This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anatomy: Gross C‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy. Sexology and sexuality B‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The section Size and race currently reads: "The belief that penis size varies according to race is not supported by scientific evidence.[12][22] A 2007 study reported that contrary to the "popular belief that black people generally have longer penile sizes", in reality "there is no convincing scientific background" to support this idea.[23]"

However, digging in the sources, this should not be stated in this manner.

For example, source 12/22 only states: "There are several areas where further work is needed. For instance, except for the Korean study, there is little evidence of racial differences. This runs counter to many widely held suppositions and needs further investigation." Source: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06806.x/full

Furthermore, source 23 states as its method: measuring "Full-stretch flaccid penile lengths, and flaccid penile lengths, were measured", even though this method (non-erect measuring) is unreliable according to several sources found on this wiki page. Furthermore, the first conclusion in this study is: "The penile length for Nigerian Blacks was longer than those of the other races, but the differences were only statistically different in comparison with the Koreans." And finally concludes with: "There is the possibility of racial differences in penile sizes, but there is no convincing scientific background to support the ascription of bigger penile dimensions to people of the Black race" Source: http://www.ajol.info/index.php/tjmr/article/view/30465

Thus, if at all, this section should affirm rather than deny the validity of a 'race theory', if merely to state that Koreans have a smaller penis size than other races. With this I mean to say that the current content in this section is not quite supported by the sources.

I think it would be most important in this section to state that scientific studies call for more scientific investigation. Maybe someone can more carefully edit this using the sources properly. --Arcorto (talk) 12:38, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have found dead link in this page ("Pesticides may affect penis size"). Recently I have published an article related to this in my blog. I just want to remove dead link from the page and give useful relevant source about "Pesticides may affect penis size". Sizegeneticsreview (talk) 06:42, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: See answer to same request below EvergreenFir (talk) 07:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have found dead link in this page ("Pesticides may affect penis size"). Recently I have published an article related to this in my blog. I just want to remove dead link from the page and give useful relevant source about "Pesticides may affect penis size". Sizegeneticsreview (talk) 06:43, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Proposed source is not a reliable one EvergreenFir (talk) 07:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no correlation between penis size and other properties. 108.71.122.34 (talk) 20:03, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

...then why don't we have one of a larger than average size one? It would be good for illustrating what is larger than average. 108.71.122.34 (talk) 20:06, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I proposed this some time ago,[1] but it fell on deaf (or most likely, unwilling) ears. Protecting the egos of males editors/readers should not be a factor in an encyclopedia article. 186.227.192.79 (talk) 20:11, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]