Content deleted Content added
DarpSinghh (talk | contribs) |
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films/Archive 15) (bot |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Skip to TOC}} |
||
{{talk header|archive_age=30|minthreadsleft=3|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|||
{{Indian English}} |
{{Indian English}} |
||
{{oldafdfull| date = 20 December 2011 |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes|1= |
|||
(UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = List of highest-grossing Indian films in india }} |
|||
{{WikiProject India |class=list |importance=mid |cinema=yes |cinema-importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=List|listas=Highest-Grossing Indian Films, List Of|1= |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject India |importance=mid |cinema=yes |cinema-importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Business|importance=mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Film|Indian=yes}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Lists|class=list|importance=mid}} |
{{WikiProject Lists|class=list|importance=mid}} |
||
}} |
|||
{{banner shell|collapsed=yes| |
|||
{{merged-from|Bollywood highest grossing films by month|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}} |
{{merged-from|Bollywood highest grossing films by month|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}} |
||
{{merged-from|List of Bollywood highest-grossing films in overseas markets|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}} |
{{merged-from|List of Bollywood highest-grossing films in overseas markets|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}} |
||
{{merged-from|List of top grossing Marathi films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}} |
{{merged-from|List of top grossing Marathi films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}} |
||
{{copied|from=Bollywood|from_oldid =670957198|to=List of highest-grossing Indian films||to_diff=672526653|diff=https://myarticlelibrary4u.blogspot.com/2019/09/uk-box-office-it-chapter-two-at-top.htmltitle=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&type=revision&diff=672526653&oldid=672526378|date=July 21, 2015}} |
|||
{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tamil films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}} |
|||
{{Top 25 Report|Dec 28 2014 (21st)|Jan 4 2015 (21st)|Jul 19 2015 (23rd)|Jul 26 2015 (6th)|Jul 24 2016 (23rd)|Jan 1 2017 (20th)|Jan 8 2017 (17th)|Apr 30 2017 (3rd)|May 7 2017 (3rd)|May 14 2017 (5th)|May 21 2017 (6th)|May 28 2017 (8th)|Dec 2 2018 (25th)|Dec 9 2018 (14th)|Dec 23 2018 (24th)|Apr 3 2022|until|May 15 2022|Jan 29, 2023 (10th)|Dec 31, 2023 (22nd)|ranks=yes}} |
|||
{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Telugu films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}} |
|||
{{Annual report|[[Wikipedia:2017 Top 50 Report|2017]], [[Wikipedia:2022 Top 50 Report|2022]], and [[Wikipedia:2023 Top 50 Report|2023]]}} |
|||
{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Punjabi films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}} |
|||
{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Telugu films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}} |
|||
{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tamil films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}} |
|||
{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Bollywood films|talk=no|date=26 July 2015}} |
|||
{{copied|from=Bollywood|from_oldid =670957198|to=List of highest-grossing Indian films||to_diff=672526653|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&type=revision&diff=672526653&oldid=672526378|date=July 21, 2015}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{oldafdfull| date = 20 December 2012 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = List of highest-grossing Indian films worldwide }} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
| algo = old(30d) |
|||
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |
|||
| archive = Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|||
|counter = |
| counter = 15 |
||
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
|||
|minthreadsleft = 3 |
|||
| archiveheader = {{Aan}} |
|||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|||
|algo = old(14d) |
|||
| minthreadsleft = 3 |
|||
|archive = Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{section sizes}} |
|||
{{Annual readership}} |
|||
== Remove the languages of Hindi and Tamil for RRR in Global gross figures == |
|||
In the Global gross figures, language of RRR is shown as Hindi, Tamil, Telugu. RRR is shot only in Telugu language and dubbed into Hindi, Kannada, Tamil and Malayalam languages. So, please remove Hindi and Tamil from the list. |
|||
== Please update official RRR box office figures in the range of 1000 - 1200 crore == |
|||
Please update RRR box office collection to 1000 - 1450 crore as per latest sources collected. |
|||
https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/trends/story/rrr-beats-aamir-khans-3-idiots-to-become-third-highest-grossing-indian-film-in-japan-352209-2022-11-08/ |
|||
Business Today reported 1000+ crore |
|||
https://www.ibtimes.co.in/rrr-worldwide-box-office-collection-here-lifetime-business-made-by-ss-rajamoulis-flick-850820/ |
|||
== Odd numbering == |
|||
IB Times mentioned the final collection to be ₹1125.9 crore. |
|||
https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/box-office/rrr-final-worldwide-box-office-collections-closes-run-900-crores-india-and-1100-crores-worldwide-1143834 |
|||
Unless there's some WikiProject Film-wide precedent to the contrary, I think it's a bad idea to give films with the same grosses ''unique'' rankings. For example, at Highest-grossing Kannada films, we have: |
|||
Pinkvilla stated the collection to be 1111 crore |
|||
https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/gangubai-kathiawadi-rrr-netflix-viewership-indian-films-7960117/ |
|||
{| style="margin:auto; margin:auto;" class="wikitable" |
|||
|+ |
|||
|- |
|||
! Rank |
|||
! Movie |
|||
! Year |
|||
! Director |
|||
! Studio(s) |
|||
! Worldwide gross |
|||
! Source |
|||
|- |
|||
|5 |
|||
| ''[[Sangolli Rayanna (film)|Krantiveera Sangolli Rayanna]]'' |
|||
| 2012 |
|||
| Naganna |
|||
| Sri Sangolli Rayanna Cine Combines |
|||
| {{INRConvert|40|c}} |
|||
| <sup><font color=blue>[1]</font></sup> |
|||
|- |
|||
|6 |
|||
|''[[Uppi 2]]'' |
|||
| 2015 |
|||
| [[Upendra (actor)|Upendra]] |
|||
| Upendra Productions |
|||
| {{INRConvert|40|c}} |
|||
| <sup><font color=blue>[2]</font></sup> |
|||
|- |
|||
|7 |
|||
| ''[[Kirik Party]]'' |
|||
| 2016 |
|||
|[[Rishab Shetty]] |
|||
| Paramvah Studios |
|||
| {{INRConvert|40|c}} |
|||
| <sup><font color=blue>[3]</font></sup> |
|||
|- |
|||
|8 |
|||
|''[[Doddmane Hudga]]'' |
|||
| 2016 |
|||
| [[Duniya Soori]] |
|||
| Ajay Pictures |
|||
| {{INRConvert|35-40|c}} |
|||
| <sup><font color=blue>[4]</font></sup> |
|||
|} |
|||
Three films have 40 crore grosses, but somehow Wikipedia is the arbiter of which 40 crore film was #5, #6 and #7? In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&diff=prev&oldid=766296337 this edit] a user moved Kirik Party all the way to the bottom of the list of 40 crore grossing films, even beneath the film that potentially only grossed 35 crore? Why? This arrangement is problematic, because it encourages POV editing. If someone doesn't like the actor/director/producer of Kirik Party, the film arbitrarily gets moved to the #8 spot? The smarter and more neutral approach is to lump similar films together under the same rank like this: |
|||
{| style="margin:auto; margin:auto;" class="wikitable" |
|||
|+ |
|||
|- |
|||
! Rank |
|||
! Movie |
|||
! Year |
|||
! Director |
|||
! Studio(s) |
|||
! Worldwide gross |
|||
! Source |
|||
|- |
|||
| rowspan="3" |5 |
|||
| ''[[Kirik Party]]'' |
|||
| 2016 |
|||
|[[Rishab Shetty]] |
|||
| Paramvah Studios |
|||
|{{INRConvert|40|c}} |
|||
| <sup><font color=blue>[1]</font></sup> |
|||
|- |
|||
| ''[[Sangolli Rayanna (film)|Krantiveera Sangolli Rayanna]]'' |
|||
| 2012 |
|||
| Naganna |
|||
| Sri Sangolli Rayanna Cine Combines |
|||
|{{INRConvert|40|c}} |
|||
| <sup><font color=blue>[2]</font></sup> |
|||
|- |
|||
|''[[Uppi 2]]'' |
|||
| 2015 |
|||
| [[Upendra (actor)|Upendra]] |
|||
| Upendra Productions |
|||
| {{INRConvert|40|c}} |
|||
| <sup><font color=blue>[3]</font></sup> |
|||
|- |
|||
|6 |
|||
|''[[Doddmane Hudga]]'' |
|||
| 2016 |
|||
| [[Duniya Soori]] |
|||
| Ajay Pictures |
|||
| {{INRConvert|35-40|c}} |
|||
| <sup><font color=blue>[4]</font></sup> |
|||
|} |
|||
The films could then be organised alphabetically. Yes, this means that there will be more than 10 entries for some lists, but I can't think of a better way to organise films without getting into POV issues. I'm still not sure what should be done with Doddmane Hudga here, because with the range it could be one of the #5 films, or it could be the #6 film. It's generally problematic that Wikipedia is ranking films itself instead of relying on what authoritative sources say, but that's mostly the fault of the industry-wide box office guesstimations. Comments welcomed. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:52, 19 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:While the idea is good, please do limit the total entities to 10. So if rank 5 has 2 more movies tied at the same place, have the ranks limited to 8 to ensure that only 10 movies are on the list. The only exception I can think of is if rank 10 has 2 movies tied, in which case it might be acceptable to let the tied movies remain. [[User:Jupitus Smart|<b><span style="color:#f45342;">Jupitus</span> <span style="color:#05ad83"><i>Smart</i></span></b>]] 14:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
::I appreciate the feedback, but I don't understand the rationale for limiting a table to a literal 10 films. The point of each table is to present the films that fall into the top 10 slots. Presenting only the top 8 wouldn't achieve that goal. I think it's bizarre to treat the table so literally. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
::And just to make this easier to understand for anyone else who wants to participate, here's a visual: |
|||
{{collapse top}} |
|||
::;Option A - focus on top 10 films |
|||
::1) Film 1 |
|||
::2) Film 2 |
|||
::3) Film 3 |
|||
::4) Film 4 |
|||
::5) Film 5, Film 6, Film 7 |
|||
::6) Film 8 |
|||
::7) Film 9 |
|||
::8) Film 10 |
|||
:: |
|||
::;Option B - focus on top 10 grosses |
|||
::1) Film 1 |
|||
::2) Film 2 |
|||
::3) Film 3 |
|||
::4) Film 4 |
|||
::5) Film 5, Film 6, Film 7 |
|||
::6) Film 8 |
|||
::7) Film 9 |
|||
::8) Film 10 |
|||
::9) Film 11 |
|||
::10) Film 12 |
|||
{{collapse bottom}} |
|||
::Thanks, [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 17:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/telugu-cinema/rrr-is-second-best-film-at-hollywood-critics-association-awards-2022-101656779034501.html |
|||
A better way would be to number them like this: |
|||
:1) Film 1 |
|||
:2) Film 2 |
|||
:3) Film 3 |
|||
:4) Film 4 |
|||
:5) Film 5, Film 6, Film 7 |
|||
:8) Film 8 |
|||
:9) Film 9 |
|||
:10) Film 10 |
|||
Cheers, [[User:Lyrda|Lyrda]] ([[User talk:Lyrda|talk]]) 17:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:Support Lyrda's numbering scheme. [[User:Betty Logan|Betty Logan]] ([[User talk:Betty Logan|talk]]) 17:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:: Yeah, that's how it's usually done. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 18:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
::: Ah, interesting. Comments very much appreciated, thank you. What would you guys recommend in the example of Doddmane Hudga above, where the source presents a range of guesstimation? Does that fall into slot 5 because it has a top estimate of 40 crore, or do we keep it where it is, because we know for sure that it has made at least 35 crore? [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 20:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:::: That's a tricky question. I'd sort "35–40" between 35 and 36, as if it were a [[string (computer science)|string]]. It makes sense to me, but maybe that's only because I've worked in information technology. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 22:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:::::I would sort it on 35. By saying 35–40 you are basically saying it's made at least 35, but not much more than that. Ultimately if something has made 40 crore it has made 35 crore, but not the other way around. [[User:Betty Logan|Betty Logan]] ([[User talk:Betty Logan|talk]]) 23:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
::::::It's like 'finished in the top three' always means third place. [[User:Lyrda|Lyrda]] ([[User talk:Lyrda|talk]]) 23:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
https://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment-news/box-office-report-card-first-half-2022-bhool-bhulaiyaa-2-to-gangubai-kathiawadi-heres-a-look-at-how-indian-films-fared-bollywood-news-entertainment-news-article-92619214 |
|||
== Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2017 == |
|||
https://www.news18.com/news/movies/rrr-to-tiger-zinda-hai-list-of-most-expensive-indian-films-and-how-they-fared-5941465.html |
|||
{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}} |
|||
Munthirivallikal Thalirkumbol malayalam film 51cr collection please update [[User:Arjunachoo123|Arjunachoo123]] ([[User talk:Arjunachoo123|talk]]) 15:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
While Indian express, Hindustan Times, Times Now, news18 claimed the collection to be 1200 crore. |
|||
== Can we include [[Kung Fu Yoga]] in highest grossing? == |
|||
==REMOVE TAMIL FROM BABUBALI2 LANGUAGE IT WAS FIRST DRIECTED IN TELUGU == |
|||
Can we include [[Kung Fu Yoga]] in highest grossing? [[Special:Contributions/45.116.233.20|45.116.233.20]] ([[User talk:45.116.233.20|talk]]) 20:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Change the Bahubali 2 language to only Telugu, not Tamil as it was first directed in Telugu and later on dubbed into multiple languages |
|||
I think we can include [[Kung Fu Yoga]] in Hindi list as the movie was shot in Hindi also. Any how, we are including the revenues from international dubbed versions into the gross collections. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bhuvannalla|Bhuvannalla]] ([[User talk:Bhuvannalla#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bhuvannalla|contribs]]) 13:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== IN Highest-grossing films by language Section == |
|||
== Too many Franchises mentioned which really poorly performed but very less actual highest grossing films mentioned in their list... == |
|||
IN the Highest-grossing films by language Section |
|||
I firmly believe that it is absolutely not fair to have '25' number of film franchises to be mentioned for highest grossing Bollywood films, some of which performed shamelessly poor (Like Kya Kool Hai Hum or Yamla Pagla Deewani whose entire franchise barely earned 2 crore rupees) which shouldnt even be presented here, but the actual number of highest grossing films are just 15 which is really less and so many 300+ and 200+ crore box office blockbuster films arent mentioned......... My opinion is we really need to improve the number of highest grossing bollywood hindi films till 25 or 30, and reduce the franchises film to 5. |
|||
kindly remove Bahubali 1 and Bahubali 2 from the Tamil section |
|||
what is wrong with you???? It was first directed in Telugu language only kindly remove it and remove the language of Tamil from Bahubali 2 |
|||
later on, it was dubbed Understand that stop spoiling the originality of the film |
|||
Revision as of 19:04, 20 May 2024
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Other talk page banners |
Remove the languages of Hindi and Tamil for RRR in Global gross figures
In the Global gross figures, language of RRR is shown as Hindi, Tamil, Telugu. RRR is shot only in Telugu language and dubbed into Hindi, Kannada, Tamil and Malayalam languages. So, please remove Hindi and Tamil from the list.
Please update official RRR box office figures in the range of 1000 - 1200 crore
Please update RRR box office collection to 1000 - 1450 crore as per latest sources collected.
https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/trends/story/rrr-beats-aamir-khans-3-idiots-to-become-third-highest-grossing-indian-film-in-japan-352209-2022-11-08/ Business Today reported 1000+ crore
https://www.ibtimes.co.in/rrr-worldwide-box-office-collection-here-lifetime-business-made-by-ss-rajamoulis-flick-850820/ IB Times mentioned the final collection to be ₹1125.9 crore.
https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/box-office/rrr-final-worldwide-box-office-collections-closes-run-900-crores-india-and-1100-crores-worldwide-1143834 Pinkvilla stated the collection to be 1111 crore
While Indian express, Hindustan Times, Times Now, news18 claimed the collection to be 1200 crore.
REMOVE TAMIL FROM BABUBALI2 LANGUAGE IT WAS FIRST DRIECTED IN TELUGU
Change the Bahubali 2 language to only Telugu, not Tamil as it was first directed in Telugu and later on dubbed into multiple languages
IN Highest-grossing films by language Section
IN the Highest-grossing films by language Section kindly remove Bahubali 1 and Bahubali 2 from the Tamil section what is wrong with you???? It was first directed in Telugu language only kindly remove it and remove the language of Tamil from Bahubali 2 later on, it was dubbed Understand that stop spoiling the originality of the film