This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Skepticism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Alternative Views Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Which outlets are considered to be a reliable source? Don’t want to put out the wrong information. 2600:1700:44A0:6EF0:FD12:1801:AE36:7077 (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:RS. Bon courage (talk) 14:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is stereotyping a group of people. It’s racist 2601:985:680:5A80:BCF7:BCB3:ECEE:90FA (talk) 01:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]