Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Forensic analysis: Remove "allegedly" per outcome of RfC
SPECIFICO (talk | contribs)
Extended confirmed users
34,804 edits
→‎top: more direct representation of status, consistent with RfC
Tag: Reverted
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Use mdy dates|date=July 2022}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=July 2022}}
[[File:R. Hunter Biden at Center for Strategic & International Studies (1).jpg|thumb|Hunter Biden in 2013]]
[[File:R. Hunter Biden at Center for Strategic & International Studies (1).jpg|thumb|Hunter Biden in 2013]]
The '''Hunter Biden laptop controversy''' involves a [[laptop]] computer that belonged to [[Hunter Biden]], son of the then-[[2020 United States presidential election|presidential candidate]] and former vice president [[Joe Biden]]. The [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] seized the laptop after being informed of its existence by John Paul Mac Isaac, a computer repair shop owner in [[Wilmington, Delaware]], who claimed that it had been brought to his shop in April 2019 by a person claiming to be Hunter Biden, but never came back to retrieve it.<ref name="The New York Times">{{cite news |last1=Goldman |first1=Adam |title=What We Know and Don’t About Hunter Biden and a Laptop |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/22/us/politics/hunter-biden-laptop.html |work=The New York Times |date=October 22, 2020}}</ref> Three weeks before the [[2020 United States presidential election]], the ''[[New York Post]]'' published a story presenting these claims, Hunter Biden's ownership, and some material on the laptop that was allegedly compromising for Joe Biden. The incumbent president and presidential candidate [[Donald Trump]] tried to turn the story into a so-called [[October surprise]] to hurt Joe Biden's campaign.<ref name="Padden_10/28/2020">{{cite web | last=Padden | first=Brian | title=Trump Campaign Focuses on Hunter Biden Emails as 'October Surprise' | website=[[Voice Of America]] | date=October 28, 2020 | url=https://www.voanews.com/a/2020-usa-votes_trump-campaign-focuses-hunter-biden-emails-october-surprise/6197711.html | access-date=April 26, 2022}}</ref> Other conservative media outlets promoted the story, leading most other major media outlets to also discuss the story. The laptop was of unclear origin and contained emails allegedly from Hunter Biden<ref name="Padden_10/28/2020" /> and other digital files relating to Hunter Biden, some of which were confirmed as authentic in 2022. However, "the vast majority of the data — and most of the nearly 129,000 emails it contained — could not be verified by either of the two security experts who reviewed the data for The Post."<ref name="Timberg_Viser_Hamburger_3/30/2022" />
The '''Hunter Biden laptop controversy''' involves a [[laptop]] computer that is believed to have belonged to [[Hunter Biden]], son of the then-[[2020 United States presidential election|presidential candidate]] and former vice president [[Joe Biden]]. The [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] seized the laptop after being informed of its existence by John Paul Mac Isaac, a computer repair shop owner in [[Wilmington, Delaware]], who claimed that it had been brought to his shop in April 2019 by a person claiming to be Hunter Biden, but never came back to retrieve it.<ref name="The New York Times">{{cite news |last1=Goldman |first1=Adam |title=What We Know and Don’t About Hunter Biden and a Laptop |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/22/us/politics/hunter-biden-laptop.html |work=The New York Times |date=October 22, 2020}}</ref> Three weeks before the [[2020 United States presidential election]], the ''[[New York Post]]'' published a story presenting these claims, Hunter Biden's ownership, and some material on the laptop that was allegedly compromising for Joe Biden. The incumbent president and presidential candidate [[Donald Trump]] tried to turn the story into a so-called [[October surprise]] to hurt Joe Biden's campaign.<ref name="Padden_10/28/2020">{{cite web | last=Padden | first=Brian | title=Trump Campaign Focuses on Hunter Biden Emails as 'October Surprise' | website=[[Voice Of America]] | date=October 28, 2020 | url=https://www.voanews.com/a/2020-usa-votes_trump-campaign-focuses-hunter-biden-emails-october-surprise/6197711.html | access-date=April 26, 2022}}</ref> Other conservative media outlets promoted the story, leading most other major media outlets to also discuss the story. The laptop was of unclear origin and contained emails allegedly from Hunter Biden<ref name="Padden_10/28/2020" /> and other digital files relating to Hunter Biden, some of which were confirmed as authentic in 2022. However, "the vast majority of the data — and most of the nearly 129,000 emails it contained — could not be verified by either of the two security experts who reviewed the data for The Post."<ref name="Timberg_Viser_Hamburger_3/30/2022" />


[[PolitiFact]] wrote in June 2021: "Over time, there has been less doubt that the laptop did in fact belong to Hunter Biden", concluding that the laptop "was real in the sense that it exists, but it didn't prove much", as "[n]othing from the laptop has revealed illegal or unethical behavior by Joe Biden as vice president with regard to his son's tenure as a director for Burisma..."<ref name="Drobnic"/> PolitiFact states that it is possible that "copies of a laptop" were obtained, instead of the actual laptop.<ref name="Drobnic"/>
[[PolitiFact]] wrote in June 2021: "Over time, there has been less doubt that the laptop did in fact belong to Hunter Biden", concluding that the laptop "was real in the sense that it exists, but it didn't prove much", as "[n]othing from the laptop has revealed illegal or unethical behavior by Joe Biden as vice president with regard to his son's tenure as a director for Burisma..."<ref name="Drobnic"/> PolitiFact states that it is possible that "copies of a laptop" were obtained, instead of the actual laptop.<ref name="Drobnic"/>

Revision as of 12:46, 28 September 2022

For the controversy surrounding Joe Biden and Ukraine, see Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory.

Hunter Biden in 2013

The Hunter Biden laptop controversy involves a laptop computer that is believed to have belonged to Hunter Biden, son of the then-presidential candidate and former vice president Joe Biden. The Federal Bureau of Investigation seized the laptop after being informed of its existence by John Paul Mac Isaac, a computer repair shop owner in Wilmington, Delaware, who claimed that it had been brought to his shop in April 2019 by a person claiming to be Hunter Biden, but never came back to retrieve it.[1] Three weeks before the 2020 United States presidential election, the New York Post published a story presenting these claims, Hunter Biden's ownership, and some material on the laptop that was allegedly compromising for Joe Biden. The incumbent president and presidential candidate Donald Trump tried to turn the story into a so-called October surprise to hurt Joe Biden's campaign.[2] Other conservative media outlets promoted the story, leading most other major media outlets to also discuss the story. The laptop was of unclear origin and contained emails allegedly from Hunter Biden[2] and other digital files relating to Hunter Biden, some of which were confirmed as authentic in 2022. However, "the vast majority of the data — and most of the nearly 129,000 emails it contained — could not be verified by either of the two security experts who reviewed the data for The Post."[3]

PolitiFact wrote in June 2021: "Over time, there has been less doubt that the laptop did in fact belong to Hunter Biden", concluding that the laptop "was real in the sense that it exists, but it didn't prove much", as "[n]othing from the laptop has revealed illegal or unethical behavior by Joe Biden as vice president with regard to his son's tenure as a director for Burisma..."[4] PolitiFact states that it is possible that "copies of a laptop" were obtained, instead of the actual laptop.[4]

Background

The media coverage of the laptop spurred speculation about the Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory, which falsely[5] alleged that the then vice president Joe Biden acted in Ukraine to protect his son from a corruption investigation by Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin. On October 14, 2020, the New York Post published an article based on an email from the laptop about a purported meeting between then vice president Joe Biden and the Burisma advisor Vadym Pozharskyi. The Biden campaign denied Joe Biden had any meeting with Pozharskyi and said that if they had ever met, it would have been a brief encounter.[6] Witnesses at the dinner where they allegedly met said Biden briefly passed by to see an old friend. The Post reported in its story that Pozharskyi declined to comment, and he did not comment to a Politico journalist who reported extensively on the story a year later.[7]

The Post reported that the email was found in a cache of data extracted from the external hard drive of the laptop computer that appeared to belong to Hunter Biden. The Post reported that the owner of the repair shop had made a copy of the external hard drive before it was seized by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and that the copy was later provided to the Post by Donald Trump's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani. The subpoena to seize the laptop was issued by a grand jury on behalf of the U.S. attorney's office in Wilmington, which was later reported to be investigating Hunter Biden about lobbying and financial matters.[1][8]

The veracity of the Post's reporting was strongly questioned by most mainstream media outlets, analysts, and intelligence officials due to the unknown origin and chain of custody of the laptop and the provenance of its contents and due to suspicion that it may have been used as part of a disinformation campaign by Russian intelligence or its proxies.[9][10][11]

As of 2022, Vox reported that no evidence had ever emerged "that the laptop's leak was a Russian plot."[12] In March 2022, The New York Times reported it had authenticated some emails "from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop."[12][13] Also in March, The Washington Post reported that two security experts authenticated thousands of the 129,000 emails, though the vast majority of the laptop contents, including most of its emails, could not be authenticated.[3] Among the emails that The Washington Post was able to authenticate was the Pozharskyi email that formed the basis of the New York Post's original article.[3]

New York Post reporting

The logo of the New York Post, which first published the story of the laptop

On October 14, 2020, the New York Post published articles containing purported emails of unknown authorship which suggested that Hunter Biden provided an "opportunity" to Vadym Pozharskyi, an advisor to the board of Burisma, to meet his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden.[14][15][16] Joe Biden stated in September 2019 that he had never spoken to his son about his foreign business dealings.[17] His presidential campaign denied such a meeting took place and stated the New York Post had never contacted them "about the critical elements of this story".[18] Michael Carpenter, Vice President Biden's foreign policy adviser in 2015, told The Washington Post that he had accompanied Biden during all of his meetings about Ukraine and that, "He never met with [Pozharskyi]." He added, "In fact, I had never heard of this guy until the New York Post story broke."[19] One of the purported emails showed Pozharskyi saying he would share information with Amos Hochstein, a State Department advisor close to Vice President Biden, though Hochstein stated, "The Republican Senate investigation subpoenaed all my records, including emails and calendars and found no mention of this man. I led the US energy efforts in Ukraine and never even heard of him before yesterday."[20] The New York Post published images and PDF copies of the alleged emails, but their authenticity and origin have not been determined.[21] According to an investigation by The New York Times, editors at the New York Post "pressed staff members to add their bylines to the story", and at least one refused, in addition to the original author, reportedly because of a lack of confidence in its credibility. Of the two writers eventually credited on the article, the second did not know her name was attached to it until after The Post published it.[22] In its opening sentence, the New York Post story misleadingly asserted "the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating" Burisma, despite the fact that Shokin had not pursued an investigation into Burisma's founder.[19] The opening sentence also misleadingly stated that Hunter Biden introduced his father to Pozharskyi, but the purported email from Pozharskyi only mentioned an invitation and "opportunity" for the men to meet.[23][24]

On October 15, the Post published another article regarding a business venture relating to CEFC China Energy that Hunter Biden was negotiating with potential investment partners in May 2017, when his father was a private citizen. The Post published a purported email it said came from the laptop, written by one of the prospective investors, on which Hunter Biden was copied. The email described the proposed equity shares of each of the investors in the venture, ending with a reference to "10 held by H for the big guy?" The Post reported the 'H' apparently referred to Hunter Biden, and one of his former business partners soon came forward to assert 'the big guy' referred to Joe Biden. The former business partner also tweeted a copy of the email that had been addressed to him. In a subsequent email, Biden said his "Chairman" gave him "an emphatic no," with a later email identifying the 'chairman' as his father. The Post also reported on an August 2017 venture Hunter Biden was seeking with Ye Jianming, the chairman of CEFC, but the paper did not associate Joe Biden with that deal. Neither of the two ventures came to fruition.[12][25]

On May 26, 2021, the New York Post published another article focused on purported emails, suggesting that Joe Biden had met with Vadym Pozharskyi at a dinner in Cafe Milano in Washington.[26] The Washington Post investigated the April 16, 2015, dinner.[26] According to dinner attendee Rick Leach, who like Hunter Biden was one of the leaders of the World Food Program USA fundraising organization, the discussions at the dinner were about food security, not "politics or business".[26] Leach said that Joe Biden briefly dropped by the dinner to meet Alex Karloutsos.[26] According to Leach, Joe Biden "didn't even sit down. He was not part of the dinner or part of the dinner discussion."[26] Karloutsos, a longtime friend of Joe Biden, had an influential role in the Greek Orthodox Church that Joe Biden long worked with.[26] Karloutsos corroborated Leach's account.[26] Also, according to The Washington Post, the tentative guest list for the dinner included the name "Vadym" with no surname listed.[26]

Laptop and hard drive

Rudy Giuliani provided the materials to the New York Post after they were allegedly found on a water-damaged[27] MacBook Pro left at a Delaware computer repair shop owned by John Paul Mac Isaac.[28] Mac Isaac obtained the laptop in April 2019.[29] He asserted three years later that while he was copying individual files and folders from the laptop's hard drive to another device, he "saw some content that was disturbing and then also raised some red flags", including "criminality … related to foreign business dealings, to potential money laundering and, more importantly, national security issues and concerns."[29] This caused him "to do a deep dive into the laptop once it became my property."[29] Mac Isaac contacted Giuliani, who he said was his "lifeguard"—voicing credence to the conspiracy theory that the Hillary Clinton 2016 presidential campaign was behind the murder of campaign worker Seth Rich.[30] Steve Bannon informed the New York Post of the laptop,[31] and he and Giuliani delivered a copy of the supposed laptop hard drive to the publication.[32] Weeks before, Bannon had boasted on Dutch television that he had Hunter Biden's hard drive.[32] Giuliani was later quoted as saying he had given the copy to the New York Post because "either nobody else would take it, or if they took it, they would spend all the time they could to try to contradict it before they put it out".[22] According to the New York Post story, a person—who Mac Isaac could not identify because he is legally blind[33]—left the computer at the repair shop to repair water damage, but once this was completed, the shop had no contact information for its owner, and nobody ever paid for it or came to pick it up.[34] Criticism has been focused on Mac Isaac over inconsistencies in his accounts of how the laptop came into his possession and how he passed it on to Giuliani and the FBI.[34][30] When interviewed by CBS News, Mac Isaac offered contradictory statements about his motivations.[35] Thomas Rid, a political scientist and disinformation expert at Johns Hopkins University, noted that the emails could have been forged or that forged material could have been mixed with genuine materials, a "common feature" of disinformation operations.[36] The Daily Beast reported that according to two "individuals with direct knowledge", multiple senior officials in the Trump administration and reelection campaign were aware of the laptop hard drive "several weeks" prior to the New York Post story.[37] Giuliani later confirmed to The Daily Beast that he had informed Trump about the material before the New York Post story.[38]

The New York Post reported it had been shown an image purporting to show a federal subpoena that resulted in the computer and an external hard drive being seized by the FBI in December 2019.[19] NBC News reported the FBI had acquired the devices via a grand jury subpoena, though it was unclear if this was the subpoena cited by the New York Post, and was investigating whether the contents were linked to a foreign intelligence operation.[39] The Associated Press confirmed the existence of the FBI investigation into possible foreign-intelligence activity.[40] Citing a "US official and a congressional source briefed on the matter", CNN reported the FBI was specifically investigating possible connections to ongoing Russian disinformation efforts against Biden.[20] In 2022, Mark Zuckerberg stated that an FBI warning about a possible Russian disinformation campaign prompted Facebook to remove content purporting to convey facts concerning the laptop story.[41][42]

According to The Washington Post, Mac Isaac was alarmed that the laptop was not mentioned during Donald Trump's first impeachment trial in early 2020.[29]

Hunter Biden stated in an interview published April 2021 that he was not sure whether the laptop belonged to him; he said there "could be a laptop out there that was stolen from" him, or he could have been "hacked" by Russian intelligence.[43] PolitiFact wrote in June 2021: "Over time, there has been less doubt that the laptop did in fact belong to Hunter Biden", concluding that the laptop "was real in the sense that it exists, but it didn't prove much", as "Nothing from the laptop has revealed illegal or unethical behavior by Joe Biden as vice president with regard to his son's tenure as a director for Burisma..."[4] PolitiFact states that it is possible that "copies of a laptop" were obtained, instead of the actual laptop.[4] PolitiFact states that the Daily Mail published nude photos of Hunter Biden from the laptop, as well as other content focused on Hunter Biden's drug use and legal issues, but notes that Hunter Biden had already publicized his own drug issues.[4]

Ukraine material

Material similar to the alleged hard-drive contents was reportedly circulating in Ukraine during 2019. One individual interviewed by Time magazine stated that he had been approached in late May 2019, and a second person stated that he had been approached in mid-September. The seller, according to the second individual, wished to sell compromising information about Hunter Biden to Republican Party allies of Donald Trump for $5 million. "I walked away from it, because it smelled awful", he told Time. Igor Novikov, a former advisor to the Ukrainian president and a disinformation researcher, said that the market for kompromat (damaging material) had been very active in the past year in reaction to political events in the United States, with political operatives rushing to respond to Giuliani's call for damaging information on the Bidens. Novikov characterized the materials available on the market as "extremely hard to verify, yet very easy to fake". On October 19, Ukrainian legislator Andrii Derkach posted on social media that he had a second Hunter Biden laptop, stating, "The facts confirming international corruption are stored on a second laptop. These are not the last witnesses or the last laptop."[44] Derkach had worked with Giuliani in Ukraine and was later sanctioned by the United States Treasury Department for his involvement in disinformation about Joe Biden; the Treasury concluded Derkach had been an active Russian intelligence agent for over a decade.[45][46] Lev Parnas told Politico that Giuliani had been told about compromising material regarding Hunter Biden on May 30, 2019, during a visit with Vitaly Pruss. Pruss was an associate of Burisma founder Mykola Zlochevsky, who was then being investigated for corruption by Ukraine.[47]

Hunter Biden story pitch

Earlier in the month and before the Post's report, a White House lawyer and two others affiliated with Trump had already pitched a story about Hunter Biden's business dealings in China to The Wall Street Journal, which the Trump team saw as an ideal outlet due to its combination of conservatism and industry credibility. However, without warning to the Trump team and while the Journal was exercising due diligence in investigating the story, Giuliani and the New York Post went ahead and published a version of the story based on documents and emails with "questionable provenance" that alleged, but did not prove, Joe Biden's involvement in his son's affairs. Bannon had anticipated the Journal story would appear on October 19, and Trump told reporters to expect a major story in the Journal. The resulting possible insinuation that their journalism was affiliated with or working on behalf of Trump irritated the Journal editors. Tony Bobulinski, a business partner of Hunter Biden who was interviewed for the Journal's report, was afraid that the Journal would not run the piece and therefore issued his own statement on October 21, which Breitbart News published unedited. During the next day's presidential debate, Trump made a vague reference to the emails and hosted Bobulinski as his special guest. After the debate, the Journal published its brief story that Bobulinski and corporate records assessed by the Journal "show no role for Joe Biden".[48]

Aftermath and veracity concerns

The New York Times reported in May 2021 that federal investigators in Brooklyn had begun a criminal investigation late in the Trump administration into possible efforts by several current and former Ukrainian officials to spread unsubstantiated allegations about Joe Biden concerning corruption. The investigators had been examining whether the Ukrainians used Giuliani as a channel for the allegations, though he was not a specific subject of the investigation, in contrast to a long-running investigation of Giuliani by the US attorney's office in Manhattan.[49]

The New York Times reported in March 2022 that they found emails "from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop."[12]

In April 2022, The Washington Post reported that Mac Isaac said that he had seen claims about what the laptop contained that did not reflect what he had seen on the laptop: "I do know that there have been multiple attempts over the past year-and-a-half to insert questionable material into the laptop as in, not physically, but passing off this misinformation or disinformation as coming from the laptop. ... And that is a major concern of mine because I have fought tooth and nail to protect the integrity of this drive and to jeopardize that is going to mean that everything that I sacrificed will be for nothing."[29]

In May 2022, NBC News published an analysis of a copy of the hard drive they received from Giuliani and documents released by Republicans on two Senate committees. The analysis found that Hunter Biden's firm took in $11 million from 2013 to 2018 and spent the money quickly. The analysis also found that few of Biden's deals ever came to fruition.[50]

Forensic analysis

In March 2022, The Washington Post published the findings of two forensic information analysts it had retained to examine 217 gigabytes of data provided to the paper on a hard drive by Republican activist Jack Maxey, who represented that its contents came from the laptop. One of the analysts characterized the data as a "disaster" from a forensics standpoint. The analysts found that people other than Biden had repeatedly accessed and copied data for nearly three years; they also found evidence others had written files to the drive both before and after the October 2020 New York Post reports. In September 2020, someone created six new folders on the drive, including with the names "Biden Burisma," "Salacious Pics Package" and "Hunter. Burisma Documents." One of the analysts found evidence someone may have accessed the drive contents from a West Coast location days after The New York Post published their stories about the laptop.

Using cryptographic signatures, the analysts were able to verify that from 1,828 to nearly 22,000 emails Biden had received came from the indicated email accounts of origin, suggesting they were authentic and had not been tampered with. The analysts said emails from Burisma, where Pozharskyi was an advisor, were likely authentic, but cautioned that if Burisma had been hacked, it would be possible for hackers to use stolen cryptographic signatures to forge emails that would pass as authentic. The New York Times reported in January 2020 that Russian military intelligence had hacked Burisma beginning in November 2019; a co-founder of the firm that discovered the hacking said Russians were stealing email credentials. Both analysts acknowledged that cryptographic signatures are not a perfect way to authenticate emails, as some email services do not implement the technology as rigorously as others. About 16,000 of the 22,000 emails carrying cryptographic signatures came via Google, which rigorously implements the technology. The analysts noted that cryptographic signatures can only verify that an email originated from a certain email account, but not who controlled that account; there are other means for hackers to commandeer email accounts of others.

One of the analysts found that timestamps on documents and in operating system indexes matched, though he noted hackers could forge timestamps in undetectable ways. The analysts also noted that the drive had been handled in such a way that logs and other files used by forensic analysts to examine system activity had been repeatedly deleted. Neither analyst found evidence emails or other files had been manipulated by hackers, nor could they rule out that possibility.[3][51]

An analysis by Distributed Denial of Secrets of 128,755 emails allegedly copied from the laptop and circulated by allies and former staff of President Donald Trump showed "signs of tampering" including 145 modification dates and emails created more than a year after Hunter Biden had the laptop.[52][53] Matt Tait, a cybersecurity expert and former information security specialist for the U.K.’s Government Communications Headquarters, reviewed the analysis and said "it is clear the cache isn’t in its original form."[54]

Reactions

Intelligence officials

On October 19, 2020, a group of 51 former senior intelligence officials, who had served in the Trump administration and those of the three previous presidents, released an open letter stating that the release of the alleged emails "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation," adding:

We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement – just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case.[55][56]

During an interview with Fox News on October 19 2020, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe said the laptop was "not part of some Russian disinformation campaign" and accused Adam Schiff of mischaracterizing the views of the intelligence community by describing the alleged emails as part of a smear campaign against Biden.[57] Schiff's spokesman accused Ratcliffe of "purposefully misrepresenting" the congressman's words.[58] Ratcliffe had previously made public assertions that contradicted professional intelligence assessments.[59][60][61] Several security officials criticized Ratcliffe for appearing to pre-judge its outcome.[62] The FBI has publicly stated they had "nothing to add" to Ratcliffe's remarks in response to a request for more information made by Sen. Ron Johnson.[63] The New York Times reported days after the Post story that no solid evidence had emerged that the laptop contained Russian disinformation.[64] An FBI probe seeking to determine whether the laptop was used as part of a foreign intelligence operation is still ongoing.[20][39]

Social media corporations

After the 2016 election, social media companies were criticized for allowing false political information to proliferate on their platforms, including from Russian intelligence, suggesting it may have assisted Trump's election.[65] Twitter and Facebook both implemented measures on their platforms to prevent sharing of the New York Post article. Twitter first deprecated the story (prevented its algorithm from highlighting it due to its popularity) but eventually banned links to the story from being posted.[18] It did so according to their Hacked Materials Policy and Facebook per a policy that "in many countries, including in the U.S., if we have signals that a piece of content is false, we temporarily reduce its distribution pending review by a third-party fact-checker."[66][67][68] Facebook's decision had been informed by an FBI warning to watch for disinformation spread by foreign actors.[69] The Hill reported on the Facebook action, "it is unclear what 'signals' triggered the limit on the New York Post article".[66] Twitter briefly locked President Donald Trump's presidential campaign Twitter account for sharing a controversial Hunter Biden video earlier on October 15. The account was unlocked later that day.[70] Between October 14 and 23, the original New York Post story received over 54 million Facebook views.[71]

Commentators from varied political backgrounds criticized the actions taken by Facebook and Twitter, arguing that they could have amplified disinformation thanks to the Streisand effect.[18] Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey noted, "Our communication around our actions on the @nypost article was not great", adding that "blocking URL sharing via tweet or [direct message]" without explaining the context was "unacceptable".[72]

President Donald Trump tweeted criticism on October 14 in response to Facebook and Twitter's actions, directing complaints at the Communications Decency Act, a 1996 law that includes Section 230.[73]

Congressional Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee called on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to testify before the committee in response to their platforms' actions. Senators Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, and Josh Hawley announced that the committee would vote on subpoenaing Dorsey to appear on October 23.[67] Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell described the restrictions made by Facebook and Twitter as "absolutely reprehensible" and stated that the companies were acting as "speech police".[74]

Dorsey stated that "Straight blocking of URLs was wrong, and we updated our policy and enforcement to fix," adding "Our goal is to attempt to add context, and now we have capabilities to do that."[75] In March 2021, Dorsey told Congress, "It was literally just a process error. This was not against them [the Post] in any particular way."[76] Facebook also said that it was restricting spread pending input from third-party fact-checkers. Associated Press noted that the story had, as of October 17, 2020, "not been confirmed by other publications".[75]

The New York Times reported in September 2021 that a Federal Election Commission inquiry into a complaint about Twitter’s censorship of the article had dismissed the complaint, saying the social media company had legitimate commercial reasons for their actions, and that it could not be determined that Twitter had acted on purely political grounds.[77]

Ross Douthat has pointed out similarities between social media reactions to the Biden-laptop-and-emails situation and the Steele dossier. He doesn't see the New York Post story as Russian disinformation, but "a more normal example of late-dropping opposition research... weaving genuine facts into contestable conclusions. It was, in other words, analogous to all kinds of contested anti-Trump stories that various media outlets have run with across the last four crazy years — from the publicity around the Steele dossier's wilder rumors to the tales of Michael Cohen's supposed Prague rendezvous to the claims that Russians hacked Vermont's power grid or even C-SPAN." He therefore criticized the widely different reactions of social media companies where they, in a "don't let 2016 happen again" reaction, totally shut down coverage of the laptop, but did not do the same to protect the public when the dossier was published.[78]

Ben Smith, who felt that social media should have treated the laptop and dossier stories in the same way, described how he published the dossier for BuzzFeed News in 2017 when he saw that media gatekeepers were "keeping [the dossier] from their audience". He saw the media's refusal to cover the laptop as a "revenge of the gatekeepers".[48]

The accuracy of the Hunter Biden laptop story resulted in increased scrutiny of Twitter and Facebook limiting the spread of the story by conservatives, who argued that their actions "proves Big Tech's bias".[79][80]

Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign

The Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign press secretary Jamal Brown stated that Twitter's action with regard to the New York Post story indicated that the allegations in the story were false.[81] They specifically denied that Joe Biden ever had a formal meeting with Pozharskyi, and said that if they had ever met, it would have been a brief encounter.[82]

Congress

On January 21, 2021, the day after Biden's inauguration, Republican representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia filed articles of impeachment against Biden that cited the claims.[83] No fellow members of Congress co-sponsored the articles.

Other press outlets

The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal stated that they could not independently verify the data provided by the New York Post.[22] NBC News requested a copy of the hard drive from Giuliani, who told them that he would not provide one; they said Giuliani offered them copies of a small number of emails but would not give them the full set.[84] In May 2022, NBC News published an analysis of a copy of the hard drive they received from Giuliani and documents released by Republicans on two Senate committees. The analysis found that Biden's firm took in $11 million from 2013 to 2018 and spent the money fast. The analysis also found that few of Biden's deals ever came to fruition.[50]

David Folkenflik of NPR observed that the New York Post story asserted as facts things it presumed to be true. He also noted that the credited lead author of the story, deputy political editor Emma-Jo Morris, had virtually no previous bylines in reporting, and her most significant prior employment was a nearly four-year position as a producer on Sean Hannity's Fox News program. Hannity, a close Trump advisor, has repeatedly suggested wrongdoing by Biden in Ukraine.[21]

Vanity Fair observed the story had exposed an ongoing journalistic "cold war" within Rupert Murdoch's media empire, which includes The New York Post, Fox News, and The Wall Street Journal. In particular, it described an internal rift over coverage by the Journal which published an opinion article by conservative columnist Kimberley Strassel inflating the claims, only to have the news section publish an article which "swept the legs out from under their Opinion colleague's argument" four hours later. Ryan Lizza, reporter for Politico, was quoted as saying "reporters at the WSJ, Fox News, and NYP have all come to the same conclusion about these documents but they are being drowned out by bad faith activists on the opinion side at these Murdoch companies who favor Trump's re-election."[85]

In April 2022, the Editorial Board of The Washington Post wrote the Biden laptop story provided "an opportunity for a reckoning" by American media to ensure "accurate and relevant" stories are covered. They noted that:

"The investigation adds new details and confirms old ones about the ways in which Joe Biden's family has profited from trading overseas on his name — something for which the president deserves criticism for tacitly condoning. What it does not do, despite some conservatives' insistence otherwise, is prove that President Biden acted corruptly."[86]

Joan Donovan, the research director of the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics, and Public Policy at Harvard University, said that "This is arguably the most well-known story the New York Post has ever published and it endures as a story because it was initially suppressed by social media companies and jeered by politicians and pundits alike".[79]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Goldman, Adam (October 22, 2020). "What We Know and Don't About Hunter Biden and a Laptop". The New York Times.
  2. ^ a b Padden, Brian (October 28, 2020). "Trump Campaign Focuses on Hunter Biden Emails as 'October Surprise'". Voice Of America. Retrieved April 26, 2022.
  3. ^ a b c d Timberg, Craig; Viser, Matt; Hamburger, Tom (March 30, 2022). "Here's how The Post analyzed Hunter Biden's laptop". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 20, 2022.
  4. ^ a b c d e Drobnic Holan, Angie; Kertscher, Tom; Sherman, Amy (June 14, 2021). "Donald Trump's 'I was right about everything,' fact-checked". PolitiFact. Retrieved July 23, 2021.
  5. ^
    • Kiely, Eugene (October 16, 2020). "Trump Revives False Narrative on Biden and Ukraine". FactCheck.org. At a campaign rally in Iowa, President Donald Trump cited an unsubstantiated news report to revive a widely debunked false narrative about Joe Biden's work in Ukraine on behalf of the Obama administration. As we have reported more than once last year, Biden traveled to Kyiv as vice president and warned Ukraine's then-president, Petro Poroshenko, that the U.S. would withhold $1 billion in loan guarantees until Ukraine removed its prosecutor general, Viktor Shokin, who was widely viewed as corrupt. At the time, the international community and anti-corruption advocates in Ukraine were also calling for Shokin to be removed from office for his failure to aggressively prosecute corruption.
    • "Fact check: Biden leveraged $1B in aid to Ukraine to oust corrupt prosecutor, not to help his son". USA Today. October 21, 2020. Based on our research, the claim that Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion from Ukraine to save his son's job is FALSE. The then-vice president leveraged aid dollars to persuade the country to oust its top prosecutor as part of anti-corruption efforts endorsed by other international players that were unrelated to his son, Hunter Biden.
    • Lawler, Dave (October 2, 2019). "Fact check: What Joe and Hunter Biden actually did in Ukraine". Axios. False: Biden pushed for Shokin's ouster to protect his son
  6. ^ Cheney, Kyle; Bertrand, Natasha (October 14, 2020). "Biden campaign lashes out at New York Post". Politico. Archived from the original on November 17, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  7. ^ Ben Schreckinger (October 12, 2021). "'Hiding the Ball': Hunter Biden Complicates White House Anti-Corruption Push". Politico.
  8. ^ Katie Benner; Kenneth P. Voge; Michael S. Schmidt (March 16, 2022). "Hunter Biden Paid Tax Bill, but Broad Federal Investigation Continues". The New York Times.
  9. ^ Robertson, Katie (October 18, 2020). "New York Post Published Hunter Biden Report Amid Newsroom Doubts". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 18, 2020. Retrieved October 18, 2020.
  10. ^ Benveniste, Alexis (October 18, 2020). "The anatomy of the New York Post's dubious Hunter Biden story". CNN. Archived from the original on October 19, 2020. Retrieved October 19, 2020.
  11. ^ Bertrand, Natasha (October 19, 2020). "Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say". Politico. Archived from the original on October 20, 2020. Retrieved October 20, 2020.
  12. ^ a b c d Prokop, Andrew (March 25, 2022). "The return of Hunter Biden's laptop". Vox. Retrieved March 28, 2022. no evidence has emerged to back up suspicions from former intelligence officials, backed by Biden himself, that the laptop's leak was a Russian plot.
  13. ^ Benner, Katie; Vogel, Kenneth P.; Schmidt, Michael S. (March 16, 2022). "Hunter Biden Paid Tax Bill, but Broad Federal Investigation Continues". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 31, 2022.
  14. ^ "N.Y. Post Says It Obtained Hunter Biden Emails on Ukraine". Bloomberg. October 14, 2020. Archived from the original on November 27, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  15. ^ Allen, Nick (October 14, 2020). "Joe Biden denies meeting with Burisma official as purported Hunter Biden email leaked". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on October 16, 2020. Retrieved October 16, 2020.
  16. ^ Chait, Jonathan (October 14, 2020). "Rudy Found Hunter Biden Emails That Totally Weren't Stolen by Russia". Intelligencer. New York. Archived from the original on October 14, 2020. Retrieved October 14, 2020.
  17. ^ Madhani, Aamer (September 21, 2019). "Biden: I never talked to son Hunter about overseas business dealings". USA Today. Archived from the original on October 18, 2020. Retrieved October 19, 2020.
  18. ^ a b c Cox, Kate (October 14, 2020). "Twitter, Facebook face blowback after stopping circulation of NY Post story". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on October 14, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
  19. ^ a b c Kessler, Glenn (October 15, 2020). "Hunter Biden's alleged laptop: an explainer". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 15, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
  20. ^ a b c Cohen, Marshall; Cohen, Zachary; Warren, Michael; Perez, Evan; Marquardt, Alex; Morales, Mark (October 16, 2020). "US authorities investigating if recently published emails are tied to Russian disinformation effort targeting Biden". CNN. Archived from the original on October 17, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  21. ^ a b Folkenflik, David (October 17, 2020). "Analysis: Questionable 'N.Y. Post' Scoop Driven By Ex-Hannity Producer And Giuliani". NPR. Archived from the original on October 17, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  22. ^ a b c Robertson, Katie (October 18, 2020). "New York Post Published Hunter Biden Report Amid Newsroom Doubts". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 18, 2020. Retrieved October 18, 2020.
  23. ^ Breland, Ali (October 14, 2020). "Facebook had the chance to stop Biden Ukraine misinformation before, but opted not to". Mother Jones. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  24. ^ Kertscher, Tom (October 15, 2020). "A look behind the NY Post headline about Joe Biden and a Ukraine meeting". PolitiFact. Archived from the original on October 16, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  25. ^ Prokop, Andrew (October 22, 2020). "Mysterious emails and convenient leaks: The Trump campaign's Hunter Biden attacks, explained". Vox.
  26. ^ a b c d e f g h Kessler, Glenn (June 7, 2021). "Hunter Biden's laptop: The April 16, 2015, dinner". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 14, 2021. Retrieved July 22, 2021.
  27. ^ Prokop, Andrew (March 25, 2022). "The return of Hunter Biden's laptop". Vox. Retrieved May 4, 2022.
  28. ^ Bohan, Caren; Johnson, Kevin; Brown, Matthew; Neiburg, Jeff (October 17, 2020). "A tabloid got a trove of data on Hunter Biden from Rudy Giuliani. Now, the FBI is probing a possible disinformation campaign". USA TODAY. Retrieved August 1, 2021.
  29. ^ a b c d e Bump, Philip (April 12, 2022). "Now warning about Hunter Biden-laptop disinfo: The guy who leaked it". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 13, 2022.
  30. ^ a b Sheth, Sonam (October 14, 2020). "An explosive New York Post story that sent Trumpworld into a frenzy is riddled with holes and red flags". Business Insider. Archived from the original on October 15, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
  31. ^ Prokop, Andrew (October 15, 2020). "Trump team makes a suspicious effort to swing the election with purported Hunter Biden emails". Vox. Archived from the original on October 17, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  32. ^ a b Olding, Rachel (October 16, 2020). "Steve Bannon Boasted on Dutch TV Weeks Ago That He Had Hunter Biden's Hard Drive". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on November 27, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  33. ^ Goldman, Adam (October 22, 2020). "What We Know and Don't About Hunter Biden and a Laptop". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved April 2, 2022.
  34. ^ a b Trotter, J.K. (October 14, 2020). "The New York Post inadvertently revealed the original source of its dubious Hunter Biden story". Business Insider. Archived from the original on October 16, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  35. ^ Erickson, Bo; Becket, Stefan (October 15, 2020). "What we know – and don't know – about Hunter Biden's alleged laptop". CBS News. Archived from the original on October 16, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
  36. ^ Tucker, Eric; Braun, Stephen (October 15, 2020). "AP Explains: Trump seizes on dubious Biden–Ukraine story". Associated Press. Archived from the original on October 15, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
  37. ^ Suebsaeng, Asawin; Banco, Erin; Rawnsley, Adam (October 14, 2020). "Trump Knew for Days That Rudy's Hit on Hunter Biden Was Coming". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on November 27, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
  38. ^ Suebsaeng, Asawin; Banco, Erin (October 17, 2020). "Rudy: Only '50/50' Chance I Worked With a 'Russian Spy' to Dig Dirt on Bidens". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on October 17, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  39. ^ a b Dilanian, Ken (October 15, 2020). "Feds examining whether alleged Hunter Biden emails are linked to a foreign intel operation". NBC News. Archived from the original on October 17, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  40. ^ Tucker, Eric (October 17, 2020). "Biden email episode illustrates risk to Trump from Giuliani". Associated Press. Archived from the original on October 17, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  41. ^ "Zuckerberg admits mistakes on Biden laptop story". BBC News. August 26, 2022. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
  42. ^ Thomas, Jake (August 25, 2022). "Mark Zuckerberg's explanation of Hunter Biden censorship enrages MAGA world". Newsweek. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
  43. ^ Cohen, Marshall; Perez, Evan (April 2, 2021). "Hunter Biden dodges questions on laptop seized by FBI". CNN. Retrieved July 23, 2021.
  44. ^ Shuster, Simon (October 21, 2020). "Exclusive: Alleged Hunter Biden Emails Circulated in Ukraine as Rudy Giuliani Dug for Dirt There Last Year". Time. Archived from the original on October 21, 2020. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  45. ^ Paul Sonne; Rosalind S. Helderman (May 19, 2020). "Ukrainian lawmaker releases leaked phone calls of Biden and Poroshenko". The Washington Post.
  46. ^ Kyle Cheney; Natasha Bertrand. "Treasury sanctions Ukrainian lawmaker who met with Giuliani to smear Biden". Politico. No. September 10, 2020.
  47. ^ Bertrand, Natasha (October 24, 2020). "Former Giuliani associate raises questions about Hunter Biden's 'hard drive from hell'". Politico. Archived from the original on October 24, 2020. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
  48. ^ a b Smith, Ben (October 25, 2020). "Trump Had One Last Story to Sell. The Wall Street Journal Wouldn't Buy It". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 30, 2020. Retrieved October 31, 2020.
  49. ^ Rashbaum, William K.; Protess, Ben; Vogel, Kenneth P.; Hong, Nicole (May 27, 2021). "Prosecutors Investigating Whether Ukrainians Meddled in 2020 Election". The New York Times. Retrieved June 12, 2021.
  50. ^ a b Winter, Tom; Fitzpatrick, Sarah; Atkins, Chloe; Strickler, Laura (May 19, 2022). "Analysis of Hunter Biden's hard drive shows he, his firm took in about $11 million from 2013 to 2018, spent it fast". NBC News. Retrieved May 19, 2022.
  51. ^ Nicole Perlroth; Matthew Rosenberg (January 13, 2020). "Russians Hacked Ukrainian Gas Company at Center of Impeachment". The New York Times.
  52. ^ "Hunter Biden emails - Distributed Denial of Secrets". ddosecrets.com. Retrieved June 1, 2022.
  53. ^ Secrets, Distributed Denial of (May 21, 2022). "Release: Hunter Biden emails (3.6 GB)". Distributed Email of Secrets. Retrieved June 1, 2022.
  54. ^ "Hunter Biden emails that Trump allies shared contain signs of possible 'tampering,' analysis suggests". CyberScoop. May 24, 2022. Retrieved June 1, 2022.
  55. ^ Bertrand, Natasha (October 19, 2020). "Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say". Politico. Archived from the original on October 20, 2020. Retrieved October 20, 2020.
  56. ^ Visser, Nick (October 20, 2020). "More Than 50 Former Intel Officials Say Hunter Biden Smear Smells Like Russia". HuffPost. Archived from the original on October 22, 2020. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  57. ^ Dilanian, Ken (October 19, 2020). "Ratcliffe says no proof, but FBI probing foreign tie to "Biden" laptop". NBC News. Archived from the original on October 21, 2020. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  58. ^ Swanson, Ian (October 19, 2020). "Ratcliffe, Schiff battle over Biden emails, politicized intelligence". TheHill. Archived from the original on October 22, 2020. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  59. ^ Julian E. Barnes; Adam Goldman (October 9, 2020). "John Ratcliffe Pledged to Stay Apolitical. Then He Began Serving Trump's Political Agenda". The New York Times.
  60. ^ "Donald Trump wants a loyalist as America's top intelligence official". The Economist. No. August 3, 2020. Archived from the original on October 28, 2020. Retrieved October 25, 2020.
  61. ^ Holmgren, Brett (July 16, 2020). "Trump's New Director of National Intelligence Doesn't Understand His Job". Foreign Policy. No. July 16, 2020. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved October 25, 2020.
  62. ^ Tucker, Patrick (October 19, 2020). "Intelligence Experts Suspicious of DNI Ratcliffe On Laptop Story". Defense One. Archived from the original on October 25, 2020. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  63. ^ Barrett, Devlin. "FBI says it has 'nothing to add' to Ratcliffe's remarks about Hunter Biden, Russian disinformation". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 22, 2020. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  64. ^ Goldman, Adam (October 22, 2020). "What We Know and Don't About Hunter Biden and a Laptop". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 23, 2020. Retrieved October 23, 2020.
  65. ^ Prokop, Andrew (March 25, 2022). "The return of Hunter Biden's laptop". Vox. Retrieved March 28, 2022. Meanwhile, social media companies were facing their own second-guessing about the 2016 election from outside critics and their own employees. Many argued that misinformation spreading unchecked (or algorithmically assisted) on these platforms, some circulated by Russia, helped Trump win. So they, like many journalists, hoped to do things differently should a similar situation arise in 2020.
  66. ^ a b Rodrigo, Chris Mills (October 14, 2020). "Twitter, Facebook clamp down on New York Post article about Hunter Biden". The Hill. Archived from the original on October 17, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  67. ^ a b Mihalcik, Carrie (October 16, 2020). "Facebook, Twitter limit reach of New York Post article about Hunter Biden". CNET. Archived from the original on October 15, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
  68. ^ Dwoskin, Elizabeth (October 15, 2020). "Facebook and Twitter take unusual steps to limit spread of New York Post story". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 15, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
  69. ^ Tiffany, Kaitlyn (April 28, 2022). "Why Hunter Biden's Laptop Will Never Go Away". The Atlantic. Retrieved July 5, 2022.
  70. ^ Vengattil, Munsif; Culliford, Elizabeth (October 15, 2020). "Twitter unblocks Trump campaign account after initially saying post violated rules". CBC. Thomson Reuters. Archived from the original on October 17, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  71. ^ Gilbert, David (October 23, 2020). "Facebook Failed Miserably in its Attempt to Stop the Hunter Biden Story". Vice Media. Archived from the original on October 23, 2020. Retrieved October 23, 2020.
  72. ^ Homan, Timothy R. (October 15, 2020). "Facebook, Twitter's handling of New York Post article raises election night concerns". The Hill. Archived from the original on October 17, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  73. ^ Hamilton, Isobel Asher (October 15, 2020). "Trump threatened Facebook and Twitter again after they throttled the spread of a dubious New York Post story about Hunter Biden". Business Insider. Archived from the original on October 15, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
  74. ^ Cornwell, Susan (October 15, 2020). "U.S. Senate's McConnell says it is 'reprehensible' that social media platforms blocked stories". Reuters. Archived from the original on October 16, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
  75. ^ a b Chan, Kelvin (October 16, 2020). "Twitter CEO says it was wrong to block links to Biden story". Associated Press. Retrieved April 3, 2021.
  76. ^ "House Hearing on Combating Online Misinformation and Disinformation". C-SPAN. March 25, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2022.
  77. ^ Goldmacher, Shane (September 13, 2021). "The F.E.C. dismisses claims that Twitter illegally blocked a Hunter Biden article". The New York Times.
  78. ^ Douthat, Ross (October 27, 2020). "Opinion - The Media's Hunter Biden Conundrum". The New York Times. Retrieved April 13, 2022.
  79. ^ a b Tiffany, Kaitlyn (April 28, 2022). "Why Hunter Biden's Laptop Will Never Go Away". The Atlantic. Retrieved June 2, 2022.
  80. ^ "Hunter Biden laptop confirmation proves Big Tech's bias". Washington Examiner. May 31, 2022. Retrieved June 2, 2022.
  81. ^ "Twitter's Response to Hunter Biden Article Makes Clear 'Purported Allegations Are False,' Says Biden Campaign". Cheddar TV. October 15, 2020. Archived from the original on October 16, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
  82. ^ Cheney, Kyle; Bertrand, Natasha (October 14, 2020). "Biden campaign lashes out at New York Post". Politico. Archived from the original on November 17, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  83. ^ Marcos, Christina (January 21, 2021). "Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene files articles of impeachment against Biden". The Hill. Retrieved January 21, 2021.
  84. ^ Dilanian, Ken; Winter, Tom (October 30, 2020). "Here's what happened when NBC News tried to report on the alleged Hunter Biden emails". NBC News. Archived from the original on October 31, 2020. Retrieved October 31, 2020.
  85. ^ Ecarma, Caleb (October 23, 2020). "The Wall Street Journal Cold War Explodes into the Limelight". Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
  86. ^ Editorial Board (April 3, 2022). "The Hunter Biden story is an opportunity for a reckoning". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 22, 2022.

External links

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hunter_Biden_laptop_controversy&diff=1112853292&oldid=1112791383

Leave a Reply