Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Dnllnd (talk | contribs)
lead revision
2001:56b:dc01:7d00:80fd:48cc:f6cd:7bca (talk)
No edit summary
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Canadian Royal Commission in 1991}}
{{Indigenous Peoples of Canada}}
{{Indigenous Peoples of Canada}}


The '''Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples''' ('''RCAP''') was a [[Canada|Canadian]] [[Royal Commission]] established in 1991 with the aim of investigating the relationship between Indigenous peoples in Canada, the Government of Canada, and Canadian society as a whole.<ref name="RCAPv1">{{cite book |title=Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples |date=October 1996 |publisher=Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples |url=https://data2.archives.ca/e/e448/e011188230-01.pdf |accessdate=30 June 2020 |chapter=Volume 1: Looking Forward, Looking Back}}</ref>{{rp|11}} It was launched in response to status and rights issues brought to light following events such as the [[Oka Crisis]] and the failure of the [[Meech Lake Accord]].<ref name="Barton" /> The commission culminated in a final report of 4,000 pages, published in 1996 and set out a 20-year agenda for implementing recommended changes.<ref name=recommendations/>
The '''Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples''' ('''RCAP''') was a Canadian [[royal commission]] established in 1991 with the aim of investigating the relationship between Indigenous peoples in Canada, the Government of Canada, and Canadian society as a whole.<ref name="RCAPv1">{{cite book |title=Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples |date=October 1996 |publisher=Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples |url=https://data2.archives.ca/e/e448/e011188230-01.pdf |access-date=30 June 2020 |chapter=Volume 1: Looking Forward, Looking Back}}</ref>{{rp|11}} It was launched in response to status and rights issues brought to light following events such as the [[Oka Crisis]] and the failure of the [[Meech Lake Accord]].<ref name="Barton" /> The commission culminated in a final report of 4,000 pages, published in 1996 and set out a 20-year agenda for implementing recommended changes.<ref name=recommendations/>


==Scope==
==Scope==
The Commission of Inquiry investigated the evolution of the relationship among Aboriginal peoples ([[First Nations]], [[Inuit]] and [[Métis people (Canada)|Métis]]), the [[Government of Canada]], [[Indian and Northern Affairs Canada]] and part of the [[Culture of Canada]] as a whole. It proposed specific solutions, rooted in domestic and international experience, to the problems which have plagued those relationships and which confront [[Indigenous peoples|Aboriginal peoples]] today. The Commission examined many issues which it deems to be relevant to any or all of the [[Aboriginal peoples in Canada]].<ref name=royal>{{cite web|url=http://iog.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/1997_October_healthrcap.pdf|format=pdf|title=Summary of the Final Report of The Royal Commission on Aboriginal|work=CTV Canada|accessdate=2009-10-05|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150224042134/http://iog.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/1997_October_healthrcap.pdf|archivedate=2015-02-24}}</ref> The study of the historical relations between the government and Aboriginal people, in order to determine the possibility of Aboriginal [[self-government]], and the legal status of previous agreements that included, the [[Royal Proclamation of 1763]], the [[Indian Act]], the [[Numbered treaties]] and [[Canadian Aboriginal law|Aboriginal case law]].<ref name=recommendations/>
The Commission of Inquiry investigated the evolution of the relationship among Aboriginal peoples ([[First Nations in Canada|First Nations]], [[Inuit]] and [[Métis people (Canada)|Métis]]), the [[Government of Canada]], [[Indian and Northern Affairs Canada]] and part of the [[Culture of Canada]] as a whole. It proposed specific solutions, rooted in domestic and international experience, to the problems which have plagued those relationships and which confront [[Indigenous peoples|Aboriginal peoples]] today. The Commission examined many issues which it deems to be relevant to any or all of the [[Aboriginal peoples in Canada]].<ref name=royal>{{cite web|url=http://iog.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/1997_October_healthrcap.pdf|title=Summary of the Final Report of The Royal Commission on Aboriginal|work=CTV Canada|access-date=2009-10-05|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150224042134/http://iog.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/1997_October_healthrcap.pdf|archive-date=2015-02-24}}</ref> The study of the historical relations between the government and Aboriginal people, in order to determine the possibility of Aboriginal [[self-government]], and the legal status of previous agreements that included, the [[Royal Proclamation of 1763]], the ''[[Indian Act]]'', the [[Numbered treaties]] and [[Canadian Aboriginal law|Aboriginal case law]].<ref name=recommendations/>


==The commission and public hearings==
==Public hearings==
The commission consisted of several high-profile Aboriginal members and [[jurists]], including Paul Chartrand (Commissioner of the [[Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission]]),<ref>Barkwell, Lawrence. http://www.metismuseum.ca/media/document.php/14785.Chartrand,%20paul.pdf</ref> J. Peter Meekison, Viola Robinson, Mary Sillett, and [[Bertha Wilson]], and was chaired by René Dussault, and [[Georges Erasmus]].
The commission consisted of several high-profile Aboriginal members and [[jurists]], including Paul Chartrand (Commissioner of the [[Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission]]),<ref>Barkwell, Lawrence. http://www.metismuseum.ca/media/document.php/14785.Chartrand,%20paul.pdf</ref> J. Peter Meekison, Viola Robinson, Mary Sillett, and [[Bertha Wilson]], and was chaired by René Dussault, and [[Georges Erasmus]].


Line 13: Line 14:
==Final report==
==Final report==
The Commission issued its final report in November 1996. The five-volume, 4,000-page report covered a vast range of issues; its 440 recommendations called for sweeping changes to the relationship between Aboriginal, non-Aboriginal people and the governments in Canada.<ref name="royal"/>
The Commission issued its final report in November 1996. The five-volume, 4,000-page report covered a vast range of issues; its 440 recommendations called for sweeping changes to the relationship between Aboriginal, non-Aboriginal people and the governments in Canada.<ref name="royal"/>
Some of the major recommendations included the following:<ref name=recommendations>{{cite web|url=http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ap/pubs/rpt/rpt-eng.asp|title=Highlights from the Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples|work=Indian and Northern Affairs Canada| accessdate = 2009-10-05}}</ref>
Some of the major recommendations included the following:<ref name=recommendations>{{cite web|url=http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ap/pubs/rpt/rpt-eng.asp|title=Highlights from the Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples|work=Indian and Northern Affairs Canada| access-date = 2009-10-05}}</ref>


*Legislation, including a new [[Royal Proclamation of 1763|Royal Proclamation]] stating Canada’s commitment to a new relationship and companion legislation setting out a treaty process and recognition of Aboriginal nations and governments.<ref name=recommendations/>
*Legislation, including a new [[Royal Proclamation of 1763|Royal Proclamation]] stating Canada's commitment to a new relationship and companion legislation setting out a treaty process and recognition of Aboriginal nations and governments.<ref name=recommendations/>
*Recognition of an Aboriginal order of government, subject to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, with authority over matters related to the good government and welfare of Aboriginal peoples and their territories.<ref name=recommendations/>
*Recognition of an Aboriginal order of government, subject to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, with authority over matters related to the good government and welfare of Aboriginal peoples and their territories.<ref name=recommendations/>
*Replacement of the federal Department of [[Indian Affairs]] with two departments, one to implement the new relationship with Aboriginal nations and one to provide services for non-self-governing communities.<ref name=recommendations/>
*Replacement of the federal Department of [[Indian Affairs]] with two departments, one to implement the new relationship with Aboriginal nations and one to provide services for non-self-governing communities.<ref name=recommendations/>
Line 21: Line 22:
*Expansion of the Aboriginal land and resource base.<ref name=recommendations/>
*Expansion of the Aboriginal land and resource base.<ref name=recommendations/>
*Recognition of Métis self-government, provision of a land base, and recognition of Métis rights to hunt and fish on Crown land.<ref name=recommendations/>
*Recognition of Métis self-government, provision of a land base, and recognition of Métis rights to hunt and fish on Crown land.<ref name=recommendations/>
*Initiatives to address social, education, health ([[Indian Health Transfer Policy (Canada)|Indian Health Transfer Policy]]) and housing needs, including the training of 10,000 health professionals over a ten-year period, the establishment of an Aboriginal peoples’ university, and recognition of Aboriginal nations’ authority over [[Child protection|child welfare]].<ref name=recommendations/>
*Initiatives to address social, education, health ([[Indian Health Transfer Policy (Canada)|Indian Health Transfer Policy]]) and housing needs, including the training of 10,000 health professionals over a ten-year period, the establishment of an Aboriginal peoples' university, and recognition of Aboriginal nations' authority over [[Child protection|child welfare]].<ref name=recommendations/>


The Report outlined a 20-year timeline for the implementation of identified recommendations.<ref name="recommendations" /><ref name="Barton">{{cite news |last1=Barton |first1=Rosemary |title=Over 20 years ago, we had a plan to repair the Crown-Indigenous relationship. What happened? |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/royal-commission-indigenous-crown-1.5478890 |accessdate=30 June 2020 |work=CBC News |date=28 February 2020}}</ref> In 2016, during an interview regarding the conclusion of the 20-year period, Paul Chartrand, one of the Report commissioners, acknowledged not much had changed.<ref name="Troian">{{cite news |last1=Troian |first1=Martha |title=20 years since Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, still waiting for change |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/20-year-anniversary-of-rcap-report-1.3469759 |accessdate=30 June 2020 |work=CBC News |date=3 March 2016}}</ref>
The Report outlined a 20-year timeline for the implementation of identified recommendations.<ref name="recommendations" /><ref name="Barton">{{cite news |last1=Barton |first1=Rosemary |title=Over 20 years ago, we had a plan to repair the Crown-Indigenous relationship. What happened? |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/royal-commission-indigenous-crown-1.5478890 |access-date=30 June 2020 |work=CBC News |date=28 February 2020}}</ref> In 2016, during an interview regarding the conclusion of the 20-year period, Paul Chartrand, one of the Report commissioners, acknowledged not much had changed.<ref name="Troian">{{cite news |last1=Troian |first1=Martha |title=20 years since Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, still waiting for change |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/20-year-anniversary-of-rcap-report-1.3469759 |access-date=30 June 2020 |work=CBC News |date=3 March 2016}}</ref>


==Criticism==
==Criticism==
In an uncharacteristic move, [[Georges Erasmus]] denounced the historical role of the [[Roman Catholicism in Canada|Roman Catholic Church in Canada]] in the forced assimilation of Aboriginal Peoples, citing the abandonment of [[Languages of Canada#Indigenous languages|indigenous languages]], [[:Category:Indigenous culture in Canada|cultures]] and [[Native American mythology|traditions]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/rights_freedoms/clips/2442/ |title=Abandoning neutrality |work= Canadian Broadcasting Corporation|date=October 30, 1992|format=video|accessdate=October 7, 2009}}</ref>
[[Georges Erasmus]] denounced the historical role of the [[Roman Catholicism in Canada|Roman Catholic Church in Canada]] in the forced assimilation of Aboriginal Peoples, citing the abandonment of [[Languages of Canada#Indigenous languages|indigenous languages]], [[:Category:Indigenous culture in Canada|cultures]] and [[Native American mythology|traditions]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/rights_freedoms/clips/2442/ |title=Abandoning neutrality |work= Canadian Broadcasting Corporation|date=October 30, 1992|format=video|access-date=October 7, 2009}}</ref>


==Legacy==
==Legacy==
Despite the majority of the RCAP recommendations remaining unimplemented, the Summary of the Final Report of the [[Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada]] credits the Report of the Royal Commission of Aboriginal Peoples with drawing the attention of non-Indigenous Canadians to the lived experiences of Indigenous peoples in Canada and redirecting the nature of related conversations.<ref name="TRCSummary">{{cite web |title=Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future: Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada |url=https://nctr.ca/assets/reports/Final%20Reports/Executive_Summary_English_Web.pdf |publisher=Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada |accessdate=30 June 2020 |date=31 May 2015}}</ref>{{rp|7}} The RCAP report also led to greater recognition in Western Canada of "the urgent need for preservation of Canada’s Indigenous languages, many of which face extinction if current trends continue."<ref name="Blair_2003">{{citation|url= http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED482037.pdf |date= 2003 |title=Preparing Indigenous language advocates, teachers, and researchers |series=Nurturing Native Languages |location= Flagstaff, Arizona |work=Northern Arizona University |first1=Heather A. |last1=Blair |first2= Donna |last2=Paskemin |first3=Barbara |last3=Laderoute |format=PDF}}</ref> In response to the threat of extinction, institutes for the revitalization of indigenous languages, including the [[Canadian Indigenous Languages and Literacy Development Institute]] (CILLDI), were established.<ref name="Blair_2003" /> Now based at the [[University of Alberta]], CILLDI had attracted over 1,000 participants to its summer school programmes by 2016.<ref name="CILLDI_APN">{{citation |url=http://www.aboriginal.ualberta.ca/en/OurCommunity/CanadianIndigenousLanguagesandLiteracyDevelopmentInstitute.aspx |work=University of Alberta |date=2002 |accessdate=July 5, 2016 |location=Edmonton, Alberta |title=Aboriginal Peoples Network: Canadian Indigenous Languages and Literacy Development Institute}}</ref><ref name="CILLDI_about">{{citation |url=http://www.cilldi.ualberta.ca/en/AboutCILLDI.aspx |title=CIILDI homepage: About|work=University of Alberta |date=2002 |accessdate=July 5, 2016 |location=Edmonton, Alberta}}</ref>
Despite the majority of the RCAP recommendations remaining unimplemented, the Summary of the Final Report of the [[Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada]] credits the Report of the Royal Commission of Aboriginal Peoples with drawing the attention of non-Indigenous Canadians to the lived experiences of Indigenous peoples in Canada and redirecting the nature of related conversations.<ref name="TRCSummary">{{cite web |title=Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future: Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada |url=https://nctr.ca/assets/reports/Final%20Reports/Executive_Summary_English_Web.pdf |publisher=Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada |access-date=30 June 2020 |date=31 May 2015}}</ref>{{rp|7}} The RCAP report also led to greater recognition in Western Canada of "the urgent need for preservation of Canada's Indigenous languages, many of which face extinction if current trends continue."<ref name="Blair_2003">{{citation|url= http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED482037.pdf |date= 2003 |title=Preparing Indigenous language advocates, teachers, and researchers |series=Nurturing Native Languages |location= Flagstaff, Arizona |work=Northern Arizona University |first1=Heather A. |last1=Blair |first2= Donna |last2=Paskemin |first3=Barbara |last3=Laderoute }}</ref> In response to the threat of extinction, institutes for the revitalization of indigenous languages, including the [[Canadian Indigenous Languages and Literacy Development Institute]] (CILLDI), were established.<ref name="Blair_2003" /> Now based at the [[University of Alberta]], CILLDI had attracted over 1,000 participants to its summer school programmes by 2016.<ref name="CILLDI_APN">{{citation |url=http://www.aboriginal.ualberta.ca/en/OurCommunity/CanadianIndigenousLanguagesandLiteracyDevelopmentInstitute.aspx |work=University of Alberta |date=2002 |access-date=July 5, 2016 |location=Edmonton, Alberta |title=Aboriginal Peoples Network: Canadian Indigenous Languages and Literacy Development Institute}}</ref><ref name="CILLDI_about">{{citation |url=http://www.cilldi.ualberta.ca/en/AboutCILLDI.aspx |title=CIILDI homepage: About|work=University of Alberta |date=2002 |access-date=July 5, 2016 |location=Edmonton, Alberta}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 44: Line 45:


==External links==
==External links==
* [http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/prb9924-e.htm Government brief on the Royal Commission's report on Aboriginal peoples]
* [http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/prb9924-e.htm Government brief on the Royal Commission's report on Aboriginal peoples] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120405040858/http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/prb9924-e.htm |date=2012-04-05 }}
* [http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ap/pubs/rpt/rpt-eng.asp Highlights of the report]
* [http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ap/pubs/rpt/rpt-eng.asp Highlights of the report]
* [http://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/aboriginal-heritage/royal-commission-aboriginal-peoples/Pages/final-report.aspx Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples – full text]
* [http://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/aboriginal-heritage/royal-commission-aboriginal-peoples/Pages/final-report.aspx Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples – full text]
Line 50: Line 51:
{{Canadian identity}}
{{Canadian identity}}
{{Canadian Aboriginal case law}}
{{Canadian Aboriginal case law}}
{{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Royal Commission On Aboriginal Peoples}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Royal Commission On Aboriginal Peoples}}

Latest revision as of 16:11, 14 April 2024

The Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) was a Canadian royal commission established in 1991 with the aim of investigating the relationship between Indigenous peoples in Canada, the Government of Canada, and Canadian society as a whole.[1]: 11  It was launched in response to status and rights issues brought to light following events such as the Oka Crisis and the failure of the Meech Lake Accord.[2] The commission culminated in a final report of 4,000 pages, published in 1996 and set out a 20-year agenda for implementing recommended changes.[3]

Scope

[edit]

The Commission of Inquiry investigated the evolution of the relationship among Aboriginal peoples (First Nations, Inuit and Métis), the Government of Canada, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada and part of the Culture of Canada as a whole. It proposed specific solutions, rooted in domestic and international experience, to the problems which have plagued those relationships and which confront Aboriginal peoples today. The Commission examined many issues which it deems to be relevant to any or all of the Aboriginal peoples in Canada.[4] The study of the historical relations between the government and Aboriginal people, in order to determine the possibility of Aboriginal self-government, and the legal status of previous agreements that included, the Royal Proclamation of 1763, the Indian Act, the Numbered treaties and Aboriginal case law.[3]

Public hearings

[edit]

The commission consisted of several high-profile Aboriginal members and jurists, including Paul Chartrand (Commissioner of the Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission),[5] J. Peter Meekison, Viola Robinson, Mary Sillett, and Bertha Wilson, and was chaired by René Dussault, and Georges Erasmus.

Using its $60-million dollar budget, the five commissioners visited 96 First Nation communities and held 178 days of public hearings.[6]

Final report

[edit]

The Commission issued its final report in November 1996. The five-volume, 4,000-page report covered a vast range of issues; its 440 recommendations called for sweeping changes to the relationship between Aboriginal, non-Aboriginal people and the governments in Canada.[4] Some of the major recommendations included the following:[3]

  • Legislation, including a new Royal Proclamation stating Canada's commitment to a new relationship and companion legislation setting out a treaty process and recognition of Aboriginal nations and governments.[3]
  • Recognition of an Aboriginal order of government, subject to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, with authority over matters related to the good government and welfare of Aboriginal peoples and their territories.[3]
  • Replacement of the federal Department of Indian Affairs with two departments, one to implement the new relationship with Aboriginal nations and one to provide services for non-self-governing communities.[3]
  • Creation of an Aboriginal parliament.[3]
  • Expansion of the Aboriginal land and resource base.[3]
  • Recognition of Métis self-government, provision of a land base, and recognition of Métis rights to hunt and fish on Crown land.[3]
  • Initiatives to address social, education, health (Indian Health Transfer Policy) and housing needs, including the training of 10,000 health professionals over a ten-year period, the establishment of an Aboriginal peoples' university, and recognition of Aboriginal nations' authority over child welfare.[3]

The Report outlined a 20-year timeline for the implementation of identified recommendations.[3][2] In 2016, during an interview regarding the conclusion of the 20-year period, Paul Chartrand, one of the Report commissioners, acknowledged not much had changed.[6]

Criticism

[edit]

Georges Erasmus denounced the historical role of the Roman Catholic Church in Canada in the forced assimilation of Aboriginal Peoples, citing the abandonment of indigenous languages, cultures and traditions.[7]

Legacy

[edit]

Despite the majority of the RCAP recommendations remaining unimplemented, the Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada credits the Report of the Royal Commission of Aboriginal Peoples with drawing the attention of non-Indigenous Canadians to the lived experiences of Indigenous peoples in Canada and redirecting the nature of related conversations.[8]: 7  The RCAP report also led to greater recognition in Western Canada of "the urgent need for preservation of Canada's Indigenous languages, many of which face extinction if current trends continue."[9] In response to the threat of extinction, institutes for the revitalization of indigenous languages, including the Canadian Indigenous Languages and Literacy Development Institute (CILLDI), were established.[9] Now based at the University of Alberta, CILLDI had attracted over 1,000 participants to its summer school programmes by 2016.[10][11]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Volume 1: Looking Forward, Looking Back". Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (PDF). Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. October 1996. Retrieved 30 June 2020.
  2. ^ a b Barton, Rosemary (28 February 2020). "Over 20 years ago, we had a plan to repair the Crown-Indigenous relationship. What happened?". CBC News. Retrieved 30 June 2020.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k "Highlights from the Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples". Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. Retrieved 2009-10-05.
  4. ^ a b "Summary of the Final Report of The Royal Commission on Aboriginal" (PDF). CTV Canada. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-02-24. Retrieved 2009-10-05.
  5. ^ Barkwell, Lawrence. http://www.metismuseum.ca/media/document.php/14785.Chartrand,%20paul.pdf
  6. ^ a b Troian, Martha (3 March 2016). "20 years since Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, still waiting for change". CBC News. Retrieved 30 June 2020.
  7. ^ "Abandoning neutrality" (video). Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. October 30, 1992. Retrieved October 7, 2009.
  8. ^ "Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future: Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada" (PDF). Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. 31 May 2015. Retrieved 30 June 2020.
  9. ^ a b Blair, Heather A.; Paskemin, Donna; Laderoute, Barbara (2003), "Preparing Indigenous language advocates, teachers, and researchers" (PDF), Northern Arizona University, Nurturing Native Languages, Flagstaff, Arizona
  10. ^ "Aboriginal Peoples Network: Canadian Indigenous Languages and Literacy Development Institute", University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, 2002, retrieved July 5, 2016
  11. ^ "CIILDI homepage: About", University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, 2002, retrieved July 5, 2016
[edit]

Leave a Reply