InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.5.3) |
Roger 8 Roger (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 22:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC) |
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 22:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
==Lead== |
|||
Thank you [[user:Bluebird207|Bluebird207]] for you recent removal of clutter from the lead. This insertion is distressing and I welcome any comments as to why you think it is an improvement. ''Historically part of Kent, it was absorbed into Greater London in 1965 and today forms part of the London Borough of Bexley.'' It seems to be a location specific standard sentence being used across Greater London articles and is not a personal creation of yours, but rather than bring this up at that project talk page, I'll mention it here. My views are that the sentence is not ideal, is confusing, misleading, and factually incorrect. ''Historically part of Kent'' means it is no longer part of Kent, which is wrong. Is this a clumsy way of trying to say that Erith is in the historic county of Kent, as lead guidelines advise. ''it was absorbed into Greater London in 1965'' is either wrong or misleading because GL of the 1965 act did not exist to do any absorbing, and all GL did take over was local government responsibility. This sort of wording is hardly encyclopedic. [[User:Roger 8 Roger|Roger 8 Roger]] ([[User talk:Roger 8 Roger|talk]]) 22:50, 25 August 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:50, 25 August 2018
UK geography Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
London Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Erith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081007013402/http://www.bexley.gov.uk:80/service/erithwesterngateway/index.html to http://www.bexley.gov.uk/service/erithwesterngateway/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:34, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Erith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.thamesgateway.gov.uk/index.html?rm=news&article=22&PHPSESSID=986aa54265aa061b23cb5883448aae85
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Erith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120729195722/http://www.playhouse.org.uk/news.htm to http://www.playhouse.org.uk/news.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080928200621/http://www.ramblers.org.uk:80/INFO/paths/thames.html to http://www.ramblers.org.uk/info/paths/thames.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:09, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Notable residents
Over the next couple of weeks I'm going to try to rationalise the lists of notable residents of Bexley towns. Each one currently has a long and unsourced lists of people who might have gone to school there, may anecdotally have been seen in the area, may be from a neighbouring town etc. (see Sidcup for example). Also, many people were born in, say, Bexleyheath but grew up in, say, Welling. Meanwhile the article List of people from Bexley is woefully underpopulated. So I'm going to try to migrate most of the lists to there as a central list (with fully explanation of their local connection and history etc), add them to the articles about their secondary schools if the sources back that up, and only leave people on the list in articles about the specific towns if the source clearly states that they lived in that place. (see current list at Bexleyheath for an example). This should make the info more reliable, easier to check, and easier to understand. Any comments, objections, suggestions? Jdcooper (talk) 13:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- How do you define Towns? Why exclude Villages and Hamlets? — Preceding unsigned
Domesday contradiction
This article claimed that, "Erith passed into the possession of Bishop Odo and is mentioned in the Domesday Survey", but provided no evidence.
The contradiction is Local Government asserting that: the most populated area was by the river at Lessness. This area probably included Erith which is not mentioned in Domesday.
Source: http://www.bexley.gov.uk/article/10263/The-Bexley-Area-in-the-Domesday-Book
I have modified the sentences to remove the contradiction. More generally, the article does not identify the earliest mention of Erith.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Erith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160609204629/http://www.bexley.gov.uk/article/3296/Surnames-beginning-with-A to http://www.bexley.gov.uk/article/3296/Surnames-beginning-with-A
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161114001941/http://www.bexley.gov.uk/article/3378/Surnames-beginning-with-T to http://www.bexley.gov.uk/article/3378/Surnames-beginning-with-T
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Erith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050515074054/http://www.molas.org.uk/pages/siteSummariesDetailsAll.asp?year=summaries2001 to http://www.molas.org.uk/pages/siteSummariesDetailsAll.asp?year=summaries2001
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050325224515/http://www.molas.org.uk/pages/siteSummariesDetailsAll.asp?year=summaries1996 to http://www.molas.org.uk/pages/siteSummariesDetailsAll.asp?year=summaries1996
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.bexley.gov.uk/localstudies/local_history/guide_pdfs/51_historical_references_to_erith_market.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161124154255/http://www.bexley.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=10724 to http://www.bexley.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=10724
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160215003728/http://www.bexley.gov.uk/article/10693/The-Wheatleys-housekeepers-accounts-1792-1817 to http://www.bexley.gov.uk/article/10693/The-Wheatleys-housekeepers-accounts-1792-1817
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.bexley.gov.uk/localstudies/local_history/guide_pdfs/11_erith.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Lead
Thank you Bluebird207 for you recent removal of clutter from the lead. This insertion is distressing and I welcome any comments as to why you think it is an improvement. Historically part of Kent, it was absorbed into Greater London in 1965 and today forms part of the London Borough of Bexley. It seems to be a location specific standard sentence being used across Greater London articles and is not a personal creation of yours, but rather than bring this up at that project talk page, I'll mention it here. My views are that the sentence is not ideal, is confusing, misleading, and factually incorrect. Historically part of Kent means it is no longer part of Kent, which is wrong. Is this a clumsy way of trying to say that Erith is in the historic county of Kent, as lead guidelines advise. it was absorbed into Greater London in 1965 is either wrong or misleading because GL of the 1965 act did not exist to do any absorbing, and all GL did take over was local government responsibility. This sort of wording is hardly encyclopedic. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 22:50, 25 August 2018 (UTC)