Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
→‎Other views: no mention of mercola in this source
Reverted good faith edits by Tornado chaser (talk): If you could stop buffing up articles on charlatans, that'd be great. (TW)
Tag: Undo
Line 31: Line 31:
Phyllis Entis, a microbiologist and food safety expert, highlighted Mercola.com as an example of websites "likely to mislead consumers by offering one-sided, incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading information."<ref name="Entis"/>
Phyllis Entis, a microbiologist and food safety expert, highlighted Mercola.com as an example of websites "likely to mislead consumers by offering one-sided, incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading information."<ref name="Entis"/>


In 2016, Mercola agreed to pay up to $5.3 million restitution after federal regulators complained that he made false claims about tanning beds that he sold.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/an-anti-vaxxers-new-crusade|title=An Anti-Vaxxer’s New Crusade|website=Newyorker.com|accessdate=27 November 2018}}</ref>
In 2016, Mercola agreed to reimburse up to $5.3 million restitution after federal regulators complained that he made false claims about tanning beds that he sold.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/an-anti-vaxxers-new-crusade|title=An Anti-Vaxxer’s New Crusade|website=Newyorker.com|accessdate=27 November 2018}}</ref>

=== Vaccinations ===
Mercola has been highly critical of [[vaccines]] and [[vaccination policy]], claiming that too many vaccines are given too soon during infancy. He hosts anti-vaccination activists on his website, advocates other measures rather than vaccination in many cases such as using vitamin D rather than a flu shot<ref>Mercola, Joseph. (February 27, 2017) "[https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/02/27/vitamin-d-better-than-flu-vaccine.aspx Vitamin D Is More Effective Than Flu Vaccine, Study Says]", ''Mercola''. Retrieved September 24, 2018.</ref> despite the data not being conclusive<ref>{{cite news |last1=Gallgher |first1=James |title=Vitamin D pills 'could stop colds or flu |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/health-38988982 |accessdate=1 August 2018 |agency=BBC |date=16 February 2017}}</ref> and strongly criticizes [[influenza vaccine]]s. During 2011, he reportedly donated $1 million to organizations that oppose vaccination.<ref name=Groopman >{{Citation |last=Groopman |first=Jerome |date=March 5, 2015 |title=There's No Way Out of It! | publisher=[[The New York Review of Books]] |url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2015/mar/05/vaccinate-or-not/ |accessdate=February 15, 2015 }}</ref>

Mercola has said that [[thimerosal]], a vaccine preservative, is [[thimerosal controversy|harmful]] due to its [[Ethylmercury|mercury]] content.<ref>Mercola, Joseph. (October 31, 2011) "[https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/10/31/flu-vaccination-epa-safety-limit-for-mercury.aspx Flu Vaccination: The Hidden Risks in This Heavily Promoted Seasonal Routine...]", ''Mercola''. Retrieved September 24, 2018.</ref></ref> Thimerosal is no longer present in most vaccines given to young children in the U.S., though it is still present in some vaccines approved for adults.<ref>{{cite web | title = Thimerosal in Vaccines Questions and Answers | url=http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/QuestionsaboutVaccines/UCM070430}}</ref> Extensive evidence has accumulated since 1999 showing that this preservative is safe,<ref name=Clements/> with the [[World Health Organization]] stating in 2006 that "there is no evidence of toxicity in infants, children or adults exposed to thiomersal in vaccines."<ref name=Clements>{{cite journal |vauthors=Clements CJ, McIntyre PB |title=When science is not enough - a risk/benefit profile of thiomersal-containing vaccines |journal=Expert Opin Drug Saf |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=17–29 |date=January 2006 |pmid=16370953 |doi=10.1517/14740338.5.1.17 |url=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title= Thiomersal and vaccines |author= Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety |publisher= World Health Organization |url=http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/topics/thiomersal/en/index.html |date=2006-07-14 |accessdate=2007-11-20}}</ref>


===Other views===
===Other views===
Other controversial views Mercola supports include:
Other controversial views Mercola supports include:
*Dietary recommendations on food consumption that often put him at odds with mainstream dietary advice.<ref name = Entis>{{cite book | pages = [https://books.google.ca/books?id=NLKzbOOzffgC&pg=PA300&#v=onepage&q&f=false 300] | last = Entis | first = P | title = Food safety: old habits, new perspectives | isbn = 1-55581-417-4 | publisher = [[Wiley-Blackwell]] | year = 2007 }}</ref>
*Dietary recommendations on food consumption that often put him at odds with mainstream dietary advice.<ref name = Entis>{{cite book | pages = [https://books.google.ca/books?id=NLKzbOOzffgC&pg=PA300&#v=onepage&q&f=false 300] | last = Entis | first = P | title = Food safety: old habits, new perspectives | isbn = 1-55581-417-4 | publisher = [[Wiley-Blackwell]] | year = 2007 }}</ref>
*Advocacy on the labeling and health of genetically modified food.<ref>The Atlantic [https://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2014/05/want-to-know-if-your-food-is-genetically-modified/370812/ Want to Know If Your Food Is Genetically Modified? By Molly Ball MAY 14, 2014]</ref> As well as for their elimination entirely from the market.<ref>Mercola, Joseph. (February 29, 2012) "[https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/02/29/new-vermont-gmo-labeling-policy-officially-introduced.aspx The One and Only Way You Can Tell if a Food is GMO-Free]", ''Mercola''. Retrieved September 24, 2018.</ref>
*Mercola.com has featured positive presentations of the claims of [[AIDS denialism|AIDS denialists]], a fringe group which denies the role of HIV in causing [[AIDS]].<ref name=ChicagoMag/>
*Claims that microwaving food [[microwave chemistry|alters its chemistry]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/05/18/microwave-hazards.aspx|title=8 reasons you need to throw away your microwave immediately|website=Articles.mercola.com|accessdate=27 November 2018}}</ref> despite consensus that microwaving food does not adversely affect nutrient content compared to conventionally prepared food.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1080/10408398209527340 |vauthors=Cross GA, Fung DY |title=The effect of microwaves on nutrient value of foods |journal=Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr |volume=16 |issue=4 |pages=355–81 |year=1982 |pmid=7047080}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/17/health/17real.html |title=The Claim: Microwave Ovens Kill Nutrients in Food |work=[[New York Times]] |date=October 17, 2006 |first=Anahad | last = O'Connor}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Hoffman CJ, Zabik ME |title=Effects of microwave cooking/reheating on nutrients and food systems: a review of recent studies |journal=J Am Diet Assoc |volume=85 |issue=8 |pages=922–6 |date=August 1985 |pmid=3894486 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/microwave-cooking-and-nutrition|title=Microwave cooking and nutrition |publisher=[[Harvard Medical School]] |year=2008 |accessdate=August 20, 2010}}</ref>
*Opposition to [[homogenization (chemistry)|homogenization]], claiming that homogenized milk has little nutritional value and contributes to a variety of negative health effects,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.mercola.com/article/milk/no-milk.aspx |access-date=July 22, 2018 |title=Don't Drink Your Milk! |last=Mercola |first=Joseph |website=Mercola.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-mercola/dairy-free-avoid-this-pop_b_558447.html |access-date=July 22, 2018 |title=Why You Shouldn't Drink Pasteurized Milk |last=Mercola |first=Joseph |website=Huffington Post | date = June 3, 2010 }}</ref> despite scientists considering that belief "tenuous and implausible",<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1001/jama.234.6.630 |vauthors=Bierman EL, Shank RE |title=Editorial: Homogenized milk and coronary artery disease: theory, not fact |journal=JAMA |volume=234 |issue=6 |pages=630–1 |date=November 1975 |pmid=1242197}}</ref> stating "Experimental evidence has failed to substantiate, and in many cases has refuted, the xanthine oxidase/plasmalogen depletion hypothesis."<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Clifford AJ, Ho CY, Swenerton H |title=Homogenized bovine milk xanthine oxidase: a critique of the hypothesis relating to plasmalogen depletion and cardiovascular disease |journal=Am. J. Clin. Nutr. |volume=38 |issue=2 |pages=327–32 |date=August 1983 |pmid=6349321 }}</ref>
*[[HIV/AIDS denialism|Questioning whether HIV is the cause of AIDS]], claiming manifestations of [[AIDS]] (including [[opportunistic infection]]s and death) may be the result of "psychological stress" brought on by the belief that [[HIV]] is harmful.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110818091231/http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/01/02/azt.aspx|title=Can AZT and Other "Antiretrovirals" Cause AIDS?|date=18 August 2011|website=Web.archive.org|accessdate=27 November 2018}}</ref> The [[scientific community]] considers the evidence that HIV causes AIDS conclusive.<ref name=iomreport>{{cite web | url = http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=771&page=2 | title = Confronting AIDS: Update 1988 | publisher = [[Institute of Medicine]] of the [[U.S. National Academy of Sciences]] | year = 1988 | quote = …the evidence that HIV causes AIDS is scientifically conclusive.}}</ref><ref name=niaid>{{cite web | url = http://www.niaid.nih.gov/topics/HIVAIDS/Understanding/howHIVCausesAIDS/Pages/HIVcausesAIDS.aspx | title = The Evidence that HIV Causes AIDS | publisher = [[National Institutes of Health]] | date = 2010-01-14 | accessdate = 2011-02-04 }}</ref><ref name = Cohen>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1126/science.7992043| last1 = Cohen | first1 = J.| title = The Duesberg phenomenon| journal = Science| volume = 266| issue = 5191| pages = 1642–1644| year = 1994| pmid = 7992043| url = http://www.sciencemag.org/feature/data/cohen/266-5191-1642a.pdf|bibcode = 1994Sci...266.1642C }}</ref><ref name="denying science">{{cite journal |title=Denying science |journal=Nat. Med. |volume=12 |issue=4 |year=2006 |pmid=16598265 |doi=10.1038/nm0406-369|quote=To support their ideas, some AIDS denialists have also misappropriated a scientific review in ''Nature Medicine'' which opens with this reasonable statement: "Despite considerable advances in HIV science in the past 20 years, the reason why HIV-1 infection is pathogenic is still debated." |page= 369}}</ref> Mercola.com has also featured positive presentations of the claims of [[AIDS denialism|AIDS denialists]], a fringe group which denies the role of HIV in causing [[AIDS]].<ref name=ChicagoMag/>
*Claiming cancer risks arise from [[Mobile phone radiation and health|mobile phone radiation]],<ref>New York Times [https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/19/style/could-wearable-computers-be-as-harmful-as-cigarettes.html?_r=0 The Health Concerns in Wearable Tech]</ref> which is pseudoscientific.<ref>Margaret Sullivan on the New York Times' Public Editor's Journal Opinion Pages Blog . March 19, 2015 [http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03/19/a-tech-column-on-wearable-gadgets-draws-fire-as-pseudoscience/ A Tech Column on Wearable Gadgets Draws Fire as ‘Pseudoscience’]</ref>
*Claiming cancer risks arise from [[Mobile phone radiation and health|mobile phone radiation]],<ref>New York Times [https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/19/style/could-wearable-computers-be-as-harmful-as-cigarettes.html?_r=0 The Health Concerns in Wearable Tech]</ref> which is pseudoscientific.<ref>Margaret Sullivan on the New York Times' Public Editor's Journal Opinion Pages Blog . March 19, 2015 [http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03/19/a-tech-column-on-wearable-gadgets-draws-fire-as-pseudoscience/ A Tech Column on Wearable Gadgets Draws Fire as ‘Pseudoscience’]</ref>
*Claims that many commercial brands of [[sunscreen]] increase, rather than decrease, the likelihood of contracting [[skin cancer]] with high UV exposure, and instead advocating the use of natural sunscreens, some of which he markets on his website.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/04/22/new-study-shows-many-sunscreens-are-accelerating-not-preventing-cancer.aspx|title=New Study Shows Many Sunscreens are Accelerating not Preventing Cancer|website=Articles.mercola.com|accessdate=27 November 2018}}</ref> This view is not held by mainstream medical science; in 2011, the [[National Toxicology Program]] stated that "Protection against photodamage by use of broad-spectrum sunscreens is well-documented as an effective means of reducing total lifetime UV dose and, thereby, preventing or ameliorating the effects of UV radiation on both the appearance and biomechanical properties of the skin."<ref>[http://www.ntp.niehs.nih.gov/NTP/About_NTP/TRPanel/2011/January/DraftTR568.pdf Photococarcinogenesis Study of Retinoic Acid and Retinyl Palmitate] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111023170333/http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/about_ntp/TRPanel/2011/January/DraftTR568.pdf |date=2011-10-23 }}, draft technical report, National Toxicology Program</ref>


== FDA warning letters ==
== FDA warning letters ==

Revision as of 23:15, 7 December 2018

Joseph M. Mercola
Joseph Mercola, 2009
Born
Joseph Michael Mercola

(1954-07-08) July 8, 1954 (age 69)
Known forMercola.com, an alternative medicine website
Medical career
ProfessionPhysician (DO)
InstitutionsNatural Health Center
Sub-specialtiesNutrition

Joseph Michael Mercola (born 1954) is an alternative medicine proponent, osteopathic physician, and Web entrepreneur, who markets a variety of controversial dietary supplements and medical devices through his website, Mercola.com.[1] Until 2013,[2] Mercola operated the "Dr. Mercola Natural Health Center" (formerly the "Optimal Wellness Center") in Schaumburg, Illinois.[3] He wrote the books The No-Grain Diet[4] (with Alison Rose Levy) and The Great Bird Flu Hoax. Mercola criticizes many aspects of standard medical practice, such as vaccination and what he views as overuse of prescription drugs and surgery to treat diseases. On his website mercola.com, Mercola and colleagues advocate a number of unproven alternative health notions including homeopathy, and anti-vaccine positions. Mercola is a member of the political advocacy group Association of American Physicians and Surgeons as well as several alternative medicine organizations.[5]

Mercola has been criticized by business, regulatory, medical, and scientific communities. A 2006 BusinessWeek editorial stated his marketing practices relied on "slick promotion, clever use of information, and scare tactics."[3] In 2005, 2006, and 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration warned Mercola and his company that they were making illegal claims of their products' ability to detect, prevent, and treat disease.[6] The medical watchdog site Quackwatch has criticized Mercola for making "unsubstantiated claims [that] clash with those of leading medical and public health organizations and many unsubstantiated recommendations for dietary supplements."[6]

Life and career

Mercola is a 1976 graduate of the University of Illinois at Chicago and a 1982 graduate of the Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine (now Midwestern University).[7] According to Mercola's website, he is a former Chairman of Family Medicine at St. Alexius Medical Center. He has written two books which have been listed on the New York Times bestseller list: The No-Grain Diet (May 2003) and The Great Bird Flu Hoax (October 2006).[8][9] In the latter book, Mercola dismisses medical concerns over an avian influenza pandemic, asserting that the government, big business, and the mainstream media have conspired to promote the threat of avian flu in order to accrue money and power.[10] Mercola has appeared on The Dr. Oz Show[11] and The Doctors.[12]

Views and controversy

Mercola operates Mercola.com, which he has described as the most popular alternative-health website on the internet.[3] Aside from the main site, it also hosts various blog subsites, like Healthy Pets and Peak Fitness. Traffic counting from Quantcast shows the site receives about 1.9 million novel visitors per month, each returning almost ten times each month; the number of views are roughly equal to those received by the National Institutes of Health.[1] The site and his company, Mercola LLC, brought in roughly $7 million in 2010 through the sale of a variety of alternative medicine treatments and dietary supplements.[1] The site promotes a number of alternative health ideas, including the notion that homeopathy can treat autism, and that vaccinations have hidden detriments to human health.[1] An article in BusinessWeek criticized his website as using aggressive direct-marketing tactics, writing:[3]

Mercola gives the lie to the notion that holistic practitioners tend to be so absorbed in treating patients that they aren't effective businesspeople. While Mercola on his site seeks to identify with this image by distinguishing himself from "all the greed-motivated hype out there in health-care land", he is a master promoter, using every trick of traditional and Internet direct marketing to grow his business ... He is selling health-care products and services, and is calling upon an unfortunate tradition made famous by the old-time snake oil salesmen of the 1800s.

Phyllis Entis, a microbiologist and food safety expert, highlighted Mercola.com as an example of websites "likely to mislead consumers by offering one-sided, incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading information."[13]

In 2016, Mercola agreed to reimburse up to $5.3 million restitution after federal regulators complained that he made false claims about tanning beds that he sold.[14]

Vaccinations

Mercola has been highly critical of vaccines and vaccination policy, claiming that too many vaccines are given too soon during infancy. He hosts anti-vaccination activists on his website, advocates other measures rather than vaccination in many cases such as using vitamin D rather than a flu shot[15] despite the data not being conclusive[16] and strongly criticizes influenza vaccines. During 2011, he reportedly donated $1 million to organizations that oppose vaccination.[17]

Mercola has said that thimerosal, a vaccine preservative, is harmful due to its mercury content.[18]</ref> Thimerosal is no longer present in most vaccines given to young children in the U.S., though it is still present in some vaccines approved for adults.[19] Extensive evidence has accumulated since 1999 showing that this preservative is safe,[20] with the World Health Organization stating in 2006 that "there is no evidence of toxicity in infants, children or adults exposed to thiomersal in vaccines."[20][21]

Other views

Other controversial views Mercola supports include:

  • Dietary recommendations on food consumption that often put him at odds with mainstream dietary advice.[13]
  • Advocacy on the labeling and health of genetically modified food.[22] As well as for their elimination entirely from the market.[23]
  • Claims that microwaving food alters its chemistry,[24] despite consensus that microwaving food does not adversely affect nutrient content compared to conventionally prepared food.[25][26][27][28]
  • Opposition to homogenization, claiming that homogenized milk has little nutritional value and contributes to a variety of negative health effects,[29][30] despite scientists considering that belief "tenuous and implausible",[31] stating "Experimental evidence has failed to substantiate, and in many cases has refuted, the xanthine oxidase/plasmalogen depletion hypothesis."[32]
  • Questioning whether HIV is the cause of AIDS, claiming manifestations of AIDS (including opportunistic infections and death) may be the result of "psychological stress" brought on by the belief that HIV is harmful.[33] The scientific community considers the evidence that HIV causes AIDS conclusive.[34][35][36][37] Mercola.com has also featured positive presentations of the claims of AIDS denialists, a fringe group which denies the role of HIV in causing AIDS.[1]
  • Claiming cancer risks arise from mobile phone radiation,[38] which is pseudoscientific.[39]
  • Claims that many commercial brands of sunscreen increase, rather than decrease, the likelihood of contracting skin cancer with high UV exposure, and instead advocating the use of natural sunscreens, some of which he markets on his website.[40] This view is not held by mainstream medical science; in 2011, the National Toxicology Program stated that "Protection against photodamage by use of broad-spectrum sunscreens is well-documented as an effective means of reducing total lifetime UV dose and, thereby, preventing or ameliorating the effects of UV radiation on both the appearance and biomechanical properties of the skin."[41]

FDA warning letters

Mercola has been the subject of a number of United States Food and Drug Administration warning letters related to his activities:

  • 02/16/2005 - Living Fuel RX(TM) and Coconut Oil Products - For marketing products for a medical use which classifies those products as drugs in violation of 201(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.[6][42]
  • 09/21/2006 - Optimal Wellness Center - For both labeling and marketing health supplements for purposes that would render them to be classified as regulated drugs as well as failing to provide adequate directions for use on the label in the event that they were legally sold as drugs.[6][43]
  • 03/11/2011 - Re: Meditherm Med2000 Infrared cameras - Mercola was accused of violating federal law by making claims about the efficacy of certain uses of a telethermographic camera exceeding those approved by the FDA concerning the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of the device (regulation of such claims being within the purview of the FDA).[44]
  • 12/16/2011 - Milk Specialties Global - Wautoma - Failure to have tested for purity, strength, identity, and composition his "Dr. Mercola Vitamin K2" and other products.[45]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Smith, Bryan (February 2012). "Dr. Mercola: Visionary or Quack?". Chicago Mag.
  2. ^ "Dr. Mercola's Natural Health Center". www.natural-health-center.com. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  3. ^ a b c d Gumpert, David (May 23, 2006). "Old-Time Sales Tricks on the Net". BusinessWeek. Archived from the original on July 6, 2009. Retrieved September 1, 2009. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ "Doc's got odd appetite". Chicago Tribune. May 25, 2003. Retrieved August 22, 2011.
  5. ^ "Who Sits at the Clintons' Table, and Who Picks Up the Tab?". Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. 1994-04-01. Retrieved 2011-08-19.
  6. ^ a b c d Barrett, S (2011-05-26). "FDA Orders Dr. Joseph Mercola to Stop Illegal Claims". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2011-08-19.
  7. ^ Mercola, Joseph (2007). "Take Control of Your Health". Mercola.com. Retrieved 16 October 2018. Joseph Mercola was born in Chicago, Illinois on July 8, 1954. He graduated from the University of Illinois at Chicago and Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine - Midwestern University.
  8. ^ "Paperback Best Sellers: May 18, 2003, How-to and Miscellaneous: Hardcover". The New York Times. May 18, 2003. Retrieved May 16, 2011.
  9. ^ "Paperback Best Sellers: October 22, 2006". The New York Times. October 22, 2006. Retrieved May 16, 2011.
  10. ^ About 'The Great Bird Flu Hoax'. Google Books.
  11. ^ "The Alternative Health Controversy". The Dr. Oz show.
  12. ^ "Health Investigation: Artificial Sweeteners". The Doctors.
  13. ^ a b Entis, P (2007). Food safety: old habits, new perspectives. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 300. ISBN 1-55581-417-4.
  14. ^ "An Anti-Vaxxer's New Crusade". Newyorker.com. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  15. ^ Mercola, Joseph. (February 27, 2017) "Vitamin D Is More Effective Than Flu Vaccine, Study Says", Mercola. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  16. ^ Gallgher, James (16 February 2017). "Vitamin D pills 'could stop colds or flu". BBC. Retrieved 1 August 2018.
  17. ^ Groopman, Jerome (March 5, 2015), There's No Way Out of It!, The New York Review of Books, retrieved February 15, 2015
  18. ^ Mercola, Joseph. (October 31, 2011) "Flu Vaccination: The Hidden Risks in This Heavily Promoted Seasonal Routine...", Mercola. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  19. ^ "Thimerosal in Vaccines Questions and Answers".
  20. ^ a b Clements CJ, McIntyre PB (January 2006). "When science is not enough - a risk/benefit profile of thiomersal-containing vaccines". Expert Opin Drug Saf. 5 (1): 17–29. doi:10.1517/14740338.5.1.17. PMID 16370953.
  21. ^ Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (2006-07-14). "Thiomersal and vaccines". World Health Organization. Retrieved 2007-11-20.
  22. ^ The Atlantic Want to Know If Your Food Is Genetically Modified? By Molly Ball MAY 14, 2014
  23. ^ Mercola, Joseph. (February 29, 2012) "The One and Only Way You Can Tell if a Food is GMO-Free", Mercola. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  24. ^ "8 reasons you need to throw away your microwave immediately". Articles.mercola.com. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  25. ^ Cross GA, Fung DY (1982). "The effect of microwaves on nutrient value of foods". Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 16 (4): 355–81. doi:10.1080/10408398209527340. PMID 7047080.
  26. ^ O'Connor, Anahad (October 17, 2006). "The Claim: Microwave Ovens Kill Nutrients in Food". New York Times.
  27. ^ Hoffman CJ, Zabik ME (August 1985). "Effects of microwave cooking/reheating on nutrients and food systems: a review of recent studies". J Am Diet Assoc. 85 (8): 922–6. PMID 3894486.
  28. ^ "Microwave cooking and nutrition". Harvard Medical School. 2008. Retrieved August 20, 2010.
  29. ^ Mercola, Joseph. "Don't Drink Your Milk!". Mercola.com. Retrieved July 22, 2018.
  30. ^ Mercola, Joseph (June 3, 2010). "Why You Shouldn't Drink Pasteurized Milk". Huffington Post. Retrieved July 22, 2018.
  31. ^ Bierman EL, Shank RE (November 1975). "Editorial: Homogenized milk and coronary artery disease: theory, not fact". JAMA. 234 (6): 630–1. doi:10.1001/jama.234.6.630. PMID 1242197.
  32. ^ Clifford AJ, Ho CY, Swenerton H (August 1983). "Homogenized bovine milk xanthine oxidase: a critique of the hypothesis relating to plasmalogen depletion and cardiovascular disease". Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 38 (2): 327–32. PMID 6349321.
  33. ^ "Can AZT and Other "Antiretrovirals" Cause AIDS?". Web.archive.org. 18 August 2011. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  34. ^ "Confronting AIDS: Update 1988". Institute of Medicine of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. 1988. …the evidence that HIV causes AIDS is scientifically conclusive.
  35. ^ "The Evidence that HIV Causes AIDS". National Institutes of Health. 2010-01-14. Retrieved 2011-02-04.
  36. ^ Cohen, J. (1994). "The Duesberg phenomenon" (PDF). Science. 266 (5191): 1642–1644. Bibcode:1994Sci...266.1642C. doi:10.1126/science.7992043. PMID 7992043.
  37. ^ "Denying science". Nat. Med. 12 (4): 369. 2006. doi:10.1038/nm0406-369. PMID 16598265. To support their ideas, some AIDS denialists have also misappropriated a scientific review in Nature Medicine which opens with this reasonable statement: "Despite considerable advances in HIV science in the past 20 years, the reason why HIV-1 infection is pathogenic is still debated."
  38. ^ New York Times The Health Concerns in Wearable Tech
  39. ^ Margaret Sullivan on the New York Times' Public Editor's Journal Opinion Pages Blog . March 19, 2015 A Tech Column on Wearable Gadgets Draws Fire as ‘Pseudoscience’
  40. ^ "New Study Shows Many Sunscreens are Accelerating not Preventing Cancer". Articles.mercola.com. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  41. ^ Photococarcinogenesis Study of Retinoic Acid and Retinyl Palmitate Archived 2011-10-23 at the Wayback Machine, draft technical report, National Toxicology Program
  42. ^ "Ref. No. CL-04-HFS-810-134" ("archived; not necessarily up to date"),fda.gov, February 16, 2005.
  43. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2014-08-29. Retrieved 2013-10-09. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)WarningLetters
  44. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2014-04-22. Retrieved 2013-10-09. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)WarningLetters
  45. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2013-09-06. Retrieved 2013-10-09. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)WarningLetters

External links

Leave a Reply