Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Pramod123123 (talk | contribs)
1 edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(81 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Vital article|topic=Geography|subpage=Cities|level=5|class=Start}}
{{talkheader}}
{{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject India |class=start |importance=mid |cities=yes |karnataka=yes |karnataka-importance=High |cities-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject India |importance=mid |cities=yes |karnataka=yes |karnataka-importance=High |cities-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Cities |class=Start |importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Cities }}
}}
}}


Line 11: Line 10:
|algo = old(100d)
|algo = old(100d)
|archive = Talk:Belgaum/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Belgaum/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
* <nowiki>[[Mhow#The Indian Army and Mhow|Mhow]]</nowiki> The anchor (#The Indian Army and Mhow) has been [[Special:Diff/705273578|deleted by other users]] before. <!-- {"title":"The Indian Army and Mhow","appear":{"revid":27319004,"parentid":27183633,"timestamp":"2005-11-04T04:25:07Z","replaced_anchors":{"Mhow in the State Assembly(Vidhan Sabha) and the National Parliament (Lok Sabha)":"Mhow in the State Assembly (Vidhan Sabha) and the National Parliament (Lok Sabha)","Legal luminaries from Mhow:":"Legal luminaries from Mhow"},"removed_section_titles":["The Indian Army and Mhow:","Mhow in the State Assembly(Vidhan Sabha) and the National Parliament (Lok Sabha)","Legal luminaries from Mhow:"],"added_section_titles":["The Indian Army and Mhow","Mhow in the State Assembly (Vidhan Sabha) and the National Parliament (Lok Sabha)","Legal luminaries from Mhow"]},"disappear":{"revid":705273578,"parentid":705263803,"timestamp":"2016-02-16T15:06:01Z","removed_section_titles":["Demography","The Indian Army and Mhow","Banks in Mhow","Picnic spots near Mhow","The Temple of Janapav and the rivers Chambal and Gambhir","The demand for a broad gauge railway line","Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and Mhow","Brief summary about the people and environment of Mhow","Renaming Mhow after Ambedkar and the controversy","References to Mhow in the written form.","Mhow and Bollywood","Sports and eminent sportspersons associated with Mhow","Human rights activists and road safety and transport specialist of Mhow","Next stop"],"added_section_titles":["Climate","Demographics","Cantonment","Tourism","Janapav hill","Transport","In popular culture","Notable people"]}} -->
}}
}}


== Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2017 ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 6 February 2023 ==


{{edit semi-protected|Belgaum|answered=yes}}
{{edit semi-protected|Belgaum|answered=yes}}
1. Wiki header should be changed to " Belagavi" and article informatio. should contain the unofficial name or old name Belagaum inside the article . It seems to be the other way round.
change Machche to Machhe [[User:Marutibp238|Marutibp238]] ([[User talk:Marutibp238|talk]]) 16:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
2. More edit requests will follow once the first one is rectified. [[Special:Contributions/2601:40B:8402:4920:992A:7765:5EFB:E6BE|2601:40B:8402:4920:992A:7765:5EFB:E6BE]] ([[User talk:2601:40B:8402:4920:992A:7765:5EFB:E6BE|talk]]) 14:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
:{{done}} [[User:DRAGON BOOSTER|<span style="color:blue;size=2">DRAGON BOOSTER</span>]][[User talk:DRAGON BOOSTER|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2"> ★</span>]] 17:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC).
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> see [[WP:ON]] [[User:SmallJarsWithGreenLabels|small jars]] <small><code>[[User talk:SmallJarsWithGreenLabels|<b style="color:#270">t</b>]][[special:contributions/SmallJarsWithGreenLabels|<b style="color:#270">c</b>]]</code></small> 16:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 3 March 2018 ==
== Requested move 12 March 2023 ==


⚫
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
{{edit semi-protected|Belgaum|answered=yes}}
⚫
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.''
[[User:Manoj pattar|Manoj pattar]] ([[User talk:Manoj pattar|talk]]) 01:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Basappa Chikkladinni is the new Mayor of Belagavi
:[[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Anon126|<span style="background-color: #000"><span style="color: #fff">Anon</span><span style="color: #0ff;">126</span></span>]] ([[User:Anon126/R|notify me of responses!]] / [[User talk:Anon126|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Anon126|contribs]]) 03:40, 3 March 2018 (UTC)


⚫
The result of the move request was: '''not moved.''' Consensus is that Belgaum is still the [[WP:COMMONNAME]] at this time. <small>([[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Non-admin closure|non-admin closure]])</small> [[User:ModernDayTrilobite|ModernDayTrilobite]] ([[User talk:ModernDayTrilobite|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ModernDayTrilobite|contribs]]) 19:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
== Belagavi ಬೆಳಗಾವಿ ==
⚫
----


[[:Belgaum]] → {{no redirect|Belagavi}} – official name was changed in 2014, and Majority of the Reliable sources published after that are using the "Belagavi" so as per [[WP:NAMECHANGES]] the article is eligible to rename as "Belagavi" , Sources which are using "Belagavi" : [[The Hindu]], [[The Times of India]], [[The Indian Express]], [[Deccan Herald]], [[Mint (newspaper)]], [[Asian News International]], [[Hindustan Times]], [[Free Press Journal]] etc ... . [[User:ಹುಲಿ|'''ಹುಲಿ🐯''']]<sup>[[User talk:ಹುಲಿ| talk]]</sup> 20:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC) <small>—&nbsp;'''''Relisting.'''''&nbsp;[[User:Adumbrativus|Adumbrativus]] ([[User talk:Adumbrativus|talk]]) 03:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)</small>
Belagavi is Karnatakas biggest district in area. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Djsourabh|Djsourabh]] ([[User talk:Djsourabh#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Djsourabh|contribs]]) 10:40, 19 June 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:'''Oppose''' Wikipedia is a world-wide encyclopedia, and the [[WP:Commonname]] is determined by what English speakers, the world over, most readily recognise. Local media do not reflect this world-wide situation, as most of their readership readily knows both names, Although only a very crude measure a Google search for [https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Belguam&ie=UTF-8&oe= Belguam] gives 66.3 million hits, whereas [https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Belagavi&sxsrf=AJOqlzXDstf3AtaGlrPuBp3lKOQ0BwPZAA%3A1678653189774&ei=BTcOZJzlLvKg8gKyxZ-gDw&ved=0ahUKEwjc-864ntf9AhVykFwKHbLiB_QQ4dUDCA8&oq=Belagavi&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAQDDIKCAAQRxDWBBCwAzIKCAAQRxDWBBCwAzIKCAAQRxDWBBCwAzIKCAAQRxDWBBCwAzIKCAAQRxDWBBCwAzIKCAAQRxDWBBCwAzIKCAAQRxDWBBCwAzIKCAAQRxDWBBCwA0oECEEYAFAAWABg0yZoAXABeACAAQCIAQCSAQCYAQDIAQjAAQE&sclient=gws-wiz-serp Belgavi] gives just 12 million - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 20:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
:'''comment''' another reason to support move as per [[WP:COMMONNAME]] : quality encyclopedias ;[[Britannica]] :- https://www.britannica.com/place/Belagavi [[User:ಹುಲಿ|'''ಹುಲಿ🐯''']]<sup>[[User talk:ಹುಲಿ| talk]]</sup> 21:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
* '''Support''' based on Google News search results, it seems clear that Belagavi is now the common name. [[User:Walt Yoder|Walt Yoder]] ([[User talk:Walt Yoder|talk]]) 03:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
⚫
*'''Oppose''' per Arjayay. -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 14:41, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
⚫
*'''Comment'''. As was the case at the time of the last move request [[/Archive 3#Requested move 11 August 2018|5 years ago]], in [https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&q=Belgaum,Belagavi Worldwide Google Trends], and for what it's worth, [https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&geo=IN&q=Belgaum,Belagavi in India] and [https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&geo=IN-KA&q=Belgaum,Belagavi in Karnataka], Belgaum still outpaces Belagavi. [[User:Dekimasu|Dekimasu]]<small>[[User talk:Dekimasu|よ!]]</small> 04:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/21/they-cut-him-into-pieces-indias-love-jihad-conspiracy-theory-turns-lethal [[User:In ictu oculi|In ictu oculi]] ([[User talk:In ictu oculi|talk]]) 09:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] -->
</div><div style="clear:both;"></div>


== Requested move 11 August 2018 ==
== Needs change of city name to Belagavi ==

⚫
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
⚫
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[WP:requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section. ''

⚫
The result of the move request was: '''not moved''' as there is a consensus that Belgaum is still the [[WP:COMMONNAME]]. <small>([[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Closure by a page mover|closed by non-admin page mover]])</small> [[User_talk:Bradv|<span style="color:#C60">Brad</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bradv|<span style="color:#C60">v</span>]] 22:21, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
⚫
----

[[:Belgaum]] → {{no redirect|Belagavi}} – Belgaum was one of the 12 cities in Karnataka that had its name changed to a more faithful romanization of the local language name in [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/Bangalore-11-other-cities-will-get-new-names/articleshow/44862699.cms October 2014]. Unlike [[Bangalore]], the new name has caught on since the [[Talk:Belgaum#Requested_move_18_October_2014|last RM]] and its usage significantly outstrips the old one. The "News" tab of Google, which significantly favours newer sources, gives about 50,000 hits for "Belgaum", but over 200,000 hits for "Belagavi". This is also reflected in ''NewsBank'', where a search for "Belgaum" with a date range of 1 August 2016 till this day gives about 900 results, but over 8,000 results for "Belagavi". Both names rarely feature in news outside of India, with results for all the continents (with Asia's total excluding India's, of course) are in single or low double digits. As per our policy of [[WP:NAMECHANGES|giving extra weight to reliable sources published after the name change]], the article's name should be changed to "Belagavi". —[[User:Gazoth|Gazoth]] ([[User talk:Gazoth|talk]]) 05:03, 11 August 2018 (UTC) <small>--'''''Relisting.''''' [[User:Dreamy Jazz|Dreamy <i style="color:#d01e1e">'''Jazz'''</i>]] 🎷 <sup>''[[User_talk:Dreamy Jazz|talk to me]]'' &#124; ''[[Special:Contributions/Dreamy Jazz|my contributions]]''</sup> 16:18, 20 August 2018 (UTC)</small>
⚫
:'''Comment'''. [https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&q=Belgaum,Belagavi Worldwide Google Trends], and for what it's worth, [https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&geo=IN&q=Belgaum,Belagavi Google Trends for India] and [https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&geo=IN-KA&q=Belgaum,Belagavi for Karnataka]. Belgaum outpaces Belagavi in this data. [[User:Dekimasu|Dekimasu]]<small>[[User talk:Dekimasu|よ!]]</small> 05:35, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
::With the caveat that it is search data, not reliable sources as preferred by [[WP:COMMONNAME]]. —[[User:Gazoth|Gazoth]] ([[User talk:Gazoth|talk]]) 08:41, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
⚫
*'''Oppose'''. Belgaum appears to still be the commonest name. -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 13:11, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''<s>Oppose</s>'''. The proposal includes the statement:-<br>''The "News" tab of Google, which significantly favours newer sources, gives about 50,000 hits for "Belgaum", but over 200,000 hits for "Belagavi"''
:I tried my own search, using Google's news tab, in English, as it is the common name in English that we follow.<br> [https://www.google.co.uk/search?tbm=nws&q=Belgaum&spell=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwizppvb2uzcAhVCiqQKHep_CYwQBQgkKAA&biw=1293&bih=989&dpr=1.05 Belgaum] gave 49,500 matches, roughly the 50,000 mentioned above, whereas [https://www.google.co.uk/search?tbm=nws&q=Belgavi&nfpr=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwifz_C43OzcAhXCGewKHYTDDNUQvgUIJSgB&biw=1293&bih=989&dpr=1.05 Belgavi] gave just 1,540 hits, nowhere near the 200,000 claimed above.<br>Therefore, by the proposers own chosen criteria, Belgaum is 32 times more "common" than Belgavi, so should remain. - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 14:28, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
::{{re|Arjayay}} There was a typo in your search term. It is supposed to be "Bel'''a'''gavi", not "Belgavi". —[[User:Gazoth|Gazoth]] ([[User talk:Gazoth|talk]]) 17:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
:::Thank you for pointing out my mistake so politely, [https://www.google.co.uk/search?biw=1293&bih=989&tbm=nws&ei=eSlzW-KqB8GkwAK-zIbgAQ&q=Belagavi&oq=Belagavi&gs_l=psy-ab.12..0j0i10k1.4758.4758.0.7431.1.1.0.0.0.0.80.80.1.1.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.1.76....0.SloIZHdkjFA Belagavi] does, indeed, have 212,000 results - I have struck my objection accordingly, and apologise for my mistake - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 19:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
* '''Support''' both are still used, but it seems to me that Belagavi is slightly more common overall, and much more common among official sources. Interestingly, I find several sources that refer to Belgaum and Bengaluru ([https://cricketaddictor.com/cricket/bcci-shifts-india-a-games-against-south-africa-a-from-belgaum-to-bengaluru/] [https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/air-india-introduces-new-flight-from-bengaluru-to-belgaum-1283039-2018-07-11]). [[User:power~enwiki|power~enwiki]] ([[User talk:Power~enwiki|<span style="color:#FA0;font-family:courier">π</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Power~enwiki|<span style="font-family:courier">ν</span>]]) 18:49, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' the old name is still most common in International media. [[User:In ictu oculi|In ictu oculi]] ([[User talk:In ictu oculi|talk]]) 20:54, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' excluding most govt/official sources, almost all the other sources using the new name are not [[WP:RS]]. Making the current name most common name in [[WP:RS]]. —<span style="font-size: 104%; letter-spacing:1.5pt;"><span class="monospaced" style="font-family: monospace, monospace;">usernamekiran[[User talk:Usernamekiran|<span style="letter-spacing:1pt;">'''(talk)'''</span>]]</span></span> 19:17, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
----
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->


The name of the city has been officially changed as Belagavi[https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/centre-clears-name-change-plan-belgaum-is-now-belagavi/] on 1st November 2014 by Government of Karnataka, with approval of Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. [[User:Djsourabh.bwd|Djsourabh.bwd]] ([[User talk:Djsourabh.bwd|talk]]) 17:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
== Name ==


:Look at the section immediately above this one - there was a requested move discussion about this, which failed. [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) 17:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
It may be time for us to revisit this move discussion. Six months ago, we determined that the old name for this town was still the [[WP:COMMONNAME|common name]]. Since then, there have been many anonymous editors who tried to rename the article, and it is now protected to prevent disruption. The search results now are fairly evenly split between the two names, but the newer media articles all seem to prefer the name Belagavi. [[The Times of India]], for example, uses the term [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Belagavi Belagavi] almost exclusively, using [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Belgaum Belgaum] generally to refer to the district or organization that still use the former name. <span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User_talk:Bradv|Brad''v'']]</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bradv|<span style="color:red">🍁</span>]] 12:50, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
::If not, change the name of this page [[User:Djsourabh.bwd|Djsourabh.bwd]] ([[User talk:Djsourabh.bwd|talk]]) 17:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
:::No. It was decided not to do that in the RM discussion above. [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) 17:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)


== Change of title from Belgaum to Belagavi. ==
It appears only ''anonymous'' users want to change the name. Any as of March 23, 2019, the name dispute is still continuing, but this time, changing the name throughout the article, so it's inconsistent with the title. I've reverted the changes as a reviewer consistent with consensus here, thereby inadvertantly entering into the content dispute. Blah! It's a legitimate dispute, nobody's right or wrong here. When I googled 'Belagavi', it returned results for 'Belgaum'! We need stability, and I'm voting to leave the name as is. [[User:Sbalfour|Sbalfour]] ([[User talk:Sbalfour|talk]]) 21:20, 23 March 2019 (UTC)


Majority of the English speakers use the name Belagavi in their conversations. It is now time to change the title of this page from Belgaum to Belagavi. [[Special:Contributions/2409:40F2:1007:3A71:98F:9C80:3DA4:EA2B|2409:40F2:1007:3A71:98F:9C80:3DA4:EA2B]] ([[User talk:2409:40F2:1007:3A71:98F:9C80:3DA4:EA2B|talk]]) 08:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Belagavi [[User:Pramod123123|Pramod123123]] ([[User talk:Pramod123123|talk]]) 12:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
:Please provide the evidence for your claim - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 12:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


== Article name must be changed to Belagavi. ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 17 April 2021 ==


On 1st November 2014, names of 12 Karnataka cities changed. Belgaum was changed as Belagavi. Then union home minister Rajnath Singh gave his approval to the proposal of the Karnataka government made on October 27, 2006 to change the names of the 12 towns and cities in consonance with their pronunciation in Kannada language. <ref>url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/karnataka-belgaum-mysore-names-of-12-cities-changed-kannada-223614-2014-10-17<ref> [[User:Djsourabh.bwd|Djsourabh.bwd]] ([[User talk:Djsourabh.bwd|talk]]) 09:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
{{edit semi-protected|Belgaum|answered=no}}
:We obviously know that, since the article clearly states "'''Belgaum''' also '''Belgaon''' and officially known as '''Belagavi'''".<br>As this is the English Wikipedia, we use the [[WP:Common name|Common name]] in English, not the [[WP:Official name|Official name]], or the name in Kannada. If the common name in English eventually changes, we will change our article title, as we did with Mumbai. However [[Bangalore]] was changed to Bengaluru in 2006, and the continued use of Bangalore for our article title has passed 14 move discussions. - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 10:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/2409:4071:2482:2A47:0:0:26E7:70A4|2409:4071:2482:2A47:0:0:26E7:70A4]] ([[User talk:2409:4071:2482:2A47:0:0:26E7:70A4|talk]]) 12:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
::Its not true. You have a misconception. Belagavi is the only common name. From city to district administration every official government website uses Belagavi.
::Apart from that all national level medias use the common name Belagavi. For your reference :
::1.Moneycontrol |Title=Jagadish Shettar retains BJP bastion Belagavi in Karnataka
::Url=https://www.moneycontrol.com/elections/lok-sabha-election/karnataka-belagavi-bjp-jagadish-shettar-congress-mrunal-ravindra-hebbalkar-election-2024-result-article-12739669.ht
::ml
::2.Deccan Herald |Title=Lok Sabha Elections 2024: Belagavi constituency result
::Url=https://www.deccanherald.com/elections/india/lok-sabha-elections-2024-belagavi-constituency-result-3030640
::3.The Hindu |Title=PM Modi to reach Belagavi tomorrow
::Url=
::https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/pm-modi-to-reach-belagavi-tomorrow/article68105884.e
::ce
::4.Times Of India |Title=Belagavi Ministers All Set To Launch Next Gen In LS Polls
::Rrl=ead more at :
::https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hubballi/belagavi-ministers-launch-next-gen-in-2024-ls-polls/articleshow/108599824.c
::Kindly respect the emotions of local people. Don't do false common name statements here. [[User:Djsourabh.bwd|Djsourabh.bwd]] ([[User talk:Djsourabh.bwd|talk]]) 18:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
:::Please read the [[WP:COMMONNAME]] policy properly. We use the commonly used name in English language sources from all over the world. "{{tq|respect the emotions of local people}}" ← doesn't work like that otherwise we would have name the [[Germany]] article as [[Deutschland]]. Latter is just a redirect similar to [[Belagavi]] in this case. - [[User:Fylindfotberserk|Fylindfotberserk]] ([[User talk:Fylindfotberserk|talk]]) 19:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:02, 8 June 2024

Semi-protected edit request on 6 February 2023[edit]

1. Wiki header should be changed to " Belagavi" and article informatio. should contain the unofficial name or old name Belagaum inside the article . It seems to be the other way round. 2. More edit requests will follow once the first one is rectified. 2601:40B:8402:4920:992A:7765:5EFB:E6BE (talk) 14:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: see WP:ON small jars tc 16:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 March 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus is that Belgaum is still the WP:COMMONNAME at this time. (non-admin closure) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 19:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Belgaum → Belagavi – official name was changed in 2014, and Majority of the Reliable sources published after that are using the "Belagavi" so as per WP:NAMECHANGES the article is eligible to rename as "Belagavi" , Sources which are using "Belagavi" : The Hindu, The Times of India, The Indian Express, Deccan Herald, Mint (newspaper), Asian News International, Hindustan Times, Free Press Journal etc ... . ಹುಲಿ🐯 talk 20:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Adumbrativus (talk) 03:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Wikipedia is a world-wide encyclopedia, and the WP:Commonname is determined by what English speakers, the world over, most readily recognise. Local media do not reflect this world-wide situation, as most of their readership readily knows both names, Although only a very crude measure a Google search for Belguam gives 66.3 million hits, whereas Belgavi gives just 12 million - Arjayay (talk) 20:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
comment another reason to support move as per WP:COMMONNAME : quality encyclopedias ;Britannica :- https://www.britannica.com/place/Belagavi ಹುಲಿ🐯 talk 21:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Needs change of city name to Belagavi[edit]

The name of the city has been officially changed as Belagavi[1] on 1st November 2014 by Government of Karnataka, with approval of Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 17:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the section immediately above this one - there was a requested move discussion about this, which failed. MrOllie (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If not, change the name of this page Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No. It was decided not to do that in the RM discussion above. MrOllie (talk) 17:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Change of title from Belgaum to Belagavi.[edit]

Majority of the English speakers use the name Belagavi in their conversations. It is now time to change the title of this page from Belgaum to Belagavi. 2409:40F2:1007:3A71:98F:9C80:3DA4:EA2B (talk) 08:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide the evidence for your claim - Arjayay (talk) 12:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article name must be changed to Belagavi.[edit]

On 1st November 2014, names of 12 Karnataka cities changed. Belgaum was changed as Belagavi. Then union home minister Rajnath Singh gave his approval to the proposal of the Karnataka government made on October 27, 2006 to change the names of the 12 towns and cities in consonance with their pronunciation in Kannada language. <ref>url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/karnataka-belgaum-mysore-names-of-12-cities-changed-kannada-223614-2014-10-17<ref> Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 09:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We obviously know that, since the article clearly states "Belgaum also Belgaon and officially known as Belagavi".
As this is the English Wikipedia, we use the Common name in English, not the Official name, or the name in Kannada. If the common name in English eventually changes, we will change our article title, as we did with Mumbai. However Bangalore was changed to Bengaluru in 2006, and the continued use of Bangalore for our article title has passed 14 move discussions. - Arjayay (talk) 10:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Its not true. You have a misconception. Belagavi is the only common name. From city to district administration every official government website uses Belagavi.
Apart from that all national level medias use the common name Belagavi. For your reference :
1.Moneycontrol |Title=Jagadish Shettar retains BJP bastion Belagavi in Karnataka
Url=https://www.moneycontrol.com/elections/lok-sabha-election/karnataka-belagavi-bjp-jagadish-shettar-congress-mrunal-ravindra-hebbalkar-election-2024-result-article-12739669.ht
ml
2.Deccan Herald |Title=Lok Sabha Elections 2024: Belagavi constituency result
Url=https://www.deccanherald.com/elections/india/lok-sabha-elections-2024-belagavi-constituency-result-3030640
3.The Hindu |Title=PM Modi to reach Belagavi tomorrow
Url=
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/pm-modi-to-reach-belagavi-tomorrow/article68105884.e
ce
4.Times Of India |Title=Belagavi Ministers All Set To Launch Next Gen In LS Polls
Rrl=ead more at :
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hubballi/belagavi-ministers-launch-next-gen-in-2024-ls-polls/articleshow/108599824.c
Kindly respect the emotions of local people. Don't do false common name statements here. Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 18:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please read the WP:COMMONNAME policy properly. We use the commonly used name in English language sources from all over the world. "respect the emotions of local people" ← doesn't work like that otherwise we would have name the Germany article as Deutschland. Latter is just a redirect similar to Belagavi in this case. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Belgaum&diff=1227963961&oldid=1018319418

Leave a Reply