THC Science

This is a list of Supreme Court of the United States cases in the area of immigration law and naturalization law.

This list is a list solely of United States Supreme Court decisions about applying immigration and naturalization law. Not all Supreme Court decisions are ultimately influential and, as in other fields, not all important decisions are made at the Supreme Court level. Many federal courts issue rulings that are significant or come to be influential, but those are outside the scope of this list.

18th century

Talbot v. Janson, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 133 (1795)

19th century

Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242 (1830)
Passenger Cases (Smith v. Turner; Norris v. Boston), 48 U.S. (7 How.) 283 (1849)
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36 (1873)
Henderson v. Mayor of City of New York, 92 U.S. 259 (1875)
Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1875) – The power to set rules around immigration and foreign relations rests with the federal government rather than with state governments.
Hauenstein v. Lynham, 100 U.S. 483 (1879)
Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94 (1884) – Court held that even though Elk was born in the United States, he was not a citizen because he owed allegiance to his tribe when he was born rather than to the U.S. and therefore was not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States when he was born.
Head Money Cases (aka Edye v. Robertson), 112 U.S. 580 (1884)
Cheong Ah Moy v. United States, 113 U.S. 216 (1885)
Hanrick v. Patrick, 119 U.S. 156 (1886)
Baldwin v. Franks, 120 U.S. 678 (1887)
United States v. Jung Ah Lung, 124 U.S. 621 (1888)
Chae Chan Ping v. United States, 130 U.S. 581 (1889)
Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U.S. 258 (1890)
In re Ross, 140 U.S. 453 (1891)
Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 U.S. 651 (1892)
Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States, 143 U.S. 457 (1892)
Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U.S. 47 (1892)
Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893)
Lem Moon Sing v. United States, 158 U.S. 538 (1895)
Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U.S. 228 (1896)
United States v. McMillan, 165 U.S. 504 (1897)
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

20th century

Yamataya v. Fisher, 189 U.S. 86 (1903) (also known as the "Japanese Immigrant Case")
Gonzales v. Williams, 192 U.S. 1 (1904)
Turner v. Williams, 194 U.S. 279 (1904)
United States v. Ju Toy, 198 U.S. 253 (1905)
Zartarian v. Billings, 204 U.S. 170 (1907)
Chin Yow v. United States, 208 U.S. 8 (1908)
Hepner v. United States, 213 U.S. 103 (1909)
Keller v. United States, 213 U.S. 138 (1909)
Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Stranahan, 214 U.S. 320 (1909)
Holmgren v. United States, 217 U.S. 509 (1910)
Zakonaite v. Wolf, 226 U.S. 272 (1912)
Bugajewitz v. Adams, 228 U.S. 585 (1913)
Patsone v. Pennsylvania, 232 U.S. 138 (1914)
Gegiow v. Uhl, 239 U.S. 3 (1915)
Truax v. Raich, 239 U.S. 33 (1915)
Heim v. McCall, 239 U.S. 175 (1915)
Crane v. New York, 239 U.S. 195 (1915)
Mackenzie v. Hare, 239 U.S. 299 (1915)
Cross v. United States, 242 U.S. 4 (1916)
United States v. Ginsberg, 243 U.S. 472 (1917)
United States v. Ness, 245 U.S. 319 (1917)
United States v. Morena, 245 U.S. 392 (1918)
Yee Won v. White, 256 U.S. 399 (1921)
Ng Fung Ho v. White, 259 U.S. 276 (1922)
Takao Ozawa v. United States, 260 U.S. 178 (1922)
Yamashita v. Hinkle, 260 U.S. 199 (1922)
United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 (1923)
United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149 (1923)
Terrace v. Thompson, 263 U.S. 197 (1923)
Porterfield v. Webb, 263 U.S. 225 (1923)
Webb v. O'Brien, 263 U.S. 313 (1923) – Overturning a lower court decision, the Supreme Court upheld a ban on cropping contracts, which technically dealt with labor rather than land and were used by many Issei to avoid the restrictions of California's alien land act.
Frick v. Webb, 263 U.S. 326 (1923)
Mahler v. Eby, 264 U.S. 32 (1924)
United States ex rel. Tisi v. Tod, 264 U.S. 131 (1924)
United States ex rel. Mensevich v. Tod, 264 U.S. 134 (1924)
Chung Fook v. White, 264 U.S. 443 (1924)
Cook v. Tait, 265 U.S. 47 (1924)
Wong Doo v. United States, 265 U.S. 239 (1924)
Commissioner of Immigration of Port of NY v. Gottlieb, 265 U.S. 310 (1924)
Asakura v. City of Seattle, 265 U.S. 332 (1924)
Tod v. Waldman, 266 U.S. 113 (1924)
Kaplan v. Tod, 267 U.S. 228 (1925)
Tutun v. United States, 270 U.S. 568 (1926)
United States ex rel. Vajtauer v. Commissioner, 273 U.S. 103 (1927)
Ohio ex rel. Clark v. Deckebach, 274 U.S. 392 (1927)
Weedin v. Chin Bow, 274 U.S. 657 (1927)
Maney v. United States, 278 U.S. 17 (1928)
United States ex rel. Claussen v. Day, 279 U.S. 398 (1929)
United States v. Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644 (1929) – Denied an applicant entry to the United States because of her pacifist beliefs
United States v. MacIntosh, 283 U.S. 605 (1931)
United States v. Bland, 283 U.S. 636 (1931)
United States ex rel. Polymeris v. Trudell, 284 U.S. 279 (1932)
Hansen v. Haff, 291 U.S. 559 (1934)
Kessler v. Strecker, 307 U.S. 22 (1939)
Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)
Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52 (1941)
Ex parte Kumezo Kawato, 317 U.S. 69 (1942)
Schneiderman v. United States, 320 U.S. 118 (1943)
Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U.S. 665 (1944)
Bridges v. Wixon, 326 U.S. 135 (1945)
Girouard v. United States, 328 U.S. 61 (1946) – Overruled United States v. Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644 (1929)
Fiswick v. United States, 329 U.S. 211 (1946)
Delgadillo v. Carmichael, 332 U.S. 388 (1947)
Oyama v. California, 332 U.S. 633 (1948)
Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan, 333 U.S. 6 (1948)
Takahashi v. Fish and Game Comm'n, 334 U.S. 410 (1948)
Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160 (1948)
Ahrens v. Clark, 335 U.S. 188 (1948)
Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 (1949)
Johnson v. Shaughnessy, 336 U.S. 806 (1949)
Eichenlaub v. Shaughnessy, 338 U.S. 521 (1950)
U.S. ex rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy, 338 U.S. 537 (1950)
Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 339 U.S. 33 (1950)
McGrath v. Kristensen, 340 U.S. 162 (1950)
Ackermann v. United States, 340 U.S. 193 (1950)
Moser v. United States, 341 U.S. 41 (1951)
Jordan v. De George, 341 U.S. 223 (1951)
Bindczyck v. Finucane, 342 U.S. 76 (1951)
United States ex rel. Jaegeler v. Carusi, 342 U.S. 347 (1952)
Carlson v. Landon, 342 U.S. 524 (1952)
Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580 (1952)
Martinez v. Neely, 344 U.S. 916 (1952)
United States v. Spector, 343 U.S. 169 (1952)
Kawakita v. United States, 343 U.S. 717 (1952)
Mandoli v. Acheson, 344 U.S. 133 (1952)
Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, 344 U.S. 590 (1953)
Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei, 345 U.S. 206 (1953)
Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U.S. 229 (1953)
Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209 (1953)
Rubinstein v. Brownell, 346 U.S. 929 (1954)
Longshoremen's Union v. Boyd, 347 U.S. 222 (1954)
Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 347 U.S. 260 (1954)
Galvan v. Press, 347 U.S. 522 (1954)
Barber v. Gonzales, 347 U.S. 637 (1954)
United States v. Menasche, 348 U.S. 528 (1955)
Shomberg v. United States, 348 U.S. 540 (1955)
Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, 349 U.S. 48 (1955)
Shaughnessy v. Accardi, 349 U.S. 280 (1955)
Marcello v. Bonds, 349 U.S. 302 (1955)
Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 (1955)
Nukk v. Shaughnessy, 350 U.S. 869 (1955)
Gonzales v. Landon, 350 U.S. 920 (1955)
Hyun v. Landon, 350 U.S. 990 (1956)
United States v. Zucca, 351 U.S. 91 (1956)
Jay v. Boyd, 351 U.S. 345 (1956)
Mesarosh v. United States, 352 U.S. 1 (1956)
Brownell v. Tom We Shung, 352 U.S. 180 (1956)
Ceballos v. Shaughnessy, 352 U.S. 599 (1957)
Hintopoulos v. Shaughnessy, 353 U.S. 72 (1957)
United States v. Witkovich, 353 U.S. 194 (1957)
Rabang v. Boyd, 353 U.S. 427 (1957)
Lehmann v. Carson, 353 U.S. 685 (1957)
Mulcahey v. Catalanotte, 353 U.S. 692 (1957)
Rowoldt v. Perfetto, 355 U.S. 115 (1957)
Lee Kum Hoy v. Murff, 355 U.S. 169 (1957)
Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44 (1958) – affirmed the provision revoking the citizenship of any American who had voted in an election in a foreign country, as a legitimate exercise (under the Constitution's Necessary and Proper Clause) of Congress' authority to regulate foreign affairs and avoid potentially embarrassing diplomatic situations
Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958) – revoking citizenship as a punishment for desertion violates the 8th Amendment
Nishikawa v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 129 (1958)
Dessalernos v. Savoretti, 356 U.S. 269 (1958)
Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116 (1958)
Leng May Ma v. Barber, 357 U.S. 185 (1958)
Rogers v. Quan, 357 U.S. 193 (1958)
Mackey v. Mendoza-Martinez, 362 U.S. 384 (1960)
Niukkanen v. McAlexander, 362 U.S. 390 (1960)
Kimm v. Rosenberg, 363 U.S. 405 (1960)
Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603 (1960)
Chaunt v. United States, 364 U.S. 350 (1960)
Montana v. Kennedy, 366 U.S. 308 (1961)
Rusk v. Cort, 369 U.S. 367 (1962)
Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144 (1963) – the Court struck down a law revoking citizenship for remaining outside the United States in order to avoid conscription into the armed forces
Rosenberg v. Fleuti, 374 U.S. 449 (1963)
Foti v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 375 U.S. 217 (1963)
Thompson v. INS, 375 U.S. 384 (1964)
Costello v. INS, 376 U.S. 120 (1964)
Mrvica v. Esperdy, 376 U.S. 560 (1964)
Schneider v. Rusk, 377 U.S. 163 (1964) – the Court invalidated a provision revoking the citizenship of naturalized citizens who returned to live permanently in their countries of origin
Marks v. Esperdy, 377 U.S. 214 (1964)
Aptheker v. Secretary of State, 378 U.S. 500 (1964)
Giova v. Rosenberg, 379 U.S. 18 (1964)
Zemel v. Rusk, 381 U.S. 1 (1965)
Soric v. INS, 382 U.S. 285 (1965)
INS v. Errico, 385 U.S. 214 (1966)
Woodby v. INS, 385 U.S. 276 (1966)
Berenyi v. Immigration Director, 385 U.S. 630 (1967)
Boutilier v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 387 U.S. 118 (1967)
Afroyim v. Rusk, 387 U.S. 253 (1967)
Kwok v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 392 U.S. 206 (1968)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Stanisic, 395 U.S. 62 (1969)
Rogers v. Bellei, 401 U.S. 815 (1971)
Rosenberg v. Yee Chien Woo, 402 U.S. 49 (1971)
Astrup v. INS, 402 U.S. 509 (1971)
Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365 (1971)
Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S. 753 (1972)
Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266 (1973)
Sugarman v. Dougall, 413 U.S. 634 (1973)
In re Griffiths, 413 U.S. 717 (1973)
INS v. Hibi, 414 U.S. 5 (1973)
Espinoza v. Farah Mfg. Co., 414 U.S. 86 (1973)
Reid v. INS, 420 U.S. 619 (1975)
United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 (1975)
United States v. Ortiz, 422 U.S. 891 (1975)
De Canas v. Bica, 424 U.S. 351 (1976) – employment regulation, even of aliens unlawfully present in the country, is an area of traditional state concern; arguably overruled by Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012)
Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67 (1976)
Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong, 426 U.S. 88 (1976)
Examining Board v. Flores de Otero, 426 U.S. 572 (1976)
United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Bagamasbad, 429 U.S. 24 (1976)
Fiallo v. Bell, 430 U.S. 787 (1977)
United States v. Ramsey, 431 U.S. 606 (1977)
Nyquist v. Mauclet, 432 U.S. 1 (1977)
Foley v. Connelie, 435 U.S. 291 (1978)
Elkins v. Moreno, 435 U.S. 647 (1978)
Agosto v. INS, 436 U.S. 748 (1978)
Ambach v. Norwick, 441 U.S. 68 (1979)
Toll v. Moreno, 441 U.S. 458 (1979)
Vance v. Terrazas, 444 U.S. 252 (1980)
Fedorenko v. United States, 449 U.S. 490 (1981)
INS v. Jong Ha Wang, 450 U.S. 139 (1981)
Haig v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280 (1981)
Cabell v. Chavez-Salido, 454 U.S. 432 (1982)
Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982)
Toll v. Moreno, 458 U.S. 1 (1982)
United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal, 458 U.S. 858 (1982)
INS v. Miranda, 459 U.S. 14 (1982)
Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21 (1982)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Phinpathya, 464 U.S. 183 (1984)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Delgado, 466 U.S. 210 (1984)
Bernal v. Fainter, 467 U.S. 216 (1984)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Stevic, 467 U.S. 407 (1984)
Sure-Tan, Inc. v. NLRB, 467 U.S. 883 (1984)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032 (1984)
INS v. Rios-Pineda, 471 U.S. 444 (1985)
Jean v. Nelson, 472 U.S. 846 (1985)
United States v. Montoya De Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531 (1985)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Hector, 479 U.S. 85 (1986)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421 (1987)
United States v. Mendoza-Lopez, 481 U.S. 828 (1987)
Reagan v. Abourezk, 484 U.S. 1 (1987)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94 (1988)
Kungys v. United States, 485 U.S. 759 (1988)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Pangilinan, 486 U.S. 875 (1988)
United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990)
McNary v. Haitian Refugee Center, Inc., 498 U.S. 479 (1991)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. National Center for Immigrants' Rights, Inc., 502 U.S. 183 (1991)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 (1992)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314 (1992)
Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993)
Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc., 509 U.S. 43 (1993)
Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, 509 U.S. 155 (1993)
Stone v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 514 U.S. 386 (1995)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Yang, 519 U.S. 26 (1996)
Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998)
Miller v. Albright, 523 U.S. 420 (1998) – upheld the validity of laws relating to U.S. citizenship at birth for children born outside the United States, out of wedlock, to an American parent.
Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, 525 U.S. 471 (1999)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-Aguirre, 526 U.S. 415 (1999)

21st century

Nguyen v. INS, 533 U.S. 53 (2001)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001)
Calcano-Martinez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 533 U.S. 348 (2001)
Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)
Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002)
INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12 (2002)
Demore v. Kim, 538 U.S. 510 (2003)
United States v. Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. 149 (2004)
Leocal v. Ashcroft, 543 U.S. 1 (2004)
Jama v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 543 U.S. 335 (2005)
Clark v. Martinez, 543 U.S. 371 (2005)
Muehler v. Mena, 544 U.S. 93 (2005)
Gonzales v. Thomas, 547 U.S. 183 (2006)
Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales, 548 U.S. 30 (2006)
Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47 (2006)
Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez, 549 U.S. 183 (2007)
Dada v. Mukasey, 554 U.S. 1 (2008)
Negusie v. Holder, 555 U.S. 511 (2009)
Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009)
Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29 (2009)
Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233 (2010)
Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010)
Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 560 U.S. 563 (2010)
Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, 563 U.S. 582 (2011)
Flores-Villar v. United States, 564 U.S. 210 (2011)
Judulang v. Holder, 565 U.S. 42 (2011)
Kawashima v. Holder, 565 U.S. 478 (2012)
Zivotofsky v. Clinton, 566 U.S. 189 (2012)
Vartelas v. Holder, 566 U.S. 257 (2012)
Holder v. Gutierrez, 566 U.S. 583 (2012)
Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012)
Chaidez v. United States, 568 U.S. 342 (2013)
Moncrieffe v. Holder, 569 U.S. 184 (2013)
Scialabba v. de Osorio, 573 U.S. 41 (2014)
Mellouli v. Lynch, No. 13-1034, 575 U.S. ___ (2015)
Zivotofsky v. Kerry, No. 13-628, 576 U.S. ___ (2015)
Kerry v. Din, No. 13-1402, 576 U.S. ___ (2015)
Reyes Mata v. Lynch, No. 14-185, 576 U.S. ___ (2015)
Molina-Martinez v. United States, No. 14-8913, 578 U.S. ___ (2016)
Luna Torres v. Lynch, No. 14-1096, 578 U.S. ___ (2016)
United States v. Texas, No. 15-674, 579 U.S. ___ (2016)
Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions, No. 16-54, 581 U.S. ___ (2017)
Sessions v. Morales-Santana, No. 15-1191, 582 U.S. ___ (2017)
Maslenjak v. United States, No. 16-309, 582 U.S. ___ (2017)
Jae Lee v. United States, No. 16-327, 582 U.S. ___ (2017)
Hernandez v. Mesa, No. 15-118, 582 U.S. ___ (2017)
Trump v. International Refugee Assistance Project, No. 16-1436, 582 U.S. ___ (2017)
In re United States, No. 17-801, 583 U.S. ___ (2017)
Jennings v. Rodriguez, No. 15-1204, 583 U.S. ___ (2018)
Sessions v. Dimaya, No. 15-1498, 584 U.S. ___ (2018)
Pereira v. Sessions, No. 17-459, 585 U.S. ___ (2018)
Trump v. Hawaii, No. 17-965, 585 U.S. ___ (2018)
Nielsen v. Preap, No. 16-1363, 586 U.S. ___ (2019)
Hernandez v. Mesa, No. 17-1678, 589 U.S. ___ (2020)
Kansas v. Garcia, No. 17-834, 589 U.S. ___ (2020)
Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr, No. 18-776, 589 U.S. ___ (2020)
Barton v. Barr, No. 18-725, 590 U.S. ___ (2020)
United States v. Sineneng-Smith, No. 19-67, 590 U.S. ___ (2020)
Nasrallah v. Barr, No. 18-1432, 590 U.S. ___ (2020)
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, No. 18-587, 591 U.S. ___ (2020)
Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, No. 19-161, 591 U.S. ___ (2020)
Pereida v. Wilkinson, No. 19-438, 592 U.S. ___ (2021)
Niz-Chavez v. Garland, No. 19-863, 593 U.S. ___ (2021)
United States v. Palomar-Santiago, No. 20-437, 593 U.S. ___ (2021)
Garland v. Ming Dai, No. 19-1155, 593 U.S. ___ (2021)
Sanchez v. Mayorkas, No. 20-315, 593 U.S. ___ (2021)
Johnson v. Guzman Chavez, No. 19-897, 594 U.S. ___ (2021)
Patel v. Garland, No. 20-979, 596 U.S. ___ (2022)
Egbert v. Boule, No. 21-147, 596 U.S. ___ (2022)
Garland v. Gonzalez, No. 20-322, 596 U.S. ___ (2022)
Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez, No. 19-896, 596 U.S. ___ (2022)
Biden v. Texas, No. 21-954, 597 U.S. ___ (2022)
Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, No. 21-1436, 598 U.S. ___ (2023)
Pugin v. Garland, No. 22-23, 599 U.S. ___ (2023)
United States v. Texas, No. 22-58, 599 U.S. ___ (2023)
United States v. Hansen, No. 22-179, 599 U.S. ___ (2023)
Wilkinson v. Garland, No. 22-666, 601 U.S. ___ (2024)
Campos-Chaves v. Garland, No. 22-674, 601 U.S. ___ (2024)
Department of State v. Muñoz, No. 23-334, 602 U.S. ___ (2024)
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, No. 23-583, 603 U.S. ___ (2025)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 This list is a list solely of United States Supreme Court decisions about applying immigration and naturalization law. Not all Supreme Court decisions are ultimately influential and, as in other fields, not all important decisions are made at the Supreme Court level. Many federal courts issue rulings that are significant or come to be influential, but those are outside the scope of this list.
-== 18th Century ==
+== 18th century ==
 * ''[[Talbot v. Janson]]'', {{ussc|3|133|1795|Dall.|3}}
-== 19th Century ==
+== 19th century ==
 {{div col}}
 * ''[[Shanks v. Dupont]]'', {{ussc|28|242|1830}}
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 * ''[[Head Money Cases]]'' (aka ''Edye v. Robertson''), {{ussc|112|580|1884}}
 * ''[[Cheong Ah Moy v. United States]]'', {{ussc|113|216|1885}}
+* ''[[Hanrick v. Patrick]]'', {{ussc|119|156|1886}}
 * ''[[Baldwin v. Franks]]'', {{ussc|120|678|1887}}
 * ''[[United States v. Jung Ah Lung]]'', {{ussc|124|621|1888}}
@@ Line 31: / Line 32: @@
 * ''[[Lem Moon Sing v. United States]]'', {{ussc|158|538|1895}}
 * ''[[Wong Wing v. United States]]'', {{ussc|163|228|1896}}
+* ''[[United States v. McMillan]]'', {{ussc|165|504|1897}}
 * ''[[United States v. Wong Kim Ark]]'', {{ussc|169|649|1898}}
 {{div col end}}
-== 20th Century ==
+== 20th century ==
 {{div col}}
 * ''[[Yamataya v. Fisher]]'', {{ussc|189|86|1903}} (also known as the "Japanese Immigrant Case")
@@ Line 40: / Line 42: @@
 * ''[[Turner v. Williams]]'', {{ussc|194|279|1904}}
 * ''[[United States v. Ju Toy]]'', {{ussc|198|253|1905}}
+* ''[[Zartarian v. Billings]]'', {{ussc|204|170|1907}}
 * ''[[Chin Yow v. United States]]'', {{ussc|208|8|1908}}
 * ''[[Hepner v. United States]]'', {{ussc|213|103|1909}}
+* ''[[Keller v. United States]]'', {{ussc|213|138|1909}}
 * ''[[Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Stranahan]]'', {{ussc|214|320|1909}}
+* ''[[Holmgren v. United States]]'', {{ussc|217|509|1910}}
+* ''[[Zakonaite v. Wolf]]'', {{ussc|226|272|1912}}
 * ''[[Bugajewitz v. Adams]]'', {{ussc|228|585|1913}}
 * ''[[Patsone v. Pennsylvania]]'', {{ussc|232|138|1914}}
@@ Line 51: / Line 57: @@
 * ''[[Mackenzie v. Hare]]'', {{ussc|239|299|1915}}
 * ''[[Cross v. United States (1916)|Cross v. United States]]'', {{ussc|242|4|1916}}
+* ''[[United States v. Ginsberg]]'', {{ussc|243|472|1917}}
+* ''[[United States v. Ness]]'', {{ussc|245|319|1917}}
+* ''[[United States v. Morena]]'', {{ussc|245|392|1918}}
 * ''[[Yee Won v. White]]'', {{ussc|256|399|1921}}
+* ''[[Ng Fung Ho v. White]]'', {{ussc|259|276|1922}}
 * ''[[Takao Ozawa v. United States]]'', {{ussc|260|178|1922}}
 * ''[[Yamashita v. Hinkle]]'', {{ussc|260|199|1922}}
 * ''[[United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind]]'', {{ussc|261|204|1923}}
+* ''[[United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod]]'', {{ussc|263|149|1923}}
 * ''[[Terrace v. Thompson]]'', {{ussc|263|197|1923}}
 * ''[[Porterfield v. Webb]]'', {{ussc|263|225|1923}}
 * ''[[Webb v. O'Brien]]'', {{ussc|263|313|1923}} – Overturning a lower court decision, the Supreme Court upheld a ban on cropping contracts, which technically dealt with labor rather than land and were used by many Issei to avoid the restrictions of California's alien land act.
 * ''[[Frick v. Webb]]'', {{ussc|263|326|1923}}
+* ''[[Mahler v. Eby]]'', {{ussc|264|32|1924}}
+* ''[[United States ex rel. Tisi v. Tod]]'', {{ussc|264|131|1924}}
+* ''[[United States ex rel. Mensevich v. Tod]]'', {{ussc|264|134|1924}}
 * ''[[Chung Fook v. White]]'', {{ussc|264|443|1924}}
+* ''[[Cook v. Tait]]'', {{ussc|265|47|1924}}
+* ''[[Wong Doo v. United States]]'', {{ussc|265|239|1924}}
+* ''[[Commissioner of Immigration of Port of NY v. Gottlieb]]'', {{ussc|265|310|1924}}
 * ''[[Asakura v. City of Seattle]]'', {{ussc|265|332|1924}}
 * ''[[Tod v. Waldman]]'', {{ussc|266|113|1924}}
 * ''[[Kaplan v. Tod]]'', {{ussc|267|228|1925}}
+* ''[[Tutun v. United States]]'', {{ussc|270|568|1926}}
 * ''[[United States ex rel. Vajtauer v. Commissioner]]'', {{ussc|273|103|1927}}
 * ''[[Ohio ex rel. Clark v. Deckebach]]'', {{ussc|274|392|1927}}
+* ''[[Weedin v. Chin Bow]]'', {{ussc|274|657|1927}}
+* ''[[Maney v. United States]]'', {{ussc|278|17|1928}}
+* ''[[United States ex rel. Claussen v. Day]]'', {{ussc|279|398|1929}}
 * ''[[United States v. Schwimmer]]'', {{ussc|279|644|1929}} – Denied an applicant entry to the United States because of her pacifist beliefs
 * ''[[United States v. MacIntosh]]'', {{ussc|283|605|1931}}
+* ''[[United States v. Bland]]'', {{ussc|283|636|1931}}
 * ''[[United States ex rel. Polymeris v. Trudell]]'', {{ussc|284|279|1932}}
 * ''[[Hansen v. Haff]]'', {{ussc|291|559|1934}}
+* ''[[Kessler v. Strecker]]'', {{ussc|307|22|1939}}
 * ''[[Perkins v. Elg]]'', {{ussc|307|325|1939}}
 * ''[[Hines v. Davidowitz]]'', {{ussc|312|52|1941}}
+* ''[[Ex parte Kumezo Kawato]]'', {{ussc|317|69|1942}}
+* ''[[Schneiderman v. United States]]'', {{ussc|320|118|1943}}
+* ''[[Baumgartner v. United States]]'', {{ussc|322|665|1944}}
 * ''[[Bridges v. Wixon]]'', {{ussc|326|135|1945}}
 * ''[[Girouard v. United States]]'', {{ussc|328|61|1946}} – Overruled ''[[United States v. Schwimmer]]'', {{ussc|279|644|1929}}
@@ Line 80: / Line 106: @@
 * ''[[Ludecke v. Watkins]]'', {{ussc|335|160|1948}}
 * ''[[Ahrens v. Clark]]'', {{ussc|335|188|1948}}
+* ''[[Klapprott v. United States]]'', {{ussc|335|601|1949}}
 * ''[[Johnson v. Shaughnessy]]'', {{ussc|336|806|1949}}
 * ''[[Eichenlaub v. Shaughnessy]]'', {{ussc|338|521|1950}}
 * ''[[U.S. ex rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy]]'', {{ussc|338|537|1950}}
+* ''[[Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath]]'', {{ussc|339|33|1950}}
+* ''[[McGrath v. Kristensen]]'', {{ussc|340|162|1950}}
+* ''[[Ackermann v. United States]]'', {{ussc|340|193|1950}}
+* ''[[Moser v. United States]]'', {{ussc|341|41|1951}}
 * ''[[Jordan v. De George]]'', {{ussc|341|223|1951}}
+* ''[[Bindczyck v. Finucane]]'', {{ussc|342|76|1951}}
 * ''[[United States ex rel. Jaegeler v. Carusi]]'', {{ussc|342|347|1952}}
 * ''[[Carlson v. Landon]]'', {{ussc|342|524|1952}}
 * ''[[Harisiades v. Shaughnessy]]'', {{ussc|342|580|1952}}
+* ''[[Martinez v. Neely]]'', {{ussc|344|916|1952}}
 * ''[[United States v. Spector]]'', {{ussc|343|169|1952}}
 * ''[[Kawakita v. United States]]'', {{ussc|343|717|1952}}
@@ Line 93: / Line 126: @@
 * ''[[Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei]]'', {{ussc|345|206|1953}}
 * ''[[Heikkila v. Barber]]'', {{ussc|345|229|1953}}
+* ''[[Bridges v. United States]]'', {{ussc|346|209|1953}}
+* ''[[Rubinstein v. Brownell]]'', {{ussc|346|929|1954}}
 * ''[[Longshoremen's Union v. Boyd]]'', {{ussc|347|222|1954}}
 * ''[[Accardi v. Shaughnessy]]'', {{ussc|347|260|1954}}
 * ''[[Galvan v. Press]]'', {{ussc|347|522|1954}}
 * ''[[Barber v. Gonzales]]'', {{ussc|347|637|1954}}
+* ''[[United States v. Menasche]]'', {{ussc|348|528|1955}}
+* ''[[Shomberg v. United States]]'', {{ussc|348|540|1955}}
 * ''[[Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro]]'', {{ussc|349|48|1955}}
 * ''[[Shaughnessy v. Accardi]]'', {{ussc|349|280|1955}}
-* ''[[Marcello v. INS]]'', {{ussc|349|302|1955}}
+* ''[[Marcello v. Bonds]]'', {{ussc|349|302|1955}}
 * ''[[Pino v. Landon]]'', {{ussc|349|901|1955}}
+* ''[[Nukk v. Shaughnessy]]'', {{ussc|350|869|1955}}
 * ''[[Gonzales v. Landon]]'', {{ussc|350|920|1955}}
+* ''[[Hyun v. Landon]]'', {{ussc|350|990|1956}}
+* ''[[United States v. Zucca]]'', {{ussc|351|91|1956}}
 * ''[[Jay v. Boyd]]'', {{ussc|351|345|1956}}
+* ''[[Mesarosh v. United States]]'', {{ussc|352|1|1956}}
+* ''[[Brownell v. Tom We Shung]]'', {{ussc|352|180|1956}}
 * ''[[Ceballos v. Shaughnessy]]'', {{ussc|352|599|1957}}
 * ''[[Hintopoulos v. Shaughnessy]]'', {{ussc|353|72|1957}}
@@ Line 117: / Line 159: @@
 * ''[[Kent v. Dulles]]'', {{ussc|357|116|1958}}
 * ''[[Leng May Ma v. Barber]]'', {{ussc|357|185|1958}}
-* Rogers v. Quan, 357 U.S. 193
+* ''[[Rogers v. Quan]]'', {{ussc|357|193|1958}}
 * ''[[Mackey v. Mendoza-Martinez]]'', {{ussc|362|384|1960}}
 * ''[[Niukkanen v. McAlexander]]'', {{ussc|362|390|1960}}
 * ''[[Kimm v. Rosenberg]]'', {{ussc|363|405|1960}}
 * ''[[Flemming v. Nestor]]'', {{ussc|363|603|1960}}
+* ''[[Chaunt v. United States]]'', {{ussc|364|350|1960}}
 * ''[[Montana v. Kennedy]]'', {{ussc|366|308|1961}}
+* ''[[Rusk v. Cort]]'', {{ussc|369|367|1962}}
 * ''[[Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez]]'', {{ussc|372|144|1963}} – the Court struck down a law revoking citizenship for remaining outside the United States in order to avoid conscription into the armed forces
 * ''[[Rosenberg v. Fleuti]]'', {{ussc|374|449|1963}}
@@ Line 134: / Line 178: @@
 * ''[[Giova v. Rosenberg]]'', {{ussc|379|18|1964}}
 * ''[[Zemel v. Rusk]]'', {{ussc|381|1|1965}}
+* ''[[Soric v. INS]]'', {{ussc|382|285|1965}}
 * ''[[INS v. Errico]]'', {{ussc|385|214|1966}}
 * ''[[Woodby v. INS]]'', {{ussc|385|276|1966}}
@@ Line 191: / Line 236: @@
 * ''[[Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca]]'', {{ussc|480|421|1987}}
 * ''[[United States v. Mendoza-Lopez]]'', {{ussc|481|828|1987}}
+* ''[[Reagan v. Abourezk]]'', {{ussc|484|1|1987}}
 * ''[[Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Abudu]]'', {{ussc|485|94|1988}}
+* ''[[Kungys v. United States]]'', {{ussc|485|759|1988}}
 * ''[[Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Pangilinan]]'', {{ussc|486|875|1988}}
 * ''[[United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez]]'', {{ussc|494|259|1990}}
@@ Line 209: / Line 256: @@
 {{div col end}}
-== 21st Century ==
+== 21st century ==
 {{div col}}
 * ''[[Nguyen v. INS]]'', {{ussc|533|53|2001}}
@@ Line 287: / Line 334: @@
 * ''[[United States v. Texas (2023)|United States v. Texas]]'', {{ussc|docket=22-58|volume=599|year=2023}}
 * ''[[United States v. Hansen]]'', {{ussc|docket=22-179|volume=599|year=2023}}
-* ''[[Campos-Chaves v. Garland]]'', {{ussc|docket=22-674|volume=601|year=2024}}
 * ''[[Wilkinson v. Garland]]'', {{ussc|docket=22-666|volume=601|year=2024}}
+* ''[[Campos-Chaves v. Garland]]'', {{ussc|docket=22-674|volume=601|year=2024}}
+* ''[[Department of State v. Muñoz]]'', {{ussc|docket=23-334|volume=602|year=2024}}
+* ''[[Bouarfa v. Mayorkas]]'', {{ussc|docket=23-583|volume=603|year=2025}}
 {{div col end}}

Lists of United States Supreme Court cases
List of cases by Court	Jay, Rutledge, and Ellsworth Courts (1789–1800) Marshall Court (1801–1835) Taney Court (1836–1864) Chase Court (1864–1873) Waite Court (1874–1888) Fuller Court (1888–1910) White Court (1910–1921) Taft Court (1921–1930) Hughes Court (1930–1941) Stone Court (1941–1946) Vinson Court (1946–1953) Warren Court (1953–1969) Burger Court (1969–1986) Rehnquist Court (1986–2005) Roberts Court (2005–present)	Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Complete list	List of cases by volume (United States Reports)
By recent term	1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
By subject matter	Abortion Arbitration Capital punishment First Amendment Immigration Indian tribes Intellectual property Copyright Patents Trademarks Legal standing LGBTQ rights Mental health Military Taxation
Other lists	Landmark decisions Pending cases In-chambers opinions Certiorari before judgment Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted

THC Science

Bringing Science to the Cannabis Conversation!

Cannabis Ruderalis

Revision as of 15:02, 29 April 2024

18th century

19th century

20th century

21st century

See also

Leave a Reply