office-holds-for-ss-rajamouli-monster-what-box-office-holds-for-ss-rajamouli-monster-4603035


[[User:Kiranrajanna|Kiranrajanna]] ([[User talk:Kiranrajanna|talk]]) 06:32, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|Kiranrajanna}} It's unclear what specifically you are proposing. But to address your references above:
:# IBT - 3 August 2016 - yes, source says 586.45
:# IBT - 26 July 2016 - yes, source says 586.45
:# IBT - 22 July 2016 - yes, source says 586.45
:# IBT - 8 October 2015 - yes, source says 586.45. Value attributed to Andhra Box Office, a blog. We don't typically use content sourced to blogs per [[WP:UGC]]. This calls into question the other identical values.
:# Forbes - 23 July 2015 - source says 375 crore. What purpose does this reference serve?
:# India.com - 11 August 2015 - source says 545 crore, which is not consistent with the 586.45 claim. What do we do with this data?
:# IndianExpress.com - 8 April 2017 - Unclear what this says, exactly, or why you've included it. Says "The film collected Rs 500 crore gross income at the worldwide box office that includes tax and exhibitor’s share." Obviously the guy making this statement doesn't know what "gross" means if he's subtracting tax and exhibitor's share from it. Not particularly helpful, as we can't identify what this guy thinks the film's raw gross actually was.
:So what exactly are you proposing here? Remove the 650 crore total entirely? Present the value as a range of 586.45–650 crore? Are you saying that 650 crore is a mistake? What do we do about [http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-box-office-collection-rajinikanth-starrer-fails-beat-5-records-baahubali-bahubali-689445#T1OcM8imq1iJpdhE.97 this reference] from 9 August 2016, which says unambiguously that ""Baahubali - the Beginning" has grossed over Rs 650 crore at the worldwide box office in its life time"? Where did this value come from? [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


My request is to change 650cr to 586.45cr.. because 650cr not have clear details compare to 586.45.

'''1. IBT is reliable sources from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ICTF#Guidelines_on_sources]'''

'''2. IBT is reliable sources from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ICTF#Guidelines_on_sources]'''

'''3. IBT is reliable sources from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ICTF#Guidelines_on_sources]'''

'''4. IBT is reliable sources from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ICTF#Guidelines_on_sources]'''

'''5. Forbes is very reputed website in world it mention as $70 million so far. means not even equal to 600cr, intention of sharing this information is to tell you its not earn 650cr.'''

'''6. India.com, i agree with you that its not a reliable sources according to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ICTF#Guidelines_on_sources] but No website as told it crossed 600cr.'''
'''7. IndianExpress.com Sorry for this Information.'''

'''8. my proposal is remove 650cr and make as 586.45cr.'''

'''9. About this link [http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-box-office-collection-rajinikanth-starrer-fails-beat-5-records-baahubali-bahubali-689445#T1OcM8imq1iJpdhE.97] not clearly mention about how 650cr collected.'''
<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kiranrajanna|Kiranrajanna]] ([[User talk:Kiranrajanna#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kiranrajanna|contribs]]) </small>
:{{ping|Kiranrajanna}} Please sign your posts with four tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. This will append a signature and a time stamp to the end of your posts. In regard to the above, I still don't understand what the point of the Forbes source was and it seems to greatly conflict with the first few IBT sources, since it claims a 375 crore gross when the IBT source from the day before was claiming 586.45. But beyond that, there are vast numbers of sources that support 650 crore.
:*[http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/baahubali-2-marketing-ss-rajamouli-prabhas-rana-daggubati/1/926989.html IndiaToday - 12 April 2017]
:*[http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-box-office-baahubali-2-vs-robot-20-why-the-akshay-kumar-rajinikanth-starrer-can-t-beat-ss-rajamouli-s-war-saga-any-more-2393934 DNA - 10 April 2017]
:*[http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/producer-to-rope-in-top-brands-for-bahubali-2-117032900831_1.html Business Standard - 1 April 2017]
:*[http://www.deccanchronicle.com/entertainment/bollywood/180317/baahubali-2-will-see-a-historic-run-at-bo-karan-johar.html Deccan Chronicle - 18 March 2017]
:*[http://www.firstpost.com/entertainment/baahubali-2-the-conclusion-five-things-to-expect-from-ss-rajamoulis-magnum-opus-3355588.html Firstpost - 28 March 2017]
:*[http://www.hindustantimes.com/regional-movies/baahubali-2-makers-to-re-release-baahubali-the-beginning-before-part-2-is-out/story-Z37zCD8x584XJGJZlFSWLO.html Hindustan Times - 17 March 2017]
:*[http://movies.ndtv.com/regional/baahubali-how-prabhas-physique-fluctuated-for-4-years-1671428 NDTV - 20 March 2017]
:*[http://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/Baahubali-director-SS-Rajamouli-to-kick-off-a-trilogy-based-on-the-Mahabharata/articleshow/56486116.cms Mumbai Mirror - 12 January 2017]
:*[http://www.ibtimes.co.in/baahubali-2-pre-release-business-ap-t-us-karnataka-rights-bahubali-conclusion-sold-rs-200-700311 IBT again - 19 October 2016]
:*[http://www.ibtimes.co.in/dangal-worldwide-box-office-collection-aamir-khan-starrer-beats-baahubalis-lifetime-record-711577 IBT again - 10 January 2017].
:With the preponderance of the sources seemingly in support of 650 crore, and with no clear explanation for your perceived discrepancy, it would be very controversial and imprudent to arbitrarily drop the number to 586.45. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 10:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

== Film ranking revisited ==

Hi {{u|Betty Logan|Betty}}, I'm not sure if you recall [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films/Archive_9#Odd_numbering this discussion], where a few of y'all proposed an ordering scheme for films that have the same gross values. Is there any chance you might be able to find time to implement those changes? I'm only bothering you with it because my table formatting skills are really subpar and I'm afraid I'll break something, and I seem to recall that you're quite skilled with tables and such. Also, some of the rows have fancy formatting that indicates which films are still in theatres and that just confuses the crap out of me. The preferred numbering scheme went:

:1) Film 1
:2) Film 2
:3) Film 3
:4) Film 4
:5) Film 5, Film 6, Film 7
:8) Film 8
:9) Film 9
:10) Film 10

Thanks in advance, but if you can't/don't want to do it, I'll understand! I could always get help at VPT. {{P}} [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Had to reformat the above, so I'm pinging {{u|Betty Logan|Betty}} again. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:03, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

== List of highest grossing Malayalam films ==


In the Global gross figures, language of RRR is shown as Hindi, Tamil, Telugu. RRR is shot only in Telugu language and dubbed into Hindi, Kannada, Tamil and Malayalam languages. So, please remove Hindi and Tamil from the list.
To whomsoever it may concern,


== Please update official RRR box office figures in the range of 1000 - 1200 crore ==
Ezra had entered 50 cr club. Official facebook page of the movie confirm this. Moreover other media also reported this.
Sources are cited below. Please do necessary updations.
http://www.catchnews.com/regional-cinema/ezra-prithviraj-starrer-emerges-8th-rs-50-crore-grosser-of-malayalam-cinema-57679.html
http://www.filmibeat.com/malayalam/news/2017/ezra-box-office-final-collections-enters-50-crore-club-258553.html
https://www.facebook.com/EzraMovie/?hc_ref=PAGES_TIMELINE&fref=nf


Please update RRR box office collection to 1000 - 1450 crore as per latest sources collected.
Thank you. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:TOKOMOBO12345|TOKOMOBO12345]] ([[User talk:TOKOMOBO12345#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TOKOMOBO12345|contribs]]) 14:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/trends/story/rrr-beats-aamir-khans-3-idiots-to-become-third-highest-grossing-indian-film-in-japan-352209-2022-11-08/
==Katamarayudu Telugu movie box office==
Business Today reported 1000+ crore
{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}
Here is the reliable source for the box office collection of the movie.
http://www.ibtimes.co.in/katamarayudu-10-days-total-box-office-collection-pawan-kalyan-churns-out-another-flop-after-sgs-721838 [[Special:Contributions/5.156.212.245|5.156.212.245]] ([[User talk:5.156.212.245|talk]]) 05:44, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
:[[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> There's already a presumably reliable source cited in the article that presents a 10-day gross of 125 crore. It would seem academically dishonest to switch out one reliable estimate for another reliable estimate, so I have presented the content in the form of a range, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&type=revision&diff=775673612&oldid=775221848 here]. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 11:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC)


https://www.ibtimes.co.in/rrr-worldwide-box-office-collection-here-lifetime-business-made-by-ss-rajamoulis-flick-850820/
== The great father collected above 50 cr ==
IB Times mentioned the final collection to be ₹1125.9 crore.


https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/box-office/rrr-final-worldwide-box-office-collections-closes-run-900-crores-india-and-1100-crores-worldwide-1143834
Why this page cant upload malayalam movie collection updates
Check the collection about that film.
Pinkvilla stated the collection to be 1111 crore
The great father fastest 50 cr+ collection world wide....and also it running successfully in gulf countries and india
Check the updates admin [[User:Muhaismuhammed|Muhaismuhammed]] ([[User talk:Muhaismuhammed|talk]]) 15:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|Muhaismuhammed}} Complaining without bringing references doesn't get the data updated any faster. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|Muhaismuhammed}} Oh, and I just remembered that a lot of the early financial data was coming from the filmmakers, which I believe is why some editors opted not to include the data. Filmmakers are considered [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]], and we don't typically use primary sources for controversial claims like for finances. A producer/director/actor would have every reason to inflate their box office figures. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
::Abbas:http://www.filmibeat.com/malayalam/news/2017/the-great-father-box-office-enters-50-crore-club-259046.html <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Abbas.j63|Abbas.j63]] ([[User talk:Abbas.j63#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Abbas.j63|contribs]]) 04:31, 20 April 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::{{ping|Abbas.j63}} Filmibeat is not generally considered a reliable source by the Indian cinema task force at Wikipedia. Please find mainstream news sites that support the figures. See [[WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources]] for examples of sources that are and are not generally considered reliable. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 04:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)


https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/gangubai-kathiawadi-rrr-netflix-viewership-indian-films-7960117/
== Great father malayalam ==


https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/telugu-cinema/rrr-is-second-best-film-at-hollywood-critics-association-awards-2022-101656779034501.html
Crossed 50 crore mark and it is not added here [[User:Abbas.j63|Abbas.j63]] ([[User talk:Abbas.j63|talk]]) 04:26, 20 April 2017 (UTC)


https://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment-news/box-office-report-card-first-half-2022-bhool-bhulaiyaa-2-to-gangubai-kathiawadi-heres-a-look-at-how-indian-films-fared-bollywood-news-entertainment-news-article-92619214
@abbas.j63 :
http://www.filmibeat.com/malayalam/news/2017/the-great-father-box-office-enters-50-crore-club-259046.html
[[User:Abbas.j63|Abbas.j63]] ([[User talk:Abbas.j63|talk]]) 04:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
:You posted this twice. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 04:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)


https://www.news18.com/news/movies/rrr-to-tiger-zinda-hai-list-of-most-expensive-indian-films-and-how-they-fared-5941465.html
== Semi-protected edit request on 22 April 2017 ==


While Indian express, Hindustan Times, Times Now, news18 claimed the collection to be 1200 crore.
{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}
Please include The Great Father in the highest grossing Malayalam film section. 'The Great Father Box Office: Enters 50-Crore Club!'


==REMOVE TAMIL FROM BABUBALI2 LANGUAGE IT WAS FIRST DRIECTED IN TELUGU ==
Read more at: http://www.filmibeat.com/malayalam/news/2017/the-great-father-box-office-enters-50-crore-club-259046.html [[User:Sunnyjos|Sunnyjos]] ([[User talk:Sunnyjos|talk]]) 19:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> {{ping|Sunnyjos}} Filmibeat is not generally considered a reliable source for financial data. Please see [[WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources]] for examples of sources that are and are not generally considered reliable. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 20:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)


Change the Bahubali 2 language to only Telugu, not Tamil as it was first directed in Telugu and later on dubbed into multiple languages
== New comment by Prem LS ==
already rajkumaras film declard his gross box office collection in wikipedia page premls 07:44, 23 April 2017 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Prem LS|Prem LS]] ([[User talk:Prem LS#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Prem LS|contribs]]) </small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:{{ping|Prem LS}} - {{not done}} - 1) We don't use [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]] for box office claims. Producers/directors/actors would have every reason to inflate their financial figures. 2) Edit requests should be accompanied by reliable sources. See [[WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources]], but again, see point #1, as primary sources should not be used. 3) New comments go at the bottom of talk pages. I have moved your comment for you. Please sign your posts with four tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. Thank you. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 09:09, 23 April 2017 (UTC)


== IN Highest-grossing films by language Section ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2017 ==


{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}
IN the Highest-grossing films by language Section
kindly remove Bahubali 1 and Bahubali 2 from the Tamil section
[[User:Vathanlal|Vathanlal]] ([[User talk:Vathanlal|talk]]) 09:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
what is wrong with you???? It was first directed in Telugu language only kindly remove it and remove the language of Tamil from Bahubali 2
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.<!-- Template:ESp --> {{ping|Vathanlal}} Your edit request was blank. No idea what change you're requesting. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 10:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
later on, it was dubbed Understand that stop spoiling the originality of the film

Revision as of 19:04, 20 May 2024

Remove the languages of Hindi and Tamil for RRR in Global gross figures

In the Global gross figures, language of RRR is shown as Hindi, Tamil, Telugu. RRR is shot only in Telugu language and dubbed into Hindi, Kannada, Tamil and Malayalam languages. So, please remove Hindi and Tamil from the list.

Please update official RRR box office figures in the range of 1000 - 1200 crore

Please update RRR box office collection to 1000 - 1450 crore as per latest sources collected.

https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/trends/story/rrr-beats-aamir-khans-3-idiots-to-become-third-highest-grossing-indian-film-in-japan-352209-2022-11-08/ Business Today reported 1000+ crore

https://www.ibtimes.co.in/rrr-worldwide-box-office-collection-here-lifetime-business-made-by-ss-rajamoulis-flick-850820/ IB Times mentioned the final collection to be ₹1125.9 crore.

https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/box-office/rrr-final-worldwide-box-office-collections-closes-run-900-crores-india-and-1100-crores-worldwide-1143834 Pinkvilla stated the collection to be 1111 crore

https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/gangubai-kathiawadi-rrr-netflix-viewership-indian-films-7960117/

https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/telugu-cinema/rrr-is-second-best-film-at-hollywood-critics-association-awards-2022-101656779034501.html

https://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment-news/box-office-report-card-first-half-2022-bhool-bhulaiyaa-2-to-gangubai-kathiawadi-heres-a-look-at-how-indian-films-fared-bollywood-news-entertainment-news-article-92619214

https://www.news18.com/news/movies/rrr-to-tiger-zinda-hai-list-of-most-expensive-indian-films-and-how-they-fared-5941465.html

While Indian express, Hindustan Times, Times Now, news18 claimed the collection to be 1200 crore.

REMOVE TAMIL FROM BABUBALI2 LANGUAGE IT WAS FIRST DRIECTED IN TELUGU

Change the Bahubali 2 language to only Telugu, not Tamil as it was first directed in Telugu and later on dubbed into multiple languages

IN Highest-grossing films by language Section

IN the Highest-grossing films by language Section kindly remove Bahubali 1 and Bahubali 2 from the Tamil section what is wrong with you???? It was first directed in Telugu language only kindly remove it and remove the language of Tamil from Bahubali 2 later on, it was dubbed Understand that stop spoiling the originality of the film

Leave a Reply