{{oldafdfull| date = 20 December 2012 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = List of highest-grossing Indian films worldwide }}

{{WikiProject India |class=list |importance=low |cinema=yes |cinema-importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Film |class=list |importance=low}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tamil films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Tollywood (Telugu) films|talk=no|date=25 April 2014}}

{{merged-from|List of highest-grossing Bollywood films|talk=no|date=1 May 2014}}

== Site for only Hindi movies?? ==

other langauge movies like Kollywood or Tollywood will be deleted by anomyn and other, maybe Hindi, peoples ^^ soo bad guys..soo bad..... New Headline of this site "High grossing Hindi-Movies worldwide"

== Slumdog Millionaire ==

What is the resistance to or problem with adding this film to this list? The total being cited by the people attempting add it, $377.9m USD, is not unsourced, except perhaps by the editor adding it: that number is available from the Wiki article on [[Slumdog Millionaire]], [http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=slumdogmillionaire.htm and is correctly cited there from BoxOfficeMojo.com], which, given that it is a subsidiary of IMDB.com, I would say is incontrovertibly a reliable, third-party source, and this film clearly eclipses every other film currently on this list by a large margin.

The only thing I can figure is that it was apparently produced by a UK studio, in which case, I must ask, what is the definition being used here for "Indian films"? This is not specified in the article itself, and there is even another article specifically for a list of highest-grossing Bollywood films, which implies to me that this article is or should not be limited specifically to films made ''in'' India, and rather about films by or about India/Indian peoples. The movie takes place in India, was filmed in India with Indian actors, is based on a novel by an Indian author, and apparently nearly a third of its dialogue is in Hindi, which to my line of thinking makes this an unquestionably "Indian" movie, even if the studio that filmed it wasn't based in India, thus I see no good reason why it should not be added. [[User:Besieged|<font color=#A4A4A4>b<font color=#6E6E6E>e<font color=#000000>'''s'''<font color=#2E2E2E>'''i'''<font color=#424242>'''e'''<font color=#1C1C1C>'''g'''<font color=#1C1C1C>'''e'''<font color=#585858>d]]</font>^{<small>[[User_Talk:Besieged|<font color=#A4A4A4>talk]]}</small> 18:42, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

:According to the film [[WP:WikiProject Film]], what determines which country a film is from is the country of the production company. It has been discussed many times [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Archive_index]]. [[User:Bollyjeff|<span style="color:blue">BollyJeff</span>]] <span style="color:green">&#124;</span> [[User talk:Bollyjeff|<span style="color:red">''talk''</span>]] 19:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

== Does this list include gross income from DVDs and music licensing? ==

If the numbers at BOI include DVD and music, then the following can be added to the lead (reference that it is originally from [[Cinema of India]])-- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 16:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

''Earnings from DVD and overseas showings accounting for some 12% of the revenue generated by a mainstream film, contribute substantially to the overall revenue of Indian cinema, the net worth of which was found to be {{US$}}1.3 billion in 2000.<ref name="Potts75">Potts, 75</ref> Music in Indian cinema is another substantial revenue generator, with the music rights alone accounting for 4–5% of the net revenues generated by a film in India.<ref name=Potts75/>* Potts, Michel W. (2006), "Film Industry", ''Encyclopedia of India (vol. 2)'', Thomson Gale, ISBN 978-0-684-31351-1.</ref> ''

== sourcing ==

For those not on the BOI top 10 grossing list, other reliable sources will need to be provided. It looks like they often mix a domestic in crores with international in $ so it will take someone to do the appropriate math. I will just drop some stuff here. -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 17:30, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

===Enthiran===

from our article [[Enthiran]]:

However, independent sources like [[Box Office India]] remained [[skeptic]] and put the earnings at about {{INRConvert|255.5|c}} with {{INR}}186.50 crore nett and {{INR}}202 crore gross while overseas earnings are around [[US$]]12 million.<ref name=BOI>{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=2171&nCat=box_office_news|title=Endhiran - The Robot Expected Lifetime Business-Boxofficeindia.com|publisher=[[Box Office India]]|date=1 November 2010|accessdate=27 June 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://ibnlive.in.com/videos/137592/cnnibn-indian-of-the-year-in-entertainment-shankar.html|title=CNN-IBN Indian of the Year in entertainment: Shankar – Videos – Movies – Tamil-IBNLive|publisher=Ibnlive.in.com|accessdate=27 June 2011}}</ref>

: I think we should by the figure reported by the [[Box Office India]] [[User:Jayakrishnan.ks100|JK]] ([[User talk:Jayakrishnan.ks100|talk]]) 07:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

::your BOI estimate is made only one month after release, other estimates in many other reliable sources made later have different values. why should we believe the BOI future crystal balling is accurate and everybody else looking at later data is wrong?-- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 08:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

You can not edit on your personal opinion. News paper articles that you are giving, don't specialise in boxoffice data.They gave the data reported by Enthiran producers. Box office india is an independent source,whose sole work is to track boxoffice data. If you do like this,I can give articles giving different box office figures for different films. We should follow a common parameter for ranking.I think you are bias is areflecting in you edits. Please refrain from this..[[User:Kumarila|Kumarila]] 17:43 02 april 2013 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 12:17, 2 April 2013 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:It is ''your'' editing to ''your'' personal belief that older estimates by a single source should be treated as more accurate than multiple more recent estimates. We can take this to the Reliable source notice boards if you like. -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 18:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

== Billa 2 ==

The editor 111.92.22.36 is probably right. There is no cite for the total gross of Billa 2. [[User:Jayakrishnan.ks100|JK]] ([[User talk:Jayakrishnan.ks100|talk]]) 06:29, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

== 3 idiots is no.1 ==

3 idiots has the most grossing but still it is given 2nd rank while enthiran the first. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/61.3.130.0|61.3.130.0]] ([[User talk:61.3.130.0|talk]]) 17:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Don't destroy this site with bullshit information!!! ==

Anonym people be careful with your IP ... <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Titanit|Titanit]] ([[User talk:Titanit|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Titanit|contribs]]) 10:55, 20 August 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== ENTHIRAN - Biggest grosser in the history of Indian cinema ever. ==

'''[[Enthiran]] is the highest grossing Indian film of all time as said by [[India Today ]],[[The Indian Express]],[[NDTV]],[[TV9]] and [[CNN-IBN]] with grossing of minimum 400 crores.'''

India Today [[http://indiatoday.intoday.in/video/endhiran-earns-rs-250cr-in-box-office/1/117428.html]]

Indianexpress[[http://www.indianexpress.com/news/endhiran-biggest-hit-in-the-history-of-indian-cinema/697154]]

TV9[[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg2c_Upq7tw]]

NDTV[[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0CyFDnbRmQ]]

CNN-IBN[[http://ibnlive.in.com/videos/142049/rajinikanth-starrer-robot-grosses-rs-375-crore.html]]

[[http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report_endhiran-is-set-to-be-india-s-biggest-blockbuster_1446751]]

Why do u say that [[Enthiran]] movie grossed just 255 crores as said by '''[[Box Office India]] which is an independent website which is related to only Hindi films and not tamil films.'''

'''Everyone know that [[India Today ]],[[The Indian Express]],[[NDTV]],[[TV9]] and [[CNN-IBN]] are far far better than the independent website [[Box Office India]].'''

'''This is not a small problem.'''

This issue is going on for three years.This is not a single person issue but the '''question of millions.'''

Do remember it and follow the wikipedia guidelines sir.

[[User:Rajafree|Rajafree]] ([[User talk:Rajafree|talk]]) 11:59, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

== Chennai Express worldwide gross ==

It is written that chennai express world wide gross is 3.17 billion (317 crore)

That is wrong that is the world wide collection.

The world wide gross is 3.88 billion(388 crore) crore as of Tuesday 27 August

Worldwide gross=domestic+oversea+entertainment tax

Here is the link

http://www.boxofficecapsule.com/boxoffice-collections.aspx?id=1688

Confirmed by taran Adarsh,n bollywood hungama

Look at the worldwide gross not world wide collection

World wide gross

As of 28 August the exact amound will come in the evening ill give the link in the evening.

Moreover, I check yesterday that enthiran world wide gross is 4.02 billion(402 crore) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/125.24.166.0|125.24.166.0]] ([[User talk:125.24.166.0|talk]]) 05:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Fake regional records ==

Dear sir

User:Radharani11 and other IP addresses are revert warring on this article. Please take action.

They seem to be fans of actors Rajinikanth, Surya, Vijay, Ajith and trying to create false image to boost super-ego. They are removing links that do not support their POV.

They are trying to turn hearsay and wishlist into facts.

I suspect User:Radharani11 to be a sock puppet. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/117.193.44.92|117.193.44.92]] ([[User talk:117.193.44.92|talk]]) 16:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

LOL maybe there are movies of Rajinikanth, Surya and so on which are in the Top 20 of this List ?? In India exist other languages too not only Bollywood.. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Titanit|Titanit]] ([[User talk:Titanit|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Titanit|contribs]]) 09:05, 5 September 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

====Endhiran====

Endhiran clearly is the highest grossing Indian film.BOI says its gross in Tamil itself is 255 Crs.Its Telugu version earned 69 Crs.And hindi version over 30 Crs.Overseas is different.

The 179 mentioned there is the revenue earned by producer.Everything is cleared in this article.Its total goes over 400 + Crs.Easily the highest Indian grosser. http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8077844-enthiranrobot-collected-444-crore-worldwide Post right info! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/117.195.65.205|117.195.65.205]] ([[User talk:117.195.65.205|talk]]) 18:47, 2 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:That is an example of irresponsible media speculation. Hindi population is '''7 times larger''' than Tamil population. Anyway, Enthiran flopped miserably in Bollywood. Raanjhanaa was a much bigger success story there. The 179 crore figure is the global gross revenue from theatricals and rights. ''[[Dabangg]]'' and ''[[My Name Is Khan]]'' grossed more than Enthiran as they released in more screens and higher marketing buzz. Also, several Enthiran distributors claimed losses due to high pricing for Tamil version. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/117.193.39.208|117.193.39.208]] ([[User talk:117.193.39.208|talk]]) 03:12, 3 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Request for Update This Article ==

{{edit semi-protected|<!-- Page to be edited -->|answered=yes}}

<!-- Begin request -->

So till now most of the websites are showing Chennai Express In the first position with a gross Income in Indian Films worldwide of Rs 420 Crores. With domestic gross income of Rs 301 crore and International collection is Rs 119 crore and domestic net collection is Rs 226.70 crores.''' <br />

I want to give some of the links which are the proof to my statement''' <br />

http://www.filmjagat.com/2013/09/chennai-express-box-office-journey.html<br />

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-09-29/news-interviews/42481965_1_chennai-express-aamir-and-salman-talaash<br />

http://www.koimoi.com/box-office/chennai-express-box-office-journey-comes-to-a-halt-at-420-crs-gross-globally/<br />

These sites are giving the latest informations all other are old. So I request to update this Article.

And talking about '''"Slumdog Millionaire"''' this is not at all included in Bollywood film. Its directer, producer, screen play, Editor, distributor all are of US and even the investment and taxation are in US dollar. So it is a Hollywood film. <br />

About '''Rajnikant's Robot''' the link http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8077844-enthiranrobot-collected-444-crore-worldwide is not giving the correct information. It can be confirmed from the data showing 3 Idiots with income of Rs 339 crore which is not, the gross worldwide income of 3 Idiots was Rs 392 crore, which has been now beated by Chennai Express with gross world wide income of Rs 420 crore till now. <br />

Again this link show the correct income of Robot http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/robot+rajini=rs-300-cr/1/115629.html<br />

So I request to update this article as soon as possible with list like this <br />

1st Chennai Express with Rs 420 crore'''<br />

2nd 3 Idiots with Rs 392 crore'''<br />

3rd Ek Tha Tiger with Rs 310 crore'''<br />

4th Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani with Rs 301 crore'''<br />

5th Enthiran with Rs 300 crore'''<br />

Also add Telugu film Attarintiki Daredi Gross collections 230 crore'''<br /> <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Harikrishnakandula|Harikrishnakandula]] ([[User talk:Harikrishnakandula|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Harikrishnakandula|contribs]]) 05:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

and then as it is. Please do it as soon as possible.

<!-- End request --><br />

[[User:MrDon100crore|MrDon100crore]] ([[User talk:MrDon100crore|talk]]) 13:38, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> One of your sources (koimoi) has a reliable look and presents a table which does not support your request. Regards, [[User:Celestra|Celestra]] ([[User talk:Celestra|talk]]) 18:49, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

<br />

Thanks for Editing this article. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:MrDon100crore|MrDon100crore]] ([[User talk:MrDon100crore|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MrDon100crore|contribs]]) 13:28, 12 November 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== chennai express grossed 4.22 billion ==

{{edit semi-protected|<!-- Page to be edited -->|answered=yes}}

<!-- Begin request -->

chennai express grossed 4.22 billion (422 crores) till date reference 1)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_Bollywood_films 2)http://www.koimoi.com/box-office/chennai-express-box-office-journey-comes-to-a-halt-at-420-crs-gross-globally/

<!-- End request -->

[[User:Karansangaj06071995|Karansangaj06071995]] ([[User talk:Karansangaj06071995|talk]]) 06:53, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

:[[File:Yellow check.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Partly done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> your source states 4.20, not 4.22. BOI still says 3.95. As both sources are identified in the lede as reputable, I've kept both figures. --[[User:Stfg|Stfg]] ([[User talk:Stfg|talk]]) 14:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

::Instead of reverting that and calling the editor who took the trouble to do it a "newbie" while leaving bits of the edit summary splattered at the top of the page, perhaps it would be better to edit the first sentence of the lede, which currently says "''... as reported by sources such as Box Office India,[1][2] '''Bollywood Hungama, Koimoi, and other reputable sources'''''". --[[User:Stfg|Stfg]] ([[User talk:Stfg|talk]]) 20:00, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

::Furthermore, the [[WP:NPOV]] '''policy''' states: "Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace '''''fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources''''', in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources." (First sentence of [[WP:WEIGHT]]). So how can you prioritise one reliable source over others?

::And yet another thing: that consensus one of you claimed on my talk page doesn't exist. I've just read this whole talk page. No agreement was ever struck to favour BOI at the expense of the others. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films_worldwide&diff=548285757&oldid=540206424 this edit], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films_worldwide&diff=569070518&oldid=567872280 this] for other views. --[[User:Stfg|Stfg]] ([[User talk:Stfg|talk]]) 20:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

== Request to include Tamil movies ==

Request to include Tamil movies like singam 2, arambam, viswaroopam in the 100+ crore list as all these films has crossed the landmark as reported in media several times <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/125.21.157.2|125.21.157.2]] ([[User talk:125.21.157.2|talk]]) 07:47, 13 December 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

<small>Request originally posted at the top of this talk page moved down and sorted according to date of posting. - [[User:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:green">'''Jayadevp'''</span>]][[User talk:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:red">'''13'''</span>]]</small>

== Semi-protected edit request on 17 December 2013 ==

{{edit semi-protected|<!-- Page to be edited -->|answered=yes}}

<!-- Begin request -->

Change the worldwide gross of Krrish 3 from 2.25 billion to 3.21 billion

Sources :

http://m.koimoi.com/box-office/krrish-3-now-3rd-highest-worldwide-grosser-beats-ek-tha-tigers-record/?maneref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.co.in%2F

<!-- End request -->

[[Special:Contributions/122.177.61.251|122.177.61.251]] ([[User talk:122.177.61.251|talk]]) 13:33, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

:{{done}} - [[User:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:green">'''Jayadevp'''</span>]][[User talk:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:red">'''13'''</span>]] 17:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 17 December 2013 ==

{{edit semi-protected|<!-- Page to be edited -->|answered=yes}}

<!-- Begin request -->

Chennai Express worldwide gross is 4.22 billion.Please have a correction on this.The source is another wikipedia page itself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_Bollywood_films

<!-- End request -->

[[Special:Contributions/183.83.22.156|183.83.22.156]] ([[User talk:183.83.22.156|talk]]) 19:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

:[[WP:CIRCULAR|wikipedia articles are]] not [[WP:RS| reliably published sources]]. -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 23:39, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

== Deletion of this Page ==

This page must be deleated because it already exists here and is more updated and authentic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bollywood_highest-grossing_films_in_overseas_markets

[[User:Dr. Shahid Alam|<font color="green">Dr. Shahid Alam</font>]]([[User talk:Dr. Shahid Alam|<font color="green">Talk to Me</font>]]) 09:47, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

:it would be the other page with the colloquial title that would be deleted. -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 12:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

== Merge discussion ==

There are numerous different articles about one basic thing - revenues of Indian films. All this needs to be consolidated and properly defined, as the current maintenance of several such articles is a mess, an article maintenance problem, and there is bound to be plenty of contradictory details among them all. In the merged article, the top-grossing films would be centralised, ideally with separate columns for domestic and global returns. The "Hundred Crore Club" concept could be mentioned, as this seems to have sources, but it boils down to a list of top-grossing films. Furthermore, it might be appropriate and clearer to rename this article to [[List of highest-grossing Indian films]]. This multi-way merge will take some work, but is clearly justified in view of the current redundancies. [[User:Dl2000|Dl2000]] ([[User talk:Dl2000|talk]]) 04:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

*'''Partial Support''' as per the reasons given above by [[User:Dl2000|Dl2000]] but I oppose the merging of Bollywood figures into that of all the Indian films. Please wait for the discussion at the article's talk page to complete. - [[User:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:green">'''Jayadevp'''</span>]][[User talk:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:red">'''13'''</span>]] 05:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

*'''support''' - although the "100 crore club" article probably could survive as a text only article that talks about the '''''concept''''' of the "club" - not lists of the individual films, etc.-- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 12:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

*'''Support''' per Jayadevp and TRPoD above, just the films, and not the Bollywood figures. [[User:Ruby Murray|<font color="#FF0000">Ruby</font>]] [[User talk:Ruby Murray|<font color="#C71585">Murray</font>]] 12:54, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

*'''Support''': My suggestion is, the final version of merged article should contain only [[Central Board of Film Certification|CBFC]] certified films. Not be biased an bollywood or kollywood or tollywood or any other, since it could raise some issues/disputes. I oppose for the concept of 'Hundred crore club', it seems additional glorification for the films more than the revenue mentioned. --[[User:Balablitz|βα£α]]([[User talk:Balablitz#top|ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ]]) 13:20, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

*'''Partial Support''' Well, it's a good idea to merge related articles into one and make it accessible to internet user in on go, however, Bollywood is the oldest among its local contemporaries with its own rights, figures, values and representation, therefore, I'm of the opinion as [[User:Jayadevp13]] of representing just the films in [[List of highest-grossing Indian films]] but Bollywood figures. Bolly. figures should be represented in [[List of highest-grossing Bollywood films]] itself. Salman 11:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Samsujata|Samsujata]] ([[User talk:Samsujata|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Samsujata|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{reply to|Dl2000|TheRedPenOfDoom|Ruby Murray|Balablitz|Samsujata}} Added [[Bollywood highest grossing films by month]] to the merge list. I thought that I should inform you all about it. The article has been maintained '''comparatively''' well till now though. - [[User:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:green">'''Jayadevp'''</span>]][[User talk:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:red">'''13'''</span>]] 16:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

:{{re|Jayadevp13}} {{Great}}. Good move. --[[User:Balablitz|βα£α]]([[User talk:Balablitz#top|ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ]]) 04:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

:'''Comment''' The most appropiate is to create a page titled "List of highest-grossing Indian films" and merge all these pages!

*'''Decline'''. As the major sources like TOI and India Today are mentioning special records of individual industries, what if wikipedia maintain with reliable sources?[[User:Phaneendra M|Phani M]] ([[User talk:Phaneendra M|talk]]) 17:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

*'''Strong support''' There are way too many articles for the grosses achieved by Indian cinema. And considering the fact that there is no official box office source for grosses of Indian films, it is really unnecessary too have these many articles. It would be a good idea to merge all articles into one. [[User:Nirinsanity|NiR]]_{[[User talk:Nirinsanity|insanity]]} 16:42, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

*'''Decline'''. i'm completly opposing the merge of an articls

we all telugu people want highest grossing telugu movies

we want indiual records of separte languages in india[[User:Ak-Akhil|Akhil]] ([[User talk:Ak-Akhil|talk]]) 16:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

:::do you have [[WP:WGR|any actually policy based rationale]] ?-- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 12:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

*'''Strong Decline''' These articles represent readers to get an idea about how the box office performance works from time to time. [[User:Daan0001|Daan0001]] ([[User talk:Daan0001|talk]]) 13:27, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 30 December 2013 ==

{{edit semi-protected|<!-- Page to be edited -->|answered=yes}}

<!-- Begin request -->

world wide gross of movie 'chennai express' is INR 422 Crore

<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/news/dhoom-3-chennai-express-krrish-3-transformed-business-of-bollywood-in-2013/1212330}}</ref>

<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.canindia.com/2013/12/dhoom-3-chennai-express-krrish-3-transformed-business-of-bollywood-in-2013/#}}</ref>

<!-- End request -->

[[User:Rajptl20|Rajptl20]] ([[User talk:Rajptl20|talk]]) 16:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

<s>:{{notdone}}: Box office figures are being considered whenever available and not that by other trade analysts. - [[User:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:green">'''Jayadevp'''</span>]][[User talk:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:red">'''13'''</span>]] 17:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)</s>

:{{Partly done}}: Added the figures as a note. - [[User:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:green">'''Jayadevp'''</span>]][[User talk:Jayadevp13|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:red">'''13'''</span>]] 17:43, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2014 ==

{{edit semi-protected|<!-- Page to be edited -->|answered=yes}}

<!-- Begin request -->

| <nowiki>14

|''[[Aarambam]]''

| 2012

| [[A. Raghuram]]

| {{INRConvert|1.9|b}}<ref>

|-

</nowiki>

<!-- End request -->

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> as you have not cited a [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to back up your request, without which no information should be added to any article. - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 19:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

==References==

{{reflist}}