Machine Elf 1735 (talk | contribs) WP:V doesn't mention clockwork universe/ WP:NPOV WP:OR hypothesis non fingo: God "governs", argument from design: Newton+voluntarists reject it as unseemingly lazy materialism+fate while Leibniz+intellectualists embrace on the Continent |
Wing gundam (talk | contribs) Undid revision 541249116 by Machine Elf 1735 (talk) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
A similar concept goes back, to [[Johannes de Sacrobosco|John of Sacrobosco's]] early 13th-century introduction to astronomy: ''[[De sphaera mundi|On the Sphere of the World]]''. In this widely popular medieval text, Sacrobosco spoke of the universe as the ''machina mundi'', the machine of the world, suggesting that the reported eclipse of the Sun at the crucifixion of Jesus was a disturbance of the order of that machine.<ref>John of Sacrbosco, ''On the Sphere'', quoted in Edward Grant, ''A Source Book in Medieval Science,'' (Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Pr., 1974), p. 465.</ref> |
A similar concept goes back, to [[Johannes de Sacrobosco|John of Sacrobosco's]] early 13th-century introduction to astronomy: ''[[De sphaera mundi|On the Sphere of the World]]''. In this widely popular medieval text, Sacrobosco spoke of the universe as the ''machina mundi'', the machine of the world, suggesting that the reported eclipse of the Sun at the crucifixion of Jesus was a disturbance of the order of that machine.<ref>John of Sacrbosco, ''On the Sphere'', quoted in Edward Grant, ''A Source Book in Medieval Science,'' (Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Pr., 1974), p. 465.</ref> |
||
There was an inherent contradiction in the views of some 17th-century thinkers, who believed the universe ran like clockwork, according to [[natural law]], yet also in a God who interfered with the world to perform miracles and punish sinners.<ref name=Dolnick>{{cite book|last=Dolnick|first=Edward|title=The Clockwork Universe : Isaac Newton, the Royal Society, and the Birth of the Modern World|year=2012|isbn=0062042262|page=18}}</ref> |
|||
Responding to [[Gottfried Leibniz]] {{fact|date=February 2013}}, a prominent supporter of the theory, in the [[Leibniz–Clarke correspondence]], Clarke wrote: |
Responding to [[Gottfried Leibniz]] {{fact|date=February 2013}}, a prominent supporter of the theory, in the [[Leibniz–Clarke correspondence]], Clarke wrote: |
||
Revision as of 14:52, 28 February 2013
In the history of science, the clockwork universe compares the universe to a mechanical clock. It continues ticking along, as a perfect machine, with its gears governed by the laws of physics, making every aspect of the machine predictable.
This idea was very popular among deists[1] during the Enlightenment, when Isaac Newton derived his laws of motion, and showed that alongside the law of universal gravitation, they could explain the behaviour of both terrestrial objects and the solar system.
A similar concept goes back, to John of Sacrobosco's early 13th-century introduction to astronomy: On the Sphere of the World. In this widely popular medieval text, Sacrobosco spoke of the universe as the machina mundi, the machine of the world, suggesting that the reported eclipse of the Sun at the crucifixion of Jesus was a disturbance of the order of that machine.[1]
There was an inherent contradiction in the views of some 17th-century thinkers, who believed the universe ran like clockwork, according to natural law, yet also in a God who interfered with the world to perform miracles and punish sinners.[2]
Responding to Gottfried Leibniz [citation needed], a prominent supporter of the theory, in the Leibniz–Clarke correspondence, Clarke wrote:
- "The Notion of the World's being a great Machine, going on without the Interposition of God, as a Clock continues to go without the Assistance of a Clockmaker; is the Notion of Materialism and Fate, and tends, (under pretence of making God a Supra-mundane Intelligence,) to exclude Providence and God's Government in reality out of the World."[3]
In 2009 artist Tim Wetherell created a large wall piece for Questacon (The National Science and Technology centre in Canberra, Australia) representing the concept of the clockwork universe. This steel artwork contains moving gears, a working clock, and a movie of the moon's terminator in action.
References
- ^ John of Sacrbosco, On the Sphere, quoted in Edward Grant, A Source Book in Medieval Science, (Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Pr., 1974), p. 465.
- ^ Dolnick, Edward (2012). The Clockwork Universe : Isaac Newton, the Royal Society, and the Birth of the Modern World. p. 18. ISBN 0062042262.
- ^ Davis, Edward B. 1991. "Newton's rejection of the "Newtonian world view" : the role of divine will in Newton's natural philosophy." Science and Christian Belief 3, no. 2: 103-117. Clarke quotation taken from article.
Further reading
- Dolnick, Edward, The Clockwork Universe: Isaac Newton, the Royal Society, and the Birth of the Modern World, Harper Collins, 2011.
- "A Short Scheme of the True Religion", manuscript quoted in Memoirs of the Life, Writings and Discoveries of Sir Isaac Newton by Sir David Brewster, Edinburgh, 1850; cited in; ibid, p. 65.
- Webb, R.K. ed. Knud Haakonssen. "The Emergence of Rational Dissent." Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1996. p. 19.
- Westfall, Richard S. Science and Religion in Seventeenth-Century England. p. 201.
External links
- "The Clockwork Universe". The Physical World. Ed. John Bolton, Alan Durrant, Robert Lambourne, Joy Manners, Andrew Norton.