Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Rigley (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 444555912 by Kuebie (talk) Not synthesis. International marriage and Korean admixture are mentioned in discussions of PBTheory like Myers' book.
Kuebie (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 444556729 by Quigley (talk) there are mixed korean kids sure. again, is this whole section a thesis statement? great for editorials though
Line 31: Line 31:


The ideology also maintains a conviction amongst Koreans that both South and North Koreans are all brothers and sisters of the same blood-family and reunification is the ultimate goal. A poll in April 2008 found that 34% of South Korean army cadets believed the U.S. was South Korea’s main enemy, as opposed to 33% who considered North Korea their enemy.<ref name=kt>[http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2008/04/113_22029.html '34 Percent of Army Cadets Regard US as Main Enemy'], Korea Times, 4 June 2008</ref>{{Syn|date=October 2010}} The South Korea government reportedly forced the researchers not to notify the public of the result. Similar sentiment can also be observed in North Korea that labels the U.S. as "mortal enemy" and Japan "longstanding enemy", but there has been no document or official commentaries describing South Korea as the main enemy.{{Citation needed|date=October 2010}}
The ideology also maintains a conviction amongst Koreans that both South and North Koreans are all brothers and sisters of the same blood-family and reunification is the ultimate goal. A poll in April 2008 found that 34% of South Korean army cadets believed the U.S. was South Korea’s main enemy, as opposed to 33% who considered North Korea their enemy.<ref name=kt>[http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2008/04/113_22029.html '34 Percent of Army Cadets Regard US as Main Enemy'], Korea Times, 4 June 2008</ref>{{Syn|date=October 2010}} The South Korea government reportedly forced the researchers not to notify the public of the result. Similar sentiment can also be observed in North Korea that labels the U.S. as "mortal enemy" and Japan "longstanding enemy", but there has been no document or official commentaries describing South Korea as the main enemy.{{Citation needed|date=October 2010}}

== Evidences against the pure blood theory ==
=== Historical analysis ===
After the [[Koryo|Koryo]] dynasty had become a [[vassal|vassal]] of [[Mongol Empire|Mongol Empire]] in 1259, four Koryo kings married Mongolian princesses between 1274 and 1349.

The [[Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–1598)|Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–1598)]] and [[Manchu invasion of Korea|Manchu invasions of Korea]] (1627, 1637) further compromised Korean pure blood system. After the Manchurian invasion, the women raped by Mancurian invaders were called 'Hwan Hyang Neyo' (환향녀(還鄕女); women who came back) and alienated from Korean society. A derivative word, 'Hwan Yang Neyon' (화냥년) remains one of most offensive Korean swear word toward a woman today.<ref>[http://100.naver.com/100.nhn?docid=748093]</ref>

=== Genetic analysis ===

Contrary to the pure blood myth, a genetic study conducted in 2008 suggested otherwise.<ref name=gene>{{cite journal |author=Jin H-J, Tyler-Smith C, Kim W |title=The Peopling of Korea Revealed by Analyses of Mitochondrial DNA and Y-Chromosomal Markers |url=http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0004210 |journal=PLoS ONE |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=e4210 |year=2009|pmid=19148289|doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0004210}}, studies by the Department of Biological Sciences, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea and The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton and Cambridge, United Kingdom.</ref> In the analysis on the FST distances of [[Human mitochondrial genetics|mtDNA]] [[Human mitochondrial DNA haplogroup|markers]], Koreans have a close relationship with [[Manchu]]rians, [[Yamato people|Japanese]], [[Mongols|Mongolians]] and northern [[Han Chinese]] but not with southern Asians.<ref name=gene /> However, surveys of [[Y chromosome|Y-chromosomal]] [[Human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup|DNA variation]] further revealed that Koreans appeared to have affinities with [[Vietnamese people|Vietnamese]], Manchurian, and southern Chinese.<ref name=gene />

=== Recent trends towards international marriage ===
According to 2009 statistics published by Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare, there are 144,385 couples of international marriage in South Korea as of May, 2008. 88.4% of immigrants was female, and 61.9% was from China. <ref> [http://academic.naver.com/view.nhn?doc_id=39555627&dir_id=0&page=0&query=%EB%8B%A4%EB%AC%B8%ED%99%94%20%ED%86%B5%EA%B3%84] </ref> Recently it has been argued that South Korean society had already become a multicultural society. As of 2011, 10 ministries and agencies of South Korean government are supporting international couples and foreign workers in South Korea toward the cultural plurality. <ref> [http://www.kyeongin.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=589126] </ref>


==Social Issues==
==Social Issues==

Revision as of 03:06, 13 August 2011

Template:POV-title

The pure blood theory or pure blood hypothesis in Korea refers to a notion that Korean people are the cleanest and purest race, descendants[1] of a single ancestor.[2] Koreans call this concept as "tanil minjok" (단일민족; 單一民族) "pure race"[3] or "the single ethnic nation".[4]

The ideology of purest race began in the early 20th century[2] when the Japanese[1] annexed Korea in and launched a Nazism-influenced campaign to persuade them that they were of the same pure racial stock as the Japanese themselves.[1][2] After independence in the late 1940s, neither North or South Korea disputed the ethnic homogeneity of the Korean nation based on a single bloodline of the Great Han[5] as a divine race.[1]

Despite contrary evidence proven by history and genetic records, this ideology has given Koreans an impetus to national pride,[6] [verification needed] racial supremacy, strong sense of ethnic homogeneity, nationalism[5] and continues to function as an influence in Korean politics and foreign relations.[5]

Background

Early use

Contrary to popular belief in Korea, the Korean ideology of purest race began only in the early 20th century when the Japanese annexed Korea[1] and launched a campaign to persuade them that they were of the same pure racial stock as the Japanese themselves.[2] The ideology of pure race is ascribed to the Western hypothesis of Aryan race in the late 19th century and later adopted as Nazi ideology that motivated racism, occultism and supremacism in Nazi doctrine.[7]

In the colonial period, the Japanese assimilation policy claimed that Koreans and Japanese were of common origin but the former always subordinate. The pure blood theory was used to justify colonialist policies to replace Korean cultural traditions with Japanese ones in order to supposedly get rid of all distinctions and achieve equality between Koreans and inlanders.[5] The policy included changing Korean names into Japanese, exclusive use of Japanese language, school instruction in the Japanese ethical system, and Shinto worship.[5]

Independence

Heaven Lake of Baekdu Mountain (백두산; 白頭山) where Hwan Woong (환웅; 桓雄), Dangun's father, is said to have descended from heaven, constitutes a foundation for the legend of blood purity in Korean

In resistance to the Japanese assimilation policy, Koreans came forward to assert their unique national heritage. Shin Chaeho (신채호; 申采浩; 1880–1936), the founder of the nationalistic historiography of modern Korea and a Korean independence movement activist, published his influential book of reconstructed history Joseon Sanggosa (조선상고사; 朝鮮上古史; The Early History of Joseon) in 1924-25, proclaiming that Koreans are descendants of Dangun (단군; 檀君), the legendary ancestor of Korean people, who merged with Buyo of Manchuria to form the Goguryeo (고구려; 高句麗) people.[8]

Borrowing from the Japanese theory of nation and race,[8] Shin Chaeho located the martial roots of the Korean in Goguryeo,[8] which he depicted as militarist, expansionist which turned out to inspire pride and confidence in the resistance against the Japanese.[8] In order to establish Korean uniqueness, he also replaced the story of Gija (기자, 箕子) whose founder was the paternal uncle or brother of the Chinese Shang emperor Zhou with the Dangun legend [9] and asserted that it is the important ways to establish Korea’s uniqueness.[8]

After the independence in the late 1940s, despite the split between North and South Korea, neither side disputed the ethnic homogeneity of the Korean nation based on a firm conviction that they are purest descendant of a legendary genitor and half-god figure called Dangun who founded Gojoseon in 2333 BCE based on the description of the Dongguk Tonggam (1485).[5][10]

Reception

In Korea, pure blood theory is a common belief justified as "defensive nationalism".[11] The debates on this topic can be found sporadic in the South, whereas the public opinion in the North is hard to access. In a nationalistic view, to impugn the theory would have been tantamount to betraying Koreanness in the face of the challenge of an alien ethnic nation.[5]

Some Korean scholars observed that the pure blood theory served as a useful tool for the South Korean government to make its people obedient and easy to govern when the country was embroiled in ideological turmoil.[11] It was especially true in the dictatorial leaderships by former presidents Syngman Rhee and Park Chung-hee when nationalism was incorporated into anti-Communism.[11]

The ideology also maintains a conviction amongst Koreans that both South and North Koreans are all brothers and sisters of the same blood-family and reunification is the ultimate goal. A poll in April 2008 found that 34% of South Korean army cadets believed the U.S. was South Korea’s main enemy, as opposed to 33% who considered North Korea their enemy.[12][improper synthesis?] The South Korea government reportedly forced the researchers not to notify the public of the result. Similar sentiment can also be observed in North Korea that labels the U.S. as "mortal enemy" and Japan "longstanding enemy", but there has been no document or official commentaries describing South Korea as the main enemy.[citation needed]

Social Issues

Xenophobia

American footballer Hines Ward's visit in Korea has stirred debate if the society should accept mixed blood

The notion of the pure blood theory comes at the cost of discrimination on people of both foreign-blood and mixed blood'.[13]

In 2006, Hines Ward who was born to a Korean mother and an African American father became the first Korean American to win the Super Bowl MVP award. This achievement threw him into the media spotlight in South Korea.[14] When he travelled to Korea for the first time, he raised unprecedented attention to the acceptance of "mixed blood" children. He also donated USD 1 million to establish the "Hines Ward Helping Hands Foundation", which the media called "a foundation to help mixed-race children like himself in South Korea, where they have suffered discrimination."[15]

However, while Koreans are fascinated by the bi-racial sport hero, the majority of ordinary mixed-race people and migrant workers face various forms of discrimination and prejudice.[13] In 2007, the Korean pure blood theory became an international issue when the U.N. Committee on the International Convention Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination urged better education on the pure blood theory is needed especially for judicial workers such as police officers, lawyers, prosecutors and judges.[16][17] The suggestion got mixed reception in South Korea in which some raised a xenophobic concern that foreigners will invade the Korean culture and challenged the sovereignty of Korea.[18] Others also claimed that the embrace of multi-ethnicism is at the cost of reunification.[18]

The Korea nationality law is based on jus sanguinis[5][18] instead of the territorial principle which takes into account the place of birth. In this context, most Koreans have stronger attachment to "ethnic Koreans living in foreign countries" than to "ethnic non-Koreans living in Korea."[5][18]

In 2005, the opposition Grand National Party suggested a revision of the current nationality law to allow Korean nationality to people who are born in South Korea regardless of the nationalities of their parents but it was discarded due to unfavorable public opinion.[13]

Racism is an ongoing problem and there has been a great deal of awareness in South Korea. Hines Ward was granted "honorary" Korean citizenship.[19] Tasha Reid (also known as Natasha Shanta Reid, Korean name is Yoon Mi-rae (윤미래)) is a famous mixed race singer in Korea.[20] Middle school access has been expanded to children of illegal immigrants.[21]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e B.R.Myers. The Cleanest Race: How North Koreans See Themselves and Why It Matters. Melville House, January 2010, ISBN 1933633913
  2. ^ a b c d North Korea's official propaganda promotes idea of racial purity and moral superiority, UC Berkeley News, 19 February 2010
  3. ^ Pai, Hyung Il (2000). Constructing "Korean" origins: a critical review of archaeology, historiography, and racial myth in Korean state-formation theories. Harvard University Asia Center. p. 256. ISBN 067400244X. The idea of racial unity and continuity is embodied in the concept of tanil minjok (pure race), which holds that all Koreans have successfully maintained their "Korean-ness" by fighting off foreign invaders since the formation of the nation in prehistoric times.
  4. ^ Kim, Nadia Y. (2008). Imperial citizens: Koreans and race from Seoul to LA. Stanford University Press. p. 24. ISBN 0804758875. Koreans' beloved trope of tanil minjok—"the single ethnic nation"— would soon come into its own (see Shin 1998). The centrality of blood has been revived in more current times as well.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i Ethnic pride source of prejudice, discrimination, Gi-Wook Shin, Asia-Pacific Research Center of Stanford University, 2 August 2006
  6. ^ South Korea Guidebook, 7th Edition, Lonely Planet, April 2007, page 46
  7. ^ Race Life of the Aryan Peoples New York: Funk & Wagnalls. 1907 In Two Volumes: Volume One--The Old World Volume Two--The New World ISBN B000859S6O See Chapter II—"Original Homeland of the Aryan Peoples" Pages 9-25—the term “Proto-Aryan” is used to describe the people today called Proto-Indo-Europeans
  8. ^ a b c d e The Koguryo Controversy, National Identity, and Sino-Korean Relations Today [1], Peter Hays Gries, Institute for US-China Issues, The University of Oklahoma
  9. ^ Andre Schmid, "Rediscovering Manchuria: Som Cj’aeho and the Politics of Territorial History in Korea," in The Journal of Asian Studies, 56, no. 1 February 1997
  10. ^ Old Choson and the Culture of the Mandolin-shaped Bronze Dagger, Kim Jung-bae
  11. ^ a b c Myth of Pure-Blood Nationalism Blocks Multi-Ethnic Society, quoted from Kim Sok-soo, a professor at Kyungpook National University, The Korea Times, August 14, 2006
  12. ^ '34 Percent of Army Cadets Regard US as Main Enemy', Korea Times, 4 June 2008
  13. ^ a b c Myth of Pure-Blood Nationalism Blocks Multi-Ethnic Society, The Korea Times, 14 August 2006
  14. ^ Chuck Finder (2006-04-09). "Hines Ward scores big for social change". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
  15. ^ Associated Press (2006-05-30). "Ward kicks off his new charity". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
  16. ^ U.N. Committee Hits Korea's Discrimination, KBS, August 19, 2007
  17. ^ "Koreans Reassess Concept of Blood Purity". The Korea Times. 2007-09-02.
  18. ^ a b c d Korea: How Much Should One Ethnicity be Emphasized? Global Voices, 2007
  19. ^ http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?no=283952&rel_no=1
  20. ^ http://search.naver.com/search.naver?where=nexearch&sm=tab_txc&ie=utf8&query=%EC%9C%A4%EB%AF%B8%EB%9E%98&os=158484
  21. ^ http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=shm&sid1=102&oid=001&aid=0004608957

Leave a Reply