{{talk header}}

{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes|1=

{{WikiProject India |class=list |importance=mid |cinema=yes |cinema-importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Business|class=list|importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject Film|class=list|Indian=yes|listas=Highest-Grossing Indian Films, List Of}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tamil films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tollywood (Telugu) films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Punjabi films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Telugu films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tamil films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Bollywood films|talk=no|date=26 July 2015}}

{{copied|from=Bollywood|from_oldid =670957198|to=List of highest-grossing Indian films||to_diff=672526653|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&type=revision&diff=672526653&oldid=672526378|date=July 21, 2015}}

{{oldafdfull| date = 20 December 2012 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = List of highest-grossing Indian films worldwide }}

|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}

|maxarchivesize = 70K

|counter = 8

|minthreadsleft = 3

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(30d)

|archive = Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films/Archive %(counter)d

== add surya's 24 tamil movie in tamil list ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

<!-- Be sure to state UNAMBIGUOUSLY your suggested changes; editors who can edit the protected page need to know what to add or remove. Blank edit requests WILL be declined. -->

<!-- Begin request -->

Sir Good Evening

Please add starer surya's 24 tamil moive in the list of Tamil films

|-

| ''[[24]]''

| 2016

| [[Vikram Kumar]]

| 2D Entertainment

Kindly Request for add tamil movie starre surya 24 moive

the movie collected world wide 150 crores

this is the proof website: http://www.onlookersmedia.in/collection-report/suriya-24-collection-report-28-days

http://gabbarboxofficecollection.com/2016/suriya-24-box-office-collection-3rd-day-sunday-1st-weekend-total-collection.html

<!-- End request -->

[[User:Samsuddeen|Samsuddeen]] ([[User talk:Samsuddeen|talk]]) 14:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> {{u|Samsuddeen}}, [[WP:UGC|we don't use blogs or other user-generated sources as references]]. See [[WP:UGC]] and prior explanations on this talk page. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Sure

Add this 24 movie 150crores

[[User:Kasim999|Kasim999]] ([[User talk:Kasim999|talk]]) 13:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

<!-- State UNAMBIGUOUSLY your suggested changes. Other editors need to know what to add or remove. Blank edit requests will be declined. -->

Theri Box office Collection:

http://idailytimes.com/vijays-theri-collects-rs-250cr-worldwide-box-office-update.html

<!-- Write your request ABOVE this line and do not remove the tildes below. -->

[[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C514:4501:619D:2679:2B9:47ED|2003:80:C514:4501:619D:2679:2B9:47ED]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C514:4501:619D:2679:2B9:47ED|talk]]) 07:09, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=]] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> <b>[[User:St170e|st170e]]</b>^{<i><small>[[User talk:St170e|talk]]</small></i>} 13:09, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

== Merger proposal ==

I propose that [[List of highest-grossing Indian films in overseas markets]] be merged into [[List of highest-grossing Indian films]]. We don't need a separate page just for overseas figures. - [[User:Managerarc|<font face="serif"><span style="color:dark blue;text-grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em"><font size="2">Managerarc</font></span></font>]]™[[User talk:Managerarc|<span style="color:green">^{<small> talk</small>}</span>]] 20:45, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

: {{u|Managerarc}} I don't think we need to keep a unique tally of grosses domestically vs. grosses internationally. Maybe discussing whether the overseas article should be deleted is in order. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:53, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

:: {{ping|Cyphoidbomb}} Multiple reliable sources, newspapers etc do report domestic and overseas figures separately. I don't see a valid reason to completely remove it. Maybe splitting the worldwide gross in the global gross section into overseas and domestic would be a better option?- [[User:Managerarc|<font face="serif"><span style="color:dark blue;text-grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em"><font size="2">Managerarc</font></span></font>]]™[[User talk:Managerarc|<span style="color:green">^{<small> talk</small>}</span>]] 18:02, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

:::{{u|Managerarc}}, what's the parallel example at Wikipedia for Western films? This just feels like we're treating Indian films like a special snowflake instead of having Indian film articles adhere to common community editing practices. This is especially problematic because of how prone Indian film financials are to fudging, incomplete data, vandalism and other forms of corruption. I'm very reluctant to endorse yet another avenue for paid sock rings to deliver dubious information of questionable academic value. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 22:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

:Merging is appropriate. A totally unnecessary list. See the [[List of highest-grossing films]] (FL), gross when adjusted for inflation, films by year, franchise films are all listed in that single page. Likewise, the [[List of highest-grossing Indian films in overseas markets]] is not an independent topic, and [[List of highest-grossing Indian films]] shows worldwide gross, not the domestic. --[[User:Charles Turing|Charles Turing]] ([[User talk:Charles Turing|talk]]) 11:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

:'''Merge''' Keeping another article for this is totally unnecessary. [[User:Karyasuman|Karyasuman]] ([[User talk:Karyasuman|talk]]) 16:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

*'''Merge'''. -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 00:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

:'''Merge'''. -- [[User:Rajeshbieee|Rajeshbieee]] ([[User talk:Rajeshbieee|talk]]) 10:36, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

== Mungaru Male gross ==

In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&diff=730274919&oldid=730253098 this edit] I reverted {{u|Honor bee}}'s resubmission of a 75 crore total for Mungaru Male. Filmibeat is not considered a reliable source by [[WP:ICTF]]. Mybangalore.com looks like a blog to me, and thus would be unsuitable per [[WP:UGC]]. The final reference, [http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-ganesh-bal-the-outsider-on-the-inside-1678970 dnaindia.com], attributes the information to the film's lead actor, which would mean that we're using [[WP:PRIMARY|a primary source]] for controversial information. A primary source would absolutely have a reason to fudge the financial numbers of a film, for instance he might inflate it to make it more of an attractive spectacle for potential viewers, or he might deflate it to reduce the film's entertainment tax liability, or an actor might inflate it to make himself more marketable as an actor. There are all sorts of reasons why it is a bad idea to use a primary source for controversial data. Oh, and the information was also previously submitted by a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&diff=726335703&oldid=726298461 disruptive troll] who is not welcome to edit at Wikipedia, which should raise some questions about motive and appropriateness of the submission. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 00:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Moot point. Not surprisingly, Honor bee was a sock of Nagendra NJ, a user who is not welcome to edit at Wikipedia. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 21 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

[[Special:Contributions/115.112.71.222|115.112.71.222]] ([[User talk:115.112.71.222|talk]]) 14:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Vedalam Movie of Ajith 56 Director Siva Mass Opening in TamilNadu 15.5 Crores in First Day.

:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.<!-- Template:ESp --> Also any change would require you to provide reliable sources. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

== Regarding Kabali collections ==

The producer uttered some words in the media about the Kabali collections as Rs 250 crores in Day 1, which is highly impossible according to number of screens, occupancy rate and ticket rates. It seems to be a marketing gimmick to attract more people to the cinema halls. The reference given for the Kabali collections http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/rajinikanths-kabali-smashes-all-box-office-records-earns-rs-250-crore-in-india-on-first-day/articleshow/53354457.cms itself contradicts in another reference by showing Day 1 collection as over 40 crores http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/rajinikanths-kabali-smashes-all-box-office-records-collects-over-rs-40-crore/articleshow/53347794.cms. So, please update the Kabali collections according to a consistent reference source like as given in http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/kabali-rajinikanth-second-day-box-office-collection-sultan-vedalam-review/1/722537.html <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/27.49.83.78|27.49.83.78]] ([[User talk:27.49.83.78|talk]]) 07:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Its time to update the data, please refer http://www.financialexpress.com/photos/entertainment-gallery/334390/kabali-box-office-collections-at-over-rs-650-cr-rajinikanth-starrer-is-now-no-1-movie-in-india/ and get the update <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rkthik|Rkthik]] ([[User talk:Rkthik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rkthik|contribs]]) 14:04, 1 August 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Kabali needs to be updated as 470cr (211 Cr domestic + 259 Cr overseas) based on the link. Excluded pre business from 650cr.

http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/rajinikanth-kabali-box-office-collection-rs-650-crore-leaves-salman-khan-sultan-behind/ [[User:Pradoblaze|Pradoblaze]] ([[User talk:Pradoblaze|talk]]) 12:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 24 July 2016 ==

it had collected nearly 90 crore on first day

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-box-office-collection-rajinikanth-starrer-performs-well-2nd-day-687625#yiEzDzEOeZv9dKa1.97 <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:77:6F5F:D6FE:105F:CC1F:3209:9CC4|2003:77:6F5F:D6FE:105F:CC1F:3209:9CC4]] ([[User talk:2003:77:6F5F:D6FE:105F:CC1F:3209:9CC4|talk]]) 16:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2016 ==

Kabali earth shattering opening: 200 crore in just 3 day,

please add superstars Kabli in Tamil movie list

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-3-day-box-office-collection-rajinikanth-starrer-grosses-over-rs-200-crore-worldwide-687728 <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C514:4501:7C5E:F40E:23AE:5190|2003:80:C514:4501:7C5E:F40E:23AE:5190]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C514:4501:7C5E:F40E:23AE:5190|talk]]) 08:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2016 ==

Kabali Update: 210 crore worldwide over the weekend

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-box-office-collection-rajinis-film-fails-surpass-bahubali-1st-weekend-record-beats-687768 <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C514:4501:7C5E:F40E:23AE:5190|2003:80:C514:4501:7C5E:F40E:23AE:5190]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C514:4501:7C5E:F40E:23AE:5190|talk]]) 09:39, 25 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Koimoi ==

Koimoi is not considered a reliable source per [[WP:ICTF]], yet many of the film grosses in this article are supported by Koimoi as a reference.[http://www.koimoi.com/box-office/bollywoods-top-worldwide-grossers/] Is this bugging anyone? [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

* That's the least concerning thing for me but I agree with their removal. It would be helpful if the Indian film task force agreed on removing it. -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 00:43, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

<ref>http://www.greatandhra.com/movies/movie-news/baahubali-gets-decent-start-in-china-75970.html

</ref>

[[User:Sgoli123|Sgoli123]] ([[User talk:Sgoli123|talk]]) 17:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

:{{not done}} - You didn't request anything. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 19:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Kabali has only grossed 200 crore as per the Indian Express Article. the other 200 crore is the business done before the movie release. So, it should be changed to 200 crore from 400 crore

[[User:VigneshwaranShanmugam|VigneshwaranShanmugam]] ([[User talk:VigneshwaranShanmugam|talk]]) 19:10, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> Reverted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&diff=731501067&oldid=731499671 this edit]. For anyone else who's curious, {{u|VigneshwaranShanmugam}} is referring to [http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/rajinikanth-kabali-day-4-box-office-collections-radhika-apte-tamil-movie-2934930/ this reference], which says, {{tq|"the Rajinikanth-starrer has earned about Rs 400 crore already. While Rs 200 crore is the box office collection, the film earned Rs 200 crore before release with sale of music rights etc."}} I imagine the trades will botch things and we will see the 400crore+ figure cited again and again. We're not here to track every dollar the film traded, and music rights sales should not be reflected in box office gross. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 19:33, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

[[User:Lalithsmash|Lalithsmash]] ([[User talk:Lalithsmash|talk]]) 19:41, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> Blank request —&thinsp;[[User:JJMC89|JJMC89]]&thinsp;<small>([[User talk:JJMC89|T]]'''·'''[[Special:Contributions/JJMC89|C]])</small> 19:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Dasavathaaram Tamil movies - 200 Crore collection economic times.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/business-of-bollywood/a-rendezevous-with-kamal-haasan/articleshow/4357064.cms

Movie Wiki Link:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dasavathaaram

[[User:VigneshwaranShanmugam|VigneshwaranShanmugam]] ([[User talk:VigneshwaranShanmugam|talk]]) 20:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> Contradicted by [http://www.hindustantimes.com/regional-movies/kabali-bo-rajinikanth-film-smashes-all-records-to-collect-rs-250-crore/story-84OyaLFJFWzdceqJxdWQzH.html this reference]. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

kabali has grossed over 400 crores and it has to be changed

http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/rajinikanth-kabali-day-4-box-office-collections-radhika-apte-tamil-movie-2934930/

[[User:Njj55|Njj55]] ([[User talk:Njj55|talk]]) 07:47, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> See further up on the page. Short story: 400 crore figure is not the box office gross, it represents box office + other revenue streams prior to the film's release. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:44, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2016 ==

Kabali Update:

425 crore

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-4th-day-box-office-collection-rajinis-film-smashes-fastest-fifty-beats-ajiths-687871 <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C514:4501:343C:F077:BF1E:3F55|2003:80:C514:4501:343C:F077:BF1E:3F55]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C514:4501:343C:F077:BF1E:3F55|talk]]) 07:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{not done}} - The scope of this article is box office grosses. Wikipedia is not an accounting firm, so it's not our job to tally up all the money made from Kabali's myriad revenue streams. Just box. If the box office gross reaches 425 crore, then you can come back to request a change. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Kabali 4 days collections: 200 crores

http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/rajinikanth-kabali-day-4-box-office-collections-radhika-apte-tamil-movie-2934930/

The current article that was used as source says kabali has collected 250 crores in 1 day, which has been refuted by other magazines and was informed that was not possible. Please change the collection from 250 crore to 200 crore

[[User:VigneshwaranShanmugam|VigneshwaranShanmugam]] ([[User talk:VigneshwaranShanmugam|talk]]) 15:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> {{u|VigneshwaranShanmugam}}, you need to substantiate your statement that the 250 crore value asserted by [http://www.hindustantimes.com/regional-movies/kabali-bo-rajinikanth-film-smashes-all-records-to-collect-rs-250-crore/story-84OyaLFJFWzdceqJxdWQzH.html this typically reliable source] has been refuted as impossible. Surely we can't just take your word for it. Please bring those references to this talk page and start a discussion on how the content should be presented in the article. Please do not open another edit request until consensus has been reached. Thanks. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 27 July 2016 ==

Update Kabali Box office collection: 300 crore till now

http://www.indiaglitz.com/kabali-beat-enthiran-collection-tamil-news-163921.html

If you dont understand tamil, please translate the sentences in English, especially the last sentense <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C514:4501:743F:D366:1B14:2B8E|2003:80:C514:4501:743F:D366:1B14:2B8E]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C514:4501:743F:D366:1B14:2B8E|talk]]) 07:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{not done}} - I'm not comfortable using IndiaGlitz as a reference. Also, the Google translation of the last sentence is "Websites and social web users when giving negative reviews of some of the film's box office has been less successful is Rs 300 crore towards the goal." It is unclear what that means. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:58, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 27 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

[[Special:Contributions/220.227.74.73|220.227.74.73]] ([[User talk:220.227.74.73|talk]]) 12:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Why is thalaiva not added to the list despite grossing more(145 crores) than mankatha(130 Crores)

http://www.metromasti.com/kollywood/news/Thalaivaa-worldwide-total-collections-T halaiva-box-office-update/30866

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> A more reliable source is needed to change the statistics <b>[[User:St170e|st170e]]</b>^{<i><small>[[User talk:St170e|talk]]</small></i>} 19:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 27 July 2016 ==

2nd request

Update Kabali Box office collection: 300 crore till now

http://www.indiaglitz.com/kabali-beat-enthiran-collection-tamil-news-163921.html <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:77:6F5F:D656:A491:A206:E2BB:47B|2003:77:6F5F:D656:A491:A206:E2BB:47B]] ([[User talk:2003:77:6F5F:D656:A491:A206:E2BB:47B|talk]]) 19:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:You don't need to make a second request, you can wait until a volunteer decides to make the change. [[WP:NODEADLINE|Wikipedia has no deadline]]. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 19:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

== Kabali da ==

Kabali box office entered into 400 crore club [[User:Gunasekaran710|Gunasekaran710]] ([[User talk:Gunasekaran710|talk]]) 08:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

:{{u|Gunasekaran710}} No it didn't. You're confusing their pre-release income with box office income. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 20:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 28 July 2016 ==

Kabali 326 crore

http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movies-cinema-news-16/rajinikanths-kabali-has-collected-326-crores-in-6-days-says-thanu.html <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:77:6F5F:D61F:595B:28D0:9908:8D41|2003:77:6F5F:D61F:595B:28D0:9908:8D41]] ([[User talk:2003:77:6F5F:D61F:595B:28D0:9908:8D41|talk]]) 18:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{Not done}} - The 326 crore figure is claimed by the producer. Producers, actors, directors, distributors all constitute [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]]. A producer would have every reason to inflate or deflate financial figures to serve his personal gain. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:54, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=y}}

[[Special:Contributions/220.227.74.73|220.227.74.73]] ([[User talk:220.227.74.73|talk]]) 05:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Update Kabali's Gross.

Seems Like the Admin of this page are concerned only about bollywood movies,in that case split this page and make a separate article only for hindi movies. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:220.227.74.73|220.227.74.73]] ([[User talk:220.227.74.73|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/220.227.74.73|contribs]]) </span></small>

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> as you have not made a specific request in the form "Please replace XX with YY" or "Please add ZZ between PP and QQ".<br />Please also cite [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 13:41, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

:Perhaps the volunteers at this page aren't interested in updating Kabali's gross every six hours, and the constant requests are only cluttering the talk page, making it more difficult to discern which is the most useful data. [[WP:NODEADLINE|Wikipedia does not have a deadline]], so we're not in any hurry, and you shouldn't be either. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2016 ==

Kabali Update to 326 crore

http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movies-cinema-news-16/producer-thanu-asks-kabali-director-paranjith-to-do-another-film-for-v-creations.html

http://www.indiaglitz.com/kalaipuli-s-thanu-says-rajinikanth-radhika-apte-kabali-collected-rs-320-crores-in-six-days-tamil-news-164085.html <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C514:4501:C976:6AE5:869C:25F7|2003:80:C514:4501:C976:6AE5:869C:25F7]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C514:4501:C976:6AE5:869C:25F7|talk]]) 09:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{Not done}} - The 326 crore figure is claimed by the producer. Producers, actors, directors, distributors all constitute [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]]. A producer would have every reason to inflate or deflate financial figures to serve his personal gain. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2016 ==

Kabali 335 crore, and please put it into the Top 15 of all time.

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-7-days-box-office-collection-rajinikanths-film-ends-high-note-first-week-688236 <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C514:4501:C976:6AE5:869C:25F7|2003:80:C514:4501:C976:6AE5:869C:25F7]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C514:4501:C976:6AE5:869C:25F7|talk]]) 09:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{not done}} - Source says "The early prediction says that the movie has raked in over Rs. 335 crore." Predictions are guesses. The source also attributes the 320 crore figure to the '''producer''', which would constitute a [[WP:PRIMARY|primary source]]. Producers have a vested interest in fudging financial data. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:51, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

[[Special:Contributions/117.241.163.243|117.241.163.243]] ([[User talk:117.241.163.243|talk]]) 09:49, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carry_On_Jatta pls change to punjabi movie history its 3rd numbers movie

:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.<!-- Template:ESp --> '''[[User:Sam Sailor|Sam Sailor]] [[User talk:Sam Sailor|^''Talk!'']]''' 09:54, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

== Protection raised ==

Given the aggressive attempts to make this into a live action box office results with poor sources, I've raised protection here. I advise the people coming here to spend more than a minute and actually look for a reliable source and discuss it. -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 00:40, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

:Thanks {{u|Ricky81682}}, I've restored the talk page edit notice to make it clear that claims made by primary sources will not be accepted. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 00:47, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 30 July 2016 ==

{{edit fully-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

On the top of the article it says Semi-protected, but the article is fully protected. The article was recently targeted with edit warring, but has already been done

[[Special:Contributions/86.22.8.235|86.22.8.235]] ([[User talk:86.22.8.235|talk]]) 09:48, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 30 July 2016 ==

Kabali latest 330 crore

www.thereportertimes.com/kabali-8th-day-box-office-collection/33135/ <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:77:6F5F:D64C:6CEB:4D5D:8931:5988|2003:77:6F5F:D64C:6CEB:4D5D:8931:5988]] ([[User talk:2003:77:6F5F:D64C:6CEB:4D5D:8931:5988|talk]]) 16:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{Not done}} - Thereportertimes.com is not a reliable source. [[WP:UGC|We don't care what random blogs have to say]]. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Kabali latest 320 crore. Do you take Indiatoday a national daily as a source atleast?

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/kabali-rajinikanth-box-office-collecion-total-collection/1/726839.html

<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:‎SaiGovind95|‎SaiGovind95]] ([[User talk:‎SaiGovind95|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/‎SaiGovind95|contribs]]) </span></small>

:When you posted this request, {{u|SaiGovind95}}, there was a giant notice at the top of the edit window. It said:

::# [[WP:DEADLINE|Wikipedia does not have a deadline nor an obligation to report-up-to-the-minute box office numbers]];<br>

::# Requests that do not include a [[WP:RS|reliably published source with a reputation for editorial oversight]] that [[WP:V|verifies]] the suggested changes WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

::# '''Requests to change budget/box office data that are supported by claims made by, or attributed to, [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]] (producers, actors, directors, distributors, etc.) will be closed with no action. Only independently verified estimates from reliable published sources will be entertained.'''

:Please note #3. Now [http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/kabali-rajinikanth-box-office-collecion-total-collection/1/726839.html look at your reference].

::{{tq|"At the success meet of Kabali, the makers have revealed that the film has grossed Rs 320 crore worldwide in six days."}}

:So who's the source of the information? The national daily, or the makers of the film? We only care what has been ''independently verified'' by secondary sources, not [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]] like film producers/directors, etc. These people have an inherent reason to inflate the values. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 21:52, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

== Kabali Worldwide Gross ==

As producer has conformed earlier; Kabali WW gross was 320 Cr in 6 days. Till yesterday it has crossed 375 Cr, But it's not getting updated in Highest grossing movies column. When someone adds; the other people (North Indians/Bollywood) are removing... It's pathetic and sick... Please add... <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/183.82.194.32|183.82.194.32]] ([[User talk:183.82.194.32|talk]]) 07:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{u|183.82.194.32}}: No. Read the answers above. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 07:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 31 July 2016 ==

{{edit fully-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

I wanna edit some things

[[User:Hulk60606|Hulk60606]] ([[User talk:Hulk60606|talk]]) 14:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' this is not the right page to [[WP:PERM|request]] additional [[WP:RIGHTS|user rights]]. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you.<!-- Template:EP --> [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 18:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

== Kabali Box Office Report from a Third Party Independent Verification. ==

Hi, Kabali Rs 300 Crore box office collection as given by a third party and independent source is now available. <ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/rajinikanth-kabali-box-office-collection-radhika-apte-tamil-movie-rs-300-crore-club-2940943/|title=Rajinikanth’s Kabali day 7 box office collection: Rs 300 crore collection is a done deal.|work=The Indian Express|date=30 July 2016|access-date=30 July 2016}}</ref>. Please help us update. Thanks. --<font face="Monotype corsiva" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:blue">[[User:pearll's sun|P<small>earll's</small> S<small>un</small>]]</font>^{<small><b>[[User_talk:pearll's sun|TALK]]</b></small>} 14:22, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

:{{not done}} - {{u|pearll's sun}}, the source says the gross is 250, and they '''predict''' Kabali will hit 300. Reading is fundamental. {{tq|"Trade tracker Ramesh B put the India box office business of the Rajinikanth movie at Rs 142.5 crore net and Rs 166.5 crore gross. With the international box office close to Rs 90 crore, '''the total BO figure has crossed Rs 250 crore worldwide'''."}} and {{tq|"Rajinikanth’s Kabali is a shoo-in for the Rs 300 crore club."}} [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 18:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

:: How about this? "Kabali box office collections: At over Rs 650 cr, Rajinikanth starrer is now No. 1 movie in India"<ref>http://www.financialexpress.com/photos/entertainment-gallery/334390/kabali-box-office-collections-at-over-rs-650-cr-rajinikanth-starrer-is-now-no-1-movie-in-india/4/</ref> Thanks. --<font face="Monotype corsiva" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:blue">[[User:pearll's sun|P<small>earll's</small> S<small>un</small>]]</font>^{<small><b>[[User_talk:pearll's sun|TALK]]</b></small>} 19:30, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

:::{{u|pearll's sun}} - No. See conversation at the bottom of the page opened by Originalboxofficer and responded to by myself and Ricky. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 23:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

::::Will this be taken as a reliable third party source? <ref>indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/rajinikanth-kabali-box-office-collection-rs-650-crore-leaves-salman-khan-sultan-behind/Rajinikanth’s Kabali box office collection Rs 650 crore, leaves Salman Khan’s Sultan behind</ref> Thanks. --<font face="Monotype corsiva" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:blue">[[User:pearll's sun|P<small>earll's</small> S<small>un</small>]]</font>^{<small><b>[[User_talk:pearll's sun|TALK]]</b></small>} 12:31, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

:::::See [http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-box-office-collection-reports-rajinikanth-starrer-raking-rs-675-crore-13-days-are-fake-688881#lrUWk7cBAGEqpEUv.97 This reference] which casts serious doubt on any gross outside of the 309-350 crore range. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:46, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

:::::: Yes, but the way things go, we are unable to accept the film producers claim on collection and even the third party claim has a conflicting claim. What would we do if this is how it stays for ever? We now have one more ref, though it doesn't give any particular details on collection we can have this for some reference :) <ref> http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-box-office-collection-rajinikanth-starrer-beats-7-big-records-baahubali-bahubali-688964#JLZl54PQmX1UFV5O.97 </ref> --<font face="Monotype corsiva" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:blue">[[User:pearll's sun|P<small>earll's</small> S<small>un</small>]]</font>^{<small><b>[[User_talk:pearll's sun|TALK]]</b></small>} 17:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 1 August 2016 ==

{{edit fully-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

I would like to know why the tamil film [[Dasavathaaram]] is missing from the list of top grossing tamil films. I think Dasavathaaram had grossed over 100 crores.

[[User:Rajeshbieee|Rajeshbieee]] ([[User talk:Rajeshbieee|talk]]) 10:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:EP --> I can't tell if you're requesting an edit or just asking a question, but we already have the top 10 highest-grossing Tamil films in the article. Previous consensus preferred to limit the number of examples to 10, and the 100 crore value you're claiming (even if sourced) would be less than the Rs. 130 crore value held by ''Mankatha'' in the #10 spot. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 17:11, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 1 August 2016 ==

{{edit fully-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Please add this detail and adjust the list.

http://www.financialexpress.com/lifestyle/showbiz/kabali-box-office-collections-rajinikanth-powers-movie-to-over-rs-645-cr/333841/#.V53i_ingnCE.whatsapp

Thanks

[[User:Prasannainfo|Prasannainfo]] ([[User talk:Prasannainfo|talk]]) 12:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.<!-- Template:EP --> [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 17:11, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 1 August 2016 ==

{{edit fully-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

change the box office of the film kabali it is more than 600 crores

http://www.financialexpress.com/photos/entertainment-gallery/334390/kabali-box-office-collections-at-over-rs-650-cr-rajinikanth-starrer-is-now-no-1-movie-in- india/

[[User:Originalboxofficer|Originalboxofficer]] ([[User talk:Originalboxofficer|talk]]) 13:32, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:EP --> Unclear whether they are claiming 650 crore was grossed solely from box office sales. It's said that the film took in 200 crore before it was even released, and several sources have erroneously included this value into the box office details. Also, three days ago everyone was gung-ho to claim 320 crores (attributed to the producer) had been grossed in six days--did the film gross an additional 280 crore in three days? Thankfully, since Wikipedia [[WP:NODEADLINE|has no deadline]], we're not in a rush to add this information and we can certainly wait until some of the box office dust settles and the estimates even out. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 17:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

:Oh, and [http://www.financialexpress.com/lifestyle/showbiz/kabali-box-office-collections-rajinikanth-powers-movie-to-over-rs-645-cr/333841/#.V53i_ingnCE.whatsapp this source], provided by the editor above you, seems to lump the 200 crore "from marketing" into a 645 crore total, indicating 195 crore grossed domestically, and 250 crore internationally. So at best we'd be talking about 445 crore, not 650. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 17:33, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

:: The source itself admits that "no official word" about it but basically rumors. I say we wait. If it's true, other sources will confirm it. If not, then we can disregard. It's not like the end total is going to change based on whether or not we update it today. -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 17:43, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

== Bahubali languages shown wrong ==

Bahubali was released simultaneously in tamil , telugu, hindi and malayalam. Then why only tamil and telugu are listed in the table. if you see the box office areawise collections, you can see that more than 40% of its collections were from Rest of India minus south.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baahubali:_The_Beginning

(see topic "release")

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/baahubali-bahubali-lifetime-box-office-collection-prabhas-starrer-earns-rs-302-crore-its-649645

(see collection trends) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Greenfireworks|Greenfireworks]] ([[User talk:Greenfireworks|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Greenfireworks|contribs]]) 18:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{u|Greenfireworks}}, the film was simultaneously shot in Tamil and Telugu. We aren't counting dubs in the list. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 19:02, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

: See the prior discussion [[Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films/Archive_6#RfC:_How_should_we_classify_Baahubali|here]]. -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 20:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 2 August 2016 ==

{{edit fully-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

I need to edit wikipwdia

[[User:Dhinakaran19|Dhinakaran19]] ([[User talk:Dhinakaran19|talk]]) 04:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' this is not the right page to [[WP:PERM|request]] additional [[WP:RIGHTS|user rights]]. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you.<!-- Template:EP --> [[User:EvergreenFir|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir|(talk)]] 04:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 2 August 2016 ==

{{edit fully-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Cyphoidbomb, your point is right, so please check the below link and I believe it is valid enough to add [[Dasavathaaram]] in the top grossing 10 tamil films list. I hope you will add it and that's the edit request I have.

http://movies.ndtv.com/regional/baahubali-to-thuppakki-tamil-cinemas-100-cr-films-1204181

[[User:Rajeshbieee|Rajeshbieee]] ([[User talk:Rajeshbieee|talk]]) 06:08, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Done'''<!-- Template:EP --> [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

== SULTAN ==

Update boxoffice collections of sultan, as it grossed around 568crs according to already provided source [[User:Ambeinghari|Ambeinghari]] ([[User talk:Ambeinghari|talk]]) 08:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

:{{done}} - [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 2 August 2016 ==

{{edit fully-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

kabali has grossed 2.5 billion inr check in google fools

[[User:Nj666|Nj666]] ([[User talk:Nj666|talk]]) 11:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:EP --> {{u|Nj666}}, thanks to some very over-eager readers who were willing to believe anything the producer said, and inconsistent reporting in the press, it seems the best approach for dealing with Kabali's box office data is to wait a bit until the information settles. Also, please watch the name-calling. [[WP:NPA|It has no place at Wikipedia]] and only distracts from the discussion. Oh, and if you choose to make an edit request again, please provide references from [[WP:RS|reliable published sources]]. Saying "check in google" doesn't actually facilitate anything. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

== kabali 2.5 billion inr ==

change the list today itself <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nj666|Nj666]] ([[User talk:Nj666|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nj666|contribs]]) 11:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{u|Nj666}}, see above. There's no need to fill out multiple edit requests. [[WP:NODEADLINE|Wikipedia has no deadline]]. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 2 August 2016 ==

Why is Vishwaroopam and Dasavatharam in the TOP 10 of highest grossing in tamil cinema?!??!

Kamal Hassan has not such a Fan following in the south, like Vijay, Ajith or Mahesh Babu.

The Internet Site must be a unreliable source <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:77:6F5F:D6CD:F445:FB2B:CD19:3250|2003:77:6F5F:D6CD:F445:FB2B:CD19:3250]] ([[User talk:2003:77:6F5F:D6CD:F445:FB2B:CD19:3250|talk]]) 17:46, 2 August 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:The answer to your question is: because the values are supported by reliable published sources. If you can provide other information that is supported by [[WP:RS|'''mainstream sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy''']] (no blogs, no other shady sources) then changes can be considered. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 19:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 2 August 2016 ==

new update on Kabali

http://www.financialexpress.com/lifestyle/showbiz/kabali-box-office-collections-rajinikanth-rs-670-cr-does-the-impossible-beats-the-bollywood-brigade/336330/ <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:77:6F5F:D6CD:9C86:DB0D:E48F:5A64|2003:77:6F5F:D6CD:9C86:DB0D:E48F:5A64]] ([[User talk:2003:77:6F5F:D6CD:9C86:DB0D:E48F:5A64|talk]]) 19:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{not done}} - I'm not willing to make changes to the article until the box office data stabilizes across the various sources that endeavor to report it, not just to regurgitate information from one source. [http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/rajinikanth-kabali-box-office-radhika-apte-tamil-movie-baahubali-2944053/ This source] from two days ago said 262 crore. Did the film gross 200 crore extra in 2 days? Unless you're in a position to argue that higher numbers by default equal greater accuracy, I think it's premature to say definitively what the actual gross estimates reflect. Adding the info seems to place Wikipedia in the middle of a promotional campaign, which is not our job. Further, as noted numerous times above, [[WP:NODEADLINE|Wikipedia has no deadline]]. If we have to wait a month for a consistent gross estimate across all sources, so be it. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 20:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

== Proposed merge with [[Tollywood Highest grossing movies]] ==

Like [[List of highest-grossing Tamil films]], I see no reason why Telugu films should have a separate article than the main Indian films one. Again, we do it by country and not by language within countries. The [[Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films/Archive_1#Merge_discussion|merger discussion from 2013 until 2015]] shows why a single listing makes more sense and there is enough discrepancies between this page and [[List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films#Highest-grossing_Telugu_films]] to make watching both unwarranted. [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 19:54, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

:I lean toward '''Merge''': Seems like unnecessary child article with somewhat arbitrary figures, ex: highest opening, opening weekend, week... Whatever detail is warranted to include could be maintained here. These pages seem more like ethnic badges of honor, to me. Past discussions across various Indian cinema articles suggest that there is a push to associate certain films with ethnic identity and for each ethnic identity to be in competition with each other. I don't know that there is an analogue for this anywhere else in the film article world. Do we have lists for highest-grossing African-American films or highest-grossing Cuban-American films? My impression after having edited and gnomed at many Indian film articles, is that pages like these seem more like badges of honor for specific ethnic identities in India. Greater feedback from the WikiProject Film community would be appreciated, so I have invited them. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 20:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 2 August 2016 ==

Can you please say, what you are doing in this site ?

It´s just a joke, if Aambala starring Vishal, earned 256 crore. He is a one of the local heros in Tamil Cinema. He can be happy, if his movie surpass the 50 crore.

Also I only 135 crore ?!?!??!

Is this side a joke ?!?!

Please close this nonsence <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:77:6F5F:D6CD:2943:6C8C:C7C2:407A|2003:77:6F5F:D6CD:2943:6C8C:C7C2:407A]] ([[User talk:2003:77:6F5F:D6CD:2943:6C8C:C7C2:407A|talk]]) 21:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

I mean this side

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_Tamil_films#cite_note-2 <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:77:6F5F:D6CD:2943:6C8C:C7C2:407A|2003:77:6F5F:D6CD:2943:6C8C:C7C2:407A]] ([[User talk:2003:77:6F5F:D6CD:2943:6C8C:C7C2:407A|talk]]) 21:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{done}} - You should have asked your question at [[Talk:List of highest-grossing Tamil films]], not here. That said, the problem was a result of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Tamil_films&type=revision&diff=643810011&oldid=643752273 vandalism from 2015]. I fixed the error [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Tamil_films&diff=732756216&oldid=732704159 in this edit]. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 01:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

== Kabali ==

Kabali has raked in more than 330 crores ... How can it still be at 250 crores ... Can the person pls make the changes .. Do not give the wrong updates. [[User:1990Krishna|1990Krishna]] ([[User talk:1990Krishna|talk]]) 07:35, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

:{{U|1990Krishna}}, are you in a hurry? Can we wait until the figures calm down a bit? See all the other requests on this page. There is clearly a problem with the values being reported. 14:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

== Sultan ==

Please update boxoffice collections of movie sultan. The movie has grossed 577 crores worldwide. Here is the source. <ref>http://www.boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=2212</ref>. Thanks <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ambeinghari|Ambeinghari]] ([[User talk:Ambeinghari|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ambeinghari|contribs]]) 14:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

{{reflist-talk}}

:{{done}} - [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:55, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

== Suggestion to add date of update ==

Wikipedia,

Showing the collections to be higher than the actual one may put Wikipedia in a promotional campaign. But the showing the figures to be less than what it has earned will earn the film a bad name. I suggest you add the last updated date next to collection column which I believe will sort out half the issues regarding the collections of blockbuster movies.

Thank you. [[User:Arunkxip|Arunkxip]] ([[User talk:Arunkxip|talk]]) 05:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

:{{U|Arunkxip}}, I'm not concerned with hypothetical damage to a film's reputation. If people are native enough to expect up-to-the-minute data about films at this encyclopedia, they obviously have no idea what an encyclopedia is. That said, the request otherwise is reasonable given the circumstances, but I assure you that the people who keep conveniently misreading the Financial Express source will continue to make their requesta. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 06:46, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 4 August 2016 ==

{{edit fully-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

It's not so... Kabali has reached 650 cr becoming the highest grossing tamil movie.But it's Baahubali that's being listed as the first.

[[User:Gauthamravichandran|Gauthamravichandran]] ([[User talk:Gauthamravichandran|talk]]) 06:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:EP --> See the other responses above. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 06:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

== Box Office collections of [[Pk]] , [[Sultan]] ==

In the list [[Pk]] is on the top with 791 crore. The source which supports that is of koimoi, which is considered as an unreliable source. The figures are manipulated as the total colletion according to Boxoffice India is 742 crore as you can see here. <ref>http://www.boxofficeindia.com/worldwide-total-gross.php</ref> likewise [[Bajrangi Bhaijaan]], [[Chennai Express]], [[Prem Ratan Dhan Payo]] etc all are higher than original collections. Pls make necessary action to make the article perfect..

Likewise collections of [[Sultan]] is now standa at 577 crore as you can see below. Pls update. <ref>http://www.boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=2212</ref> [[User:Ambeinghari|Ambeinghari]] ([[User talk:Ambeinghari|talk]]) 07:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

== Protected edit request on 4 August 2016 ==

new resource for kabali

http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/rajinikanth-kabali-box-office-collection-rs-650-crore-leaves-salman-khan-sultan-behind/ <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C516:201:C018:AF51:D5B1:BEF0|2003:80:C516:201:C018:AF51:D5B1:BEF0]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C516:201:C018:AF51:D5B1:BEF0|talk]]) 08:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:See [http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-box-office-collection-reports-rajinikanth-starrer-raking-rs-675-crore-13-days-are-fake-688881#lrUWk7cBAGEqpEUv.97 This reference] which casts serious doubt on any gross outside of the 309-350 crore range. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 4 August 2016 ==

{{edit fully-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Kabali box office needs to be updated. Source article for your reference is given below:

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-box-office-collection-reports-rajinikanth-starrer-raking-rs-675-crore-13-days-are-fake-688881#Oz9TIMcMAeGq45UD.97

[[User:Rragavendaragul|Rragavendaragul]] ([[User talk:Rragavendaragul|talk]]) 10:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Done'''<!-- Template:EP --> Ah, finally, a source that seems to be aware that there are some questionable claims being made. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

== Kabali Box Office update ( Tamil ) ==

Kabali needs to be updated as 470cr (211 Cr domestic + 259 Cr overseas) based on the link. Excluded pre business from 650cr.

http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/rajinikanth-kabali-box-office-collection-rs-650-crore-leaves-salman-khan-sultan-behind/ [[User:Pradoblaze|Pradoblaze]] ([[User talk:Pradoblaze|talk]]) 12:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

:{{u|Pradoblaze}}, see [http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-box-office-collection-reports-rajinikanth-starrer-raking-rs-675-crore-13-days-are-fake-688881#lrUWk7cBAGEqpEUv.97 This reference] which casts serious doubt on any gross outside of the 309-350 crore range. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:46, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

== Protected edit request on 4 August 2016 ==

{{edit fully-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

[[User:Farid184|Farid184]] ([[User talk:Farid184|talk]]) 13:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Can you change the collection to Baahubali from 600 crore to 581 crore? Because Baahubali collected 581 crore not 600 crore.

Thank you!

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:EP --> [http://www.ibtimes.co.in/highest-grossing-tamil-movies-2015-top-10-films-that-kept-cash-registers-ringing-box-office-659394#BIrMWKJf8hrREeoz.97 This source] estimates 600 crore broken into 518 crore domestic and 82 crore international. Your request is not supported by any references, and even if it were, you're suggesting what, that we change the value to better fit your worldview? Requesting that the data be presented as a range might be a little wiser. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:35, 4 August 2016 (UTC)