Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 1 edit by 219.88.227.85 (talk) to last revision by Lowercase sigmabot III
Undid revision 1223729519 by CyberTheTiger (talk) WP:TPO, do not edit other's talk page comments.
Tag: Undo
(282 intermediate revisions by 97 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ArticleHistory
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Biology|class=FA}}
{{ArticleHistory|action1=GAN
|action1=GAN
|action1date=30 September 2006
|action1date=30 September 2006
|action1result=not listed
|action1result=not listed
Line 26: Line 26:
|currentstatus=FA
|currentstatus=FA
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=FA|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Cats |class=FA |importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Cats|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Mammals |class=FA |importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Mammals|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Africa |class=FA |importance=High }}
{{WikiProject Africa|importance=High }}
{{WikiProject India |class=FA |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject India|importance=Low}}
}}
{{WP1.0 |class=FA |importance=Mid |WPCD=yes |VA=yes|v0.7=pass|category=natsci}}
{{Spoken Wikipedia request|Catfurball|Important}}
|collapsed=yes}}

<!-- {|class="infobox" width="238px" -->
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(90d)
| algo = old(90d)
Line 44: Line 42:
| minthreadsleft = 5
| minthreadsleft = 5
}}
}}
{{archivebox|large=no|auto=long}}
{{archivebox}}


== Subspecies : table or list ? ==
== "simulating sex" is homophobic phrasing ==


I.e. from "Males will also head-rub and roll around with each other before simulating sex together." under "Behaviour and ecology" then "Reproduction and life cycle". They have sex. [[Special:Contributions/31.20.106.40|31.20.106.40]] ([[User talk:31.20.106.40|talk]]) 10:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Hey all. In the past years, the layout of this part about the lion subspecies has changed from list to table to list, and now back to table again. Imo, the list was the better solution. What do others think about this? -- [[User:BhagyaMani|BhagyaMani]] ([[User talk:BhagyaMani|talk]]) 09:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
:It should be a table to be consistent with the pages [[Leopard]], [[Tiger]] in the genus. You can also see it in [[American black bear]], [[Giraffe]] (previously featured), [[Cheetah]]. The table is structured which makes it easier for the reader to get the pennant data.--[[User:Cs california|Cs california]] ([[User talk:Cs california|talk]]) 09:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
::I don't see the necessity for consistency with pages on other species, because: a) there are only 2 lion subspecies and resp. pages; but b) several leopard and cheetah subspecies and resp. pages that are linked, and c) several pages on tiger pops that are also linked. -- [[User:BhagyaMani|BhagyaMani]] ([[User talk:BhagyaMani|talk]]) 09:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
::I concur with BhagyaMani, the table is unnecessary and rather oversized, given that there are only two subspecies. If there were three or more, it might be warranted, but that is not the case. --[[User:SilverTiger12|SilverTiger12]] ([[User talk:SilverTiger12|talk]]) 19:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
:::Even if you don't have the table there should be an example image of both subspecies on the page somewhere --[[User:Cs california|Cs california]] ([[User talk:Cs california|talk]]) 00:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
::::You apparently missed reading the part that lion subspecies do not look different from each other. -- [[User:BhagyaMani|BhagyaMani]] ([[User talk:BhagyaMani|talk]]) 06:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


=== No it's not. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/172.56.82.219|172.56.82.219]] ([[User talk:172.56.82.219#top|talk]]) 09:15, 3 October 2023 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Xsign -->
== The most muscular mammals. ==


== Semi-protected edit request on 3 October 2023 ==
Hello everyone, here I found a book that mentions the fact that lions are the mammals with the highest percentage of skeletal muscle among all mammals.
58.8% (It is mentioned rounded up as 59%), 1.31 times more than the average mammal.
It is on page 19.


{{edit semi-protected|Lion|answered=yes}}
Source:
Mountain Lions, Cougars, and Puma are classified as Lions. Fix it.


X == Asia & Africa are native to lions
-Calder, W. A. (1996). Size, function, and life history. Courier Corporation.
Y == + America (that is all)


Having ignorant people remove edits without looking into knowledge learned before them, is pathetic.
https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=-iBS6-2OO3wC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Size,+function,+and+life+history&ots=CSR0pp2Ml9&sig=K8oavtJ_3iXLhKqihOxKCeI8sv4#v=onepage&q&f=false


Such a simple fix I thought most knew. [[Special:Contributions/172.56.82.219|172.56.82.219]] ([[User talk:172.56.82.219|talk]]) 09:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> No. They are a separate species from proper lions. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 09:28, 3 October 2023 (UTC)


== Featured Images ==
I hope to hear from you. And I hope to see if you accept this information in the next edition.


I’d like to suggest a change to the featured images, or in the very least to the lioness image. I’m a little biased, of course, as the images are my own. The [[c:File:Lion_waiting_in_Namibia.jpg|current male]] is a stunning specimen, so I won’t be too disappointed if the consensus is to keep it. Lions in sanctuaries are always just so majestic! This is a photo the biggest male I’ve seen, and my proposed [[c:File:Lion_at_Working_with_Wildlife_South_Africa.jpg|male image]].
== Article: Lion. Subcategorie: Descripition ==


For a lioness, this is my [[c:File:Lioness_at_Working_with_Wildlife_South_Africa.jpg|proposed photo]] and the most impressive female I’ve ever seen. Bias aside, I really think she is a perfect example and an improvement over the current lioness image. Hopefully my contribution can help! [[User:AfricanConservation|AfricanConservation]] ([[User talk:AfricanConservation|talk]]) 15:36, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello everyone, here I found a book that mentions the fact that lions are the mammals with the highest percentage of skeletal muscle among all mammals. 58.8% (It is mentioned rounded up as 59%), 1.31 times more than the average mammal. It is on page 19.
*'''Oppose''' because the descriptions of both images contain a link to an organisation with which you are apparently affiliated. As User:331dot already explained to you on your talk page : this kind of advertising constitutes a conflict of interest. Remove this link, and I may change my mind. – [[User:BhagyaMani|BhagyaMani]] ([[User talk:BhagyaMani|talk]]) 02:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
*:Apologies, these photos were uploaded before my talk with User:331dot and clarified. Link removed from both images. [[User:AfricanConservation|AfricanConservation]] ([[User talk:AfricanConservation|talk]]) 04:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 3 March 2024 ==
Source:

-Calder, W. A. (1996). Size, function, and life history. Courier Corporation.

https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=-iBS6-2OO3wC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Size,+function,+and+life+history&ots=CSR0pp2Ml9&sig=K8oavtJ_3iXLhKqihOxKCeI8sv4#v=onepage&q&f=false


I hope to hear from you. And I hope to see if you accept this information in the next edition. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:LeandroPucha|LeandroPucha]] ([[User talk:LeandroPucha#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LeandroPucha|contribs]]) 19:06, 30 March 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Semi-protected edit request on 29 April 2021 ==


{{edit semi-protected|Lion|answered=yes}}
{{edit semi-protected|Lion|answered=yes}}
I would like for the word "Antelope" to link to the antelope wiki page. [[User:Ejmayo15|Ejmayo15]] ([[User talk:Ejmayo15|talk]]) 20:17, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
In cultural significance -> western world the third sentence starts with: "Tfhe lion is featured in several of Aesop's fables...". There's a typo on the article, so "Tfhe" should be changed to "The". Thanks! [[User:Bullerr|Bullerr]] ([[User talk:Bullerr|talk]]) 16:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 20:23, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> Thank you! --[[User:TheImaCow|TheImaCow]] ([[User talk:TheImaCow#top|talk]]) 21:32, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

== Sanskrit connection ==

At [[lion]]:

:"''Panthera'' is phonetically similar to the Sanskrit word पाण्डर ''pând-ara'' meaning 'pale yellow, whitish, white'."

At [[Panthera]]:


== Bite force ==
:"The phonetically similar Sanskrit word पाण्डर ''pând-ara'' means 'pale yellow, whitish, white'."


Hello to all of you. I added information on the biteforce of ''Panthera leo'' because other ''Pantheras'' have this information. I put it up here to let the three major page contributors—BhagyaMani, LittleJerry, and Casliber—know. As I can personally attest to, readers find this kind of information to be really helpful, so I advise leaving the edit rather than rolling it back. Having been a Wikipedia reader since 2018, I was dismayed to see no mention of bite force on any of my favorite articles. I hope I was able to serve the readers here. [[User:Wolverine XI|<span style="color:#000080;">'''''Wolverine'''''</span> <span style="color:#8A307F;">'''''XI'''''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Wolverine XI|<span style="color:#2C5F2D;">talk to me</span>]])</sup> 17:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Phonetic similarity is an irrelevant coincidence unless there is also some etymological connection. I suggest that either the etymological connection is stated or the sentence is deleted if none is known. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C8:7B08:6A00:45FA:4CE:A465:F912|2A00:23C8:7B08:6A00:45FA:4CE:A465:F912]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C8:7B08:6A00:45FA:4CE:A465:F912|talk]]) 17:28, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:02, 14 May 2024

Featured articleLion is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 24, 2008.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 30, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
August 12, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
September 24, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
April 14, 2011Featured article reviewKept
Current status: Featured article

"simulating sex" is homophobic phrasing

I.e. from "Males will also head-rub and roll around with each other before simulating sex together." under "Behaviour and ecology" then "Reproduction and life cycle". They have sex. 31.20.106.40 (talk) 10:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

=== No it's not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.82.219 (talk) 09:15, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 October 2023

Mountain Lions, Cougars, and Puma are classified as Lions. Fix it.

X == Asia & Africa are native to lions Y == + America (that is all)

Having ignorant people remove edits without looking into knowledge learned before them, is pathetic.

Such a simple fix I thought most knew. 172.56.82.219 (talk) 09:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: No. They are a separate species from proper lions. Meters (talk) 09:28, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Images

I’d like to suggest a change to the featured images, or in the very least to the lioness image. I’m a little biased, of course, as the images are my own. The current male is a stunning specimen, so I won’t be too disappointed if the consensus is to keep it. Lions in sanctuaries are always just so majestic! This is a photo the biggest male I’ve seen, and my proposed male image.

For a lioness, this is my proposed photo and the most impressive female I’ve ever seen. Bias aside, I really think she is a perfect example and an improvement over the current lioness image. Hopefully my contribution can help! AfricanConservation (talk) 15:36, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose because the descriptions of both images contain a link to an organisation with which you are apparently affiliated. As User:331dot already explained to you on your talk page : this kind of advertising constitutes a conflict of interest. Remove this link, and I may change my mind. – BhagyaMani (talk) 02:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Apologies, these photos were uploaded before my talk with User:331dot and clarified. Link removed from both images. AfricanConservation (talk) 04:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 March 2024

In cultural significance -> western world the third sentence starts with: "Tfhe lion is featured in several of Aesop's fables...". There's a typo on the article, so "Tfhe" should be changed to "The". Thanks! Bullerr (talk) 16:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thank you! --TheImaCow (talk) 21:32, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bite force

Hello to all of you. I added information on the biteforce of Panthera leo because other Pantheras have this information. I put it up here to let the three major page contributors—BhagyaMani, LittleJerry, and Casliber—know. As I can personally attest to, readers find this kind of information to be really helpful, so I advise leaving the edit rather than rolling it back. Having been a Wikipedia reader since 2018, I was dismayed to see no mention of bite force on any of my favorite articles. I hope I was able to serve the readers here. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 17:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply