Cannabis Ruderalis


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

29 March 2024

24 March 2024

17 March 2024

14 February 2024

30 January 2024

28 January 2024

17 December 2023

9 November 2023

31 October 2023

30 October 2023

29 October 2023

27 October 2023

8 October 2023

  • curprev 14:1414:14, 8 October 2023Binksternet talk contribs 14,259 bytes −236 Reverted 1 edit by Rockmusicfanatic20 (talk): Once again restoring longstanding version, with 10 users agreeing on removal. See Talk. undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
  • curprev 12:5212:52, 8 October 2023Rockmusicfanatic20 talk contribs 14,495 bytes +236 Undid revision 1179138043 by Binksternet (talk) A user specifically asked for the content to stay in the RFC as they said its' more useful and interesting if they can see it in the context of the article. Removing this only harms that and doesn't let people come to their own opinion first. Let the RFC conclude first, then feel free to remove it if that consensus is agreed upon to be made. Please don't remove in the mean time. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 04:2604:26, 8 October 2023Binksternet talk contribs 14,259 bytes −236 Reverted 1 edit by Rockmusicfanatic20 (talk): That's not how it works, as shown by your 24-hour block. WP:ONUS says that the disputed material stays out. undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted

7 October 2023

  • curprev 18:4818:48, 7 October 2023Rockmusicfanatic20 talk contribs 14,495 bytes +236 Undid revision 1179043333 by Binksternet (talk) Do not predetermine the outcome of the RFC by removing beforehand. WAIT before the consensus is reached, the RFC was made whether to remove it or support the inclusion. Feel free to remove it after the conclusion of the RFC. As of now it stays, please don't disturb the peace. WP:Process is important. The information needs to be here so people can view the dispute of information. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 14:0314:03, 7 October 2023Binksternet talk contribs 14,259 bytes −236 Undid revision 1178577001 by Rockmusicfanatic20 (talk) WP:ONUS still applies to this disputed text undo Tags: Undo Reverted

6 October 2023

5 October 2023

4 October 2023

3 October 2023

  • curprev 21:1821:18, 3 October 2023Binksternet talk contribs 14,258 bytes −236 Reverted 1 edit by Rockmusicfanatic20 (talk): RfC result is in the future. At present, WP:ONUS says no. undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
  • curprev 21:1021:10, 3 October 2023Rockmusicfanatic20 talk contribs 14,494 bytes +236 Undid revision 1178462951 by Binksternet (talk) The consensus for removal doesn't exist either. I have started an RfC on the talk page about this. Please do not remove this through an ongoing RfC, wait until after that consensus is made. This is due process. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 20:3920:39, 3 October 2023Binksternet talk contribs 14,258 bytes −236 Reverted 1 edit by Rockmusicfanatic20 (talk): Rv... See Talk especially WP:ONUS and WP:CONTEXTMATTERS. Consensus does not exist for inclusion. undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
  • curprev 20:3320:33, 3 October 2023Rockmusicfanatic20 talk contribs 14,494 bytes +236 Undid revision 1178455563 by Binksternet (talk) If your one opinion on the talk page, that no others provided is a consensus that wasn't needed. Then what the hell is the RfC at the "In the End" for removing pop for? Start an RfC, this is due process for removing highly respected sourced genres. With respect, you as an administrator should know this. It's a controversial inclusion, some feel it should be included, others don't. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 19:5019:50, 3 October 2023Binksternet talk contribs 14,258 bytes −236 Reverted 1 edit by Rockmusicfanatic20 (talk): Rv ... consensus is not for inclusion of this genre undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
  • curprev 19:3119:31, 3 October 2023Rockmusicfanatic20 talk contribs 14,494 bytes +236 Undid revision 1170622659 by Binksternet (talk) By the discussion on the talk page, that is just only you in offering your opinion where there actually hasn't been a discussion about the inclusion of nu metal. That is not due process for the addition of a potentially controversial addition. This is up for everyone to decide, not one admin who wants it gone. If people feel that strongly about it being included, start an RfC. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

2 September 2023

16 August 2023

  • curprev 05:1605:16, 16 August 2023Binksternet talk contribs 14,258 bytes −236 Reverted 1 edit by SpaceHelmetX1 (talk): Rv... See discussion at Talk:Drive (Incubus song)#Removal of nu metal. Any list article of Best Songs of Some Genre will always throw out a very wide net undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
  • curprev 05:1305:13, 16 August 2023SpaceHelmetX1 talk contribs 14,494 bytes +236 Undid revision 1170619614 by Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk): Source (Metal Hammer) is fine per WP:MUSICRS. Open a discussion about it on the talk page, even to remove a genre, especially a source one, you will need to discuss. undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted
  • curprev 04:5304:53, 16 August 2023Y2kcrazyjoker4 talk contribs 14,258 bytes −236 The threshold for encyclopedic verifiability should be higher than a listicle that doesnt explicitly describe it as nu metal. Consequence directly contradicts the idea that it is nu metal: "it’s hard to believe that heavy metal and funk were once the dominant influences associated with Incubus". Both sources call it "laid-back, semi-acoustic", "mellow, contemplative", which is diametrically opposed to everything about nu metal. Go read the article about what nu metal is and find a better source. undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted 2017 wikitext editor

15 August 2023

  • curprev 01:2501:25, 15 August 2023SpaceHelmetX1 talk contribs 14,494 bytes +236 Undid revision 1170432484 by Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk): It's not a random writer's list nor a blog to be called unreliable... It's a Metal Hammer list, which is reliable per WP:MUSICRS. Anyway, you should discuss the removal on the talk page first undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted
  • curprev 00:5800:58, 15 August 2023Y2kcrazyjoker4 talk contribs 14,258 bytes −236 Find me any other references that corroborates this description. Presence on a random writer's list does not make it this genre. It's not explicitly described or analyzed as a nu metal song in the list prose undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

14 August 2023

6 July 2023

26 June 2023

23 June 2023

17 June 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Leave a Reply