Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
141.211.172.248 (talk)
→‎See also: unrelated things
→‎top: CORRECT [the value of] the "title" field (was this "{{cite web}}" template instance composed -- perhaps -- by some robot? or what?) and enhance some of the other fields, in *** the "{{cite web}}" template instance *** for footnote number "[2]". Add -- (among other things) -- a "QUOTE" field ... for which it was hard to choose one "quote" to include ... because this interview is so chock FULL of amazingly juicy QUOTEs. ["!"] That is why it was so difficult, to choose just "one" of them!
 
(437 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Pejorative American political term referring to hypocrisy in liberals}}
{{Mergeinto|Liberal elite|date=December 2006}}
{{use mdy dates |date=February 2021}}
'''Limousine liberal''' is a pejorative [[United States|American]] [[politics|political]]
[[File:Mega limo - Flickr - dave 7 (1).jpg|thumb|The term references [[limousine]]s as a symbol of affluence.]]
term for a [[wealth]]y [[American liberalism|liberal]] person who claims to have a deep concern for [[poverty|the poor]], but is not actually directly engaged with them on a day to day basis. The term can also carry the connotation of expressing concern for the poor but not spending any considerable portion of one's wealth to help them.


'''Limousine liberal''' and '''latte liberal''' are pejorative U.S. [[politics|political]] terms used to illustrate [[Hypocrisy|hypocritical]] behavior by political [[Modern liberalism in the United States|liberals]] of [[upper class]] or [[upper middle class]] status. The label stems primarily from unwillingness of ''limousine liberals'' to practice the views they purport to uphold, e.g. calling for the use of [[public transportation]] while frequently using privately-owned luxury transportation, especially by [[limousines]] or [[private jet]]s in the case of the extremely affluent,<ref>''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' . [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319210156/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1599714,00.html "Limousine Liberal Hypocrisy"] by [[Charles Krauthammer]]. Published March 16, 2007.</ref> claiming [[environmental consciousness]] but driving [[Fuel economy in automobiles|fuel inefficient]] vehicles, or ostensibly supporting [[public education]] while sending their children to exclusive [[private school]]s with high [[tuition fees]].<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=130020147| title = Davis Guggenheim, Looking For A Hero At Your House | website = [[NPR]] | others = (hosts: David Greene and Robert Siegel; interview of Davis Guggenheim, the director of a documentary [movie] called "Waiting for Superman" conducted by co-host Melissa Block; including [briefly] a mini interview with a fifth grader living in East L.A. named "Daisy" -- also by Melissa Block); also, an interview with Steven Farr, (Chief Knowledge Officer, Teach for America) also conducted by co-host Melissa Block.| quote = <br/><br/>Mr. FARR: [...] What they're aiming for is a room where all the students are so invested in wanting to learn, they're monitoring themselves. And I had this wonderful experience in Houston one time, where there was a fifth-grade girl. She was doing some work in this classroom with an amazing teacher. And I crouched down by the girl and I asked her: Could you just tell me a little bit about what you're learning?<br/><br/>And she said: You know, could you ask me later? I'm kind of busy. [...]<br/><br/>BLOCK: She just didn't have time for you.<br/><br/>Mr. FARR: No, it was fantastic. I loved it.<br/><br/>(Soundbite of laughter)}}</ref>
The term was coined by 1969 [[United States Democratic Party|Democratic]] [[New York City]] [[mayor]]al hopeful [[Mario Procaccino]] to describe Mayor [[John Lindsay]] and his wealthy [[Manhattan]] backers. It carried an implicit accusation that they were insulated from all negative consequences of their programs intended to benefit the poor, and that ill consequences would be borne in the main by those in the lower class who were not so poor as to be beneficiaries. In particular, Procaccino criticized Lindsay for favoring unemployed blacks over working-class white ethnics.


==Formation and early use==
In the [[1970s]], the term was applied to wealthy liberal supporters of open-housing and [[Forced busing|school busing]]. In [[Boston, Massachusetts]], supporters of busing, such as Senator [[Edward Kennedy]] and [[Judge Arthur Garrity]], both sent their children to private schools or lived in affluent [[suburb]]s. To some [[South Boston, Massachusetts|South Boston]] residents, Garrity's support of a plan that "[[racial integration|integrated]]" their children with blacks and his apparent unwillingness to do the same with his own children, seemed like hypocrisy.
===Procaccino campaign===
[[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] [[New York City]] mayoral hopeful [[Mario Procaccino]] coined the term "limousine liberal" to describe incumbent [[Mayor]] [[John Lindsay]] and his wealthy [[Manhattan]] backers during a heated [[New York City mayoral election, 1969|1969 campaign]]. Historian [[David Callahan]] says that Procaccino:


{{Blockquote|conjured up an acid image of hypocritical wealthy dogooders insulated from the negative fallout of their bad ideas. This theme has remained a staple of conservative attacks ever since.<ref>{{cite book|author=David Callahan|title=Fortunes of Change: The Rise of the Liberal Rich and the Remaking of America|url=https://archive.org/details/fortunesofchange0000call|url-access=registration|year=2010|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|page=[https://archive.org/details/fortunesofchange0000call/page/123 123]}}</ref>}}
By the late 1990s and early 21st century, the term has also come to be applied to those who purport to support [[environmentalist]] or "green" goals, such as [[mass transit]], yet still drive large SUVs or literally have a limousine and driver. This term is also applied to those who support other liberal beliefs, such as gun control, but don't practice them themselves. For example, [[Rosie O'Donnell]] is a staunch supporter of strict gun control laws, yet insists her own bodyguards carry a concealed weapon.


It was a [[Populism|populist]] and [[producerism|producerist]] epithet, carrying an implicit accusation that the people it described were insulated from all negative consequences of their programs purported to benefit the poor and that the costs and consequences of such programs would be borne in the main by [[working class]] or [[lower middle class]] people who were not so poor as to be beneficiaries themselves. In particular, Procaccino criticized Lindsay for favoring unemployed minorities, ex. blacks and Hispanics, over working-class [[white ethnic]]s.<ref>''[[The New York Times]]''. [https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D02EFD61E38F936A15752C0A96E958260&n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/People/L/Lindsay,%20John%20V. "Mayoral Follies, The 1969 Edition "] Published January 25, 1998.</ref>
A recent and related term is ''[[Lexus]] Liberal'', which refers to leftists of the upper-middle class. Unlike the limousine variety, the term is usually used to deride a person's supposed lack of common sense concerning politics and society despite having completed some sort of higher education. "Lexus liberals" supposedly demonstrate naïve ignorance as opposed to hypocrisy.{{Fact|date=February 2007}}


One Procaccino campaign memo attacked "rich super-[[assimilation (sociology)|assimilated]] people who live on [[Fifth Avenue]] and maintain some choice [[mansions]] outside the city and have no feeling for the small [[middle class]] shopkeeper, home owner, etc. They preach the politics of confrontation and condone violent upheaval in society because they are not touched by it and are protected by their [[courtiers]]".<ref>''The Ungovernable City: John Lindsay and His Struggle to Save New York'' by Vincent J. Cannato, [https://books.google.com/books?id=Upv5ezVPBOMC&dq=%22john+lindsay%22+%22limousine+liberal%22+mansions&pg=PA428 page 428].</ref> ''[[The Independent]]'' later stated that "Lindsay came across as all style and no substance, a 'limousine liberal' who knew nothing of the concerns of the same '[[Silent Majority (Politics)|silent majority]]' that was carrying [[Richard Nixon]] to the White House at the very same time."<ref>''[[The Independent]].'' [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_20001222/ai_n14346783 "Obituary: John Lindsay "] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080107210317/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_20001222/ai_n14346783 |date=2008-01-07 }}.Written December 22, 2000 by Rupert Cornwell.</ref>
==Other countries==
In [[Australia]] and [[New Zealand]], a roughly equivalent insult of ''[[chardonnay socialist]]'' is used; in the [[United Kingdom]] the phrase ''[[champagne socialist]]'' or [[Bollinger]] [[Bolshevik]] is preferred, and in [[France]] such people are referred to as the ''[[gauche caviar]]'' ("caviar left"). In the [[United States]], the synonymous phrases "[[latte]] liberal" and "lakefront liberal" are sometimes used.


==Later use==
In the [[Netherlands]], a near equivalent of "limousine liberal" would be "salon socialist". The point of a salon socialist, however, is not that he does not spend money charitably, but rather that he or she is not actively involved in the [[class struggle]]. Charity is seen as a capitalist and conservative project, because it leaves the alleged social structures of exploitation intact, and would even reinforce them (by making the poor dependent on the rich for charity). Charity also requires the application of freedom of choice to private property, which is generally opposed by the left.
In the 1970s, the term was applied to wealthy liberal supporters of open-housing and [[desegregation busing|forced school busing]] who did not make use of either of these themselves.<ref>[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4155/is_20060730/ai_n16647842 "A liberal interpretation: The current definition of right- and left-"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080107210307/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4155/is_20060730/ai_n16647842 |date=2008-01-07 }} by Geoffrey Nunberg. ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]''. Published July 30, 2006.</ref> In [[Boston]], [[Massachusetts]], supporters of busing, such as Senator [[Ted Kennedy]], sent their children to private schools and lived in affluent [[suburb]]s. To some [[South Boston, Massachusetts|South Boston]] residents, Kennedy's support of a plan that "[[racial integration|integrated]]" their children with blacks and his apparent unwillingness to do the same with his own children, was hypocrisy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/top/features/documents/01563014.htm|title=News/Features<!-- Bot generated title --> |publisher=Boston Phoenix|access-date=2007-11-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071024024419/http://bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/top/features/documents/01563014.htm |archive-date=2007-10-24 |url-status=dead}}</ref> President [[Jimmy Carter|Carter]] was suspected of this in the later 1970s when he promised better conditions for people in [[New York City]]'s [[South Bronx]] and [[Los Angeles]]'s [[Watts, Los Angeles|Watts]] when he visited these cities in respective 1977 and 1978 and none of these improvements happened.


By the late 1990s and early 21st century, the term has also come to be applied to those who support [[environmentalist]] or "green" goals, such as [[mass transit]], yet drive large [[SUVs]] or literally have a limousine and driver. Sam Dealey, writing in ''[[The Weekly Standard]]'', applied the term to [[Sheila Jackson-Lee]] for being "routinely chauffeured the one short block to work—in a government car, by a member of her staff, at the taxpayers' expense."<ref>{{cite magazine |last1=Dealey |first1=Sam |title=Sheila Jackson Lee, Limousine Liberal |url=https://www.weeklystandard.com/sam-dealey/sheila-jackson-lee-limousine-liberal |access-date=4 April 2019 |magazine=The Weekly Standard |date=11 February 2002}}</ref> The term was also used disparagingly in a 2004 episode of ''[[Law & Order]]'' by [[Fred Thompson]]'s character, [[Arthur Branch]], to criticize the politics and beliefs of his more liberal colleague, [[Serena Southerlyn]]. ''[[South Park]]'''s creators [[Trey Parker]] and [[Matt Stone]] poked fun at the tendency of some liberals to be more concerned with image than actually helping the earth in the episode "[[Smug Alert!]]".{{cn|date=April 2019}}
Note that in the United States, the usage of the term ''liberal'' differs from most of the world. [[American liberalism]] is a [[left-wing politics|left]]-of-center politics; in many countries outside the United States, "[[liberalism]]" refers to [[right-wing politics|right]]-of-center politics, and particularly to support for [[laissez faire]] capitalism, or [[libertarianism]].

''[[The New York Observer]]'' applied the term to [[2008 Democratic Party presidential primaries|2008 Democratic presidential candidate]] [[John Edwards]] for paying $400 ({{Inflation|US|400|2007|fmt=eq|r=-1}}) for a haircut and, according to the newspaper, "lectures about poverty while living in gated opulence".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Kornacki |first1=Steve |title=Is Edwards An Easy Mark? |url=http://www.observer.com/2007/edwards-easy-mark |access-date=February 7, 2021 |work=[[The New York Observer]] |date=May 28, 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080107124004/http://www.observer.com/2007/edwards-easy-mark |archive-date=January 7, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Steve Fraser|title=The Limousine Liberal: How an Incendiary Image United the Right and Fractured America|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cpzSDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA4|year=2016|publisher=Basic Books|page=4|isbn=9780465055661 }}</ref>

In 2009, the term was applied by some commentators to former Senate Majority Leader and then-[[Barack Obama]] cabinet appointee [[Tom Daschle]] for failing to pay back taxes and interest on the use of a limousine service.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.charleston.net/news/2009/feb/03/pull_this_limousine_liberal70391/ |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120729165317/http://www.charleston.net/news/2009/feb/03/pull_this_limousine_liberal70391/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=2012-07-29 |title=The Post and Courier &#124; Charleston SC, News, Sports, Entertainment |publisher=Charleston.net |date=2013-05-16 |access-date=2013-06-04 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.newsherald.com/articles/government_71658___article.html/pay_country.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090217172235/http://www.newsherald.com/articles/government_71658___article.html/pay_country.html |title=Future generations will pay for our mistakes |publisher=Newsherald.com |date=February 8, 2009 |archive-date=February 17, 2009 |access-date=June 4, 2013 |first=Ron |last=Hart}}|</ref>

Civil rights leader [[Al Sharpton]] used the term ''latte liberal'' to criticize (mostly white and high-income) left-leaning people "sit[ing] around [[the Hamptons]]" who advocated for the [[defund the police]] movement and ignored the concerns of African-Americans that suffer under high crime rates and rely on a strong police force.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/media/515448-msnbcs-sharpton-defunding-police-something-a-latte-liberal-may-go-for|title=MSNBC's Sharpton: Defunding police 'something a latte liberal may go for'|access-date=December 7, 2021|date=September 8, 2020|work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|author=Joe Concha}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/al-sharpton-defund-the-police-is-just-something-latte-liberals-support|title=Al Sharpton: Defund the Police Is Just Something 'Latte Liberals' Support|access-date=December 7, 2021|date=September 8, 2020|work=[[The Daily Beast]]|author=Justin Baragona}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
{{div col|colwidth=20em}}
*[[Champagne socialist]]
*[[Boba liberal]]
*[[Bobo (socio-economic group)]]
*''[[Bobos in Paradise]]''
*[[Champagne socialist]]
*[[Chattering class]]
*[[Gauche caviar]]
*[[Liberal elite]]
*[[Luxury belief]]
*[[Radical chic]]
{{div col end}}

==References==
{{Reflist}}


==Further reading==
[[Category:Pejorative political terms]]
* [[Francia, Peter L.]], et al. "Limousine liberals and corporate conservatives: The financial constituencies of the democratic and republican parties." ''Social Science Quarterly'' 86.4 (2005): 761–778.
[[Category:Pejorative terms for people]]
* Fraser, Steve. ''The Limousine Liberal: How an Incendiary Image United the Right and Fractured America'' (Basic, 2016). viii, 291 pp.
[[Category:American political terms]]
* Stark, Andrew. "Limousine liberals, welfare conservatives: On belief, interest, and inconsistency in democratic discourse." ''Political Theory'' 25.4 (1997): 475–501.


==External links==
[[fr:Gauche caviar]]
*{{Wikiquote-inline}}
{{Liberalism}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Limousine Liberal}}
[[Category:Class-related slurs]]
[[Category:Liberalism]]
[[Category:Upper class]]
[[Category:Political metaphors referring to people]]
[[Category:Political terminology of the United States]]
[[Category:Political pejoratives]]

Latest revision as of 18:39, 16 May 2024

The term references limousines as a symbol of affluence.

Limousine liberal and latte liberal are pejorative U.S. political terms used to illustrate hypocritical behavior by political liberals of upper class or upper middle class status. The label stems primarily from unwillingness of limousine liberals to practice the views they purport to uphold, e.g. calling for the use of public transportation while frequently using privately-owned luxury transportation, especially by limousines or private jets in the case of the extremely affluent,[1] claiming environmental consciousness but driving fuel inefficient vehicles, or ostensibly supporting public education while sending their children to exclusive private schools with high tuition fees.[2]

Formation and early use[edit]

Procaccino campaign[edit]

Democratic New York City mayoral hopeful Mario Procaccino coined the term "limousine liberal" to describe incumbent Mayor John Lindsay and his wealthy Manhattan backers during a heated 1969 campaign. Historian David Callahan says that Procaccino:

conjured up an acid image of hypocritical wealthy dogooders insulated from the negative fallout of their bad ideas. This theme has remained a staple of conservative attacks ever since.[3]

It was a populist and producerist epithet, carrying an implicit accusation that the people it described were insulated from all negative consequences of their programs purported to benefit the poor and that the costs and consequences of such programs would be borne in the main by working class or lower middle class people who were not so poor as to be beneficiaries themselves. In particular, Procaccino criticized Lindsay for favoring unemployed minorities, ex. blacks and Hispanics, over working-class white ethnics.[4]

One Procaccino campaign memo attacked "rich super-assimilated people who live on Fifth Avenue and maintain some choice mansions outside the city and have no feeling for the small middle class shopkeeper, home owner, etc. They preach the politics of confrontation and condone violent upheaval in society because they are not touched by it and are protected by their courtiers".[5] The Independent later stated that "Lindsay came across as all style and no substance, a 'limousine liberal' who knew nothing of the concerns of the same 'silent majority' that was carrying Richard Nixon to the White House at the very same time."[6]

Later use[edit]

In the 1970s, the term was applied to wealthy liberal supporters of open-housing and forced school busing who did not make use of either of these themselves.[7] In Boston, Massachusetts, supporters of busing, such as Senator Ted Kennedy, sent their children to private schools and lived in affluent suburbs. To some South Boston residents, Kennedy's support of a plan that "integrated" their children with blacks and his apparent unwillingness to do the same with his own children, was hypocrisy.[8] President Carter was suspected of this in the later 1970s when he promised better conditions for people in New York City's South Bronx and Los Angeles's Watts when he visited these cities in respective 1977 and 1978 and none of these improvements happened.

By the late 1990s and early 21st century, the term has also come to be applied to those who support environmentalist or "green" goals, such as mass transit, yet drive large SUVs or literally have a limousine and driver. Sam Dealey, writing in The Weekly Standard, applied the term to Sheila Jackson-Lee for being "routinely chauffeured the one short block to work—in a government car, by a member of her staff, at the taxpayers' expense."[9] The term was also used disparagingly in a 2004 episode of Law & Order by Fred Thompson's character, Arthur Branch, to criticize the politics and beliefs of his more liberal colleague, Serena Southerlyn. South Park's creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone poked fun at the tendency of some liberals to be more concerned with image than actually helping the earth in the episode "Smug Alert!".[citation needed]

The New York Observer applied the term to 2008 Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards for paying $400 (equivalent to $590 in 2023) for a haircut and, according to the newspaper, "lectures about poverty while living in gated opulence".[10][11]

In 2009, the term was applied by some commentators to former Senate Majority Leader and then-Barack Obama cabinet appointee Tom Daschle for failing to pay back taxes and interest on the use of a limousine service.[12][13]

Civil rights leader Al Sharpton used the term latte liberal to criticize (mostly white and high-income) left-leaning people "sit[ing] around the Hamptons" who advocated for the defund the police movement and ignored the concerns of African-Americans that suffer under high crime rates and rely on a strong police force.[14][15]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Time . "Limousine Liberal Hypocrisy" by Charles Krauthammer. Published March 16, 2007.
  2. ^ "Davis Guggenheim, Looking For A Hero At Your House". NPR. (hosts: David Greene and Robert Siegel; interview of Davis Guggenheim, the director of a documentary [movie] called "Waiting for Superman" conducted by co-host Melissa Block; including [briefly] a mini interview with a fifth grader living in East L.A. named "Daisy" -- also by Melissa Block); also, an interview with Steven Farr, (Chief Knowledge Officer, Teach for America) also conducted by co-host Melissa Block.

    Mr. FARR: [...] What they're aiming for is a room where all the students are so invested in wanting to learn, they're monitoring themselves. And I had this wonderful experience in Houston one time, where there was a fifth-grade girl. She was doing some work in this classroom with an amazing teacher. And I crouched down by the girl and I asked her: Could you just tell me a little bit about what you're learning?

    And she said: You know, could you ask me later? I'm kind of busy. [...]

    BLOCK: She just didn't have time for you.

    Mr. FARR: No, it was fantastic. I loved it.

    (Soundbite of laughter)
    {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  3. ^ David Callahan (2010). Fortunes of Change: The Rise of the Liberal Rich and the Remaking of America. John Wiley & Sons. p. 123.
  4. ^ The New York Times. "Mayoral Follies, The 1969 Edition " Published January 25, 1998.
  5. ^ The Ungovernable City: John Lindsay and His Struggle to Save New York by Vincent J. Cannato, page 428.
  6. ^ The Independent. "Obituary: John Lindsay " Archived 2008-01-07 at the Wayback Machine.Written December 22, 2000 by Rupert Cornwell.
  7. ^ "A liberal interpretation: The current definition of right- and left-" Archived 2008-01-07 at the Wayback Machine by Geoffrey Nunberg. Chicago Sun-Times. Published July 30, 2006.
  8. ^ "News/Features". Boston Phoenix. Archived from the original on October 24, 2007. Retrieved November 10, 2007.
  9. ^ Dealey, Sam (February 11, 2002). "Sheila Jackson Lee, Limousine Liberal". The Weekly Standard. Retrieved April 4, 2019.
  10. ^ Kornacki, Steve (May 28, 2007). "Is Edwards An Easy Mark?". The New York Observer. Archived from the original on January 7, 2008. Retrieved February 7, 2021.
  11. ^ Steve Fraser (2016). The Limousine Liberal: How an Incendiary Image United the Right and Fractured America. Basic Books. p. 4. ISBN 9780465055661.
  12. ^ "The Post and Courier | Charleston SC, News, Sports, Entertainment". Charleston.net. May 16, 2013. Archived from the original on July 29, 2012. Retrieved June 4, 2013.
  13. ^ Hart, Ron (February 8, 2009). "Future generations will pay for our mistakes". Newsherald.com. Archived from the original on February 17, 2009. Retrieved June 4, 2013.|
  14. ^ Joe Concha (September 8, 2020). "MSNBC's Sharpton: Defunding police 'something a latte liberal may go for'". The Hill. Retrieved December 7, 2021.
  15. ^ Justin Baragona (September 8, 2020). "Al Sharpton: Defund the Police Is Just Something 'Latte Liberals' Support". The Daily Beast. Retrieved December 7, 2021.

Further reading[edit]

  • Francia, Peter L., et al. "Limousine liberals and corporate conservatives: The financial constituencies of the democratic and republican parties." Social Science Quarterly 86.4 (2005): 761–778.
  • Fraser, Steve. The Limousine Liberal: How an Incendiary Image United the Right and Fractured America (Basic, 2016). viii, 291 pp.
  • Stark, Andrew. "Limousine liberals, welfare conservatives: On belief, interest, and inconsistency in democratic discourse." Political Theory 25.4 (1997): 475–501.

External links[edit]

  • Quotations related to Limousine liberal at Wikiquote

Leave a Reply