Insert non-formatted text here
China Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Project Countries main page | Talk | Participants | Templates | Articles | Pictures | To do | Article assessment | Countries portal |
This WikiProject helps develop country-related pages (of all types) and works toward standardizing the formats of sets and types of country-related pages. For example, the sets of Culture of x, Administrative divisions of x, and Demographics of x articles, etc. – (where "x" is a country name) – and the various types of pages, like stubs, categories, etc.
What's new?
Articles for deletion
- 21 Jun 2024 – Swadhin Axom (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Kautilya3 (t · c); see discussion (3 participants)
- 17 Jun 2024 – Mewar–Delhi Sultanate Wars (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by ImperialAficionado (t · c); see discussion (5 participants)
- 17 Jun 2024 – List of countries by easternmost point (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Traumnovelle (t · c); see discussion (5 participants)
- 17 Jun 2024 – List of countries by northernmost point (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Traumnovelle (t · c); see discussion (5 participants)
- 17 Jun 2024 – List of countries by westernmost point (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Traumnovelle (t · c); see discussion (5 participants)
- 17 Jun 2024 – List of countries by southernmost point (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Traumnovelle (t · c); see discussion (5 participants)
- 06 Jun 2024 – Rol Naath (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by MSGJ (t · c) was closed as keep by OwenX (t · c) on 21 Jun 2024; see discussion (9 participants; relisted)
Categories for discussion
- 21 Jun 2024 – Category:Christian universalists by nationality (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Koavf (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Jun 2024 – Category:American educators by ethnic or national origin (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by LaundryPizza03 (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Jun 2024 – Category:American professional wrestlers by ethnic or national origin (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by LaundryPizza03 (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Jun 2024 – Category:American academics by ethnic or national origin (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by LaundryPizza03 (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Jun 2024 – Category:Hawaii people by ethnic or national origin (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by LaundryPizza03 (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Jun 2024 – Category:American singers by ethnic or national origin (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by LaundryPizza03 (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Jun 2024 – Category:American classical musicians by ethnic or national origin (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by LaundryPizza03 (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Jun 2024 – Category:American poets by ethnic or national origin (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by LaundryPizza03 (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Jun 2024 – Category:American writers by ethnic or national origin (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by LaundryPizza03 (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Jun 2024 – Category:American musicians by ethnic or national origin (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by LaundryPizza03 (t · c); see discussion
- (10 more...)
Redirects for discussion
- 18 Jun 2024 – Botswanan (talk · edit · hist) →Botswana was RfDed by Presidentman (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Jun 2024 – Gaza death camp (talk · edit · hist) →Gaza Strip was RfDed by An anonymous username, not my real name (t · c); see discussion
Good article nominees
- 11 Jun 2024 – Botswana (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by 48JCL (t · c); start discussion
- 21 Apr 2024 – Bahmani Sultanate (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Flemmish Nietzsche (t · c); start discussion
- 19 Apr 2024 – First Republic of Armenia (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Olympian (t · c); start discussion
- 06 Mar 2024 – Rai dynasty (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by TrangaBellam (t · c); start discussion
Featured article reviews
- 30 Oct 2023 – Byzantine Empire (talk · edit · hist) was put up for FA review by SandyGeorgia (t · c); see discussion
Requests for comments
- 13 Jun 2024 – Colombia (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by LaundryPizza03 (t · c); see discussion
- 02 Jun 2024 – Israel (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by Starship.paint (t · c); see discussion
Peer reviews
- 27 May 2024 – South Yemen (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Abo Yemen (t · c); see discussion
- 04 May 2024 – Regency of Algiers (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Scope creep (t · c); see discussion
- 06 Mar 2024 – Nezak Huns (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by TrangaBellam (t · c); see discussion
Requested moves
- 16 Jun 2024 – History of the People's Republic of China (1949–1976) (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to History of China (1949–1976) by Interstellarity (t · c); see discussion
- 16 Jun 2024 – History of the People's Republic of China (2002–present) (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to History of China (2002–present) by Interstellarity (t · c); see discussion
- 16 Jun 2024 – History of the People's Republic of China (1976–1989) (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to History of China (1976–1989) by Interstellarity (t · c); see discussion
- 16 Jun 2024 – History of the People's Republic of China (1989–2002) (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to History of China (1989–2002) by Interstellarity (t · c); see discussion
- 09 Jun 2024 – Kerma kingdom (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Kingdom of Kerma by LaundryPizza03 (t · c); see discussion
Articles to be merged
- 06 May 2024 – General Command of the Armed Forces of South Russia (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Armed Forces of South Russia by Nederlandse Leeuw (t · c); see discussion
- 08 Mar 2024 – Tunna (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Atuna (state) by Wikishovel (t · c); see discussion
- 08 Mar 2024 – Atuna (state) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Tunna by Wikishovel (t · c); see discussion
- 25 Feb 2024 – Spanish East Indies (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Captaincy General of the Philippines by Mr. Information1409 (t · c); see discussion
- 16 Feb 2024 – Sierra Leone (1961–1971) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Sierra Leone by Snow Lion Fenian (t · c); see discussion
- 07 Dec 2023 – BRIC (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to BRICS by Thenightaway (t · c); see discussion
- 25 Sep 2023 – Nizari Ismaili state (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Order of Assassins by Iskandar323 (t · c); see discussion
Articles to be split
- 20 Jun 2024 – Xianbei (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Kepler-1229b (t · c); see discussion
- 02 Jun 2024 – Special administrative regions of China (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by 61.244.64.116 (t · c); see discussion
- 16 Apr 2024 – Bengal Presidency (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Mehediabedin (t · c); see discussion
- 31 Dec 2023 – Schengen Area (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Super Dromaeosaurus (t · c); see discussion
- 11 Feb 2023 – Green Ukraine (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Mupper-san (t · c); see discussion
- 02 Jan 2023 – Prince-Bishopric of Lübeck (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Srnec (t · c); see discussion
- 02 May 2021 – Vargas Era (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by FredModulars (t · c); see discussion
- 18 Apr 2021 – Jamaica (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Goszei (t · c); see discussion
Articles for creation
- 31 May 2024 – Draft:Vahika (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Zenithxxx (t · c)
- 19 May 2024 – Draft:Republic of Taiwan Provisional Government (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Qwerfjkl (bot) (t · c)
- 14 Jun 2024 – Draft:Aynvaul (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by AIG(Micronational) (t · c) was declined by Liance (t · c) on 17 Jun 2024
Click to watch (Subscribe via RSS Atom) · Find Article Alerts for other topics!
To do list
Scope
This WikiProject is focused on country coverage (content/gaps) and presentation (navigation, page naming, layout, formatting) on Wikipedia, especially country articles (articles with countries as their titles), country outlines, and articles with a country in their name (such as Demographics of Germany), but also all other country-related articles, stubs, categories, and lists pertaining to countries.
This WikiProject helps Wikipedia's navigation-related WikiProjects (Wikipedia:WikiProject Outline of knowledge, WikiProject Categories, WikiProject Portals, etc.) develop and maintain the navigation structures (menus, outlines, lists, templates, and categories) pertaining to countries. And since most countries share the same subtopics ("Cities of", "Cuisine of", "Religion in", "Prostitution in", etc.), it is advantageous to standardize their naming, and their order of presentation in Wikipedia's indexes and table-of-contents-like pages.
Categories
Click on "►" below to display subcategories: |
---|
Click on "►" below to display subcategories: |
---|
Subpages
- List of all subpages of this page.
Formatting
Many country and country-related articles have been extensively developed, but much systematic or similar information about many countries is not presented in a consistent way. Inconsistencies are rampant in article naming, headings, data presented, types of things covered, order of coverage, etc. This WikiProject works towards standardizing page layouts of country-related articles of the same type ("Geography of", "Government of", "Politics of", "Wildlife of", etc.).
We are also involved with the standardization of country-related stubs, standardizing the structure of country-related lists and categories (the category trees for countries should be identical for the most part, as most countries share the same subcategories – though there will be some differences of course).
Goals
- Provide a centralized resource guide of all related topics in Wikipedia, as well as spearhead the effort to improve and develop them.
- Create uniform templates that serve to identify all related articles as part of this project, as well as stub templates to englobe all related stubs under specific categories.
- Standardize articles about different nations, cultures, holidays, and geography.
- Verify historical accuracy and neutrality of all articles within the scope of the project.
- Create, expand and cleanup related articles.
Structure and guidelines
Although referenced during FA and GA reviews, this structure guide is advisory only, and should not be enforced against the wishes of those actually working on the article in question. Articles may be best modeled on the layout of an existing article of appropriate structure and topic (See: Canada, Japan and Australia)
Lead section
Opening paragraphs
The article should start with a good simple introduction, giving name of the country, general location in the world, bordering countries, seas and the like. Also give other names by which the country may still be known (for example Holland, Persia). Also, add a few facts about the country, the things that it is known for (for example the mentioning of windmills in the Netherlands article).
The etymology of a country's name, if worth noting, may be dealt with in the Etymology or History section. Naming disputes may also belong in the Etymology or History section.
Overly detailed information or infobox data duplication such as listing random examples, numbered statistics or naming individuals should be reserved for the infobox or body of the article.
Example: . Canada and Japan as below .
Infobox
There is a table with quick facts about the country called an infobox. A template for the table can be found at the bottom of this page.
Although the table can be moved out to the template namespace (to e.g. [[Template:CountryName Infobox]]) and thus easen the look of the edit page, most Wikipedians still disapprove as of now, see the talk page.
The contents are as follows:
- The official long-form name of the country in the local language is to go on top as the caption. If there are several official names (languages), list all (if reasonably feasible). The conventional long-form name (in English), if it differs from the local long-form name, should follow the local name(s). This is not a parameter to list every recognized language of a country, but rather for listing officially recognize national languages.
- The conventional short-form name of the country, recognised by the majority of the English-speaking world; ideally, this should also be used for the name of the article.
- A picture of the national flag. You can find flags at the List of flags. A smaller version should be included in the table itself, a larger-sized version in a page titled Flag of <country>, linked to via the "In Detail" cell. Instead of two different images, use the autothumbnail function that wiki offers.
- A picture of the national coat of arms. A good source is required for this, but not yet available. It should be no more than 125 pixels in width.
- Below the flag and coat of arms is room for the national motto, often displayed on the coat of arms (with translation, if necessary).
- The official language(s) of the country. (rot the place to list every recognized or used language)
- The political status. Specify if it is a sovereign state or a dependent territory.
- The capital city, or cities. Explain the differences if there are multiple capital cities using a footnote (see example at the Netherlands).
- If the data on the population is recent and reliable, add the largest city of the country.
- Land area: The area of the country in square kilometres (km²) and square miles (sq mi) with the world-ranking of this country. Also add the % of water, which can be calculated from the data in the Geography article (make it negligible if ~0%).
- Population: The number of inhabitants and the world-ranking; also include a year for this estimate (should be 2000 for now, as that is the date of the ranking). For the population density you can use the numbers now available.
- GDP: The amount of the gross domestic product on ppp base and the world ranking. also include the amount total and per head.
- HDI: Information pertaining to the UN Human Development Index – the value, year (of value), rank (with ordinal), and category (colourised as per the HDI country list).
- Currency; the name of the local currency. Use the pipe if the currency name is also used in other countries: [[Australian dollar|dollar]].
- Time zone(s); the time zone or zones in which the country is relative to UTC
- National anthem; the name of the National anthem and a link to the article about it.
- Internet TLD; the top-level domain code for this country.
- Calling Code; the international Calling Code used for dialing this country.
Lead map
There is a long-standing practice that areas out of a state's control should be depicted differently on introductory maps, to not give the impression the powers of a state extend somewhere they do not. This is for various types of a lack of control, be it another state (eg. Crimea, bits of Kashmir) or a separatist body (eg. DPR, TRNC).
Sections
A section should be written in summary style, containing just the important facts. Undue weight can be given in several ways, including but not limited to the depth of detail, the quantity of text, prominence of placement, the juxtaposition of statements, and the use of imagery. Main article fixation is an observed effect that editors are likely to encounter in county articles. If a section it is too large, information should be transferred to the sub-article. Avoid sections focusing on criticisms or controversies. Try to achieve a more neutral text by folding debates into the narrative, rather than isolating them into sections.
Articles may consist of the following sections:
- Etymology sections are often placed first (sometimes called name depending on the information in the article). Include only if due information is available.
- History – An outline of the major events in the country's history (about 4 to 6 paragraphs, depending on complexity of history), including some detail on current events. Sub-article: "History of X"
- Politics – Overview of the current governmental system, possibly previous forms, some short notes on the parliament. Sub-article: "Politics of X"
- Administrative divisions – Overview of the administrative subdivisions of the country. Name the section after the first level of subdivisions (and subsequent levels, if available) (e.g. provinces, states, departments, districts, etc.) and give the English equivalent name, when available. Also include overseas possessions. This section should also include an overview map of the country and subdivisions, if available. The CIA World Factbook Maps can be used as a basis for the map, but plenty of other sources are available.
- Geography – Details of the country's main geographic features and climate. Historical weather boxes should be reserved for sub articles. Sub-article: "Geography of X"
- Economy – Details on the country's economy, major industries, bit of economic history, major trade partners, a tad comparison etc. Sub-article: "Economy of X"
- Demographics – Mention the languages spoken, the major religions, some well known properties of the people of X, by which they are known. Uncontextualized data should be avoided. (See WP:NOTSTATS) Sub-article: "Demographics of X".
- Culture – Summary of the country's specific forms of art (anything from painting to film) and its best known cultural contributions. Caution should be taken to ensure that the sections are not simply a listing of names or mini biographies of individuals accomplishments. Good example Canada#Sports. Sub-article: "Culture of X".
- See also – Aim to include relevant information within the article and reduce the See also section See WP:See also. ('See also" sections of country articles normally only contain links to "Index of country" and "Outline of country" articles, alongside the main portal(s)).
- References – Sums up "Notes", "References", and all "Further Reading" or "Bibliography"
- External links – Links to official websites about the country. See WP:External links
Size
See Wikipedia:Article size and MOS:LEADLENGTH for recommendations on the size of an article summary.
- FA level articles generally consists of approximately 8,000 to 10,000 words, with a lead usually four paragraphs. See WP:SIZERULE
- Australia = Prose size (text only): 60 kB (9304 words) "readable prose size"
- Bulgaria = Prose size (text only): 56 kB (8847 words) "readable prose size"
- Canada = Prose size (text only): 67 kB (10115 words) "readable prose size"
- Germany = Prose size (text only): 54 kB (8456 words) "readable prose size"
- Japan = Prose size (text only): 51 kB (8104 words) "readable prose size"
Hatnote
The link should be shown as below: Avoid link clutter of multiple child articles in a hierarchical setup as hatnotes. For example, Canada#Economy is a summary section with a hatnote to Economy of Canada that summarizes the history with a hatnote to Economic history of Canada. See WP:SUMMARYHATNOTE for more recommended hatnote usages.
== Politics == {{main|Politics of the Netherlands}}
Charts
As prose text is preferred, overly detailed statistical charts and diagrams such as economic trends, weather boxes, historical population charts, and past elections results, etc, should be reserved for main sub articles on the topic as per WP:DETAIL as outlined at WP:NOTSTATS.
Galleries
Galleries or clusters of images are generally discouraged as they may cause undue weight to one particular section of a summary article and may cause accessibility problems, such as sandwiching of text or fragmented image display for some readers. See WP:GALLERY for more information.
As noted at Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and series boxes the number of templates at the bottom of any article should be kept to a minimum. Country pages generally have footers that link to pages for countries in their geographic region. Footers for international organizations are not added to country pages, but they rather can go on subpages such as "Economy of..." and "Foreign relations of..." Categories for some of these organizations are also sometimes added. Templates for supranational organizations like the European Union and CARICOM are permitted. A list of the footers that have been created can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Countries/Templates/Navboxes, however note that many of these are not currently in use.
Transclusions
Transclusions are generally discouraged in country articles for reasons outlined below.
Like many software technologies, transclusion comes with a number of drawbacks. The most obvious one being the cost in terms of increased machine resources needed; to mitigate this to some extent, template limits are imposed by the software to reduce the complexity of pages. Some further drawbacks are listed below.
- Transcluded text may have no sources for statements that should be sourced where they appear, have different established reference styles, contain no-text cite errors, or duplicate key errors. (To help mitigate these, see Help:Cite errors)
- Excerpts break the link between article code and article output.
- Changes made to transcluded content often do not appear in watchlists, resulting in unseen changes on the target page.
- Transcluded text may cause repeated links or have different varieties of English and date formats than the target page.
- Transclusions may not reflect protection levels, resulting in transcluded text perhaps having a different level of protection than the target page. See Cascading protection
- {{excerpt}} and related templates may require using
<noinclude>
,<includeonly>
and<onlyinclude>
markup at the transcluded page to have selective content; that would require monitoring that the markup is sustained. - Excerpts cause editors to monitor transcluded pages for "section heading" changes to ensure transclusion continues to work. (To help mitigate this, see MOS:BROKENSECTIONLINKS)
- Excerpts can result in content discussions over multiple talk pages that may have different considerations or objectives for readers.
Lists of countries
To determine which entities should be considered separate "countries" or included on lists, use the entries in ISO 3166-1 plus the list of states with limited recognition, except:
- Lists based on only a single source should follow that source.
- Specific lists might need more logical criteria. For example, list of sovereign states omits non-sovereign entities listed by ISO-3166-1. Lists of sports teams list whichever entities that have teams, regardless of sovereignty. Lists of laws might follow jurisdiction boundaries (for example, England and Wales is a single jurisdiction).
For consistency with other Wikipedia articles, the names of entities do not need to follow sources or ISO-3166-1. The names used as the titles of English Wikipedia articles are a safe choice for those that are disputed.
Resources
Sisterlinks
Related WikiProjects
Popular pages
Template:Featured article is only for Wikipedia:Featured articles. Template:Mainpage date Template:V0.5
Software: Computing Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
An event mentioned in this article is an October 1 selected anniversary.
Archives | |
---|---|
Old | China/Archive 1 |
China/Archive 2 | China/Archive 3 |
China/Archive 4 | China/Archive 5 |
China/Archive 6 | PRC/Archive 1 |
PRC/Archive 2 | PRC/Archive 3 |
Suggestion: Make China (disambiguation) page as the main page for "China"
The vote has been moved to Talk:China page Here because the discussion is not related to the People's Republic of China - Heilme 00:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
141.153.114.88 edits
141.153.114.88 keeps repeatedly adding Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 to the "See also" section even though the link is already clearly mentioned in the article. I suspect he is also using his sockpuppet User:Chairman LMAO, to evade the 3RR. User:72.65.75.237 is believed to be the same user editing under a dynamic IP address [1]. Are 141.153.114.88's appropriate? --RevolverOcelotX
- "Chairman LMAO" is not me. Other "see also" links appear elsewhere in the article. This is a selective, POV-pushing deletion. 141.153.114.88 23:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Do you have any proof that "Chairman LMAO" is not you? Chairman LMAO (talk · contribs) have been helping you revert war in this article and the Manchukuo article. The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 is clearly inappropriate in the "See also" section. The other "see also" links are broad categories which is clearly China-related. The protests links are already mentioned and it is POV-pushing to redundantly add them multiple times. RevolverOcelotX
- I can not provide proof that a user is not me as it is impossible to prove a negative; it is also impossible to disprove your positive assertion as you did not provide any evidence for it.
- As for the dispute, you previously asserted as a reason for its removal that it is mentioned in the article already. This is not a sufficient reason, as other "see also" links appear elsewhere in it as well. The link details an event and period which is notable, important, and commonly cited and discussed in the context of the PRC and its recent history. Deletion of it is selective and betrays a sense of removing critical information. 141.153.114.88 00:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Then why are you using constantly changing IP address to evade the 3RR? 141.153.114.88, if you are editing in good faith, why don't you stick to one username or one IP address. Using constantly changing IP addresses counterproductive to consensus and allows you to escape accountability.
- The protest link is way too specific to be in the "See also" section and has little to do with the PRC broadly. Look at the other links in the section. Except for the China link, the other links do not clearly appear in the article at all. The protest link is already clearly in the article and re-adding redundant link is POV-pushing. Broadly speaking, the protests have little to do with the PRC as a whole, its one single incident in history, if we allow that, it will allow other people to add many other single incidents into the section. RevolverOcelotX
- The above is a lie put forward repeatedly by a user who refuses to acknowledge the meaning of dynamic IPs. 141.153.114.88 00:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Could not the Boston Tea Party be considered one single incident in history? Is it not true that one brief incident can have a profound effect on history? I believe that such an incident is clearly China-related, and would argue that it is a broad issue, for such protests will tend to influence and instigate future protests(or in some cases the lack of future protests).--Tmchk 01:50, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but the protest link is already clearly mentioned in the article. It is redundant and POV-pushing to add it in another section. Wikipedia:Manual of Style clearly states that links should only be linked once. You could also argue that the protest are not broad as the other links in the "See also" section.
- Another anonymous IP address, 83.149.72.211 (talk · contribs) has just reverted once again and re-added the redundant protest link into the article again. Are 83.149.72.211's edits appropriate? RevolverOcelotX
This user continues to add the same POV diatribe involving Chinese governmental agents to the Human Rights section of the article. Access article history to see what I'm talking about.
I'm trying to keep the user at bay. I've left notes on both user talk pages in an attempt to resolve this, and will proceed through WP:DR if necessary. However, as far as this article goes, I'm up against the 3RR and not currently sure if this falls under one of the exceptions.
–ArmadniGeneral (talk • contribs) 11:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- User:Joinalex left this message at my talk page:
- I would view the ideals that you have constantly ovwritten mine with as being equally, if not more POV. That you don't realise this, I'd conjecture it to be blunt evidence of a lack of research on your part - something which is just a lil unbecoming of encyclopedic entries. If you wish to discuss the issue of what is appropriate to put in this section, given the proven horrific human rights abuses in China, I am willing to do so. Until then I am more than willing to continue to attempt to gather full academic references to prove this 'point of view', and to fight to keep it within the realm of reason as opposed to a vehicle of Chinese state propoganda (can countries be guilty of points of view, or are they exempt from bias?). Or at least I would be, but I got an exam tomorrow and have 2 sleep *yawn* goodnight General/Comrade chairman.
- Let us please not pretend that the direct appeal for the user to refresh the page "over the next 30 seconds," so he/she can see how the Chinese government has removed Joinalex's paragraph from Wikipedia, is neither POV nor unencyclopedic. That particular element of your edit is totally over the line.
- But even if we remove that part entirely, what we have left is nothing more than you totally eliminating a legitimate paragraph about recent developments and the PRC allowance of localized demonstrations. At that point, we have your one sentence (with one cited source about executions), leading right into another, far more detailed paragraph. As a showing of good faith and construction, I've added the execution factoid into the article, with the right percentage and a more comprehensive reference.
- I've done all I can now to help include your contributions. However, again, the specified paragraph should not be removed, and the personal appeal is unencyclopedic.
- –ArmadniGeneral (talk • contribs) 12:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
In all honesty I the request to refresh the page is based on anecdotal beliefs I held, which were the basis for the way I dealt with editing the page, which I felt would not remain in place for more than 30 seconds. That may have been a misguided belief, and I apologise. Nonetheless I am not certain that the attention paid to this page and in particular, this topic is completely free of partisanship, however I have to concede that it would be utterly unencycolpedic and unacademic to have the page left in the state in which I edited it (please remember that I never believed it would remain in this state). I would like, however to deal now with what the page should represent.
It does not reflect reality at all to simply gloss over facticity regarding human rights abuses with purpoted developments. The scope of human rights abuses in China is gargantuan, and the fact that this is denied by the authorities there does not materially change the facts. The PRC government's viewpoint certainly does, again in an encyclopedic sense, deserve to be part of the page, as their stated opinions are a fact in that they exist. However, to summarise - cultural genocide (seriously, I don't just use the term to be melodramatic) has been practiced upon regions that have come into PRC control in recent years. Dissidents are repressed brutally, as are demonstarations by dissidentss, or, as is now happening schoolchildren. There are few limitations to the methods that are used in this repression of political, social, economic or religious freedoms, this is well documented. A dissident who had been jailed for a number of years for reporting on a widening of a river to a relative in the US was released after pressure from Amnesty international a few weeks ago. As he was walking down the street he ws attacked by an 'unknown assailant' who severed his spinal column expertly, leaving him unable to do more than move his eyelids. The shock value of this is not sufficient to justify condemning the PRC government's human right srecord, however thsi kind of behaviour has been reported again and again and again, by the media and by human rights groups, it is not part of popular knowledge, nor is it something many people care about. However it is easily verifiable fact. I would hope that this encyclipoedia cannot be blinded by the simple virtue of repeating a lie often and loudly, and will attempt to steer it towards an accurate representation of fact, at all stages discussing this with the people who have an (independant) interest in this matter.
All the best. Alex.
- I understand your concerns, and do not, by any means, feel that you are outright wrong. If you feel that changes to the article are required, you are always welcome to make them in a strictly encyclopedic way. When making changes, however, please note that the two-paragraph Human Rights section is not intended to cover all available information on the subject. Due to the length of the article, it has been split into multiple subpages. As such, the article you will likely take interest in is located here: Human rights in the People's Republic of China. (Please note that it is currently protected until an edit dispute is resolved. Discussion is present on talk page.)
- So once again, if you would like to edit either article's content, you are welcome to. Please simply ensure that the final product is fact-neutral (well-cited) and encyclopedic.
- –ArmadniGeneral (talk • contribs) 20:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Ethnic groups in China
I'd like to ask those who might be interested in the subject of ethnic groups in China to weigh in on the [[Talk:Nationalities_of_China#Let.27s_try_this_again_-_Proposed_Move_and_Split.|curr
China
I plan to rename this page to China. Any objections? +-+ Latouu 01:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)