Automobiles B‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

How is a link to a random blog about the fabia vrs more relevant than a forum that skoda owners can seek help and advice from as well as tons of information? Take the article about the Volkswagen Golf for example, it has external links to just about every Volkswagen forum there is! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Golf#External_links Apinner (talk) 20:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed those. My suggestion: if you find another links like that, just remove them. Dekisugi (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Converter is working wrong: currently in information about 1.9 SDI engine 47 kW is converted to 63 hp (should be 64 hp). Marcinw2

47 kW (64 PS; 63 hp), I think its working ok? these hps are us hps... not European ones, which is PS used here in englsih wikipedia --Typ932 ^T·C 00:35, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but in this situation there should be maybe two values (PS and hp) given, because it can make misunderstanding for European people (which I believe were/are main users of these engines)..like currently:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%A0koda_Fabia - 63 hp
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suction_Diesel_Injection - 63 hp
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_discontinued_Volkswagen_Group_diesel_engines - 64 hp

What do you think ?

Marcinw2

Its preferred to have PS (metric horsepower) in European manufactured cars, you can change those hp to PS if you are sure they are metric horsepower, those conversion templates can also show both if needed/wanted even bhp (british) can be shown

• Power

--Typ932 ^T·C 14:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are 'W plates'? I'm from The Netherlands (Europe), this may be a UK-reference.

It is indeed. The whole article in its present form is obviously written from a UK perspective. 'W' would have been the first letter on the number plate on a car sold in the Britain from August 2000.

Shouldn't there be something in here about the advert where they make it out of cake?

What about the WRC participation of Skoda? There should be added something about it. Emerge.life 11:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

can someone include the new RS and vRS models and the difference between them? I'm confused! --81.156.224.97 (talk) 19:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

   It's the same car -- the vRS is only called that in the UK, in the rest of the world it's the RS.  The problem is the logo -- what looks like the letter v is supposed to be an abstract representation of wings. Emoedison (talk) 13:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have the impression that the coding for the third generation Skoda Fabia is '6V' rather than 'NJ' as cited in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeonCR (talk • contribs) 08:31, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Davey2010, EurovisionNim As requested by Nim. Seeing the pictures, from what I see there all yes and no. For the front end, the previous image was much sharper and clearer then Nim's photo but seeing Nim's image carefully, it does suffer from (I might be wrong) chromatic aberrations and noise, especially on the wheels, tires and around the edges, giving a odd purplish and orange colour. While the previous image was fine, of course the white Transporter is a little distracting but sometimes it not always possible to get a photo with no distraction at all, but can be overwhelm by how you photograph it. (Such as the angle, the lighting, reflection) If that make sense?

The rear shot by Nim is not as bad, although they both in busy backgrounds, personally I think if it at a car dealership like most of M 93 pictures and some of mine are, then the cars in the background can be a exception since it be bit odd to photograph a car in a dealership without at least another car in the background. M 93's photo highlights more of the body panels as well as better clarity around the wheels. Unfortunately the pickup and SUV above the roof are at awkward position while the previous rear shot has a nice blank wall, again doesn't always overwhelm the quality of the picture but for the case for Nim's along with the other problems I pointed, it does. --Vauxford (talk) 23:57, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• 
  Nim's edit
• 
  Nim's edit
• 
  Davey's edit
• 
  Davey's edit