Content deleted Content added
Jason Rees (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Well, by now it should be the time to put the 2nd forecast on the page. [[Special:Contributions/71.99.32.171|71.99.32.171]] ([[User talk:71.99.32.171|talk]]) 23:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC) |
Well, by now it should be the time to put the 2nd forecast on the page. [[Special:Contributions/71.99.32.171|71.99.32.171]] ([[User talk:71.99.32.171|talk]]) 23:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Perhaps [http://staugustine.com/opinions/2011-04-16/what-others-say-2011-hurricane-predictions this] link could be better. It says 16-9-5, with a 72% chance of a U.S. major hurricane, and a 47% chance of a gulf coast MH. [[User:Rye998|Rye998]] ([[User talk:Rye998|talk]]) 01:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC) |
:Perhaps [http://staugustine.com/opinions/2011-04-16/what-others-say-2011-hurricane-predictions this] link could be better. It says 16-9-5, with a 72% chance of a U.S. major hurricane, and a 47% chance of a gulf coast MH. [[User:Rye998|Rye998]] ([[User talk:Rye998|talk]]) 01:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
::How about using the proper forecast from [http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/Forecasts/2011/april2011/apr2011.pdf CSU?], instead of some random media report.[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 17:50, 18 April 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:50, 18 April 2011
Template:Hurricane Template:WPTCarchive
TSR
Is this really a credible source? Cucurbitaceae (talk) 14:36, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
90L.INVEST
The invest was recently active in the Madeira region and is now drifting northwest toward the Strait of Gibraltar. A somewhat well-developed 90Q.INVEST is spinning in the South Atlantic near Brazil. It may be worthwhile to start the invests section on the talkpage. ~AH1(TCU) 03:12, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
- To be honest, it would be better to put invests and so-so on the Hurricane Wiki than here. The talk page exists for the solemn purpose of improving and maintaining the article, and placing invests ect here isn't improving or maintaining the article. Rye998 (talk) 14:39, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
2nd CSU forecast
Should this be mentioned, if it's a reliable link? Rye998 (talk) 14:13, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Well, by now it should be the time to put the 2nd forecast on the page. 71.99.32.171 (talk) 23:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- Perhaps this link could be better. It says 16-9-5, with a 72% chance of a U.S. major hurricane, and a 47% chance of a gulf coast MH. Rye998 (talk) 01:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- How about using the proper forecast from CSU?, instead of some random media report.Jason Rees (talk) 17:50, 18 April 2011 (UTC)