Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
OtterAM (talk | contribs)
→‎Requested move 5 March 2017: move to something else
OtterAM (talk | contribs)
Line 6: Line 6:


[[:S 155]] → {{no redirect|Cave Nebula}} – A simple search for "Cave Nebula" appears to show it as the [[WP:COMMONNAME]] and the most natural sounding name. This article was created under the title but moved to the more obscure catalog name, which is probably incorrect – shouldn't it technically be Sh2-155? – with no reason for a preference for the Sharpless catalog. Anyway, we don't have the Orion Nebula under the title NGC X for this same reason. [[User:Laurdecl|Laurdecl]] <sup>[[User_talk:Laurdecl|talk]]</sup> 13:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
[[:S 155]] → {{no redirect|Cave Nebula}} – A simple search for "Cave Nebula" appears to show it as the [[WP:COMMONNAME]] and the most natural sounding name. This article was created under the title but moved to the more obscure catalog name, which is probably incorrect – shouldn't it technically be Sh2-155? – with no reason for a preference for the Sharpless catalog. Anyway, we don't have the Orion Nebula under the title NGC X for this same reason. [[User:Laurdecl|Laurdecl]] <sup>[[User_talk:Laurdecl|talk]]</sup> 13:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
: I agree that the page should be moved. I have no idea how common the name "Cave Nebula" is. The name "Sh2-155" is better than the currently incorrect name. Here is the page on Simbad [http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=sh2-155&NbIdent=1&Radius=2&Radius.unit=arcmin&submit=submit+id]. They don't list a common name, but that doesn't necessarily imply anything. Here's a link to APOD using "Sh2-155: The Cave Nebula" as their title for the article, which supports that the common name is in fact real [https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap141106.html]. [[User:OtterAM|OtterAM]] ([[User talk:OtterAM|talk]]) 01:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. I agree that the page should be moved. I have no idea how common the name "Cave Nebula" is. The name "Sh2-155" is better than the currently incorrect name. Here is the page on Simbad [http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=sh2-155&NbIdent=1&Radius=2&Radius.unit=arcmin&submit=submit+id]. They don't list a common name, but that doesn't necessarily imply anything. Here's a link to APOD using "Sh2-155: The Cave Nebula" as their title for the article, which supports that the common name is in fact real [https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap141106.html]. [[User:OtterAM|OtterAM]] ([[User talk:OtterAM|talk]]) 01:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:49, 7 March 2017

WikiProject iconAstronomy: Astronomical objects Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Requested move 5 March 2017

S 155Cave Nebula – A simple search for "Cave Nebula" appears to show it as the WP:COMMONNAME and the most natural sounding name. This article was created under the title but moved to the more obscure catalog name, which is probably incorrect – shouldn't it technically be Sh2-155? – with no reason for a preference for the Sharpless catalog. Anyway, we don't have the Orion Nebula under the title NGC X for this same reason. Laurdecl talk 13:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. I agree that the page should be moved. I have no idea how common the name "Cave Nebula" is. The name "Sh2-155" is better than the currently incorrect name. Here is the page on Simbad [1]. They don't list a common name, but that doesn't necessarily imply anything. Here's a link to APOD using "Sh2-155: The Cave Nebula" as their title for the article, which supports that the common name is in fact real [2]. OtterAM (talk) 01:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply