Cannabis Ruderalis


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View ( | older 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

7 August 2022

6 August 2022

  • curprev 21:2421:24, 6 August 202250.44.36.47 talk 15,442 bytes +139 == Changelog == == 1.0.0 == * Hello World == 1.1.0 == * Tested up to WordPress 5.0 undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

13 March 2022

11 March 2022

22 February 2022

17 February 2022

12 February 2022

  • curprev 06:3206:32, 12 February 2022180.150.30.218 talk 15,123 bytes +84 added the RFC statement as-is, removing the controversial Relying party reference in favour of Certificate Evaluators which is the focus of the reference in context to the parragraph undo

11 February 2022

  • curprev 09:2609:26, 11 February 2022Anton.bersh talk contribs 15,039 bytes +33 Clarify CAA use by relying parties undo Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 09:2109:21, 11 February 2022Anton.bersh talk contribs 15,006 bytes −710 Undid revision 1071133801 by 180.150.30.218 (talk) Undo good faith edits caused by confusion of meaning of "relying party" and "subscriber". In this context "clients" means User Agents, which are PKI relying parties. Also, recommendation for clients to use CAA sounds a lot like a guidebook suggestion, but Wikipedia is not a guidebook. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 01:4501:45, 11 February 2022180.150.30.218 talk 15,716 bytes +710 corrected a serious contradiction, rfc8659does not define relying party but rfc8659 links to the rfc5280 definition which is literally the opposite meaning described in this page prior to this edit undo Tag: Reverted

24 December 2021

2 August 2021

23 July 2021

5 May 2021

27 April 2021

26 March 2021

18 November 2020

  • curprev 01:5801:58, 18 November 2020Citation bot talk contribs 13,542 bytes +122 Alter: template type. Add: s2cid, doi, pages, issue, volume, year, journal, arxiv, author pars. 1-1. Removed parameters. Formatted dashes. Some additions/deletions were actually parameter name changes. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Suggested by Abductive | All pages linked from cached copy of User:Abductive/sandbox | via #UCB_webform_linked 138/500 undo

19 October 2020

20 September 2020

27 August 2020

22 August 2020

14 April 2020

26 March 2020

24 March 2020

  • curprev 13:3713:37, 24 March 20202607:fea8:12a0:44d::6482 talk 12,367 bytes −494 →‎Mandatory examination: Entire section just duplicates, poorly, information given elsewhere in article. Looks like an excuse to link to the reference - which is a foreign-language blog of questionable reliability status. undo Tag: section blanking

15 March 2020

14 March 2020

  • curprev 07:3107:31, 14 March 2020138.75.190.138 talk 12,512 bytes +116 Add reference to CAA being the cause of Let's encrypt revocation undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

3 March 2020

3 February 2020

1 February 2020

31 January 2020

23 January 2020

8 November 2019

18 July 2019

  • curprev 19:3019:30, 18 July 2019Joebeone talk contribs 11,536 bytes −1 small detail, the reference and words here are the approval date of the RFC, not the submission date, see: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6844/history/ undo

9 July 2019

15 June 2019

19 April 2019

16 April 2019

15 March 2019

7 January 2019

1 January 2019

18 December 2018

5 November 2018

10 October 2018

15 August 2018

20 July 2018

19 July 2018

12 July 2018

9 July 2018

3 July 2018

22 June 2018

14 June 2018

9 June 2018

7 June 2018

6 June 2018

5 June 2018

24 May 2018

18 May 2018

9 May 2018

  • curprev 18:1718:17, 9 May 2018Poisonsnak talk contribsm 12,477 bytes +663 The article's example saying certs.nocerts.example.com would be denied issuance doesn't follow the RFC in my opinion. The search starts at the bottom, not the top, and it stops when any record is found, not just an empty one. The RFC has a pretty clear example (X.Y.Z, then its CNAME, then Y.Z, then its CNAME, etc.). I also added info about how CNAMEs are checked. undo Tag: Visual edit

17 April 2018

16 April 2018

15 April 2018

13 April 2018

10 April 2018

30 March 2018

6 March 2018

16 February 2018

15 February 2018

11 February 2018

10 February 2018

4 February 2018

3 February 2018

30 January 2018

21 January 2018

18 January 2018

14 January 2018

11 January 2018

8 January 2018

7 January 2018

20 November 2017

6 October 2017

3 October 2017

17 September 2017

7 September 2017

23 August 2017

29 July 2017

7 May 2017

7 April 2017

19 March 2017

13 March 2017

9 March 2017

15 February 2017

23 January 2017

19 January 2017

18 January 2017

15 November 2016

14 November 2016

21 October 2016

20 October 2016

10 May 2016

26 April 2016

10 March 2016

16 January 2016

7 January 2016

8 December 2015

7 October 2015

7 May 2015

30 March 2015

(newest | oldest) View ( | older 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Leave a Reply