All members of this category should be notified of the RfC at Wikipedia_talk:User_categories#Request_for_comment_on_our_proposed_policy_for_users_remaining_in_redlinked_categories. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:☂
A
User talk:Andrewa
User talk:Arthur Rubin
B
User talk:BabbaQ
User talk:BD2412
C
User talk:Chris troutman
User talk:CouvGeek
D
User talk:Davey2010
User talk:David Eppstein/2016d
User:Doug Coldwell/Sandboxes/Archive 13
User talk:Drmies/Archive 94
E
User talk:EEng
User talk:Epicgenius
G
User talk:Gorthian/Archive 2
J
User talk:JaconaFrere
K
User talk:Kew Gardens 613
User talk:Konveyor Belt/Archive 3
M
User talk:MjolnirPants
P
User talk:Polentarion/Archive 1
R
User talk:Randykitty
User talk:Roxy the dog
User:Roxy the dog
User talk:Rubbish computer
User talk:Rubbish computer/Archive 4
S
User talk:Slawekb
T
User talk:Trevj
User:Trevj/Talk header

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (1) The content is substantially different to what was deleted in 2015; (2) Consensus on redlinked usercategoried has recently changed greatly, thus a fresh discussion is demanded. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus hasn't changed just because two editors have decided it should have. But if "a fresh discussion is demanded", then the proper way is to start a new CfD, or maybe try to persuade the participants in the discussions at Wikipedia_talk:User_categories. – Uanfala (talk) 22:02, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want the category deleted, you'll need to use CfD. I dispute the applicability of G4 here. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to use CfD as the category was deleted and salted with a consensus there. Consensus was against the existence (and recreation) of this category, so any cosmetic differences in what's in the category text don't diminish the applicability of G4. – Uanfala (talk) 22:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]