Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2020: already answered User:Robynthehode Thanks for not forgetting next time. You may also use the user script mentioned at CAT:ESP for assistance in the matter.
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)
Bots, Template editors
2,182,105 edits
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:List of cities with the most skyscrapers/Archive 1) (bot
 
(190 intermediate revisions by 81 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=List|
{{Skyscrapers|class=list|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Skyscrapers|importance=high}}
}}
{{Archives}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(30d)
| archive = Talk:List of cities with the most skyscrapers/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 1
| maxarchivesize = 150K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 3
}}.


. Kuala Lumpur has 478 above 150 meters. Update this. source is archived because Emporis has defunct as a company <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:OOOshafiqOOO|OOOshafiqOOO]] ([[User talk:OOOshafiqOOO#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OOOshafiqOOO|contribs]]) 08:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Need to restore the article "List of city with the most highrise building".Since there is no generally agreed-on definition of a [[skyscraper]], this list ranks cities by their number of buildings higher than various thresholds, complementing the [[list of cities with the most high-rise buildings]], which uses a somewhat arbitrary 35m cutoff.
The site skyscrapercity.com used to create this article contains not quite complete data on the number of skyscrapers in different cities. A more extensive database is contained on Emporis.com, where, for example, the number of buildings with a height of more than 150 meters exceeds 430 pieces (instead of 353 on the skyscrapercity). Similarly, the number of skyscrapers in other cities of Asia is different. Perhaps for more.


{| class="wikitable"
|-
! City
! 600m
! 500m
! 400m
! 300m
! 250m
! 200m
|-
| [[Dubai]]
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 14
| 31
| 59
|-
| [[Hong Kong]]
| -
| -
| 2
| 6
| 15
| 54
|-
| [[New York City]]
| -
| 1
| 1
| 4
| 10
| 52
|-
| [[Chicago]]
| -
| -
| 2
| 4
| 13
| 27
|-
| [[Shanghai]]
| 1
| -
| 3
| 4
| 11
| 32
|-
|}


Philadelphia now has 17 buildings over 150 meters. Can someone please update?
See also
*[[List of cities with the most high-rise buildings]]
*[[List of tallest buildings in Dubai]]
*[[List of tallest buildings in Hong Kong]]
*[[List of tallest buildings in New York City]]
*[[List of tallest buildings in Chicago]]
*[[List of tallest buildings in Shanghai]]


Boston now has 23 buildings over 150 meters. Can someone update?
[[User:Quiname|Quiname]] ([[User talk:Quiname|talk]]) 18:12, 8 February 2011 (UTC)


. Panama City # of skyscrapers is wrong. It has around 109 buildings over 150 meters. Source: skyscrapercity . com/threads/proyectos-y-avances-miscel%C3%81neos.461168/post-170900851. Please, cross-reference this list with the individual building specifications to double check if you want. The old source (skyscrapercenter.com) is missing many buildings.
==Caracas...?==
Apparently Caracas's 46 buildings taller than 100m sum to 5,678,8. That doesn't seem right, as it doesn't make sense(should be 56,788) and it's kind of impossible to sum 46 buildings to 56788. I'm thinking that it's either supposed to be 5,678 or 5,678.8 (which would be rounded to 5679.) [[User:Ev3commander|Ev3commander]] ([[User talk:Ev3commander|talk]]) 00:16, 25 February 2015 (UTC)


== Dealing with inaccuracy with CTBUH numbers ==


As some of you might know, the CTBUH isn't always accurate when it comes to tallying the number of skyscrapers that meet the 150 m+ criterion. In most cases it is close to accurate but for certain cities (Mumbai, Moscow, Miami as per above, etc.) there is a disparity between the city's own tallest buildings page and the cities page on CTBUH. There isn't an alternative authoritative source that could provide statistics for every city. What should we do in these cases? For such cities, should we adhere to CTBUH's number or the number determined from a city's tallest buildings page, if all the buildings in that page is well-written and sourced? [[User:LivinAWestLife|LivinAWestLife]]


([[User talk:LivinAWestLife|talk]]) 05:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)


:Here's a list of some discrepancies I found - I'll keep updating this if I find more:
:Bangkok: 114 (CTBUH), 165 (Wikipedia)
:Daegu: 6 (CTBUH), 27 (Wikipedia)
:Jakarta: 115 (CTBUH), 128 (Wikipedia)
:Miami: 61 (CTBUH), 68 (Wikipedia)
:Mumbai: 100 (CTBUH), 252 (Wikipedia)
:Seoul: 82 (CTBUH), 126 (Wikipedia) [[User:LivinAWestLife|LivinAWestLife]] ([[User talk:LivinAWestLife|talk]]) 05:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2024 ==


== Formatting Error ==
There is a formatting error with Kiev which causes the list to look wrong in the "This is a ranking of the cities with at least 10 buildings above 100m." section. I don't know enough about list formatting to fix it sadly, perhaps someone else does. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/23.240.131.64|23.240.131.64]] ([[User talk:23.240.131.64|talk]]) 04:09, 17 September 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Only cities with at least 20 buildings above 200m are listed for now ==

Some cities such as [[Taipei]] have buildings above 500m. But they don't show up here if they don't have at least 20 buildings above 200m:

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! City
! Total
! >=600m
! 500m
! 450m
! 400m
! 350m
! 300m
! 250m
! 200m
|-
| [[Dubai]]
| 59
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 5
| 14
| 31
| 59
|-
| [[Hong Kong]]
| 54
| -
| -
| 1
| 2
| 4
| 6
| 15
| 54
|-
| [[New York City]]
| 52
| -
| -
| -
| -
| 2
| 4
| 10
| 52
|-
| [[Shanghai]]
| 32
| -
| -
| 1
| 2
| 2
| 4
| 11
| 32
|-
| [[Chicago]]
| 27
| -
| -
| -
| 2
| 2
| 6
| 13
| 27
|-
|}
[[User:Quiname|Quiname]] ([[User talk:Quiname|talk]]) 18:36, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

== New section including buildings under construction? ==

The present table takes into account only completed buildings. It would be nice to have another table whose numbers also reflect the skyscrapers currently under construction. [[User:Quiname|Quiname]] ([[User talk:Quiname|talk]]) 20:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

In fact, dramatic changes will affect at least Dubai:

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! City
! >=600m
! 500m
! 450m
! 400m
! 350m
! 300m
! 250m
! 200m
|-
| [[Dubai]] soon
| 1
| 2
| 2
| 5
| 11
| 23
| 46
| 79
|-
| [[Dubai]] now
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 5
| 14
| 31
| 59
|-

|}

[[User:Quiname|Quiname]] ([[User talk:Quiname|talk]]) 19:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

== List of cities with most buildings higher than 100m (not enough for a skyscraper) ==

If we lowered the threshold from 200m to 100m (not enough for a [[skyscraper]] by most definitions), and included only cities with at least 400 buildings higher than 100m, then [[Tokyo]] would replace [[Chicago]] in the top 5 list<ref>M. Gerometta, P. Kazmierczak, M. lacey, P. Oldfield, A. Wood. Tall Buildings In Numbers. World's Tallest 50 Urban Agglomerations. CTBUH Journal, 2009, issue II. http://www.ctbuh.org/HighRiseInfo/TallestDatabase/50TallestAgglomerations/tabid/1006/language/en-GB/Default.aspx</ref>.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! City
! # Buildings >=100m
|-
| [[Hong Kong]]
| 3214-3700
|-
| [[Chongqing]]
| +2200
|-
| [[Shanghai]]
| 1600-4000
|-
| [[Shenzhen]]
| +2000
|-
| [[Seoul]]
| +1000
|-
| [[Sao Paolo]]
| 800-1000
|-
| [[New York City]]
| 830
|-
| [[Mumbai]]
| 768
|-
| [[Guangzhou]]
| 760-1100
|-
| [[Tokyo]]
| 683
|-
| [[Dubai]]
| 671
|-
| [[Bangkok]]
| 600-700
|-
| [[Beijing]]
| 500-1500
|-
| [[Shenyang]]
| +1000
|-
| [[Metro Manila]]
| +500
|-
| [[Chengdu]]
| 1000-2000
|-
| [[Incheon]]
| +500
|-
| [[Busan]]
| +700
|-
| [[Jakarta]]
| 350-450
|-
| [[Istanbul]]
| 400-600
|-
| [[Moscow]]
| 250-300
|-
| [[Mexico]]
| 130-180
|-
| [[Panama]]
| 250-300
|-
| [[Recife]]
| 140-220
|-
| [[Goiania]]
| 220-280
|-
| [[Buenos-Aires]]
| 110-150
|-
| [[Gurgaon]]
| 100-150
|-
|}
{{reflist}}
[[User:Quiname|Quiname]] ([[User talk:Quiname|talk]]) 17:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

== New Data ==

Hi Quiname, I've done some revising on the data. From now on there will be three tables.

One is categorized based on skyscrapers that are above 100m, one will be''' completed''' skyscrapers above 200m, and the last one would be for under construction. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Lkiller123|Lkiller123]] ([[User talk:Lkiller123|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lkiller123|contribs]]) 06:18, 15 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Lkiller123, there already were three tables, and your 200+ table made things worse. You deleted the columns for 450+ 350+ 250+ without explanation. And the reader should immediately see how many buildings of city X are higher than Y meters, but in your 200+ table he has to add up the values of the columns for 500m, 400m, 300m etc. Not good. I'll use your longer 100+ table though. [[User:Quiname|Quiname]] ([[User talk:Quiname|talk]]) 18:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Some [[skyscraper]] definitions draw the lower limit at 150m<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.skyscrapernews.com/news.php?ref=1244 |title=Huge New Rogers Skyscraper Proposed |quote=...their eleventh proper skyscraper, that is by definition buildings above 150&nbsp;metres |publisher=skyscrapernews.com |date=3 December 2007 |accessdate=3 December 2007}}</ref>. Perhaps one should add a 150m column. [[User:Quiname|Quiname]] ([[User talk:Quiname|talk]]) 19:04, 15 February 2011 (UTC)




Quiname - I see what you are trying to do here. I mistakenly made the chart as 200-300m, 300-400m, and so on...
Did you keep my newly updated data?

I have also done edits to update the data from CTBUH.com, and I believe that you reverted those edits. I will try to get the data up again and improve the readability on the table. I will try to get more list while minimize wordings as much as possible. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Lkiller123|Lkiller123]] ([[User talk:Lkiller123|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lkiller123|contribs]]) 00:35, 16 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I think it's consistent with CTBUH now, and includes a 150m column for completed and topped-out buildings, since 150m is the skyscraper cutoff, according to the cited source. BTW, we might want to delete the somewhat redundant 200m table now. [[User:Quiname|Quiname]] ([[User talk:Quiname|talk]]) 17:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

== Cities with at least 100 skyscrapers higher than 150m ==

The reference above claims skyscrapers start a 150m. So I guess we should have a list of completed or topped out buildings as follows (CTBUH database):
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! City
! >=600m
! >=500m
! >=450m
! >=400m
! >=350m
! >=300m
! >=250m
! >=200m
! >=150m
|-
| [[Dubai]]
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 5
| 14
| 27
| 48
| 122
|-
| [[Hong Kong]]
| -
| -
| 1
| 2
| 4
| 6
| 15
| 52
| 272
|-
| [[Shanghai]]
| -
| -
| 2
| 3
| 3
| 4
| 16
| 45
| 109
|-
| [[Chicago]]
| -
| -
| -
| 2
| 2
| 6
| 12
| 27
| 110
|-
| [[New York City]]
| -
| -
| -
| -
| 2
| 4
| 10
| 52
| 223
|-
|}
[[Tokyo]] has 99 and thus just fails to get included.
[[User:Quiname|Quiname]] ([[User talk:Quiname|talk]]) 17:00, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


==Seattle==
Where is Seattle? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.173.23.145|68.173.23.145]] ([[User talk:68.173.23.145|talk]]) 03:29, 17 April 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==150m==
Yeah I will go ahead and delete the 200 meter chart. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Lkiller123|Lkiller123]] ([[User talk:Lkiller123|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lkiller123|contribs]]) 00:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== More info ==

Should we get more infos up on this article? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Lkiller123|Lkiller123]] ([[User talk:Lkiller123|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lkiller123|contribs]]) 20:10, 19 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Sure, would you like to write a script that systematically queries the CTBUH database (or similar sites) and automatically generates a more detailed, huge table with additional columns for >=100m, >=75m, >=50m, plus maybe a hundred extra rows for all those cities with a reasonable number of buildings above 50m? [[User:Quiname|Quiname]] ([[User talk:Quiname|talk]]) 20:45, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

For the script - that will be way beyond limits for Wikipedia, though technically possible.
For the tables: I believe that the height thresholds are already nicely done and defined. Maybe I would get something more on the 100m table since there are loads of data from the CTBUH list.

Edit away! :D <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Lkiller123|Lkiller123]] ([[User talk:Lkiller123|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lkiller123|contribs]]) 03:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


May I suggest you include Tokyo in the list of cities with the most skyscrapers? According to the reliable http://www.eonet.ne.jp/~building-pc/tokyo/to.htm there're already 108 above 150m in town, with
over 30 u/c http://www.eonet.ne.jp/~building-pc/tokyo-kensetu/tokyo-ing-menu.htm <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/219.2.68.4|219.2.68.4]] ([[User talk:219.2.68.4|talk]]) 10:39, 24 May 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-

No, in order to maintain the data integrity, only datas from CTBUH should be used.~~~~

== concerned about data accuracy. ==

hi,
interesting article, but i have to admit i'm concerned where the numbers are coming from, as they do not reconcile with some other available information. specifically i'm talking about skyscraperpage.com.
of course the criterion for listing buildings/high-rises/skyscrapers will vary somewhat, but still, the numbers seem way off. for example, re: hong kong, skyscraperpage lists their building count/high-rise count at 842/833 and your page list various numbers such as 2354 above 100m (!). something seems wrong. would appreciate some clarification, as it is quite confusing looking at data from other sources. thx.~~~~ {{subst:UnsignedIP|1=173.69.37.61|2=02:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)}} <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== data accuracy ==

where is this data coming from? the numbers don't reconcile at all from other sources, such as skyscraperpage.com. in some cases they are way way off. for example, the number of buildings in nyc vs. hong kong. i see that it came from CTBUH, but still, the striking contrast with other sources does raise questions...
clarification would be of great help.
[[Special:Contributions/173.69.37.61|173.69.37.61]] ([[User talk:173.69.37.61|talk]]) 02:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
:The [[WP:RS|reliability of the sources]] is important here. I would certainly trust the CTBUH more than skyscrapercity.com. [[User:Astronaut|Astronaut]] ([[User talk:Astronaut|talk]]) 02:29, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

== List of Cities with most buildings at least >100m, cited source contradicts list ==

According to the wiki page, #36 is San Francisco at 9,379m and #38 is Warsaw with 2,320m. I found this high of a difference dubious since the amount of difference should level off as you move further down the list. So I checked the source cited by this section (source #8):
http://www.ctbuh.org/HighRiseInfo/TallestDatabase/50TallestAgglomerations/tabid/1006/language/en-GB/Default.aspx

According to the list, San Francisco is ranked #35, with Wuhan, Busan, Shenyang, Atlanta, Chengdu, Los Angeles, Melbourne, and Paris coming in afterward. Warsaw doesn't even appear in the top 50.

This section also cites a Polish language article for the city of Warsaw:
http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warszawskie_wie%C5%BCowce
This is not an appropriate source for an English-language article. There is an English-language page for Warsaw, but it doesn't appear to offer anything to suggest that Warsaw belongs on this list ranked after San Francisco.

I believe someone with some admirable Polish pride decided to put it on the list after San Francisco and hoped nobody would notice. I'll leave it to more experienced Wikipedia editors to review and/or correct this section.

[[Special:Contributions/158.121.82.46|158.121.82.46]] ([[User talk:158.121.82.46|talk]]) 21:26, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Justin Smith
::The entire "List of cities with most buildings at least >100m," section is an inaccurate mess. For instance, Winston Salem is listed at #47 with a whopping 2 buildings above 100m (?!?), yet the source quoted above shows Dallas at #49 with 53 buildings above 100m; Dallas isn't even included in the table, nor is Hangzhou with 62 buildings or Los Angeles with 70. I am too inexperienced with table editing, or I would have a go at changing it to reflect the source. The section needs to either be made accurate, or be purged. [[Special:Contributions/66.25.42.226|66.25.42.226]] ([[User talk:66.25.42.226|talk]]) 22:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't see Auckland, New Zealand on this list either. As per the Wiki page 'list of tallest structures in New Zealand' there are 14 skyscrapers above 100 metres, excluding of course the Sky Tower which is 328 metres. [[User:Rockyar88|Rockyar88]] ([[User talk:Rockyar88|talk]]) 06:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

== Inclusion criteria and keeping it up to date ==

1. The table in 'Cities with at least 100 completed / topped-out skyscrapers above 150m' is somewhat out of date. Dubai in particular has six buildings between 400 and 350 m (four have been topped-out in 2011 - see [http://buildingdb.ctbuh.org/?do=create&search=yes&list_city=AE-DXB&list_function=all&status_COM=on&status_UCT=on&type_building=on&page=0]). I suspect the whole table needs to be revisited and updated.

2. In the table in 'Cities with at least 100 skyscrapers above 150m (under construction inclusive)' it seems there is something odd going on that contradicts the previous table. In particular, why is Tokyo listed as having a building apparently >600 m when only the [[Tokyo Sky Tree]] is anywhere near that height and that is a tower, not a skyscraper. According to [[List of tallest structures in Japan]], the tallest skyscraper in Tokyo is the 248 m Midtown Tower, while the 296 m Yokohama Landmark Tower is the tallest in Japan and that's in Yokohama. [[User:Astronaut|Astronaut]] ([[User talk:Astronaut|talk]]) 02:26, 1 January 2012 (UTC)


I noticed the same thing. Should I change it? [[User:Informed Person|Informed Person]] ([[User talk:Informed Person|talk]]) 22:26, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

==Madrid vs Warsaw==
MADRID HAS MORE OVER 100 m SKYCRAPERS THAN VARSAW
Just the CTBA has four over 250 m skycrapers.--[[Special:Contributions/83.53.171.147|83.53.171.147]] ([[User talk:83.53.171.147|talk]]) 04:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

== definition of height ==

Please include the definition of "height" that you are using. Is it top floor, roof, mast, or antenna height? [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 23:36, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

== List of cities with most buildings at least >100m ==

The List of cities with most buildings at least >100m is currently a complete disaster. Some problems right now include:
* The list is ordered by number of buildings rather than by combined height, which contradicts both the sentence preceding the table and the original source material.
* The list is incomplete. The cited source provides a list of the top 50 cities, but only the top 35 were added to this table.
* Some of the stats are wrong, such as San Francisco's number of buildings and combined height being listed as 70 and 9,379 instead of 88 and 11,582 as cited.
* To make matters worse, people have added additional cities making this list wildly inaccurate. For example, #50 in this table is Montreal at 20 skyscrapers, while the cited source has Tel Aviv at #50 with 59 skyscrapers. Major cities such as Dallas and Los Angeles aren't even listed while several cities with only 1, 2, or 3 skyscrapers are.
* The source is from 2009-2010 and is somewhat outdated now. If anyone can find a more recent and updated source, that would be great!


Unless anyone objects, I will edit the table so that only the top 50 cities are listed exactly as they appear in the cited source. Otherwise, this entire table needs to be deleted as it is very misleading.

'''[[User:Kachyna|<font color="#008080">Kachyna</font>]][[User talk:Kachyna|<font color="#9ACD32"><small>(talk)</small></font>]]''' 07:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

== Cities with at least 45 skyscrapers above 150m (i.e. about 35–40 floors) (under construction inclusive) ==

I think Toronto should be included in this section according to the [[List of tallest buildings in Toronto]] article. <font face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Intoronto1125|Intoronto1125]]</font><b><font color="red">[[User talk:Intoronto1125|Talk]]</font></b><font color="orange">[[Special:Contributions/Intoronto1125|Contributions]]</font> 04:34, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

The cutoff is not 45 its 50. Toronto is close but not quite there yet. I have already explained that "Only skyscrapers of known height are recorded on the chart. Skyscrapers of unknown height but are known to be at least 35 floors high will still be count for the city's skyscraper tally but will not appear on the chart." so it appears the cut off is 45 at the moment but its not it is 50.[[User:Steve chiu|Steve chiu]] ([[User talk:Steve chiu|talk]]) 02:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

== Manchester, Birmingham and Leeds not on list? ==

Hi just wondering why Manchester, Birmingham and Leeds are not on the List of cities with the most buildings taller than 100m on this page.
Manchester has 4 skyscrapers taller than 100m - adding up to a total height of 500m
Birmingham and Leeds both have 2 buildings taller than 100m adding up to 222m and 218m respectively.
Obviously I can understand cities like Liverpool being excluded from the list, with Radio City Tower and Liverpool Cathedral, but is there any particular reason as to why none of either Manchester, Birmingham or Leeds are on the list? I thought I would check before making amendments. [[User:J349|~J349]] ([[User talk:J349|talk]]) 15:05, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

== It's a mess ==

On this moment, the lists seemed to be dropped just somewhere in the article and most references are viewed above the last table. There's also one wrong reference which has to be corrected. Besides that, Eindhoven has 2 high towers of 100m or taller, totalling 206m (source within Wikipedia: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lijst_van_hoogste_gebouwen_van_Eindhoven) and many other cities might have two or more of these towers which allows them to be put on the list, so the last table is far from complete. --[[User:OPolkruikenz|OPolkruikenz]] ([[User talk:OPolkruikenz|talk]]) 08:51, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

==Benidorm==

Benidorm is known as the Mediterranean Manhattan, the alicantinian touristic city has got more than Madrid and Barcelone. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.120.5.169|84.120.5.169]] ([[User talk:84.120.5.169|talk]]) 06:10, 21 July 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Atlantic City, NJ ==

This list has 5 over 150 meters in Atlantic City [[List of tallest buildings in Atlantic City]] but there is a height discrepancy (shows 2) with CTBUH http://skyscrapercenter.com/create.php?search=yes&page=99999&type_building=on&status_COM=on&list_continent=NA&list_country=US&list_city=US-AIY&list_height=150&list_company=&list_year=

Revel casino hotel is definitely the 2nd tallest in New Jersey as of Nov. 2013, yet AC is not on the list of cities with most skyscrapers even though there are some with 1 over 150 meters on this list. I don't want to add AC until I know where to put it? (with 2 or 5 skyscrapers) can someone else please advise here?[[Special:Contributions/24.0.133.234|24.0.133.234]] ([[User talk:24.0.133.234|talk]]) 23:26, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

== Paris should be verify ==

Paris has a lot of building exceeding 150 meters and not only one. Check your sources.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_and_structures_in_the_Paris_region

Considering Paris area is the most vertical urban area in Europe. By the way it should be far above London that counts way less towers.
Thanks to modify in consequences. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/93.7.59.80|93.7.59.80]] ([[User talk:93.7.59.80|talk]]) 09:49, 3 December 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Paris itself only has one building above 150m, the remaining ones in the Paris region are located in Courbevoie, which I have added to the list. It's not actually the "most vertical urban area" by the way, both London and Frankfurt come in ahead. [[Special:Contributions/91.66.237.200|91.66.237.200]] ([[User talk:91.66.237.200|talk]]) 17:45, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

== Cities to add: ==

(Here, “skyscraper” refers to a building of at least 150 m; # = Featured List)

* Philadelphia: [[List of tallest buildings in Philadelphia|14]]#
* Pittsburgh: [[List of tallest buildings in Pittsburgh|9]]#
* Seattle: [[List of tallest buildings in Seattle|14]]#
* São Paulo: [[List of tallest buildings in São Paulo|16]] (Should be upgraded from 11)
* Santiago: at least [[Gran Torre Santiago|1]]
* Malmö: [[Turning Torso|1]]
* Beijing: [[:Category:Skyscrapers in Beijing|perhaps 8]]
* [[Portland, Oregon|Portland]]: [[List of tallest buildings in Portland, Oregon|3]]#
* Baltimore: [[List of tallest buildings in Baltimore|3]]#
* Denver: [[List of tallest buildings in Denver|7]]#
* Minneapolis: [[List of tallest buildings in Minneapolis|10]]#
* Indianapolis: [[List of tallest buildings in Indianapolis|3]]#
* Fort Worth, Texas: [[List of tallest buildings in Fort Worth|3]]
* Austin, Texas: [[List of tallest buildings in Austin|3]]#
* Charlotte, North Carolina: [[List of tallest buildings in Charlotte|6]]#
* Cincinnati: at least [[List of tallest buildings in Cincinnati|3]]
* Cleveland, Ohio: [[List of tallest buildings in Cleveland|4]]#
* San Antonio, Texas: [[List of tallest buildings in San Antonio|2]]
* Milwaukee: [[List of tallest buildings in Milwaukee|2]]
* Detroit: [[List of tallest buildings in Detroit|9]]#
* Oklahoma City: at least [[Chase Tower (Oklahoma City)|2]]
* Louisville, Kentucky: [[List of tallest buildings in Louisville|2]]
* Kansas City, Missouri: [[List of tallest buildings in Kansas City, Missouri|2]]
* Tianjin: [[:Category:Skyscrapers in Tianjin|perhaps 7]]
* Omaha, Nebraska: at least [[First National Bank Tower|1]]
* London: [[List of tallest buildings in London|15]]#. (Should be upgraded from 12)
* Yekaterinburg: [[List of tallest buildings in Russia|1]]
* Vienna: at least [[Millennium Tower (Vienna)|one]]
* Balneario Camboriu, Brazil: [[List of tallest buildings in Brazil|2]]
* [[Salvador, Bahia]]: [[List of tallest buildings in Brazil|1]]
* Curitiba: [[List of tallest buildings in Brazil|2]]
* Rotterdam: [[List of tallest buildings in the Netherlands|3]]
* Kuwait City: at least [[Al Hamra Tower|1]]
* Suzhou: at least [[Global 188|1]]
* Vancouver: at least [[List of tallest buildings in Vancouver|2]]
* Mississauga: [[List of tallest buildings in Mississauga|2]] (if you count the [[Absolute World]] towers twice).

[[Phoenix, Arizona|Phoenix]], Arizona [[List of tallest buildings in Phoenix|comes close]] to having a skyscraper, at 148 m; as does [[List of tallest buildings in Berlin|Berlin]] at 146.8 m.

The following cities apparently don't have any skyscrapers:

[[List of tallest buildings in Sweden|Stockholm]]
[[:Category:Buildings and structures in Helsinki|Helsinki]]
[[:Category:Buildings and structures in Saint Petersburg|St. Petersburg]]
[[List of tallest buildings and structures in Glasgow|Glasgow]]
[[:Category:Buildings and structures in Athens|Athens]]
[[List of tallest buildings in Ecuador|Guayaquil]]
[[List of tallest buildings in Ecuador|Quito]]
[[List of tallest buildings in Peru|Lima]]
[[List of tallest buildings in Quebec City|Quebec City]]
[[List of tallest buildings in Ottawa–Gatineau|Ottawa]]
[[List of tallest buildings in Winnipeg|Winnipeg]]
[[List of tallest buildings in Edmonton|Edmonton]]
[[List of tallest buildings in Albuquerque|Albuquerque]]
[[List of tallest buildings in El Paso|El Paso]]
[[List of tallest buildings in Tijuana|Tijuana]]
[[List of tallest buildings in Egypt|Cairo]]
[[List of tallest buildings in Chennai|Chennai]]

[[List of tallest buildings in Dallas|Dallas]]# may have only 18 skyscrapers; while [[List of tallest buildings in Houston|Houston]]# may have only 31.--[[User:Solomonfromfinland|Solomonfromfinland]] ([[User talk:Solomonfromfinland|talk]]) 08:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

== Philly ==

Umm, yeah. 14 Buildings here are 150 meters... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.185.63.232|71.185.63.232]] ([[User talk:71.185.63.232|talk]]) 06:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== The list of 100 building is slightly dated? what if we use 90m? ==

I found this online! what do you think of changing the list?

http://tudl0867.home.xs4all.nl/skylines.html <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/114.79.58.186|114.79.58.186]] ([[User talk:114.79.58.186|talk]]) 05:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

*Not a reliable source. They have used an uncited 'algorithm' to rank the cities. The list is arbitrary.[[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode|talk]]) 11:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

==Paris ==

Umm, well, do you think it would not have been better to group Courbevoie, Puteaux and Nanterre in France ,under the name of Paris considering that these 3 cities are part of
the Paris urban area and the area is called "La Défense". I think this would have been way clearer for foreign people. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/93.174.33.253|93.174.33.253]] ([[User talk:93.174.33.253|talk]]) 07:19, 11 June 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Confusion. Confusing!==
Lots of editors of this list are confusing what structures should be included in the list and what shouldn't. Some editors are also not citing reliable sources or following other Wikipedia guidelines and policy:
*Skyscrapers - there is no internationally agreed definition for a 'skyscraper'. Therefore the better wording (and therefore structure to include) is 'building' OR 'tower' where there is a definition and one that is used in lots of other tall structure lists in Wikipedia
*The list will be confusing if it is not explicitly stated whether buildings should be counted for the total, towers should be counted or all freestanding structures.
*Referencing another Wikipedia article is not a reliable source
*Cited definitions of a city and its boundaries must be used to define the area within which structures are judged to be within the city
*Aggregation of heights is not a criteria that should be part of this list. Each list lead only state that the city should have building included if above a certain height

As this list is such a mess I will change it unless objections are made to my analysis of the problems[[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode|talk]]) 11:25, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

== Bogota (capital of Colombia) should be higher on the list ==

This city currently has 6 buildings exceeding 150 m in height and 7 under construction that exceed this height, excluding entrecalles over 300m project because it has not happened project , I leave the link to the most current version in Spanish (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anexo:Rascacielos_de_Colombia) ,and the city appears as only had 4 buildings with more of 150 m.

This is the case in several cities in Latin America that do not have updated data on page SkyscraperCity can see new buildings , or the Spanish version of skyscrapers in cities wikipedia <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Edwin1216|Edwin1216]] ([[User talk:Edwin1216|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Edwin1216|contribs]]) 16:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

**acho que a lista ta errada; Salvador aparece na lista e o maior dela é menor que o Segundo maior de frederickstadt - recife não aparecer nessa e sim na outra faz mais sentido pelo sitio do skyscraper <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/187.64.10.156|187.64.10.156]] ([[User talk:187.64.10.156|talk]]) 13:27, 16 August 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Mumbai ==

This number has again skyrocketed somehow even though the source specifically disproves it. Moving it back down to where it should be is just so much effort... [[User:Kaustavdibya|Kaustavdibya]] looks to be responsible.

I had no idea that Mumbai had 66 AND 22 skyscrapers. Which one's correct, please so it can be fixed? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Laurelpeter122|Laurelpeter122]] ([[User talk:Laurelpeter122|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Laurelpeter122|contribs]]) 01:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:That was at least the second time that someone had added a fake and massively overstated number for Mumbai. So disappointing that people do things like that when some of us are just trying to help provide accurate information. [[Special:Contributions/81.99.182.245|81.99.182.245]] ([[User talk:81.99.182.245|talk]]) 22:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

== Orphaned references in [[:List of cities with the most skyscrapers]] ==

I check pages listed in [[:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting]] to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for [[User:AnomieBOT/docs/OrphanReferenceFixer|orphaned references]] in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of [[:List of cities with the most skyscrapers]]'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for ''this'' article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

<b>Reference named "Emporis":</b><ul>
<li>From [[Minneapolis]]: {{cite web|title= Minneapolis|publisher=Emporis Buildings (emporis.com)| url= http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/ci/?id=101331| accessdate= 2007-03-18}}</li>
<li>From [[List of tallest buildings in Washington, D.C.]]: [http://www.emporis.com/building/franklincourt-washington-dc-usa "Franklin Court." Emporis.com. 2012.] Accessed 2012-10-05; [http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=79657 "Franklin Court." SkyscraperPage.com. 2012.] Accessed 2012-10-05.</li>
<li>From [[Skyscraper]]: [http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=116876 John Hancock Center], [[Emporis]]</li>
<li>From [[List of cities with the most high-rise buildings]]: {{cite web|url=http://www.emporis.com/statistics/skyline-ranking|title=Emporis Skyline ranking|author=Emporis GmbH|publisher=}}</li>
<li>From [[Burj Khalifa]]: {{cite web|url=http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=burjdubai-dubai-unitedarabemirates|title=Burj Dubai, Dubai, at Emporis.com|publisher=[[Emporis]]|accessdate=1 March 2007}}</li>
<li>From [[List of tallest buildings in Slovenia]]: {{cite web |url=http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/co/?id=slovenia |title=Slovenia |work=emporis.com}}</li>
</ul>

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<font color="#888800">⚡</font>]] 13:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

*acho que a lista ta errada; Salvador aparece na lista e o maior dela é menor que o Segundo maior de frederickstadt - recife não aparecer nessa e sim na outra faz mais sentido pelo sitio do skyscraper

== Tehran is the city with least skyscrapers and high rise buildings ==

tehran has only one skyscraper above 150 m. tehran has 5 high rise buildings taller than 100 m.tehran has about 32 high rise buildings including the 1 skyscraper which is 162 m. tehran is the city with least and smallest and fewest number of skyscrapers and least high rise buildings in the world.--[[Special:Contributions/80.241.81.150|80.241.81.150]] ([[User talk:80.241.81.150|talk]]) 13:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

tehran is the city in the world with least and smallest number of high rise buildings with only 32 completed high rises. --[[Special:Contributions/80.241.81.150|80.241.81.150]] ([[User talk:80.241.81.150|talk]]) 13:41, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

check the links which is written at the down of the article. all are useful sites. you can find the fact and reality of skyscrapers and high rise buildings in those sites.--[[Special:Contributions/80.241.81.150|80.241.81.150]] ([[User talk:80.241.81.150|talk]]) 13:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

the former cited number of skyscrapers was 9 but it is wrong. because in this article only buildings above 150 m is considered skyscrapers. but according to emporis buildings above 100 m are considered skyscrapers. so you have to go to emporis and find the skyscrapers above 150 m and which are completed and built because in emporis also cancelled and unbuilt and buildings which are under construction are listed. --[[Special:Contributions/80.241.81.150|80.241.81.150]] ([[User talk:80.241.81.150|talk]]) 13:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

the information about tehran and other iranian cities in the article Cities with most high rise buildings, is also wrong. i hope someone will fix it soon. tehran is far far far far from that numbher which is cited in the article.--[[Special:Contributions/80.241.81.150|80.241.81.150]] ([[User talk:80.241.81.150|talk]]) 13:51, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

by looking and seeing some pictures of the skyline of tehran in google pictures you will realize that the skyline of tehran is almost nothing . the skyline of tehran is bad even if you compare it with small sized cities.--[[Special:Contributions/80.241.81.150|80.241.81.150]] ([[User talk:80.241.81.150|talk]]) 13:54, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


please fix the statistics and information of karachi and other pakistani cities, because the current statistics are wrong <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2A02:FE0:C210:4050:39E2:8F40:B396:8CC|2A02:FE0:C210:4050:39E2:8F40:B396:8CC]] ([[User talk:2A02:FE0:C210:4050:39E2:8F40:B396:8CC|talk]]) 16:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Tokyo ==

Can anyone explain why Tokyo is listed as #1 with 458 buildings over 150m? I went to the cited link and it shows only 158 that tall. The CTBUH shows 116. Thanks.<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Crystalclearpepc|Crystalclearpepc]] ([[User talk:Crystalclearpepc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Crystalclearpepc|contribs]]) 21:41, 3 January 2016‎</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
:Looks like it's incorrect to me. Furthermore, that source includes buildings still under construction, so I've reverted Tokyo's building count to that from the CTBUH source.—Laoris&nbsp;([[User_talk:Laoris|talk]]) 19:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

== – and - ==

There is no consistency in the use of – and - in the tables. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.87.96.107|86.87.96.107]] ([[User talk:86.87.96.107|talk]]) 10:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[List of cities with the most skyscrapers]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=706874938 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100103115516/http://skyscrapernews.com/bdbsearch.php?city=London to http://www.skyscrapernews.com/bdbsearch.php?city=London

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner]]:Online</sub></small> 20:00, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

== Chongqing, New York and Tokyo==
According to 30th source link Chongqing has 1329 finished buildings above 100m (100m not included). Plus 24 buildings which was included in number of skyscrapers, which construction is probably in progress, but they are already higher than 150m. So it's at least 1353 buildings.
And definetely with more than 150.000m summary height due to more than 1000 buildings higher or with height equal to 120m (I used the same link). <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/183.67.53.234|183.67.53.234]] ([[User talk:183.67.53.234|talk]]) 20:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
And according to second link source New York has 350 buildings above 150m (including), and 114 of them are planned or not finished or demolished. So it's 236 skyscrapers, not 383. According to third link souce Tokyo has 139 finished skyscrapers, not 172.

== Shanghai >100m Data is massively inaccurate ==

The data source currently listed is from http://www.stats-sh.gov.cn/tjnj/nj14.htm?d1=2014tjnj/C1104.htm.
This source is not only outdated (2014), it also doesn't say anything about >100m. It only categorizes buildings according to number of floors, and the 1,463 number is only derived from >30 floors, which doesn't mean >100m. Therefore, this number needs to be revised down to 275, according to http://community.emporis.com/statistics/most-skyscraper-cities-worldwide. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tseung Kwan O|Tseung Kwan O]] ([[User talk:Tseung Kwan O|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tseung Kwan O|contribs]]) 05:56, 22 May 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Removal of claim that USA has most Skyscrapers ==
I have removed the claim in the lede that the USA has the most skyscrapers. A brief totaling of the skyscrapers listed in this article has China at 1095 and USA at 669. Unless the article information is incorrect this fact shows that the claim I have removed is incorrect using the same criteria that this list uses. [[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode|talk]]) 15:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

== Listed twice ==

Tel Aviv and Astana were listed twice. I have removed.[[Special:Contributions/91.79.18.152|91.79.18.152]] ([[User talk:91.79.18.152|talk]]) 15:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

== Cities with skyscrapers over 150m ==

Detroit, United States: buildings taller than 150m

Detroit Marriott 222m
One Detroit Center 189m
Penobscot 172m
Renaissance Center 100 159
Renaissance Center 200 159
Renaissance Center 300 159
Renaissance Center 400 159
Guardian Building 151
[[User:Scrappyacres|Scrappyacres]] ([[User talk:Scrappyacres|talk]]) 02:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

== Hong Kong ==
Hong Kong has independence of architects and civil engineering. In Hong Kong, [[Buildings Department|Buildings Department of Hong Kong]] excises full sovereignty in architects and civil engineering, and [[Ministry of Industry and Information Technology|Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China]] does not. The case is similar to [[Olympic Games]], civil aviation, etc. Hong Kong has their own national teams and use [[Flag of Hong Kong|Hong Kong flag]] as national flag. Since Hong Kong is full member of [[International Union of Architects]], Hong Kong flag would be adopted in architects and civil engineering pages. This is following the rule of [[MOS:SOVEREIGNFLAG]]. [[User:Hoising|hoising]] ([[User talk:Hoising|talk]]) 14:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

: Hong Kong is a special administrative region of China. It is not, according to all reliable sources, a country / nation state. Where a building is located when a list titles a column 'Country' means that the recognised country that building is in is relevant not any sub national region. [[User:Hoising|hoising]] has misinterpreted [[MOS:SOVEREIGNFLAG]]. As it says 'In general, if a flag is felt to be necessary, it should be that of the sovereign state (e.g. the United States of America or Canada) not of a subnational entity, even if that entity is sometimes considered a "nation" or "country" in its own right. This is partly for the sake of consistency across Wikipedia'.[[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode|talk]]) 20:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

:: Hong Kong excises full sovereignty in architects and civil engineering. We have to use [[Flag of Hong Kong|Hong Kong flag]] as national flag when the region was treated as a independent member of a country or nation state. This is following the rule of [[MOS:SOVEREIGNFLAG]]. -- [[User:Hoising|hoising]] ([[User talk:Hoising|talk]]) 10:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

:::Thanks for you response. You have not made the case for changing the flag to the Hong Kong one. In fact your view is contrary to the guidelines from Wikipedia. You have not achieved consensus for this article nor any of the articles you decided to change immediately after seeing my comment above. You need to achieve consensus following a discussion about these changes not just make wholesale changes across many articles. Please discuss the flag issue here before making any other changes. If you do make changes without consensus they will be reverted. [[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode|talk]]) 13:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

::::{{u|Robynthehode}}, in the interest of not getting you blocked for edit warring, I'll note that you've been reverted three times on your change in the last day, and if I were trying to tempt you ''into'' getting blocked I would have reverted you a fourth time. You were reverted by three different editors, which implies that you currently do not have consensus for this change. Hong Kong is a weird exception to just about every rule we have regarding countries and sovereignty. Are you suggesting that ''every'' usage of Hong Kong, such as at the [[Hong Kong at the Olympics|Olympics]], needs to be changed to the Chinese flag? That's just silly. The rules are not inflexible, they are guidelines, and I'm not entirely sure why you're so hell-bent on getting the exact letter of the law written down in stone here. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

::::Agreed, Hong Kong in Asian Games, Olympic or Badminton events such as Thomas Cup and Uber Cup is always recognized as a different entity than People's Republic of China, so does Taiwan (as Chinese Taipei). Why in this skyscrapper rank it should be treated differently by being represented by PRC flag?<span style="background:white;color:blue;font:arialbold;border-radius:4px"><b>&nbsp;''[[User:Gunkarta|Gunkarta]]''&nbsp;</b></span><span style="background:lightblue;color:blue;border-radius:2px">&nbsp;''[[User talk:Gunkarta|talk]]''&nbsp;</span> 15:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

:::::Thanks for your comments. No I just want a proper discussion about this issue that has been going on for a number of years. I have not seen a consensus on this issue at any of the pages under discussion here. And no I am not suggesting changing the Hong Kong flag to a China flag for the Olympics, you are merely assuming that. While you state that Hong Kong is a strange exception no good reason has been given here for that. Hong Kong is not a country. The guidelines are clear. Follow the guidelines or make the argument don't just revert (many articles have had relatively stable presence of the China flag other with the Hong Kong flag I have just posed the idea that we have a discussion and reach a consensus for, at least, articles that are about buildings or similar geographic / country contexts [[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode|talk]]) 15:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

::::::: As I mentioned, architects and civil engineering issues including skyscrapers in Hong Kong are independent from China authorities. Hong Kong has independent membership in [[International Union of Architects]]. --[[User:Hoising|hoising]] ([[User talk:Hoising|talk]]) 15:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

:::::::: I'll note that Macau, which is in the same situation as Hong Kong, has both the Macau flag next to city and the Chinese flag next to country. Why can't that be done here too, as a compromise? [[User:Smartyllama|Smartyllama]] ([[User talk:Smartyllama|talk]]) 16:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

::::::::: [[Actividade Privada em Macau]] is an independent member of International Union of Architects also. --[[User:Hoising|hoising]] ([[User talk:Hoising|talk]]) 16:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

:::::::::: Thanks for comments. I would have expected a discussion rather than an immediate revert but happy to leave the reverts with the Hong Kong flag as long as the discussion is continued here about my legitimate concerns. As per [[WP:CON]] no consensus has been reached about this issue. All that has happened so far is the initial laying out of information to try to support one sides view. To make it clear my objections to using the Hong Kong flag are: it is not a country but a subnational entity which as
[[MOS:SOVEREIGNFLAG]] states the nation / country flag is to be used. I pasted the text from this guideline above. The argument against this seems to be that: 1: Hong Kong is an independent member of the [[International Union of Architects]]. That is just a statement of fact not an argument. Is [[User:Hoising|hoising]] saying that because Hong Kong is a member of this organisation that that fact makes Hong Kong a country. No. Are all buildings in Hong Kong approved, built or otherwise linked to that organisation? 2: Hong Kong has recognition as a separate entity by sporting organisations. Are you saying that this makes Hong Kong a country? Hong Kong's status within various organisations varies depending on the organisation. I can equally state that the UN does not recognise Hong Kong as a country. WHO does not recognise Hong Kong as a country. Anyone can cherry pick. I think the reason these articles should have the China rather than Hong Kong flag is because that is where the building are located. It is about the country of location not the fact that Hong Kong is a member of this or that organisation. And the country is, as the most reliable source (the UN) states is China not Hong Kong. In pretty much all these articles (about buildings) the tables have a column which states the building is in Hong Kong anyway, it is just the country column which should state the country / nation state not any subnational entity. Seems logical and reasonable to me, but always happy to build a consensus so this issue can be laid to rest. [[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode|talk]]) 16:44, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

: [[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] has a big mistake that nobody said Hong Kong is a country. [[Dependent territory|Dependent territories]] have status of and to be listed as country in civil affairs with full sovereignty (including sport affairs and civil aviation). --[[User:Hoising|hoising]] ([[User talk:Hoising|talk]]) 06:50, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

:: Hong Kong is not a sovereign state and [[WP:SOVEREIGNFLAG]] unambiguously says non-sovereign flags should not be used. There's no such thing as a dependent territory with full sovereignty. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 16:34, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

:: [[User:Zanhe|@Zanhe]] Please read the paragraphs that Hong Kong is not a sovereign state but this dependent territories have status of and to be listed as country in civil affairs with full sovereignty (including sport affairs and civil aviation). -- [[User:Hoising|hoising]] ([[User talk:Hoising|talk]]) 08:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

::: [[User:Hoising|hoising]] your link to [[Dependent territory|Dependent territories]] gives no support to your contention that the flag of Hong Kong should be used. Read the whole article - Dependent territories - and you will see that all (except for Hong Kong) the listed territories do not have a special status with regard to the Olympics or any other organisations. I disagree with altering the column title just to accommodate Hong Kong. The national flag is the only flag that should be shown. The nation is China according to the most reliable international source - the UN. As [[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] rightly states this is unambiguous according to [[WP:SOVEREIGNFLAG]]. If we cannot reach consensus here then I suggest this is taken to other editors or to [[WP:DRN]]. [[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode|talk]]) 11:25, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Hong Kong is a country (or as some others may prefer the word "region"), though not a sovereignty state. It has its own flag: The HKSAR Flag, which is widely recognised by International Olympic Committee and some other international organisations (e.g. APEC) under the name of "Hong Kong, China" (often referred to as the Olympic Standard). This is recognised and approved also by the central government of P.R. China. I strongly request related articles to list Hong Kong in the country list (in the form of "Hong Kong, China" if preferred to avoid disputes), and to list its SAR Flag int the flag list.
The situation is highly similar to Puerto Rico of U.S., Gibraltar of U.K., and French Polynesia of France. The reasons are: Hong Kong enjoys its own currency (HK Dollar), has its own border (with independent immigration and customs control), own jurisdiction system (common law and Court of Final Appeal), and is recognised as an economy. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Groverlynn|Groverlynn]] ([[User talk:Groverlynn|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Groverlynn|contribs]]) </span></small>

I suggest [[User:Robynthehode|@Robynthehode]] read more talk pages before edit all wikipedia pages. -- [[User:Hoising|hoising]] ([[User talk:Hoising|talk]]) 14:34, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

== Penang Island's number of skyscrapers ==

I suspect that Penang Island has been misrepresented in this article on the number of skyscrapers. Just one glance at any panoramic pictures of the city would tell you that there is definitely more than 3 skyscrapers that are over 150m in height.

I assume that the 3 skyscrapers in Penang Island referred to by [http://www.skyscrapercenter.com/cities?list=buildings-150| Skyscrapercenter] are [[Komtar|KOMTAR]] and the [[Gurney Paragon]] East and West Towers (the latter towers were completed in 2013). But since then, there are other towers which exceed the 150m threshold. The Cove (with six towers) are all [https://www.emporis.com/statistics/tallest-buildings/city/101334/penang-island-malaysia| above 150m], as are The Peak Residences ([http://www.propwall.my/tanjung_tokong/the_peak_residences/2126| three towers with each having a height of at least 500 feet or 152.4m]). Setia V Tower A, at [https://www.emporis.com/buildings/1198358/setia-v-residence-tower-a-penang-island-malaysia| 189m tall], has been topped out and is [http://www.setiavresidences.com/gallery/site-progress.html| nearing completion].

According to Emporis's data for [https://www.emporis.com/city/101334/penang-island-malaysia/type/skyscrapers| skyscrapers] and [https://www.emporis.com/city/101334/penang-island-malaysia/type/high-rise-buildings| high-rises], other skyscrapers that exceed the 150m height include
* Shineville Park Condominium
* The Maritime B
* Pearl Regency
* Northam Tower
* Gurney 8A

Do all this suggest that Penang Island has ONLY 3 skyscrapers above 150m in height?

I haven't even begun mentioning that, technically speaking, Penang is a STATE in Malaysia, not a city. The only city in Penang is Penang Island, where the skyscrapers are concentrated. A distinction has to be made between the two entities.

Vnonymous 03:04, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

== Dubai reference ==

It should be noted that the Dubai reference only supports 142 buildings above 490 feet, not 173 (or 177 depending on the current edit war.) Either a new reference should be found, or Dubai changed. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 02:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

: Noted. Though such is not unexpected as building databases will have difficulty keeping up with countries experiencing building booms as new projects come in and some projects may be put on hold. This is why I personally find building lists valuable since the actual building names are enumerated and we can view clarifications, photo evidence, and notes. The page "[[List of tallest buildings in Dubai]]" still needs to be updated to 2018. As of January 2018, building lists for Indonesia and the Philippines have been updated. Numbers for China could be lower than what is shown in the article and will need to be updated. --[[User:Arquenevis|Arquenevis]] ([[User talk:Arquenevis|talk]]) 03:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
::Well if a database isn't up to date then it shouldn't be used to reference a number that it can't support. Hate to say it but it needs to be referenced and the reference needs to be accurate. So unfortunately either the number needs to be updated to that in the reference, or the reference replaced with one that supports the number. What we technically have now is a lie since the reference claims something different to the number. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 13:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
::: That is precisely why I am working on not just improving the table but their corresponding pages. For most part, most countries are more or less up to date. But as I indicated earlier some countries will still need to be updated to 2018. For that I need help. Some countries have been adding dozens of skyscrapers per year over the past several years which has seen the count soar. Though there is no standard definition, the cutoff height here is a minimum of 150m. So I am proposing individual wiki pages to standardize their lists to the minimum 150 meters under the metric system (not the Imperial system). Again, this is why the individual Wiki pages with the building lists are of great importance. Rather than just mere vague statistics, they are enumerated so we can always cross check the count. Thus, there is also a need to coordinate with the respective individual pages to ensure accuracy and consistency between Wiki articles. --[[User:Arquenevis|Arquenevis]] ([[User talk:Arquenevis|talk]]) 20:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

== Number of skyscrapers in Tel Aviv and in general ==

A user has [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_cities_with_the_most_skyscrapers&type=revision&diff=847467728&oldid=847460336 reverted] my correction to the number of skyscrapers in Tel Aviv, citing CTBUH. This seems like a correct figure for the city of Tel Aviv (although there could be some dispute about [[Vision Tower (Tel Aviv)|Vision Tower]]). However, for anyone familiar with the city, it is also true that the city's borders are pretty arbitrary (historical reasons), and it constitutes a minority of the population its its built-up area (~440,000 vs. ~1,400,000), and a small minority in the metropolitan area (~3,960,000). This is rare worldwide (although not unique), and it makes sense to me to use the entire urban/built-up area around the city for the purpose of this list. It doesn't have to be an arbitrary area, but can be a defined metropolitan ring, which in Tel Aviv's case is defined by the Central Bureau of Statistics and Ministry of the Interior. In this case, Tel Aviv has 22–23 completed skyscrapers of 150 m and above. I can't tell however what the general tendency is on this list, not being intricately familiar with most of these cities—and whether there is consistency at all. In any case, if the number is strictly of skyscrapers within municipal boundaries, then it puts [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_cities_with_the_most_skyscrapers&type=revision&diff=838351347&oldid=838102917 this series of edits] into question, and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_cities_with_the_most_skyscrapers&type=revision&diff=841309991&oldid=841000322 this edit] should be largely undone (might not be so simple). —[[User:Ynhockey|Ynhockey]] <sup>([[User talk:Ynhockey|Talk]])</sup> 16:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
: It was me who reverted your edits. You need to cite a reliable source. Probably the most reliable source for this article (and other similar articles on building height records) is the Council for Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH). Tel Aviv is listed as having 13 completed buildings over 150m. See [http://www.skyscrapercenter.com/city/tel-aviv] . If you can provide alternative reliable sources that say otherwise please state them here. Your suggestion that a certain area should be assessed for the buildings is relevant but you need sources to back up what you are suggesting. Other edits may be in error but that is not an argument for not citing proper sources in this one. Feel free to correct other articles if you can provide reliable sources for changes. [[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode|talk]]) 18:00, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
::Hi Robynthehode,
::That was not actually the point of what I wrote. I am well aware of both the policy-related and technical aspects of sourcing on Wikipedia (I've been editing for a really long time :) ). The point was to ask a few specific questions, which you may be able to answer if you have been editing this article:
::* Was there a previous discussion on this page about whether or not to include urban or metropolitan areas? If so, what was the consensus?
::* If not, what is the current convention in this list in practice?
::While I understand your point about CTBUH (and largely agree), and ostensibly the list is sourced to there, it's clear that this list does not fully correspond with the source, due to frequent edits (some of which did not cite sources). It's possible that an editorial decision was made to include urban areas, for example.
::Finally, FYI: citing a reliable source for the entire list, even for a specific city, is not necessary provided the number is verifiable in some way. For example (and this is sort of what I did with my 23 figure): it is possible to have a separate list of tallest buildings in a specific city on Wikipedia, where every height is sourced to some WP:RS, and this list would simply include a count of those buildings. Actually some of the best lists on Wikipedia are made this way.
::—[[User:Ynhockey|Ynhockey]] <sup>([[User talk:Ynhockey|Talk]])</sup> 21:38, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
::P.S. If no discussions were held whatsoever, and we (and other editors who might be interested) can come to a consensus about what to include and what not, I'd be willing to protect the article against frequent anonymous editors who might not be aware of such a discussion and make incorrect additions. —[[User:Ynhockey|Ynhockey]] <sup>([[User talk:Ynhockey|Talk]])</sup> 21:41, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
::: Hi [[User:Ynhockey|Ynhockey]]. No I don't know of a previous consensus but there are a number of issues:
:::*Any list can have multiple sources but all should support the same city area assessment of inclusion of tall buildings.
:::*Using a base source which is regarded as the or one of the most reliable ones is useful. This allows a reference point which is the reason for my use of CTBUH.
:::*First deciding on an area (within which buildings included or excluded as part of the list) and then using multiple sources to populate the list would run the risk or either [[WP:OR]] or [[WP:SYNTH]]. Good sources would be needed that explicitly relate the area to the buildings
:::*Instead of editors coming to a consensus about the area to be used for assessment I would suggest that it would be better to come to a consensus about which source we use as the base one. Say CTBUH. We then use their criteria for inclusion for their list as the basis for criteria for inclusion in the Wikipedia list. This can then explicitly be stated at the start of the list and any edits or use of other sources would need to accord with these criteria [[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode|talk]]) 06:41, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
::::I am fine with your proposal. In that case, I will return Ramat Gan to the list. The list really needs to be cleaned up though, I am sure there are many inconsistencies with what you wrote, plus a lot of formatting and other glitches. —[[User:Ynhockey|Ynhockey]] <sup>([[User talk:Ynhockey|Talk]])</sup> 07:12, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
:::::Thanks. Yes lots of lists on Wikipedia need cleaning up. Mostly because editors have either failed to follow the clear criteria for inclusion already stated, their isn't any criteria stated or editors are unwilling to follow Wikipedia guidelines about citing sources. Makes our job so much harder. Look forward to improving the list with you [[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode|talk]]) 07:53, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
::::::Great, I have enabled semi-protection for the article, because indeed most anonymous edits here have been disruptive. —[[User:Ynhockey|Ynhockey]] <sup>([[User talk:Ynhockey|Talk]])</sup> 10:56, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
::::::Also: Do you think we should set the minimum completed skyscrapers to 5? The list has become fairly long. —[[User:Ynhockey|Ynhockey]] <sup>([[User talk:Ynhockey|Talk]])</sup> 12:25, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
:::::::Yes I think the semi protected is good as you are correct, I believe, that most anonymous edits have been disruptive. Having done a quick check I would say the main (1st) list is limited to those cities with at least ten buildings above 150m. About half the list is populated by cities with less than 10 which makes it unmanageable and slightly meaningless. Also the last list (at least 100m buildings) should be limited to at least 25 or 30 buildings being of that height. What do you think? [[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode|talk]]) 12:35, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
::::::::That seems reasonable. —[[User:Ynhockey|Ynhockey]] <sup>([[User talk:Ynhockey|Talk]])</sup> 15:38, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 6 September 2018 ==


{{edit semi-protected|List of cities with the most skyscrapers|answered=yes}}
{{edit semi-protected|List of cities with the most skyscrapers|answered=yes}}
Mumbai has 252 skyscrapers currently and the page shows 210, correct the information and the source is given below-
For Mumbai, INDIA city you have mentioned 37 buildings taller 150 meter(490 ft) or more
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Mumbai [[Special:Contributions/76.39.101.150|76.39.101.150]] ([[User talk:76.39.101.150|talk]]) 13:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


:{{done}} Thank you! [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 14:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
As per this article of wiki Mumbai is having 118 completed project with height 150 meter (490 feet) or above
wiki article - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Mumbai <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:146.23.30.235|146.23.30.235]] ([[User talk:146.23.30.235#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/146.23.30.235|contribs]]) </small>
:{{not done}} Many of the buildings in [[List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Mumbai]] are under construction. This list only includes completed buildings. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em">[[User:Fish and karate|<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish</u>]]+[[User_talk:Fish and karate|<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate</u>]]</u> 14:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2024 (2) ==
== Sunny Isles ==


{{Edit semi-protected|List of cities with the most skyscrapers|answered=yes}}
Sunny Isles is currently number 15 in the US with 9 completed greater than 150 m, and two more under construction. It is not included on any of these lists, even though it has more completed skyscrapers than many of the cities listed. And it's numbers are not included in with Miami.
In the number of skyscrapers under construction section of the page, the list is lacking many Indian cities. For now I would like to include Hyderabad as no 2 in the list. Hyderabad has 150+ skyscrapers under construction
And Mumbai actually has over 400 skyscrapers under construction.
Source -


for Hyderabad - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Hyderabad
Indeed, since Miami is only 35 square miles, it's extremely difficult because they are scattered throughout many small cities, some of them less than two square miles (sunny Isles is roughly two square miles, Miami Beach is 8). In the Miami area, there are 59 buildings greater than 150 meters (roof height). These are scattered between Miami, Miami Beach, Hallandale, Sunny Isles, and a few other places.


For Mumbai - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Mumbai
So the question is, include them all as one, or separate Miami, Miami Beach, and Sunny Isles? [[User:ReignMan|ReignMan]] ([[User talk:ReignMan|talk]]) 06:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)


Please keep Hyderabad as number 2 and the number of skyscrapers under construction as >150 and also change the number of skyscrapers for Mumbai as >400 [[Special:Contributions/2606:8700:8:0:3496:22F0:17D7:4BF6|2606:8700:8:0:3496:22F0:17D7:4BF6]] ([[User talk:2606:8700:8:0:3496:22F0:17D7:4BF6|talk]]) 15:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
== Semi-protected edit request on 6 December 2018 ==
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> in the Hyderabad article, there are only 2 buildings (that's a stretch) that are listed as being taller than 150 m. [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 20:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

{{edit semi-protected|List of cities with the most skyscrapers|answered=yes}}
Please correct the Mumbai ranking in Wikipedia page of skyscrapers in Mumbai one can see that there are 118 buildings in Mumbai with height 150m and above still in the article its given Mumbai has only 44 buildings [[User:Rkj rox|Rkj rox]] ([[User talk:Rkj rox|talk]]) 03:55, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> &mdash;<span style="color:#808080">[[User:Kuyabribri|'''KuyaBriBri''']]</span><sup><span style="color:#008080">[[User_Talk:Kuyabribri|''Talk'']]</span></sup> 15:22, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2019 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of cities with the most skyscrapers|answered=yes}}
please include name of kolkata ,India in main list.It has 12 completed skyscrapers. [[Special:Contributions/27.59.41.125|27.59.41.125]] ([[User talk:27.59.41.125|talk]]) 07:19, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 07:41, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2019 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of cities with the most skyscrapers|answered=yes}}
Paris-Courbevoie=12 should be removed. [[Special:Contributions/77.136.17.237|77.136.17.237]] ([[User talk:77.136.17.237|talk]]) 23:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
:[[File:Yellow check.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Partly done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> In the source that supports the table, Courbevoie is listed at 12, and Paris does not appear. Unless I am misreading something, it looks like Paris-Courbevoie=18 should be removed, so I have done so. – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 07:23, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2019 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of cities with the most skyscrapers|answered=yes}}
-Skyscrapers in Levallois-Perret and Nanterre should be added to Paris-Courbevoie.
-Makati and Bangkok should be merged. [[Special:Contributions/77.136.16.215|77.136.16.215]] ([[User talk:77.136.16.215|talk]]) 23:29, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> <span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User_talk:Bradv|Brad''v'']]</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bradv|<span style="color:red">🍁</span>]] 03:47, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

== Change request - 21 April 2019 ==

Warsaw has 11 skyscrapers over 150m & the next 3 are under construction: https://www.urbanity.pl/wiezowce
Please change it <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.190.62.144|81.190.62.144]] ([[User talk:81.190.62.144#top|talk]]) 16:42, 21 April 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Semi-protected edit request on 28 July 2019 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of cities with the most skyscrapers|answered=yes}}
Because Shanghai and Dubai are both number 4 but Dubai has more skyscrapers. [[User:Hanleyczhao|Hanleyczhao]] ([[User talk:Hanleyczhao|talk]]) 15:55, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
:[[File:Pictogram voting wait.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Already done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> It seems like this is already done please change answered=yes to answered=no to reactivate the request --[[User:Trialpears|Trialpears]] ([[User talk:Trialpears|talk]]) 20:53, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 28 July 2019 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of cities with the most skyscrapers|answered=yes}}
Both Dubai and Shanghai are Number 4 but Dubai is bigger so change Shanghai to Number 5 and whatever was at Number 5, change to Number 6. [[User:Hanleyczhao|Hanleyczhao]] ([[User talk:Hanleyczhao|talk]]) 16:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
:[[File:Pictogram voting wait.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Already done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> It seems like this is already done please change answered=yes to answered=no to reactivate the request --[[User:Trialpears|Trialpears]] ([[User talk:Trialpears|talk]]) 20:54, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 17 August 2019 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of cities with the most skyscrapers|answered=yes}}
Please switch the number "63" to "65" in Toronto's number of skyscrapers. You can click on the link on the number "63", and it says that there are actually 65 skyscrapers in Toronto in the Wikipedia page. [[Special:Contributions/99.238.32.87|99.238.32.87]] ([[User talk:99.238.32.87|talk]]) 01:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
:[[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Sakura Cartelet|<span style="color: fuchsia;">Sak</span><span style="color: red;">ura </span><span style="color: gold;">Cart</span><span style="color: cyan;">elet</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Sakura Cartelet|Talk]]</sup> 02:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

== Skyscraper definition ==
Why is the definition of a skyscraper considered to be anything over 492 ft when the first sky skyscraper ever built (Chicago's Home Insurance Building) was just 138 ft? This is blatant revisionism. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2001:8000:1100:5800:B1F3:4DD2:A782:A171|2001:8000:1100:5800:B1F3:4DD2:A782:A171]] ([[User talk:2001:8000:1100:5800:B1F3:4DD2:A782:A171#top|talk]]) 03:00, 27 August 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion ==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* [[commons:File:Panama city.png|Panama city.png]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2019-09-21T16:37:15.929460 | Panama city.png -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Derekitou|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 16:37, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 21 January 2020 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of cities with the most skyscrapers|answered=y}}
[[User:Sadam95|Sadam95]] ([[User talk:Sadam95|talk]]) 23:38, 21 January 2020 (UTC) London's numbers of skyscrapers were outdated, London has 30 skyscrapers over 150m according to their skyscrapers in Wikipedia. Upgrade London's ranking because of increases in skyscrapers numbers

41
| [[London]]
| {{flag|United Kingdom}}
| [[File:London from a hot air balloon.jpg|125px]]
| 30
:[[File:Pending-protection-unlocked.svg|28px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' According to the page's protection level you should be able to [[Help:Editing|edit the page yourself]]. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Interstellarity|Interstellarity]] ([[User talk:Interstellarity|talk]]) 16:04, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* [[commons:File:Nanjing Skyline 2012.jpg|Nanjing Skyline 2012.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-03-28T07:06:32.865787 | Nanjing Skyline 2012.jpg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nanjing Skyline 2012.jpg|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 07:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2020 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of cities with the most skyscrapers|answered=yes}}
Go to the "List of Tallest Buildings in Karachi" Wikipedia page. It has 15 buildings with a height of 150 metres or more.It is not included so I believe you should add this on rank# 68 with Frankfurt and Brisbane. Also,I have a Wikipedia account "Ahadwiki". So you can also verify that this is not vandalism or any misinformation brought to you.I would also appreciate if you could take Calcutta out of the list. If you go to the Wikipedia page "list of tallest building in Calcutta" you will find that it only has 8 Buildings with heights of 150 metres or more. Kindly remove this city.
Thank-you for listening to this and I strongly hope you fulfill my request. Again my Wikipedia account is "Ahadwiki" for verification. Thanks :) :) :) [[User:Ahadwiki|Ahadwiki]] ([[User talk:Ahadwiki|talk]]) 12:49, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
: {{u|Ahadwiki}} Checking the [[List of tallest buildings in Karachi]] shows 14 buildings of 150m or more (not 15) and 7 of these are not referenced in any way, with others with dubious references. Therefore to include Karachi in this article is not appropriate. You could help by finding sources/citations for the buildings in that article and then this verified information will help support your request. Please read [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:V]]. You may also like to read [[WP:5P]]. You can become an auto-confirmed user with little effort enabling you to edit semi-protected pages. [[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode|talk]]) 16:00, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:51, 30 April 2024

.

. Kuala Lumpur has 478 above 150 meters. Update this. source is archived because Emporis has defunct as a company — Preceding unsigned comment added by OOOshafiqOOO (talk • contribs) 08:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Philadelphia now has 17 buildings over 150 meters. Can someone please update?

Boston now has 23 buildings over 150 meters. Can someone update?

. Panama City # of skyscrapers is wrong. It has around 109 buildings over 150 meters. Source: skyscrapercity . com/threads/proyectos-y-avances-miscel%C3%81neos.461168/post-170900851. Please, cross-reference this list with the individual building specifications to double check if you want. The old source (skyscrapercenter.com) is missing many buildings.

Dealing with inaccuracy with CTBUH numbers[edit]

As some of you might know, the CTBUH isn't always accurate when it comes to tallying the number of skyscrapers that meet the 150 m+ criterion. In most cases it is close to accurate but for certain cities (Mumbai, Moscow, Miami as per above, etc.) there is a disparity between the city's own tallest buildings page and the cities page on CTBUH. There isn't an alternative authoritative source that could provide statistics for every city. What should we do in these cases? For such cities, should we adhere to CTBUH's number or the number determined from a city's tallest buildings page, if all the buildings in that page is well-written and sourced? LivinAWestLife

(talk) 05:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a list of some discrepancies I found - I'll keep updating this if I find more:
Bangkok: 114 (CTBUH), 165 (Wikipedia)
Daegu: 6 (CTBUH), 27 (Wikipedia)
Jakarta: 115 (CTBUH), 128 (Wikipedia)
Miami: 61 (CTBUH), 68 (Wikipedia)
Mumbai: 100 (CTBUH), 252 (Wikipedia)
Seoul: 82 (CTBUH), 126 (Wikipedia) LivinAWestLife (talk) 05:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2024[edit]

Mumbai has 252 skyscrapers currently and the page shows 210, correct the information and the source is given below- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Mumbai 76.39.101.150 (talk) 13:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thank you! The AP (talk) 14:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2024 (2)[edit]

In the number of skyscrapers under construction section of the page, the list is lacking many Indian cities. For now I would like to include Hyderabad as no 2 in the list. Hyderabad has 150+ skyscrapers under construction And Mumbai actually has over 400 skyscrapers under construction. Source - 

for Hyderabad - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Hyderabad

For Mumbai - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Mumbai

Please keep Hyderabad as number 2 and the number of skyscrapers under construction as >150 and also change the number of skyscrapers for Mumbai as >400 2606:8700:8:0:3496:22F0:17D7:4BF6 (talk) 15:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: in the Hyderabad article, there are only 2 buildings (that's a stretch) that are listed as being taller than 150 m. M.Bitton (talk) 20:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_cities_with_the_most_skyscrapers&diff=1221516165&oldid=960606900

Leave a Reply