Cannabis Ruderalis


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

30 April 2024

29 April 2024

18 April 2024

10 April 2024

1 April 2024

23 March 2024

20 March 2024

18 March 2024

12 March 2024

  • curprev 07:1007:10, 12 March 2024GigaMigaDigaChad talk contribs 114,732 bytes −1 Undid revision 1213308944 by GigaMigaDigaChad (talk) undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 07:1007:10, 12 March 2024GigaMigaDigaChad talk contribs 114,733 bytes +1 To clarify: of course this isn't a defense of such material, I personally find such distasteful and content specifically made to simulate actual children in porn to me should be made illegal outright, however at the same time much as the focus in this article represents cartoon/anime art such as "loli/shota", which I feel that conflating the two in my mind seems rather unfair since lolicon has no direct relation to utilizing actual children nor has concrete proof of harm despite critics claims undo Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 07:0107:01, 12 March 2024GigaMigaDigaChad talk contribs 114,732 bytes +17 By that logic, we could say the same for violent videogames or rap music since "Educated individuals" including people with legitimate professions have attacked all of them (Ex, Numerous Presidents have sought to restrict violent videogames), yet both the attacks against violent video games and rap are generally regarded as "moral panics" regardless since the burden of proof has not been met with sufficient evidence to confirm concretely such accusations of affecting reality. undo

10 March 2024

  • curprev 21:0821:08, 10 March 2024MagiTagi talk contribs 114,715 bytes −18 Re-excluded Moral Panic, while the hypothetical average person may not be able to formulate exact arguments, the pile of arguments made by educated individuals, experts, and governments can conclude that the use of Moral Panic to imply irrationality (and implicit lack of reason) is wrong. undo

9 March 2024

  • curprev 12:2312:23, 9 March 2024Dicklyon talk contribs 114,733 bytes −18 case fix undo
  • curprev 10:0410:04, 9 March 2024GigaMigaDigaChad talk contribs 114,751 bytes +18 I do very much agree to a large agree that it does seem like a hit-piece however I do think it has some relation, as in recent years on social media, simulated porn of cartoon or anime characters of fictional minors and animals have boiled over into serious controversy over fiction vs. reality, with both lolicons/shotacons and furries being targeted in recent years for such fictional content as if it was akin to partaking in said acts in reality undo Tag: Undo

23 February 2024

21 February 2024

20 February 2024

  • curprev 15:0915:09, 20 February 2024Brians198 talk contribs 114,648 bytes −2,671 →‎Fictional child pornography illegal: I don't think it's illegal in Norway. I don't think it's illegal in Norway. https://lovdata.no/dokument/LASTR/avgjorelse/la-2018-171257?q=la-2018-171257 <= Nothing on this page suggests that the man charged was guilty of using hentai or other sexually explicit images, but rather possession of actual child pornography. https://lovdata.no/dokument/LASTR/avgjorelse/la-2018-70393?q=LA-2018-70393 <= And from what's on this page, it appears the man was char... undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

3 February 2024

2 February 2024

30 January 2024

29 January 2024

  • curprev 23:2623:26, 29 January 2024Elmhead49 talk contribs 114,242 bytes +45 Added specificity and (hopefully) concluding editorial debate. Obscenity -- as both a mere concept and legal entity under US law -- is definitively subjective and vague. As such, 'United States' section belongs in 'Gray Area' and not in 'Illegal', since many works that are not 'obscene' may still be illegal in other countries. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

28 January 2024

  • curprev 21:5621:56, 28 January 2024140.114.236.106 talk 114,197 bytes −214 The move overlooked the subjectivity of "merit" and "overly offensive.", as described within the section, which vary across communities and in judicial interpretations. The U.S. also allows possession under conditions unlike others listed as "illegal". Also, the categories aim to provide guidance on jurisdictions approaches. Given laws that both prohibit and permit based on specific criteria, categorizing them strictly as "illegal" or "legal" is misleading, even without regard to the "vagueness" undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 15:1715:17, 28 January 2024MagiTagi talk contribsm 114,411 bytes +214 Undid revision 1199821630 by 140.114.236.106 (talk) The subtleties/exceptions are only content that has merit in some field or is not overly offensive (which doesn't mean the law is grey), PROTECT is not subjective about its wording or rationale, as a law should be. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 02:0002:00, 28 January 2024140.114.236.106 talk 114,197 bytes −214 Undid previous revision. Rationale is pretty subjective, so one could argue that moving the United States into an outright ""Illegal"" category overlooks the subtleties mentioned in the section and may misrepresent how laws are applied in practice. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

27 January 2024

  • curprev 15:0215:02, 27 January 2024MagiTagi talk contribs 114,411 bytes +214 Moved US from Gray Area to Illegal, if you've read PROTECT, you'll find it's not exactly "gray", and it's certainly not as nebulous as the other nations in the Grey category. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

23 January 2024

21 January 2024

18 January 2024

15 January 2024

  • curprev 02:4102:41, 15 January 2024MagiTagi talk contribs 113,489 bytes +1,158 reverted a revert, revert did not provide rationale and user has had no previous contributions. (so probably not done in good faith, correct me if I'm wrong though!) undo

13 January 2024

12 January 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Leave a Reply