This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Dance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles WikiProject Dance To-do list: To nominate at WP:FAC: To improve to Featured standard: To nominate as a Good article: To expand: 18th century dance - 20th century ballet - Bolero - Choreography on Broadway - Dance education - English ballet - Indian classical dance - Italian ballet - List of dance companies - Meg Stuart - Opera ballet - Sasha Waltz - Scotch reel - Set dance - Physically integrated dance To cleanup: Contra dance - Salsa (dance) - Dandiya - Lead and follow To unbias: To check for copyvios: To merge: List of dancers and List of dance personalities‎ as per AfD discussion Substubs needing expansion: see /substubs To destub: Amir Hossain Babu - Canada Dance Festival - Dance etiquette - Flash dance - more Needing references: Chorus line - specifically verifying that each girl actually started out as a chorine To create: Broadway dance - Country Western Dance International - Dance and cinema - Dance and society - German folk dancing - Latin swing - Post-structuralist ballet - Push (dance) - Salon dance - Shuffle dance - Swing boogie - World Dance Alliance - Xavier Le Roy - more Wanted Pics/Graphics: Category:Dance articles needing images Ukraine Start‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Visual arts Start‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

The name given by the author is 'Russian Dancers', so the title must be consistent.

• "Degas himself (mistakenly) titled a series of works with this name".[1]

Mhorg (talk) 15:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, we title articles by the most WP:COMMONNAME in WP:RELIABLESOURCES, giving weight to names used after WP:NAMECHANGES. RS clearly state that the name was wrong and have retitled it to respect Ukrainian identity.

Why would we want to intentionally disrespect that? While the change is absolutely supported by the content guidelines, it is also in line with the Wikimedia:Universal Code of Conduct: people may use specific terms to describe themselves. As a sign of respect, use these terms when communicating with or about these people, e.g., ethnic groups may use a specific name to describe themselves, rather than the name historically used by others.  —Michael Z. 16:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COMMONNAME does not apply here, as the extremely most used name is 'Russian Dancers':

• Russian Dancers 15000
• Ukrainian Dancers 4800

"Why would we want to intentionally disrespect that?" This is no disrespect, it is literally the name given by the author to one of his works. We are disrespecting the author the moment we alter the title given by him.

About Wikimedia:Universal Code of Conduct, if I am not mistaken, these are the guidelines on how we Wikipedia editors should behave among ourselves. I think it has nothing to do with the topic. Mhorg (talk) 20:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand what you mean by “COMMONNAME does not apply,” but anyway I disagree.

I have also read that Degas didn’t formally title these drawings but that museums named them. The Met recently renamed one “Dancer in Ukrainian Dress.”[2] I think you’ll need more sources to confirm this is the artist’s formal title.

In case you’re not aware, different terminology was used for Ukrainians under Russian imperialism than is today, but it is obsolete. We can refer to it in a historical context, but we don’t use it. We don’t refer to Ukrainians as “Russians,” “Little Russians,” or “Khokhols,” all of which are seen as expressions of diminishment or denial of Ukraine and Ukrainians.

Regarding the UCC, seriously, now it’s as if one was looking for excuses to sneak disrespect into article copy. Article copy incorporating prejudice does not make this an inclusive and positive environment, but the opposite.

But I see it say:

• “avoid bias and prejudice”
• “applies to . . . aspects of content contribution”
• “when communicating with or about these people”
• “content vandalism and abuse”: “deliberately introducing biased, false, inaccurate or inappropriate content” . . . “systematically manipulating content to favour specific interpretations of facts or points of view”

 —Michael Z. 20:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Strange thing, I didn't find the source about Degas himself naming the series, while writing this article last year. It seemed to me he was half-blind that time and more interested in finishing works than naming or disignating them as series. As far as I understand, Lisa Bixenstine in 1980s was the first to prove it is really one series, not artificial collection of items. I cannot remember her writing "this is how Degas called it". So anonymous note from Getty.edu looks confusing itself to me. --Brunei (talk) 22:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  The Getty’s description does say he named them thus,[3], although I’d like to see that confirmed by some other source.

  The only direct quotation I’ve found is in the Bixenstine PhD dissertation, where he asked someone to come see his “orgy of colour.”

  Of course it’s quite possible that he referred to the drawings or the subjects as danseuses Russes, as they came from the Russian empire, and Ukrainians in Europe were commonly referred to as Ruthenians, Russians, or “Little Russians” at the time. But current sources are renaming them.

  There’s no reason to ignore NAMECHANGES, especially since today the old name disrespects Ukrainian self-identification and culture.  —Michael Z. 22:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, it is important to look for additional sources for Degas' names or attributions. Maybe he called several of the pastels danseuses Russes, and then art curators approximated it to others? I am not an art historian, but can ask someone closer to the field. --Brunei (talk) 23:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  For me there is nothing derogatory about it, if the artist has given that name to one of his works of art that name should not be altered. That would be manipulation and a derogatory act towards the author.

  I agree with Brunei, in my opinion we need to show this discussion to other users, perhaps art experts. Mhorg (talk) 09:33, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Mzajac the destructive work you are conducting here is against wikipedia policies. The "cancel culture" you are trying to impose on the name of the series and to push the WP:OWN is beyond any normal conduct.

  Given the time the painting were created 1890, and autor namimg them danseuses Russes the post february 2022 articles are not reliable sources Pixius talk 10:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Masterworks of European Painting in the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston p190 print 2000

  Describes that Degas was fascinated with then emerging popularion from the Tsardom of Russia. The book explicitly said the Russian culture and Russian dancers.

  The post 24.02. events cannot rewrite what is written in the past and alter the history.

  You behave like in 1984 novel the ministry of truth Pixius talk 13:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Pixius: The tone of your comments are an inappropriate escalation. Others are citing sources and policy focused on the topic itself, not using emotional language, buzzwords, or commenting on editors' motivations. Please keep the discussion civil and assume good faith. DMacks (talk) 14:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Brunei, could you show what part from this source[4] is used for the text below? Thank you!

• "so throughout the 20th century these paintings were attributed as "Russian dancers" in English and French sources, despite vast ethnographic and art historical evidence for the Ukrainian origin of the women."

Mhorg (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You can browse through pages 105, 107, 109 and several next ones. Degas' dancing Russians are Ukrainian (p. 107). --Brunei (talk) 17:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the source.[5]  —Michael Z. 16:50, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. I didn’t notice the PDF link on the cited page before. The dissertation discusses the ethnography and Degas’s subject in detail on pp 102–160. I will restore the citation.  —Michael Z. 17:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]