{{talk header}}

{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes|1=

{{WikiProject India |class=list |importance=mid |cinema=yes |cinema-importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Business|class=list|importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject Film|class=list|Indian=yes|listas=Highest-Grossing Indian Films, List Of}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tamil films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tollywood (Telugu) films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Punjabi films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Telugu films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tamil films|talk=no|date=11 July 2015}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Bollywood films|talk=no|date=26 July 2015}}

{{copied|from=Bollywood|from_oldid =670957198|to=List of highest-grossing Indian films||to_diff=672526653|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&type=revision&diff=672526653&oldid=672526378|date=July 21, 2015}}

{{oldafdfull| date = 20 December 2012 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = List of highest-grossing Indian films worldwide }}

|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}

|maxarchivesize = 70K

|counter = 8

|minthreadsleft = 3

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(50d)

|archive = Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films/Archive %(counter)d

== add surya's 24 tamil movie in tamil list ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

<!-- Be sure to state UNAMBIGUOUSLY your suggested changes; editors who can edit the protected page need to know what to add or remove. Blank edit requests WILL be declined. -->

<!-- Begin request -->

Sir Good Evening

Please add starer surya's 24 tamil moive in the list of Tamil films

|-

| ''[[24]]''

| 2016

| [[Vikram Kumar]]

| 2D Entertainment

Kindly Request for add tamil movie starre surya 24 moive

the movie collected world wide 150 crores

this is the proof website: http://www.onlookersmedia.in/collection-report/suriya-24-collection-report-28-days

http://gabbarboxofficecollection.com/2016/suriya-24-box-office-collection-3rd-day-sunday-1st-weekend-total-collection.html

<!-- End request -->

[[User:Samsuddeen|Samsuddeen]] ([[User talk:Samsuddeen|talk]]) 14:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> {{u|Samsuddeen}}, [[WP:UGC|we don't use blogs or other user-generated sources as references]]. See [[WP:UGC]] and prior explanations on this talk page. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Sure

Add this 24 movie 150crores

[[User:Kasim999|Kasim999]] ([[User talk:Kasim999|talk]]) 13:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

== Change Theri Gross to 175 Crore World Wide ==

Theri has grossed around 175 Crores Worldwide in the first 50 days of its run. Is [http://www.catchnews.com/regional-cinema/50-blockbuster-days-for-vijay-theri-all-set-to-emerge-actor-biggest-hit-till-date-ilayathalapathy-vijay-theri-latest-box-office-news-1464936262.html this] a reliable source? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kesh505|Kesh505]] ([[User talk:Kesh505|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kesh505|contribs]]) 23:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Can we now say Baahubali is a Telugu movie only? ==

Last year, there was a big hue and cry in wikipedia discussion when Baahublai was listed as a Tamil movie (to be specific Kollywood industry) although the production house is based in Hyderabad and the director-hero are popular only with Telugu audience (the main actresses are known in both Telugu and Tamil movie industries, however). The film was made in Tamil too and hence Baahubali was given a shared status of Tamil and Telugu by moderators. But as many pointed out this idea of just making a movie in a language does not necessarily mean the movie belongs to that specific movie industry. One must take into account various other factors like - production house location, director, actor etc. The moderators who are usually ignorant of the nuances of differences about Indian movie industries, stick to some notions that may be sensible elsewhere, but not in India where a director-actor association with a specific movie industry is pretty strong. During the last year's discussion, one of the commentators who insisted on Baahubali being only a Telugu film (or to be specific Tollywood industry), predicted that Baahubali would not be nominated for any award in Tamil. Lo and behold, his/her prediction came true: Baahubali has not been represented at all in Tamil Filmfare nomination for 2016. Of course the argument would be given that perhaps Baahubali was not worth for any award in Tamil movie industry - but I think a better argument is they didn't even consider it to be a Tamil film to begin with. So if Filmfare, which is officially the "Oscars" for India, along with most of the Indian audience who have good knowledge of Indian movie industry rightfully treat Baahubali as only Telugu film, why do moderators here think differently? I am surprised that someone can be a moderator on wikipedia without much understanding of the field upon which they are moderating. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.147.191.11|69.147.191.11]] ([[User talk:69.147.191.11|talk]]) 13:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Consensus has already been reached on this issue, and the decision was arrived at by regular editors, not by "moderators". You can thank the dishonest editors who resorted to antics like [[WP:SOCKPUPPETRY|sockpuppetry]] for polluting the conversation with their petulant behavior. Nowhere else but in Indian cinema articles do we find this drive to attribute a film to an ''ethnic industry'' rather than uncontroversially indicating the languages the film was recorded in. Tollywood is [[Baahubali: The Beginning#Production|clearly indicated]] in the main article. This list article is focused on the highest grossing films of India organized by language, not by ethnic film industry. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 16:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

* Agreed. It was a [[Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films/Archive_6#RfC:_How_should_we_classify_Baahubali|many month long lengthy discussion]] with every possible conceivable angle discussed and nothing new here has been presented. Everyone else has moved on as frankly no one should care. -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 19:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

<!-- State UNAMBIGUOUSLY your suggested changes. Other editors need to know what to add or remove. Blank edit requests will be declined. -->

Theri Box office Collection:

http://idailytimes.com/vijays-theri-collects-rs-250cr-worldwide-box-office-update.html

<!-- Write your request ABOVE this line and do not remove the tildes below. -->

[[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C514:4501:619D:2679:2B9:47ED|2003:80:C514:4501:619D:2679:2B9:47ED]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C514:4501:619D:2679:2B9:47ED|talk]]) 07:09, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=]] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> <b>[[User:St170e|st170e]]</b>^{<i><small>[[User talk:St170e|talk]]</small></i>} 13:09, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

== Merger proposal ==

I propose that [[List of highest-grossing Indian films in overseas markets]] be merged into [[List of highest-grossing Indian films]]. We don't need a separate page just for overseas figures. - [[User:Managerarc|<font face="serif"><span style="color:dark blue;text-grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em"><font size="2">Managerarc</font></span></font>]]™[[User talk:Managerarc|<span style="color:green">^{<small> talk</small>}</span>]] 20:45, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

: {{u|Managerarc}} I don't think we need to keep a unique tally of grosses domestically vs. grosses internationally. Maybe discussing whether the overseas article should be deleted is in order. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:53, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

:Merging is appropriate. A totally unnecessary list. See the [[List of highest-grossing films]] (FL), gross when adjusted for inflation, films by year, franchise films are all listed in that single page. Likewise, the [[List of highest-grossing Indian films in overseas markets]] is not an independent topic, and [[List of highest-grossing Indian films]] shows worldwide gross, not the domestic. --[[User:Charles Turing|Charles Turing]] ([[User talk:Charles Turing|talk]]) 11:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

:'''Merge''' Keeping another article for this is totally unnecessary. [[User:Karyasuman|Karyasuman]] ([[User talk:Karyasuman|talk]]) 16:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

*'''Merge'''. -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 00:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

== Mungaru Male gross ==

In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&diff=730274919&oldid=730253098 this edit] I reverted {{u|Honor bee}}'s resubmission of a 75 crore total for Mungaru Male. Filmibeat is not considered a reliable source by [[WP:ICTF]]. Mybangalore.com looks like a blog to me, and thus would be unsuitable per [[WP:UGC]]. The final reference, [http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-ganesh-bal-the-outsider-on-the-inside-1678970 dnaindia.com], attributes the information to the film's lead actor, which would mean that we're using [[WP:PRIMARY|a primary source]] for controversial information. A primary source would absolutely have a reason to fudge the financial numbers of a film, for instance he might inflate it to make it more of an attractive spectacle for potential viewers, or he might deflate it to reduce the film's entertainment tax liability, or an actor might inflate it to make himself more marketable as an actor. There are all sorts of reasons why it is a bad idea to use a primary source for controversial data. Oh, and the information was also previously submitted by a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&diff=726335703&oldid=726298461 disruptive troll] who is not welcome to edit at Wikipedia, which should raise some questions about motive and appropriateness of the submission. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 00:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Moot point. Not surprisingly, Honor bee was a sock of Nagendra NJ, a user who is not welcome to edit at Wikipedia. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 21 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

[[Special:Contributions/115.112.71.222|115.112.71.222]] ([[User talk:115.112.71.222|talk]]) 14:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Vedalam Movie of Ajith 56 Director Siva Mass Opening in TamilNadu 15.5 Crores in First Day.

:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.<!-- Template:ESp --> Also any change would require you to provide reliable sources. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

== Regarding Kabali collections ==

The producer uttered some words in the media about the Kabali collections as Rs 250 crores in Day 1, which is highly impossible according to number of screens, occupancy rate and ticket rates. It seems to be a marketing gimmick to attract more people to the cinema halls. The reference given for the Kabali collections http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/rajinikanths-kabali-smashes-all-box-office-records-earns-rs-250-crore-in-india-on-first-day/articleshow/53354457.cms itself contradicts in another reference by showing Day 1 collection as over 40 crores http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/rajinikanths-kabali-smashes-all-box-office-records-collects-over-rs-40-crore/articleshow/53347794.cms. So, please update the Kabali collections according to a consistent reference source like as given in http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/kabali-rajinikanth-second-day-box-office-collection-sultan-vedalam-review/1/722537.html <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/27.49.83.78|27.49.83.78]] ([[User talk:27.49.83.78|talk]]) 07:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Semi-protected edit request on 24 July 2016 ==

it had collected nearly 90 crore on first day

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-box-office-collection-rajinikanth-starrer-performs-well-2nd-day-687625#yiEzDzEOeZv9dKa1.97 <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:77:6F5F:D6FE:105F:CC1F:3209:9CC4|2003:77:6F5F:D6FE:105F:CC1F:3209:9CC4]] ([[User talk:2003:77:6F5F:D6FE:105F:CC1F:3209:9CC4|talk]]) 16:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2016 ==

Kabali earth shattering opening: 200 crore in just 3 day,

please add superstars Kabli in Tamil movie list

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-3-day-box-office-collection-rajinikanth-starrer-grosses-over-rs-200-crore-worldwide-687728 <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C514:4501:7C5E:F40E:23AE:5190|2003:80:C514:4501:7C5E:F40E:23AE:5190]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C514:4501:7C5E:F40E:23AE:5190|talk]]) 08:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2016 ==

Kabali Update: 210 crore worldwide over the weekend

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-box-office-collection-rajinis-film-fails-surpass-bahubali-1st-weekend-record-beats-687768 <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C514:4501:7C5E:F40E:23AE:5190|2003:80:C514:4501:7C5E:F40E:23AE:5190]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C514:4501:7C5E:F40E:23AE:5190|talk]]) 09:39, 25 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Koimoi ==

Koimoi is not considered a reliable source per [[WP:ICTF]], yet many of the film grosses in this article are supported by Koimoi as a reference.[http://www.koimoi.com/box-office/bollywoods-top-worldwide-grossers/] Is this bugging anyone? [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

* That's the least concerning thing for me but I agree with their removal. It would be helpful if the Indian film task force agreed on removing it. -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 00:43, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

<ref>http://www.greatandhra.com/movies/movie-news/baahubali-gets-decent-start-in-china-75970.html

</ref>

[[User:Sgoli123|Sgoli123]] ([[User talk:Sgoli123|talk]]) 17:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

:{{not done}} - You didn't request anything. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 19:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Kabali has only grossed 200 crore as per the Indian Express Article. the other 200 crore is the business done before the movie release. So, it should be changed to 200 crore from 400 crore

[[User:VigneshwaranShanmugam|VigneshwaranShanmugam]] ([[User talk:VigneshwaranShanmugam|talk]]) 19:10, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> Reverted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&diff=731501067&oldid=731499671 this edit]. For anyone else who's curious, {{u|VigneshwaranShanmugam}} is referring to [http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/rajinikanth-kabali-day-4-box-office-collections-radhika-apte-tamil-movie-2934930/ this reference], which says, {{tq|"the Rajinikanth-starrer has earned about Rs 400 crore already. While Rs 200 crore is the box office collection, the film earned Rs 200 crore before release with sale of music rights etc."}} I imagine the trades will botch things and we will see the 400crore+ figure cited again and again. We're not here to track every dollar the film traded, and music rights sales should not be reflected in box office gross. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 19:33, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

[[User:Lalithsmash|Lalithsmash]] ([[User talk:Lalithsmash|talk]]) 19:41, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> Blank request —&thinsp;[[User:JJMC89|JJMC89]]&thinsp;<small>([[User talk:JJMC89|T]]'''·'''[[Special:Contributions/JJMC89|C]])</small> 19:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Dasavathaaram Tamil movies - 200 Crore collection economic times.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/business-of-bollywood/a-rendezevous-with-kamal-haasan/articleshow/4357064.cms

Movie Wiki Link:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dasavathaaram

[[User:VigneshwaranShanmugam|VigneshwaranShanmugam]] ([[User talk:VigneshwaranShanmugam|talk]]) 20:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> Contradicted by [http://www.hindustantimes.com/regional-movies/kabali-bo-rajinikanth-film-smashes-all-records-to-collect-rs-250-crore/story-84OyaLFJFWzdceqJxdWQzH.html this reference]. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

kabali has grossed over 400 crores and it has to be changed

http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/rajinikanth-kabali-day-4-box-office-collections-radhika-apte-tamil-movie-2934930/

[[User:Njj55|Njj55]] ([[User talk:Njj55|talk]]) 07:47, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> See further up on the page. Short story: 400 crore figure is not the box office gross, it represents box office + other revenue streams prior to the film's release. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:44, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2016 ==

Kabali Update:

425 crore

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-4th-day-box-office-collection-rajinis-film-smashes-fastest-fifty-beats-ajiths-687871 <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C514:4501:343C:F077:BF1E:3F55|2003:80:C514:4501:343C:F077:BF1E:3F55]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C514:4501:343C:F077:BF1E:3F55|talk]]) 07:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{not done}} - The scope of this article is box office grosses. Wikipedia is not an accounting firm, so it's not our job to tally up all the money made from Kabali's myriad revenue streams. Just box. If the box office gross reaches 425 crore, then you can come back to request a change. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

Kabali 4 days collections: 200 crores

http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/rajinikanth-kabali-day-4-box-office-collections-radhika-apte-tamil-movie-2934930/

The current article that was used as source says kabali has collected 250 crores in 1 day, which has been refuted by other magazines and was informed that was not possible. Please change the collection from 250 crore to 200 crore

[[User:VigneshwaranShanmugam|VigneshwaranShanmugam]] ([[User talk:VigneshwaranShanmugam|talk]]) 15:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> {{u|VigneshwaranShanmugam}}, you need to substantiate your statement that the 250 crore value asserted by [http://www.hindustantimes.com/regional-movies/kabali-bo-rajinikanth-film-smashes-all-records-to-collect-rs-250-crore/story-84OyaLFJFWzdceqJxdWQzH.html this typically reliable source] has been refuted as impossible. Surely we can't just take your word for it. Please bring those references to this talk page and start a discussion on how the content should be presented in the article. Please do not open another edit request until consensus has been reached. Thanks. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 15:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 27 July 2016 ==

Update Kabali Box office collection: 300 crore till now

http://www.indiaglitz.com/kabali-beat-enthiran-collection-tamil-news-163921.html

If you dont understand tamil, please translate the sentences in English, especially the last sentense <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C514:4501:743F:D366:1B14:2B8E|2003:80:C514:4501:743F:D366:1B14:2B8E]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C514:4501:743F:D366:1B14:2B8E|talk]]) 07:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{not done}} - I'm not comfortable using IndiaGlitz as a reference. Also, the Google translation of the last sentence is "Websites and social web users when giving negative reviews of some of the film's box office has been less successful is Rs 300 crore towards the goal." It is unclear what that means. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:58, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 27 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

[[Special:Contributions/220.227.74.73|220.227.74.73]] ([[User talk:220.227.74.73|talk]]) 12:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Why is thalaiva not added to the list despite grossing more(145 crores) than mankatha(130 Crores)

http://www.metromasti.com/kollywood/news/Thalaivaa-worldwide-total-collections-T halaiva-box-office-update/30866

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> A more reliable source is needed to change the statistics <b>[[User:St170e|st170e]]</b>^{<i><small>[[User talk:St170e|talk]]</small></i>} 19:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 27 July 2016 ==

2nd request

Update Kabali Box office collection: 300 crore till now

http://www.indiaglitz.com/kabali-beat-enthiran-collection-tamil-news-163921.html <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:77:6F5F:D656:A491:A206:E2BB:47B|2003:77:6F5F:D656:A491:A206:E2BB:47B]] ([[User talk:2003:77:6F5F:D656:A491:A206:E2BB:47B|talk]]) 19:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:You don't need to make a second request, you can wait until a volunteer decides to make the change. [[WP:NODEADLINE|Wikipedia has no deadline]]. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 19:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

== Kabali da ==

Kabali box office entered into 400 crore club [[User:Gunasekaran710|Gunasekaran710]] ([[User talk:Gunasekaran710|talk]]) 08:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

:{{u|Gunasekaran710}} No it didn't. You're confusing their pre-release income with box office income. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 20:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 28 July 2016 ==

Kabali 326 crore

http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movies-cinema-news-16/rajinikanths-kabali-has-collected-326-crores-in-6-days-says-thanu.html <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:77:6F5F:D61F:595B:28D0:9908:8D41|2003:77:6F5F:D61F:595B:28D0:9908:8D41]] ([[User talk:2003:77:6F5F:D61F:595B:28D0:9908:8D41|talk]]) 18:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{Not done}} - The 326 crore figure is claimed by the producer. Producers, actors, directors, distributors all constitute [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]]. A producer would have every reason to inflate or deflate financial figures to serve his personal gain. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:54, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=y}}

[[Special:Contributions/220.227.74.73|220.227.74.73]] ([[User talk:220.227.74.73|talk]]) 05:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Update Kabali's Gross.

Seems Like the Admin of this page are concerned only about bollywood movies,in that case split this page and make a separate article only for hindi movies. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:220.227.74.73|220.227.74.73]] ([[User talk:220.227.74.73|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/220.227.74.73|contribs]]) </span></small>

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> as you have not made a specific request in the form "Please replace XX with YY" or "Please add ZZ between PP and QQ".<br />Please also cite [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 13:41, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

:Perhaps the volunteers at this page aren't interested in updating Kabali's gross every six hours, and the constant requests are only cluttering the talk page, making it more difficult to discern which is the most useful data. [[WP:NODEADLINE|Wikipedia does not have a deadline]], so we're not in any hurry, and you shouldn't be either. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2016 ==

Kabali Update to 326 crore

http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movies-cinema-news-16/producer-thanu-asks-kabali-director-paranjith-to-do-another-film-for-v-creations.html

http://www.indiaglitz.com/kalaipuli-s-thanu-says-rajinikanth-radhika-apte-kabali-collected-rs-320-crores-in-six-days-tamil-news-164085.html <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C514:4501:C976:6AE5:869C:25F7|2003:80:C514:4501:C976:6AE5:869C:25F7]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C514:4501:C976:6AE5:869C:25F7|talk]]) 09:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{Not done}} - The 326 crore figure is claimed by the producer. Producers, actors, directors, distributors all constitute [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]]. A producer would have every reason to inflate or deflate financial figures to serve his personal gain. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2016 ==

Kabali 335 crore, and please put it into the Top 15 of all time.

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kabali-7-days-box-office-collection-rajinikanths-film-ends-high-note-first-week-688236 <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:80:C514:4501:C976:6AE5:869C:25F7|2003:80:C514:4501:C976:6AE5:869C:25F7]] ([[User talk:2003:80:C514:4501:C976:6AE5:869C:25F7|talk]]) 09:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{not done}} - Source says "The early prediction says that the movie has raked in over Rs. 335 crore." Predictions are guesses. The source also attributes the 320 crore figure to the '''producer''', which would constitute a [[WP:PRIMARY|primary source]]. Producers have a vested interest in fudging financial data. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:51, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=yes}}

[[Special:Contributions/117.241.163.243|117.241.163.243]] ([[User talk:117.241.163.243|talk]]) 09:49, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carry_On_Jatta pls change to punjabi movie history its 3rd numbers movie

:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.<!-- Template:ESp --> '''[[User:Sam Sailor|Sam Sailor]] [[User talk:Sam Sailor|^''Talk!'']]''' 09:54, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

== Protection raised ==

Given the aggressive attempts to make this into a live action box office results with poor sources, I've raised protection here. I advise the people coming here to spend more than a minute and actually look for a reliable source and discuss it. -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 00:40, 30 July 2016 (UTC)