Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
GimmeBot (talk | contribs)
m Bot adding FA star
Revert edit to writing row in infobox; not aware of any new guidelines mentioned in preceding edit summary
(49 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| caption = theatrical poster
| caption = theatrical poster
| director = [[James Whale]]
| director = [[James Whale]]
| producer = [[Carl Laemmle Jr.]]
| producer = [[Carl Laemmle, Jr.]]
| writer = [[Mary Shelley]] ''([[Frankenstein|novel]])''<br>William Hurlbut ''(screenplay and adaptation)''<br>[[John L. Balderston]] ''(adaptation)''
| writer = '''Screenplay:'''<br />William Hurlbut<br />'''Adaptation:'''<br />William Hurlbut<br />[[John L. Balderston]]<br />'''Novel:'''<br />[[Mary Shelley]]
| starring = [[Boris Karloff]]<br>[[Colin Clive]]<br>[[Valerie Hobson]]<br>[[Ernest Thesiger]]<br>[[Elsa Lanchester]]<br>[[Una O'Connor]]
| starring = [[Boris Karloff]]<br />[[Colin Clive]]<br />[[Valerie Hobson]]<br />[[Ernest Thesiger]]<br />[[Elsa Lanchester]]<br />[[Una O'Connor]]
| music = [[Franz Waxman]]
| music = [[Franz Waxman]]
| cinematography = [[John J. Mescall]]
| cinematography = [[John J. Mescall]]
| editing = Ted Kent
| editing = Ted Kent
| distributor = [[Universal Pictures]]
| distributor = [[Universal Pictures]]
| released = April 22, 1935 ([[Los Angeles|LA]])<br>May 10, 1935 ([[New York City|NY]])<ref name="Brown124">{{cite book |title=Movie Time: A Chronology of Hollywood and the Movie Industry from its Beginnings to the Present |last=Brown |first=Gene |authorlink= |coauthors= |year= 1995 |publisher=MacMillan |location=New York |isbn=0-02-86042906 |page=124 |pages= |url= |accessdate=}} In New York, the film premiered at the famed [[Roxy Theatre (New York City)|Roxy Theatre]].</ref>
| released = April 22, {{fy|1935}} ''(US)''
| runtime = 75 min.
| runtime = 75 minutes
| country = {{FilmUS}}
| country = United States
| language = {{English}}
| language = English
| budget = US$393,750
| budget = US$393,750
| gross =
| gross =
| preceded_by = ''[[Frankenstein (1931 film)|Frankenstein]]'' ({{fy|1931}})
| preceded_by = ''[[Frankenstein (1931 film)|Frankenstein]]'' ({{fy|1931}})
| followed_by = ''[[Son of Frankenstein]]'' ({{fy|1939}})
| followed_by = ''[[Son of Frankenstein]]'' ({{fy|1939}})
| amg_id = 1:7091
| imdb_id = 0026138
}}
}}
'''''Bride of Frankenstein''''' (advertised as '''''The Bride of Frankenstein''''') is a {{fy|1935}} [[horror film]], the first sequel to the influential ''[[Frankenstein (1931 film)|Frankenstein]]'' ([[1931 in film|1931]]). ''Bride of Frankenstein'' was directed by [[James Whale]] and stars [[Boris Karloff]] as [[Frankenstein's Monster|The Monster]], [[Elsa Lanchester]] in the dual role of his mate and [[Mary Shelley]], [[Colin Clive]] as Henry Frankenstein, and [[Ernest Thesiger]] as [[Doctor Septimus Pretorius]].
'''''Bride of Frankenstein''''' (advertised as '''''The Bride of Frankenstein''''') is a 1935 American horror film, the first sequel to the influential ''[[Frankenstein (1931 film)|Frankenstein]]'' ([[1931 in film|1931]]). ''Bride of Frankenstein'' was directed by [[James Whale]] and stars [[Boris Karloff]] as [[Frankenstein's Monster|The Monster]], [[Elsa Lanchester]] in the dual role of his mate and [[Mary Shelley]], [[Colin Clive]] as Henry Frankenstein, and [[Ernest Thesiger]] as [[Doctor Septimus Pretorius]].


The film follows on immediately from the events of the first film, and is rooted in a subplot of the original novel, ''[[Frankenstein]]'' (1818). In the film, a chastened Henry Frankenstein abandons his plans to create life, only to be tempted and finally coerced by the Monster, encouraged by Henry's old mentor Dr Pretorius, into constructing a mate for him. The Bride rejects the Monster however, resulting in her death, that of Pretorius, and apparently the Monster's own death, when he destroys Henry's laboratory.
The film follows on immediately from the events of the first film, and is rooted in a subplot of the original novel, ''[[Frankenstein]]'' (1818). In the film, a chastened Henry Frankenstein abandons his plans to create life, only to be tempted and finally coerced by the Monster, encouraged by Henry's old mentor Dr Pretorius, into constructing a mate for him.


Preparation began shortly after the first film premiered, but script problems delayed the project. [[Principal photography]] started in January 1935, with creative personnel from the original returning in front of and behind the camera. ''Bride of Frankenstein'' was released to critical and popular acclaim, although it encountered difficulties with some state and national censorship boards. Since its release the film's reputation has grown, and it is hailed as Whale's masterpiece. Modern film scholars, noting Whale's [[homosexuality]] and that of others involved in the production, have found a gay sensibility in the film, although a number of Whale's associates have dismissed the idea.
Preparation began shortly after the first film premiered, but script problems delayed the project. [[Principal photography]] started in January 1935, with creative personnel from the original returning in front of and behind the camera. ''Bride of Frankenstein'' was released to critical and popular acclaim, although it encountered difficulties with some state and national censorship boards. Since its release the film's reputation has grown, and it is hailed as Whale's masterpiece. Modern film scholars, noting Whale's [[homosexuality]] and that of others involved in the production, have found a gay sensibility in the film, although a number of Whale's associates have dismissed the idea.
Line 48: Line 46:
A storm rages as final preparations are made to bring the Bride to life. Her bandage-wrapped body is raised through the roof. Lightning strikes a kite, sending electricity through the Bride. Henry and Pretorius lower her and realize their success. "She's alive! Alive!" Henry cries. They remove her bandages and help her to stand. "The bride of Frankenstein!" Doctor Pretorius declares.
A storm rages as final preparations are made to bring the Bride to life. Her bandage-wrapped body is raised through the roof. Lightning strikes a kite, sending electricity through the Bride. Henry and Pretorius lower her and realize their success. "She's alive! Alive!" Henry cries. They remove her bandages and help her to stand. "The bride of Frankenstein!" Doctor Pretorius declares.


The excited Monster sees his mate and reaches out to her. "Friend?" he asks. The Bride, screaming, rejects him. "She hate me! Like others," the Monster says dejectedly. As Elizabeth races to Henry's side, the Monster rampages through the laboratory. "Go! You live!", he tells Henry and Elizabeth. To Pretorius and the Bride he says, "You stay. We belong dead." While Henry and Elizabeth flee, the Monster, shedding a tear as the Bride hisses at him, pulls a lever that destroys the laboratory and tower.
The excited Monster sees his mate and reaches out to her. "Friend?" he asks. The Bride, screaming, rejects him. "She hate me! Like others," the Monster says dejectedly. As Elizabeth races to Henry's side, the Monster rampages through the laboratory. "Go! You live!" he tells Henry and Elizabeth. To Pretorius and the Bride, he says, "You stay. We belong dead." While Henry and Elizabeth flee, the Monster, shedding a tear as the Bride hisses at him, pulls a lever that destroys the laboratory and tower.


==Production==
==Production==
Line 55: Line 53:
Screenwriter [[Robert Florey]] wrote a [[Film treatment|treatment]] entitled ''The New Adventures of Frankenstein &ndash; The Monster Lives!'' but it was rejected without comment early in 1932.<ref name = dvd>{{cite video
Screenwriter [[Robert Florey]] wrote a [[Film treatment|treatment]] entitled ''The New Adventures of Frankenstein &ndash; The Monster Lives!'' but it was rejected without comment early in 1932.<ref name = dvd>{{cite video
|people = MacQueen, Scott
|people = MacQueen, Scott
|year2 = 2004
|date = 2004
|title = DVD commentary, ''Bride of Frankenstein'' Legacy Collection edition
|title = DVD commentary, ''Bride of Frankenstein'' Legacy Collection edition
|medium = DVD
|medium = DVD
|publisher = Universal Studios
|publisher = Universal Studios
}}</ref> Universal staff writer Tom Reed wrote a treatment under the title ''The Return of Frankenstein'', a title retained until filming began.<ref name=vieira85/> Following its acceptance in 1933, Reed wrote a full script that was submitted to the [[Production Code|Hays office]] for review. The script passed its review but Whale, who by then had been contracted to direct, complained that "it stinks to heaven".<ref>Curtis, p. 134</ref> [[L. G. Blochman]] and [[Philip MacDonald]] were the next writers assigned, but Whale also found their work unsatisfactory. In 1934, Whale set [[John L. Balderston]] to work on yet another version, and it was he who returned to an incident from the novel in which the creature demands a mate. In the novel Frankenstein creates a mate, but destroys it without bringing it to life. Balderston also created the Mary Shelley prologue. After several months Whale was still not satisfied with Balderston's work and handed the project to playwright [[William J. Hurlbut]] and [[Edmund Pearson]]. The final script, combining elements of a number of these versions, was submitted for Hays office review in November 1934.<ref>Curtis, pp. 234–6</ref> [[Kim Newman]] reports that Whale planned to make Elizabeth the heart donor for the bride,<ref name = newman>{{cite news|author=[[Kim Newman|Newman, Kim]]|title=Rewind Masterpiece #18|work=[[Empire (magazine)|Empire]]|date=December 2004|page=181}}</ref> but film historian Scott MacQueen states that Whale never had such an intention.<ref name = dvd />
}}</ref> Universal staff writer Tom Reed wrote a treatment under the title ''The Return of Frankenstein'', a title retained until filming began.<ref name=vieira85/> Following its acceptance in 1933, Reed wrote a full script that was submitted to the [[Production Code|Hays office]] for review. The script passed its review but Whale, who by then had been contracted to direct, complained that "it stinks to heaven".<ref>Curtis, p. 134</ref> [[L. G. Blochman]] and [[Philip MacDonald]] were the next writers assigned, but Whale also found their work unsatisfactory. In 1934, Whale set [[John L. Balderston]] to work on yet another version, and it was he who returned to an incident from the novel in which the creature demands a mate. In the novel Frankenstein creates a mate, but destroys it without bringing it to life. Balderston also created the Mary Shelley prologue. After several months Whale was still not satisfied with Balderston's work and handed the project to playwright [[William J. Hurlbut]] and [[Edmund Pearson]]. The final script, combining elements of a number of these versions, was submitted for Hays office review in November 1934.<ref>Curtis, pp. 234–36</ref> [[Kim Newman]] reports that Whale planned to make Elizabeth the heart donor for the bride,<ref name = newman>{{cite news|author=[[Kim Newman|Newman, Kim]]|title=Rewind Masterpiece #18|work=[[Empire (magazine)|Empire]]|date=December 2004|page=181}}</ref> but film historian Scott MacQueen states that Whale never had such an intention.<ref name = dvd />


Sources report that [[Bela Lugosi]] and [[Claude Rains]] were considered, with varying degrees of seriousness, for the role of Frankenstein's mentor, Pretorius;<ref>Lennig, p. 92</ref> others report that the role was created specifically for Ernest Thesiger.<ref name = skal185>Skal, p. 185</ref> Because of [[Mae Clarke]]'s ill health, [[Valerie Hobson]] replaced her as Henry Frankenstein's love interest, Elizabeth.<ref name = dvd /> Early in production, Whale decided that the same actress cast to play the Bride should also play Mary Shelley in the film's prologue, to represent how the story &ndash; and horror in general &ndash; springs from the dark side of the imagination.<ref name=vieira82>Vieira, p. 82</ref> He considered [[Brigitte Helm]] and [[Phyllis Brooks]] before deciding on Elsa Lanchester. Lanchester, who had accompanied husband [[Charles Laughton]] to Hollywood, had met with only moderate success. while Laughton had achieved fame in several films (including Whale's own ''[[The Old Dark House]]'') and won an [[Academy Award]] for his role in ''[[The Private Life of Henry VIII]]''. Lanchester had returned alone to London when Whale contacted her to offer her the dual role.<ref name=lanchester>Curtis, pp. 243–4</ref> Lanchester modeled the Bride's hissing on the hissing of swans. During filming of the hissing sequence, which Whale shot from multiple angles, Lanchester gave herself a sore throat, which she treated with codeine.<ref name=vieira86>Vieira, p. 86</ref>
Sources report that [[Bela Lugosi]] and [[Claude Rains]] were considered, with varying degrees of seriousness, for the role of Frankenstein's mentor, Pretorius;<ref>Lennig, p. 92</ref> others report that the role was created specifically for Ernest Thesiger.<ref name = skal185>Skal, p. 185</ref> Because of [[Mae Clarke]]'s ill health, [[Valerie Hobson]] replaced her as Henry Frankenstein's love interest, Elizabeth.<ref name = dvd /> Early in production, Whale decided that the same actress cast to play the Bride should also play Mary Shelley in the film's prologue, to represent how the story &ndash; and horror in general &ndash; springs from the dark side of the imagination.<ref name=vieira82>Vieira, p. 82</ref> He considered [[Brigitte Helm]] and [[Phyllis Brooks]] before deciding on Elsa Lanchester. Lanchester, who had accompanied husband [[Charles Laughton]] to Hollywood, had met with only moderate success while Laughton had achieved fame in several films (including Whale's own ''[[The Old Dark House]]'') and won an [[Academy Award]] for his role in ''[[The Private Life of Henry VIII]]''. Lanchester had returned alone to London when Whale contacted her to offer her the dual role.<ref name=lanchester>Curtis, pp. 243–44</ref> Lanchester modeled the Bride's hissing on the hissing of swans. During filming of the hissing sequence, which Whale shot from multiple angles, Lanchester gave herself a sore throat, which she treated with codeine.<ref name=vieira86>Vieira, p. 86</ref>


Colin Clive and Boris Karloff reprised their roles from ''Frankenstein'' as creator and creation, respectively. Hobson recalled Clive's alcoholism had worsened since filming the original, but Whale did not recast the role because his "hysterical quality" was necessary for the film.<ref name=vieira82/> Karloff strongly objected to the decision to allow the Monster to speak. "Speech! Stupid! My argument was that if the monster had any impact or charm, it was because he was inarticulate&nbsp;– this great, lumbering, inarticulate creature. The moment he spoke you might as well&nbsp;... play it straight."<ref name = gifford55>Gifford, p. 55</ref> This decision also meant that Karloff could not remove his dental plate, so his cheeks did not have the sunken look of the original film.<ref name = dvd /> Whale and the studio psychiatrist selected 44 simple words for the Monster's vocabulary by looking at test papers of ten-year olds working at the studio.<ref name=vieira80/> Dwight Frye returned to play the doctor's assistant, Karl, having played the hunchback, Fritz in the original. Frye also filmed a scene as an unnamed villager and the role of "Nephew Glutz", a man who murdered his uncle and blamed the death on the Monster.<ref name = dvd /> Boris Karloff is credited simply as KARLOFF, which was Universal's custom during the height of his career.<ref name = curtis237 /> Elsa Lanchester is credited for Mary Shelley, but in a nod to the earlier film, the Monster's bride is credited only as "?" just as Boris Karloff had been in the opening credits of ''Frankenstein''.
Colin Clive and Boris Karloff reprised their roles from ''Frankenstein'' as creator and creation, respectively. Hobson recalled Clive's alcoholism had worsened since filming the original, but Whale did not recast the role because his "hysterical quality" was necessary for the film.<ref name=vieira82/> Karloff strongly objected to the decision to allow the Monster to speak. "Speech! Stupid! My argument was that if the monster had any impact or charm, it was because he was inarticulate&nbsp;– this great, lumbering, inarticulate creature. The moment he spoke you might as well&nbsp;... play it straight."<ref name = gifford55>Gifford, p. 55</ref> This decision also meant that Karloff could not remove his dental plate, so his cheeks did not have the sunken look of the original film.<ref name = dvd /> Whale and the studio psychiatrist selected 44 simple words for the Monster's vocabulary by looking at test papers of ten-year olds working at the studio.<ref name=vieira80/> Dwight Frye returned to play the doctor's assistant, Karl, having played the hunchback, Fritz in the original. Frye also filmed a scene as an unnamed villager and the role of "Nephew Glutz", a man who murdered his uncle and blamed the death on the Monster.<ref name = dvd /> Boris Karloff is credited simply as KARLOFF, which was Universal's custom during the height of his career.<ref name = curtis237 /> Elsa Lanchester is credited for Mary Shelley, but in a nod to the earlier film, the Monster's bride is credited only as "?" just as Boris Karloff had been in the opening credits of ''Frankenstein''.
Line 68: Line 66:
Universal makeup artist [[Jack Pierce (make-up artist)|Jack Pierce]] paid special attention to the Monster's appearance in this film. He altered his 1931 design to display the after-effects of the mill fire, adding scars and shortening the Monster's hair.<ref name = curtis237>Curtis, p. 237</ref> Over the course of filming, Pierce modified the Monster's makeup to indicate that the Monster's injuries were healing as the film progressed.<ref name = dvd /> Pierce co-created the Bride's makeup with strong input from Whale, especially regarding the Bride's [[Secular icon|iconic]] hair style,<ref name=lanchester/> based on [[Nefertiti]].<ref name=vieira85/> Lanchester's hair was given a [[Perm (hairstyle)|Marcel wave]] over a wire frame to achieve the style.<ref name = dvd /> Lanchester disliked working with Pierce, who she said "really did feel that he made these people, like he was a god&nbsp;... in the morning he'd be dressed in white as if he were in hospital to perform an operation."<ref name=vieira85>Vieira, p. 85</ref> To play Mary Shelley, Lanchester wore a white net dress embroidered with sequins of butterflies, stars and moons, which the actress had heard required 17&nbsp;women 12&nbsp;weeks to make.<ref name=vieira80/>
Universal makeup artist [[Jack Pierce (make-up artist)|Jack Pierce]] paid special attention to the Monster's appearance in this film. He altered his 1931 design to display the after-effects of the mill fire, adding scars and shortening the Monster's hair.<ref name = curtis237>Curtis, p. 237</ref> Over the course of filming, Pierce modified the Monster's makeup to indicate that the Monster's injuries were healing as the film progressed.<ref name = dvd /> Pierce co-created the Bride's makeup with strong input from Whale, especially regarding the Bride's [[Secular icon|iconic]] hair style,<ref name=lanchester/> based on [[Nefertiti]].<ref name=vieira85/> Lanchester's hair was given a [[Perm (hairstyle)|Marcel wave]] over a wire frame to achieve the style.<ref name = dvd /> Lanchester disliked working with Pierce, who she said "really did feel that he made these people, like he was a god&nbsp;... in the morning he'd be dressed in white as if he were in hospital to perform an operation."<ref name=vieira85>Vieira, p. 85</ref> To play Mary Shelley, Lanchester wore a white net dress embroidered with sequins of butterflies, stars and moons, which the actress had heard required 17&nbsp;women 12&nbsp;weeks to make.<ref name=vieira80/>


[[Kenneth Strickfaden]] created and maintained the laboratory equipment. Strickfaden recycled a number of the fancifully-named machines he had created for the original ''Frankenstein'' for use in ''Bride'', including the "Cosmic Ray Diffuser",<ref>Goldman, p. 165</ref> and the "Nebularium".<ref>Goldman, p. 183</ref> A lightning bolt generated by Strickfaden's equipment has become a [[Stock footage|stock]] scene, appearing in any number of films and television shows.<ref>Picart, et. al., p. 40</ref> The man behind the film's special photographic effects was [[John P. Fulton]], head of the special effects department at Universal Studios at the time.<ref>Picart, et. al., p. 39</ref> Fulton and [[David S. Horsely]] created the homunculi over the course of two days by shooting the actors in full-size jars against black velvet and aligning them with the perspective of the on-set jars. The foreground film plate was [[rotoscope]]d and [[Matte (filmmaking)|matte]]d onto the rear plate. Diminutive actor [[Billy Barty]] is briefly visible from the back in the finished film as a homunculus infant in a high chair but Whale cut the infant's reveal before the film's release.<ref name = dvd />
[[Kenneth Strickfaden]] created and maintained the laboratory equipment. Strickfaden recycled a number of the fancifully-named machines he had created for the original ''Frankenstein'' for use in ''Bride'', including the "Cosmic Ray Diffuser",<ref>Goldman, p. 165</ref> and the "Nebularium".<ref>Goldman, p. 183</ref> A lightning bolt generated by Strickfaden's equipment has become a [[Stock footage|stock]] scene, appearing in any number of films and television shows.<ref>Picart, ''et al.'', p. 40</ref> The man behind the film's special photographic effects was [[John P. Fulton]], head of the special effects department at Universal Studios at the time.<ref>Picart, ''et al.'', p. 39</ref> Fulton and [[David S. Horsely]] created the homunculi over the course of two days by shooting the actors in full-size jars against black velvet and aligning them with the perspective of the on-set jars. The foreground film plate was [[rotoscope]]d and [[Matte (filmmaking)|matte]]d onto the rear plate. Diminutive actor [[Billy Barty]] is briefly visible from the back in the finished film as a homunculus infant in a high chair but Whale cut the infant's reveal before the film's release.<ref name = dvd />


Whale met [[Franz Waxman]] at a party and asked him to score the picture. "Nothing will be resolved in this picture except the end destruction scene. Would you write an unresolved score for it?" asked Whale.<ref name=vieira86/> Waxman created three distinctive themes: one for the Monster; one for the Bride; and one for Pretorius. The score closes, at Whale's suggestion, with a powerful dissonant chord, intended to convey the idea that the on-screen explosion was so powerful that the theater where the film was being screened was affected by it.<ref>Curtis, p. 246</ref> Constantin Bakaleinikoff conducted 22&nbsp;musicians to record the score in a single nine-hour session.<ref>Curtis, p. 249</ref>
Whale met [[Franz Waxman]] at a party and asked him to score the picture. "Nothing will be resolved in this picture except the end destruction scene. Would you write an unresolved score for it?" asked Whale.<ref name=vieira86/> Waxman created three distinctive themes: one for the Monster; one for the Bride; and one for Pretorius. The score closes, at Whale's suggestion, with a powerful dissonant chord, intended to convey the idea that the on-screen explosion was so powerful that the theater where the film was being screened was affected by it.<ref>Curtis, p. 246</ref> Constantin Bakaleinikoff conducted 22&nbsp;musicians to record the score in a single nine-hour session.<ref>Curtis, p. 249</ref>


Shooting began on January 2, 1935<ref name = mank>Mank, p. xvii</ref> with a projected budget of US$293,750 (${{Formatprice|{{Inflation|US|293750|1935|r=-4}}|0}} as of {{CURRENTISOYEAR}}) – almost exactly the budget of the original – and an estimated 36-day shooting schedule.{{Inflation-fn|US}}<ref>Curtis, p. 241</ref> On the first day, Karloff waded in the water below the destroyed windmill wearing a rubber suit under his costume. Air got into the suit and expanded it like an "obscene water lilly".<ref name=vieira85/> Later that day, Karloff broke his hip, necessitating a stunt double.<ref name = gifford55 /> Clive had also broken his leg.<ref name=vieira82/> Shooting was completed on March 7, 1935. The film was ten days over schedule because Whale shut down the picture for ten days until Heggie became available to play the Hermit.<ref>Curtis, pp. 248–9</ref> With a final cost of $397,023 (${{Formatprice|{{Inflation|US|497023|1935|r=-4}}|0}} as of {{CURRENTISOYEAR}}), ''Bride'' was more than $100,000 (${{Formatprice|{{Inflation|US|100000|1935|r=-4}}|0}} as of {{CURRENTISOYEAR}}) over budget.{{Inflation-fn|US}}<ref name = mank /> As originally filmed, Henry and Elizabeth died fleeing the exploding castle. Whale re-shot the ending to allow for their survival, although Clive and Hobson are still visible on-screen in the collapsing laboratory.<ref name=newman/> Whale completed his final cut, shortening the running time from about 90&nbsp;minutes to 75 and re-shooting and re-editing the ending, only days before the film's scheduled premiere date.<ref name = curtis250 />
Shooting began on January 2, 1935<ref name = mank>Mank, p. xvii</ref> with a projected budget of US$293,750 (${{Formatprice|{{Inflation|US|293750|1935|r=-4}}|0}} as of {{CURRENTISOYEAR}}) – almost exactly the budget of the original – and an estimated 36-day shooting schedule.{{Inflation-fn|US}}<ref>Curtis, p. 241</ref> On the first day, Karloff waded in the water below the destroyed windmill wearing a rubber suit under his costume. Air got into the suit and expanded it like an "obscene water lilly".<ref name=vieira85/> Later that day, Karloff broke his hip, necessitating a stunt double.<ref name = gifford55 /> Clive had also broken his leg.<ref name=vieira82/> Shooting was completed on March 7, 1935. The film was ten days over schedule because Whale shut down the picture for ten days until Heggie became available to play the Hermit.<ref>Curtis, pp. 248–49</ref> With a final cost of $397,023 (${{Formatprice|{{Inflation|US|497023|1935|r=-4}}|0}} as of {{CURRENTISOYEAR}}), ''Bride'' was more than $100,000 (${{Formatprice|{{Inflation|US|100000|1935|r=-4}}|0}} as of {{CURRENTISOYEAR}}) over budget.{{Inflation-fn|US}}<ref name = mank /> As originally filmed, Henry and Elizabeth died fleeing the exploding castle. Whale re-shot the ending to allow for their survival, although Clive and Hobson are still visible on-screen in the collapsing laboratory.<ref name=newman/> Whale completed his final cut, shortening the running time from about 90&nbsp;minutes to 75 and re-shooting and re-editing the ending, only days before the film's scheduled premiere date.<ref name = curtis250 />


==Censorship==
==Censorship==
Line 80: Line 78:


==Reception==
==Reception==
''Bride of Frankenstein'' was profitable for Universal, with a 1943 report showing that the film had by then earned approximately $2 million (${{Formatprice|{{Inflation|US|2000000|1943|r=-4}}|0}} as of {{CURRENTISOYEAR}}) for the studio, a profit of about $950,000 (${{Formatprice|{{Inflation|US|950000|1943|r=-4}}|0}} as of {{CURRENTISOYEAR}}).{{Inflation-fn|US}}<ref>Curtis p. 251</ref> The film was critically praised upon its release, although some reviewers did qualify their opinions based on the film's being in the horror genre. The ''[[New York World-Telegram]]'' called the film "good entertainment of its kind".<ref name = curtis2501 /> The ''[[New York Post]]'' described it as "a grotesque, gruesome tale which, of its kind, is swell".<ref name = curtis2501 /> The ''[[Hollywood Reporter]]'' similarly called the film "a joy for those who can appreciate it".<ref name = curtis2501>Curtis, pp. 250–1</ref>
''Bride of Frankenstein'' was profitable for Universal, with a 1943 report showing that the film had by then earned approximately $2 million (${{Formatprice|{{Inflation|US|2000000|1943|r=-4}}|0}} as of {{CURRENTISOYEAR}}) for the studio, a profit of about $950,000 (${{Formatprice|{{Inflation|US|950000|1943|r=-4}}|0}} as of {{CURRENTISOYEAR}}).{{Inflation-fn|US}}<ref>Curtis p. 251</ref> The film was critically praised upon its release, although some reviewers did qualify their opinions based on the film's being in the horror genre. The ''[[New York World-Telegram]]'' called the film "good entertainment of its kind".<ref name = curtis2501 /> The ''[[New York Post]]'' described it as "a grotesque, gruesome tale which, of its kind, is swell".<ref name = curtis2501 /> The ''[[Hollywood Reporter]]'' similarly called the film "a joy for those who can appreciate it".<ref name = curtis2501>Curtis, pp. 250–51</ref>


''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' did not so qualify its review. "[It is] one of those rare instances where none can review it, or talk about it, without mentioning the cameraman, art director, and score composer in the same breath as the actors and director." ''Variety'' also praised the cast, writing that "Karloff manages to invest the character with some subtleties of emotion that are surprisingly real and touching&nbsp;... Thesiger as Dr Pretorious [is] a diabolic characterization if ever there was one&nbsp;... Lanchester handles two assignments, being first in a preamble as author Mary Shelley and then the created woman. In latter assignment she impresses quite highly."<ref name = variety>{{cite news | last =Variety staff | title = Bride of Frankenstein | work =[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |date=January&nbsp;1, 1935| url = http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117789526.html?categoryid=31&cs=1&p=0|accessdate=January&nbsp;6, 2008}}</ref>
''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' did not so qualify its review. "[It is] one of those rare instances where none can review it, or talk about it, without mentioning the cameraman, art director, and score composer in the same breath as the actors and director." ''Variety'' also praised the cast, writing that "Karloff manages to invest the character with some subtleties of emotion that are surprisingly real and touching&nbsp;... Thesiger as Dr Pretorious [is] a diabolic characterization if ever there was one&nbsp;... Lanchester handles two assignments, being first in a preamble as author Mary Shelley and then the created woman. In latter assignment she impresses quite highly."<ref name = variety>{{cite news | last =Variety staff | title = Bride of Frankenstein | work =[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |date=January&nbsp;1, 1935| url = http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117789526.html?categoryid=31&cs=1&p=0|accessdate=January&nbsp;6, 2008}}</ref>


In another unqualified review, ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' wrote that the film had "a vitality that makes their efforts fully the equal of the original picture&nbsp;... Screenwriters Hurlbut & Balderston and Director James Whale have given it the macabre intensity proper to all good horror pieces, but have substituted a queer kind of mechanistic pathos for the sheer evil that was ''Frankenstein''."<ref>{{cite news | title = The New Pictures | work = [[Time (magazine)|Time]] | date =April&nbsp;29, 1935| url =http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,754638-2,00.html|accessdate=January&nbsp;6, 2008}}</ref> The ''[[Oakland Tribune]]'' concurred it was "a fantasy produced on a rather magnificent scale, with excellent stagecraft and fine photographic effects".<ref>{{cite news | last =Soanes | first =Wood | title = Frankenstein stalks again in Roxie play | publisher = [[Oakland Tribune]] | date =[[1935-05-25]]}}</ref> While the ''[[Winnipeg Free Press]]'' thought that the electrical equipment might have been better suited to [[Buck Rogers]], nonetheless the reviewer praised the film as "exciting and sometimes morbidly gruesome", declaring that "All who enjoyed ''Frankenstein'' will welcome his ''Bride'' as a worthy successor."<ref>{{cite news | title = Lyceum screens "Monster" sequel | work = [[Winnipeg Free Press]] | date =[[1935-05-24]]}}</ref> ''[[The New York Times]]'' called Karloff "so splendid in the role that all one can say is 'he is the Monster.{{' "}}<ref name = nytreview>{{cite news
In another unqualified review, ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' wrote that the film had "a vitality that makes their efforts fully the equal of the original picture&nbsp;... Screenwriters Hurlbut & Balderston and Director James Whale have given it the macabre intensity proper to all good horror pieces, but have substituted a queer kind of mechanistic pathos for the sheer evil that was ''Frankenstein''."<ref>{{cite news | title = The New Pictures | work = [[Time (magazine)|Time]] | date =April&nbsp;29, 1935| url =http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,754638-2,00.html|accessdate=January&nbsp;6, 2008}}</ref> The ''[[Oakland Tribune]]'' concurred it was "a fantasy produced on a rather magnificent scale, with excellent stagecraft and fine photographic effects".<ref>{{cite news | last =Soanes | first =Wood | title = Frankenstein stalks again in Roxie play | work = [[Oakland Tribune]] | date =1935-05-25}}</ref> While the ''[[Winnipeg Free Press]]'' thought that the electrical equipment might have been better suited to [[Buck Rogers]], nonetheless the reviewer praised the film as "exciting and sometimes morbidly gruesome", declaring that "All who enjoyed ''Frankenstein'' will welcome his ''Bride'' as a worthy successor."<ref>{{cite news | title = Lyceum screens "Monster" sequel | work = [[Winnipeg Free Press]] | date =1935-05-24}}</ref> ''[[The New York Times]]'' called Karloff "so splendid in the role that all one can say is 'he is the Monster.{{' "}}<ref name = nytreview>{{cite news
| last = F.S.N.
| last = F.S.N.
| title = Bride of Frankenstein At the Roxy
| title = Bride of Frankenstein At the Roxy
Line 92: Line 90:
| accessdate =February&nbsp;1, 2009}}</ref> The ''Times'' praised the entire principle cast and Whale's direction in concluding that ''Bride'' is "a first-rate horror film",<ref name = nytreview /> and presciently suggested that "The Monster should become an institution, like [[Charlie Chan]]."<ref name = nytreview /> ''Bride'' was nominated for one [[Academy Award]], for Best Sound Recording.<ref>{{cite web | title =Bride of Frankenstein Awards | publisher =[[Allmovie]] | url =http://wm04.allmovie.com/cg/avg.dll?p=avg&sql=1:7091~T4 | accessdate =January&nbsp;9, 2008}}</ref>
| accessdate =February&nbsp;1, 2009}}</ref> The ''Times'' praised the entire principle cast and Whale's direction in concluding that ''Bride'' is "a first-rate horror film",<ref name = nytreview /> and presciently suggested that "The Monster should become an institution, like [[Charlie Chan]]."<ref name = nytreview /> ''Bride'' was nominated for one [[Academy Award]], for Best Sound Recording.<ref>{{cite web | title =Bride of Frankenstein Awards | publisher =[[Allmovie]] | url =http://wm04.allmovie.com/cg/avg.dll?p=avg&sql=1:7091~T4 | accessdate =January&nbsp;9, 2008}}</ref>


The film's reputation has persisted and grown in the decades since its release. In 1998, the film was added to the United States [[National Film Registry]], having been deemed "culturally, historically or aesthetically significant".<ref>{{cite news | title ='Easy Rider' now listed on National Film Registry | publisher =[[CNN]] | date =November&nbsp;17, 1998| url =http://www.cnn.com/SHOWBIZ/News/9811/17/showbuzz/ | accessdate =January&nbsp;6, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title =Films Selected to The National Film Registry, Library of Congress 1989-2007 | publisher =Library of Congress | url =http://www.loc.gov/film/titles.html | accessdate=January&nbsp;8, 2008}}</ref> Frequently identified as James Whale's masterpiece,<ref>{{cite news | last =Graham | first =Bob | title = `Bride' Is as Lovely as Ever | work = [[San Francisco Chronicle]] | date =October&nbsp;9, 1998| url =http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/1998/10/09/DD32378.DTL&type=printable|accessdate=January&nbsp;8, 2008}}</ref> the film is lauded as "the finest of all [[gothic horror]] movies".<ref>{{cite news | last =French | first =Philip | title = Films of the Day: The Bride of Frankenstein | work =[[The Observer]] | date =December&nbsp;2, 2007}}</ref> ''Time'' rated ''Bride of Frankenstein'' in its "ALL-TIME 100 Movies", in which critics [[Richard Corliss]] and [[Richard Schickel]] overruled the magazine's original review to declare the film "one of those rare sequels that is infinitely superior to its source".<ref>{{cite news | last =Corliss | first =Richard | coauthors =Richard Schickel | title = ALL-TIME 100 Movies | work = [[Time (magazine)|Time]] | date = | url =http://www.time.com/time/2005/100movies/0,23220,bride_of_frankenstein,00.html | accessdate =January&nbsp;6, 2008}}</ref> In 2008, the ''[[Boston Herald]]'' named it the second greatest horror film after ''[[Nosferatu]]''.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.bostonherald.com/entertainment/movies/general/view.bg?articleid=1127105|title=Creepy countdown: The Herald ranks the 10 scariest flicks in film history|work=[[Boston Herald]]|author=James Verniere|date=October 27, 2008|accessdate=October 28, 2008}}</ref>
The film's reputation has persisted and grown in the decades since its release. In 1998, the film was added to the United States [[National Film Registry]], having been deemed "culturally, historically or aesthetically significant".<ref>{{cite news | title ='Easy Rider' now listed on National Film Registry | publisher =CNN | date =November&nbsp;17, 1998| url =http://www.cnn.com/SHOWBIZ/News/9811/17/showbuzz/ | accessdate =January&nbsp;6, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title =Films Selected to The National Film Registry, Library of Congress 1989-2007 | publisher =Library of Congress | url =http://www.loc.gov/film/titles.html | accessdate=January&nbsp;8, 2008}}</ref> Frequently identified as James Whale's masterpiece,<ref>{{cite news | last =Graham | first =Bob | title = `Bride' Is as Lovely as Ever | work = [[San Francisco Chronicle]] | date =October&nbsp;9, 1998| url =http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/1998/10/09/DD32378.DTL&type=printable|accessdate=January&nbsp;8, 2008}}</ref> the film is lauded as "the finest of all [[gothic horror]] movies".<ref>{{cite news | last =French | first =Philip | title = Films of the Day: The Bride of Frankenstein | work =[[The Observer]] | date =December&nbsp;2, 2007}}</ref> ''Time'' rated ''Bride of Frankenstein'' in its "ALL-TIME 100 Movies", in which critics [[Richard Corliss]] and [[Richard Schickel]] overruled the magazine's original review to declare the film "one of those rare sequels that is infinitely superior to its source".<ref>{{cite news | last =Corliss | first =Richard | coauthors =Richard Schickel | title = All-Time 100 Movies | work = [[Time (magazine)|Time]] | url =http://www.time.com/time/2005/100movies/0,23220,bride_of_frankenstein,00.html | accessdate =January&nbsp;6, 2008}}</ref> In 2008, the ''[[Boston Herald]]'' named it the second greatest horror film after ''[[Nosferatu]]''.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.bostonherald.com/entertainment/movies/general/view.bg?articleid=1127105|title=Creepy countdown: The Herald ranks the 10 scariest flicks in film history|work=[[Boston Herald]]|author=James Verniere|date=October 27, 2008|accessdate=October 28, 2008}}</ref> ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'' considers this film superior to ''Frankenstein''.<ref name="Entertainment">{{cite book
|title= The Entertainment Weekly Guide to the Greatest Movies Ever Made
|year=1996
|publisher=Warner Books
|location=New York
|isbn=
|pages=99–100}}</ref>


==Christian imagery==
==Christian imagery==
Christian imagery is "hidden in plain sight" throughout the film. In addition to the scenes of the Monster trussed in a cruciform pose and the crucified figure of Jesus in the graveyard, the hermit has a crucifix on the wall of his hut (which, to Whale's consternation, editor Ted Kent made glow during a fade-out,<ref name = dvd />) and the Monster consumes the Christian [[sacrament]]s of bread and wine at his "last supper" with the hermit. Horror scholar [[David J. Skal]] suggests that Whale's intention was to make a "direct comparison of Frankenstein's monster to Christ".<ref>Skal. p. 189</ref> Film scholar Scott MacQueen, noting Whale's lack of any religious convictions, disputes the notion that the Monster is a Christ-figure. Rather, the Monster is a "mockery of the divine" since, having been created by Man rather than God, it "lacks the divine spark". In crucifying the Monster, he says, Whale "pushes the audience's buttons" by inverting the central Christian myth of the death of Christ followed by the resurrection. The Monster is raised from the dead first, ''then'' crucified.<ref name = dvd />
[[Christian symbolism|Christian imagery]] is "hidden in plain sight" throughout the film. In addition to the scenes of the Monster trussed in a cruciform pose and the crucified figure of Jesus in the graveyard, the hermit has a crucifix on the wall of his hut (which, to Whale's consternation, editor Ted Kent made glow during a fade-out<ref name = dvd />) and the Monster consumes the Christian [[sacrament]]s of bread and wine at his "last supper" with the hermit. Horror scholar [[David J. Skal]] suggests that Whale's intention was to make a "direct comparison of Frankenstein's monster to Christ".<ref>Skal. p. 189</ref> Film scholar Scott MacQueen, noting Whale's lack of any religious convictions, disputes the notion that the Monster is a Christ-figure. Rather, the Monster is a "mockery of the divine" since, having been created by Man rather than God, it "lacks the divine spark". In crucifying the Monster, he says, Whale "pushes the audience's buttons" by inverting the central Christian myth of the death of Christ followed by the resurrection. The Monster is raised from the dead first, ''then'' crucified.<ref name = dvd />


==Homosexual interpretations==
==Homosexual interpretations==
Line 120: Line 124:
| url = http://www.filmsinreview.com/2008/08/07/curtis-harrington-on-james-whale/
| url = http://www.filmsinreview.com/2008/08/07/curtis-harrington-on-james-whale/
| accessdate =February&nbsp;1, 2009}}</ref> Specifically in response to the "majesty and power" reading, Harrington stated, "My opinion is that’s just pure bullshit. That’s a critical interpretation that has nothing to do with the original inspiration."<ref name = fir /> He concludes, "I think the closest you can come to a homosexual metaphor in his films is to identify that certain sort of camp humor."<ref name = fir /> Whale's companion [[David Lewis (producer)|David Lewis]] stated flatly that Whale's sexual orientation was "not germane" to his filmmaking, saying, "Jimmy was first and foremost an artist, and his films represent the work of an artist&nbsp;– not a gay artist, but an artist."<ref>Quoted in Curtis, p. 144</ref>
| accessdate =February&nbsp;1, 2009}}</ref> Specifically in response to the "majesty and power" reading, Harrington stated, "My opinion is that’s just pure bullshit. That’s a critical interpretation that has nothing to do with the original inspiration."<ref name = fir /> He concludes, "I think the closest you can come to a homosexual metaphor in his films is to identify that certain sort of camp humor."<ref name = fir /> Whale's companion [[David Lewis (producer)|David Lewis]] stated flatly that Whale's sexual orientation was "not germane" to his filmmaking, saying, "Jimmy was first and foremost an artist, and his films represent the work of an artist&nbsp;– not a gay artist, but an artist."<ref>Quoted in Curtis, p. 144</ref>

==Remake==
In June, 2009, [[The Hollywood Reporter]]'s ''Risky Biz Blog'' reported that Universal and [[Imagine Entertainment]] were in talks with [[Neil Burger]] to write and direct a remake of the film.<ref>{{cite web|author=June 16, 2009 in Remakes |url=http://www.riskybusinessblog.com/2009/06/bride-of-frankenstein-remake.html |title=Bride of Frankenstein comes to life-The Hollywood Reporter: Risky Business |publisher=Riskybusinessblog.com |date= |accessdate=2009-06-17}}</ref> [[Brian Grazer]] and [[Sean Daniels]] will be producing, while [[Dirk Wittenborn]] would be co-writer.


==See also==
==See also==
Line 127: Line 134:


==Notes==
==Notes==
{{Reflist|2}}
{{Reflist|3}}


==References==
==References==
Line 145: Line 152:
==External links==
==External links==
{{wikiquote}}
{{wikiquote}}
{{commonscat|Bride of Frankenstein (film)}}
* {{imdb title|0026138}}
* {{tcmdb title|69663}}
*{{Amg movie|7091}}
*{{rotten-tomatoes|bride_of_frankenstein}}
* {{amg movie|1:7091}}
*{{tcmdb title|69663}}
* [http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/bride_of_frankenstein/ ''Bride of Frankenstein''] at [[Rotten Tomatoes]]
*{{imdb title|0026138}}


<!--spacing, please do not remove-->
<!--spacing, please do not remove-->
Line 155: Line 163:
{{Universal Horror}}
{{Universal Horror}}
{{James Whale}}
{{James Whale}}
{{American films}}

{{featured article}}
{{featured article}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Bride Of Frankenstein}}
[[Category:1930s horror films]]
[[Category:1930s horror films]]
[[Category:1935 films]]
[[Category:1935 films]]
[[Category:American horror films]]
[[Category:American horror films]]
[[Category:Black and white films]]
[[Category:Black-and-white films]]
[[Category:Comedy horror films]]
[[Category:Comedy horror films]]
[[Category:English-language films]]
[[Category:English-language films]]
Line 167: Line 175:
[[Category:Films directed by James Whale]]
[[Category:Films directed by James Whale]]
[[Category:Frankenstein films]]
[[Category:Frankenstein films]]
[[Category:LGBT-related films]]
[[Category:Science fiction horror films]]
[[Category:Science fiction horror films]]
[[Category:Sequel films]]
[[Category:Sequel films]]
Line 173: Line 180:
[[Category:Universal Pictures films]]
[[Category:Universal Pictures films]]
[[Category:American science fiction films]]
[[Category:American science fiction films]]
[[Category:American LGBT-related films]]
[[Category:Universal Monsters film series]]


[[bn:ব্রাইড অফ ফ্রাঙ্কেনস্টাইন]]
[[bn:ব্রাইড অফ ফ্রাঙ্কেনস্টাইন]]
Line 183: Line 192:
[[no:Bride of Frankenstein]]
[[no:Bride of Frankenstein]]
[[pl:Narzeczona Frankensteina]]
[[pl:Narzeczona Frankensteina]]
[[pt:Bride of Frankenstein]]
[[pt:A Noiva de Frankenstein]]
[[ru:Невеста Франкенштейна (фильм, 1935)]]
[[ru:Невеста Франкенштейна (фильм, 1935)]]
[[fi:Frankensteinin morsian]]
[[fi:Frankensteinin morsian]]

Revision as of 15:01, 9 March 2010

Bride of Frankenstein
File:Brideoffrankposter.jpg
theatrical poster
Directed byJames Whale
Written byScreenplay:
William Hurlbut
Adaptation:
William Hurlbut
John L. Balderston
Novel:
Mary Shelley
Produced byCarl Laemmle, Jr.
StarringBoris Karloff
Colin Clive
Valerie Hobson
Ernest Thesiger
Elsa Lanchester
Una O'Connor
CinematographyJohn J. Mescall
Edited byTed Kent
Music byFranz Waxman
Distributed byUniversal Pictures
Release dates
April 22, 1935 (LA)
May 10, 1935 (NY)[1]
Running time
75 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
BudgetUS$393,750

Bride of Frankenstein (advertised as The Bride of Frankenstein) is a 1935 American horror film, the first sequel to the influential Frankenstein (1931). Bride of Frankenstein was directed by James Whale and stars Boris Karloff as The Monster, Elsa Lanchester in the dual role of his mate and Mary Shelley, Colin Clive as Henry Frankenstein, and Ernest Thesiger as Doctor Septimus Pretorius.

The film follows on immediately from the events of the first film, and is rooted in a subplot of the original novel, Frankenstein (1818). In the film, a chastened Henry Frankenstein abandons his plans to create life, only to be tempted and finally coerced by the Monster, encouraged by Henry's old mentor Dr Pretorius, into constructing a mate for him.

Preparation began shortly after the first film premiered, but script problems delayed the project. Principal photography started in January 1935, with creative personnel from the original returning in front of and behind the camera. Bride of Frankenstein was released to critical and popular acclaim, although it encountered difficulties with some state and national censorship boards. Since its release the film's reputation has grown, and it is hailed as Whale's masterpiece. Modern film scholars, noting Whale's homosexuality and that of others involved in the production, have found a gay sensibility in the film, although a number of Whale's associates have dismissed the idea.

Plot

On a stormy night, Percy Bysshe Shelley (Douglas Walton) and Lord Byron (Gavin Gordon) praise Mary Shelley (Elsa Lanchester) for her story of Frankenstein and his Monster. Reminding them that her intention was to impart a moral lesson, Mary says she has more of the story to tell. The scene shifts to the end of the 1931 Frankenstein.

Villagers gathered around the burning windmill cheer the apparent death of the Monster (Boris Karloff, credited as "Karloff"). Their joy is tempered by the realization that Henry Frankenstein (Colin Clive) is also apparently dead. Hans (Reginald Barlow), father of the girl the creature drowned in the previous film, wants to see the Monster's bones. He falls into a pit underneath the mill, where the Monster strangles him. Hauling himself from the pit, the Monster casts Hans' wife (Mary Gordon) into it to her death. He next encounters Minnie (Una O'Connor), who flees in terror.

Henry's body is returned to his fiancée Elizabeth (Valerie Hobson) at his ancestral castle home. Minnie arrives to sound the alarm about the Monster but her warning goes unheeded. Elizabeth, seeing Henry move, realizes he is still alive.

Nursed back to health by Elizabeth, Henry has renounced his creation but still believes he may be destined to unlock the secret of life and immortality. A hysterical Elizabeth cries that she sees death coming, foreshadowing the arrival of Henry's former mentor, Doctor Septimus Pretorius (Ernest Thesiger). In his rooms, Pretorius shows Henry several homunculi he has created, including a miniature queen, king, archbishop, devil, ballerina and mermaid. Pretorius wishes to work with Henry to create a mate for the Monster and offers a toast to their venture: "To a new world of gods and monsters!"

The Monster saves a young shepherdess (Anne Darling) from drowning; her screams upon seeing him alert two hunters, who shoot and injure the creature. The hunters raise a mob that sets out in pursuit. Captured and trussed to a pole, the Monster is hauled to a dungeon and chained. Left alone, he breaks his chains and escapes.

That night the Monster encounters a gypsy family and burns his hand in their campfire. Following the sound of a violin playing "Ave Maria", the Monster encounters an old, blind hermit (O. P. Heggie), who thanks God for sending him a friend. He teaches the monster words like "friend" and "good" and shares a meal with him. Two lost hunters stumble upon the cottage and recognize the Monster. He attacks them and accidentally burns down the cottage as the hunters lead the hermit away.

Taking refuge from another angry mob in an underground crypt, the Monster spies Pretorius and his cronies Karl (Dwight Frye) and Ludwig (Ted Billings) breaking open a grave. The henchmen depart; Pretorius stays to enjoy a light supper. The Monster approaches Pretorius, and learns that Pretorius plans to create a mate for him.

Henry and Elizabeth, now married, are visited by Pretorius; he is ready for Henry to do his part in their "grand collaboration". Henry refuses and Pretorius calls in the Monster, who demands Henry's help. Henry again refuses and Pretorius orders the Monster out, signaling him to kidnap Elizabeth. Pretorius guarantees her safe return upon Henry's participation. Henry returns to his tower laboratory where, in spite of himself, he grows excited over his work. After being assured of Elizabeth's safety, Henry completes the Bride's body.

A storm rages as final preparations are made to bring the Bride to life. Her bandage-wrapped body is raised through the roof. Lightning strikes a kite, sending electricity through the Bride. Henry and Pretorius lower her and realize their success. "She's alive! Alive!" Henry cries. They remove her bandages and help her to stand. "The bride of Frankenstein!" Doctor Pretorius declares.

The excited Monster sees his mate and reaches out to her. "Friend?" he asks. The Bride, screaming, rejects him. "She hate me! Like others," the Monster says dejectedly. As Elizabeth races to Henry's side, the Monster rampages through the laboratory. "Go! You live!" he tells Henry and Elizabeth. To Pretorius and the Bride, he says, "You stay. We belong dead." While Henry and Elizabeth flee, the Monster, shedding a tear as the Bride hisses at him, pulls a lever that destroys the laboratory and tower.

Production

The studio considered making a sequel to Frankenstein as early as its 1931 preview screenings, following which the film's original ending was changed to allow for Henry Frankenstein's survival.[2] James Whale initially refused to direct Bride, believing he had "squeezed the idea dry"[3] on the first film. Following the success of Whale's The Invisible Man, producer Carl Laemmle, Jr. realized that Whale was the only possible director for Bride; Whale took advantage of the situation in persuading the studio to let him make One More River.[4] Whale believed the sequel would not top the original, so he decided instead to make it a memorable "hoot".[3] According to a studio publicist, Whale and Universal's studio psychiatrist decided "the Monster would have the mental age of a ten-year old boy and the emotional age of a lad of fifteen".[3]

Screenwriter Robert Florey wrote a treatment entitled The New Adventures of Frankenstein – The Monster Lives! but it was rejected without comment early in 1932.[5] Universal staff writer Tom Reed wrote a treatment under the title The Return of Frankenstein, a title retained until filming began.[6] Following its acceptance in 1933, Reed wrote a full script that was submitted to the Hays office for review. The script passed its review but Whale, who by then had been contracted to direct, complained that "it stinks to heaven".[7] L. G. Blochman and Philip MacDonald were the next writers assigned, but Whale also found their work unsatisfactory. In 1934, Whale set John L. Balderston to work on yet another version, and it was he who returned to an incident from the novel in which the creature demands a mate. In the novel Frankenstein creates a mate, but destroys it without bringing it to life. Balderston also created the Mary Shelley prologue. After several months Whale was still not satisfied with Balderston's work and handed the project to playwright William J. Hurlbut and Edmund Pearson. The final script, combining elements of a number of these versions, was submitted for Hays office review in November 1934.[8] Kim Newman reports that Whale planned to make Elizabeth the heart donor for the bride,[9] but film historian Scott MacQueen states that Whale never had such an intention.[5]

Sources report that Bela Lugosi and Claude Rains were considered, with varying degrees of seriousness, for the role of Frankenstein's mentor, Pretorius;[10] others report that the role was created specifically for Ernest Thesiger.[11] Because of Mae Clarke's ill health, Valerie Hobson replaced her as Henry Frankenstein's love interest, Elizabeth.[5] Early in production, Whale decided that the same actress cast to play the Bride should also play Mary Shelley in the film's prologue, to represent how the story – and horror in general – springs from the dark side of the imagination.[12] He considered Brigitte Helm and Phyllis Brooks before deciding on Elsa Lanchester. Lanchester, who had accompanied husband Charles Laughton to Hollywood, had met with only moderate success while Laughton had achieved fame in several films (including Whale's own The Old Dark House) and won an Academy Award for his role in The Private Life of Henry VIII. Lanchester had returned alone to London when Whale contacted her to offer her the dual role.[13] Lanchester modeled the Bride's hissing on the hissing of swans. During filming of the hissing sequence, which Whale shot from multiple angles, Lanchester gave herself a sore throat, which she treated with codeine.[14]

Colin Clive and Boris Karloff reprised their roles from Frankenstein as creator and creation, respectively. Hobson recalled Clive's alcoholism had worsened since filming the original, but Whale did not recast the role because his "hysterical quality" was necessary for the film.[12] Karloff strongly objected to the decision to allow the Monster to speak. "Speech! Stupid! My argument was that if the monster had any impact or charm, it was because he was inarticulate – this great, lumbering, inarticulate creature. The moment he spoke you might as well ... play it straight."[15] This decision also meant that Karloff could not remove his dental plate, so his cheeks did not have the sunken look of the original film.[5] Whale and the studio psychiatrist selected 44 simple words for the Monster's vocabulary by looking at test papers of ten-year olds working at the studio.[3] Dwight Frye returned to play the doctor's assistant, Karl, having played the hunchback, Fritz in the original. Frye also filmed a scene as an unnamed villager and the role of "Nephew Glutz", a man who murdered his uncle and blamed the death on the Monster.[5] Boris Karloff is credited simply as KARLOFF, which was Universal's custom during the height of his career.[16] Elsa Lanchester is credited for Mary Shelley, but in a nod to the earlier film, the Monster's bride is credited only as "?" just as Boris Karloff had been in the opening credits of Frankenstein.

Elsa Lanchester and Boris Karloff in Bride of Frankenstein. The bride's conical hairdo, with its white lightning-trace streaks on each side, has become an iconic symbol of both the character and the film.

Universal makeup artist Jack Pierce paid special attention to the Monster's appearance in this film. He altered his 1931 design to display the after-effects of the mill fire, adding scars and shortening the Monster's hair.[16] Over the course of filming, Pierce modified the Monster's makeup to indicate that the Monster's injuries were healing as the film progressed.[5] Pierce co-created the Bride's makeup with strong input from Whale, especially regarding the Bride's iconic hair style,[13] based on Nefertiti.[6] Lanchester's hair was given a Marcel wave over a wire frame to achieve the style.[5] Lanchester disliked working with Pierce, who she said "really did feel that he made these people, like he was a god ... in the morning he'd be dressed in white as if he were in hospital to perform an operation."[6] To play Mary Shelley, Lanchester wore a white net dress embroidered with sequins of butterflies, stars and moons, which the actress had heard required 17 women 12 weeks to make.[3]

Kenneth Strickfaden created and maintained the laboratory equipment. Strickfaden recycled a number of the fancifully-named machines he had created for the original Frankenstein for use in Bride, including the "Cosmic Ray Diffuser",[17] and the "Nebularium".[18] A lightning bolt generated by Strickfaden's equipment has become a stock scene, appearing in any number of films and television shows.[19] The man behind the film's special photographic effects was John P. Fulton, head of the special effects department at Universal Studios at the time.[20] Fulton and David S. Horsely created the homunculi over the course of two days by shooting the actors in full-size jars against black velvet and aligning them with the perspective of the on-set jars. The foreground film plate was rotoscoped and matted onto the rear plate. Diminutive actor Billy Barty is briefly visible from the back in the finished film as a homunculus infant in a high chair but Whale cut the infant's reveal before the film's release.[5]

Whale met Franz Waxman at a party and asked him to score the picture. "Nothing will be resolved in this picture except the end destruction scene. Would you write an unresolved score for it?" asked Whale.[14] Waxman created three distinctive themes: one for the Monster; one for the Bride; and one for Pretorius. The score closes, at Whale's suggestion, with a powerful dissonant chord, intended to convey the idea that the on-screen explosion was so powerful that the theater where the film was being screened was affected by it.[21] Constantin Bakaleinikoff conducted 22 musicians to record the score in a single nine-hour session.[22]

Shooting began on January 2, 1935[23] with a projected budget of US$293,750 ($6.53 million as of 2024) – almost exactly the budget of the original – and an estimated 36-day shooting schedule.[24][25] On the first day, Karloff waded in the water below the destroyed windmill wearing a rubber suit under his costume. Air got into the suit and expanded it like an "obscene water lilly".[6] Later that day, Karloff broke his hip, necessitating a stunt double.[15] Clive had also broken his leg.[12] Shooting was completed on March 7, 1935. The film was ten days over schedule because Whale shut down the picture for ten days until Heggie became available to play the Hermit.[26] With a final cost of $397,023 ($11.1 million as of 2024), Bride was more than $100,000 ($2.22 million as of 2024) over budget.[24][23] As originally filmed, Henry and Elizabeth died fleeing the exploding castle. Whale re-shot the ending to allow for their survival, although Clive and Hobson are still visible on-screen in the collapsing laboratory.[9] Whale completed his final cut, shortening the running time from about 90 minutes to 75 and re-shooting and re-editing the ending, only days before the film's scheduled premiere date.[27]

Censorship

Bride of Frankenstein was subjected to censorship, during production by the Hays office and following its release by local and national censorship boards. Joseph I. Breen, lead censor for the Hays office, objected to lines of dialogue in the originally submitted script in which Henry Frankenstein and his work were compared to that of God. He continued to object to such dialogue in revised scripts,[28] and to a planned shot of the Monster rushing through a graveyard to a figure of a crucified Jesus and attempting to "rescue" the figure from the cross.[29] Breen also objected to the number of murders, both seen and implied by the script. and strongly advised Whale to reduce the number.[5] The censor's office, upon reviewing the film in March 1935, required a number of cuts. Whale agreed to delete a sequence in which Dwight Frye's "Nephew Glutz"[5] kills his uncle and blames the Monster,[27] and shots of Elsa Lanchester as Mary Shelley in which Breen felt too much of her breasts were visible. Curiously, despite his earlier objection, Breen offered no objection to the cruciform imagery throughout the film – including a scene with the Monster lashed Christ-like to a pole – nor to the presentation of Pretorius as a coded homosexual.[28] Bride of Frankenstein was approved by the Production Code office on April 15, 1935.[27]

Following its release with the Code seal of approval, the film was challenged by the censorship board in the state of Ohio.[28] Censors in England and China objected to the scene in which the Monster gazes longingly upon the as yet unanimated body of the Bride, citing concerns that it looked like necrophilia.[30] Universal voluntarily withdrew the film from Sweden because of the extensive cuts demanded, and Bride was rejected outright by Trinidad, Palestine and Hungary. One unusual objection, from Japanese censors, was that the scene in which Pretorius chases his miniature Henry VIII with tweezers constituted "making a fool out of a king".[28]

Reception

Bride of Frankenstein was profitable for Universal, with a 1943 report showing that the film had by then earned approximately $2 million ($35.2 million as of 2024) for the studio, a profit of about $950,000 ($16.7 million as of 2024).[24][31] The film was critically praised upon its release, although some reviewers did qualify their opinions based on the film's being in the horror genre. The New York World-Telegram called the film "good entertainment of its kind".[32] The New York Post described it as "a grotesque, gruesome tale which, of its kind, is swell".[32] The Hollywood Reporter similarly called the film "a joy for those who can appreciate it".[32]

Variety did not so qualify its review. "[It is] one of those rare instances where none can review it, or talk about it, without mentioning the cameraman, art director, and score composer in the same breath as the actors and director." Variety also praised the cast, writing that "Karloff manages to invest the character with some subtleties of emotion that are surprisingly real and touching ... Thesiger as Dr Pretorious [is] a diabolic characterization if ever there was one ... Lanchester handles two assignments, being first in a preamble as author Mary Shelley and then the created woman. In latter assignment she impresses quite highly."[33]

In another unqualified review, Time wrote that the film had "a vitality that makes their efforts fully the equal of the original picture ... Screenwriters Hurlbut & Balderston and Director James Whale have given it the macabre intensity proper to all good horror pieces, but have substituted a queer kind of mechanistic pathos for the sheer evil that was Frankenstein."[34] The Oakland Tribune concurred it was "a fantasy produced on a rather magnificent scale, with excellent stagecraft and fine photographic effects".[35] While the Winnipeg Free Press thought that the electrical equipment might have been better suited to Buck Rogers, nonetheless the reviewer praised the film as "exciting and sometimes morbidly gruesome", declaring that "All who enjoyed Frankenstein will welcome his Bride as a worthy successor."[36] The New York Times called Karloff "so splendid in the role that all one can say is 'he is the Monster.'"[37] The Times praised the entire principle cast and Whale's direction in concluding that Bride is "a first-rate horror film",[37] and presciently suggested that "The Monster should become an institution, like Charlie Chan."[37] Bride was nominated for one Academy Award, for Best Sound Recording.[38]

The film's reputation has persisted and grown in the decades since its release. In 1998, the film was added to the United States National Film Registry, having been deemed "culturally, historically or aesthetically significant".[39][40] Frequently identified as James Whale's masterpiece,[41] the film is lauded as "the finest of all gothic horror movies".[42] Time rated Bride of Frankenstein in its "ALL-TIME 100 Movies", in which critics Richard Corliss and Richard Schickel overruled the magazine's original review to declare the film "one of those rare sequels that is infinitely superior to its source".[43] In 2008, the Boston Herald named it the second greatest horror film after Nosferatu.[44] Entertainment Weekly considers this film superior to Frankenstein.[45]

Christian imagery

Christian imagery is "hidden in plain sight" throughout the film. In addition to the scenes of the Monster trussed in a cruciform pose and the crucified figure of Jesus in the graveyard, the hermit has a crucifix on the wall of his hut (which, to Whale's consternation, editor Ted Kent made glow during a fade-out[5]) and the Monster consumes the Christian sacraments of bread and wine at his "last supper" with the hermit. Horror scholar David J. Skal suggests that Whale's intention was to make a "direct comparison of Frankenstein's monster to Christ".[46] Film scholar Scott MacQueen, noting Whale's lack of any religious convictions, disputes the notion that the Monster is a Christ-figure. Rather, the Monster is a "mockery of the divine" since, having been created by Man rather than God, it "lacks the divine spark". In crucifying the Monster, he says, Whale "pushes the audience's buttons" by inverting the central Christian myth of the death of Christ followed by the resurrection. The Monster is raised from the dead first, then crucified.[5]

Homosexual interpretations

In the decades since its release, modern film scholars have noted the possible gay reading of the film. Director James Whale was openly gay, and others associated with the cast, including Ernest Thesiger and Colin Clive,[47] were alleged to be gay or bisexual. Although Whale's biographer rejects the notion that Whale would have identified with the Monster from a homosexual perspective,[48] scholars have identified a gay sensibility suffused through the film, especially a camp sensibility,[49] particularly embodied in the character of Pretorius and his relationship with Henry.

Gay film historian Vito Russo, in considering Pretorius, stops short of identifying the character as gay, instead referring to him as "sissified"[50] ("sissy" itself being Hollywood code for "homosexual"). Pretorius serves as a "gay Mephistopheles",[11] a figure of seduction and temptation, going so far as to pull Frankenstein away from his bride on their wedding night to engage in the unnatural act of creating non-procreative life. A novelization of the film published in England made the implication clear, having Pretorius say to Frankenstein "'Be fruitful and multiply.' Let us obey the Biblical injunction: you of course, have the choice of natural means; but as for me, I am afraid that there is no course open to me but the scientific way."[51]

The Monster, whose affections for the male hermit and the female Bride he discusses with identical language ("friend") has been read as sexually "unsettled" and bisexual.[47] Gender studies author Elizabeth Young writes: "He has no innate understanding that the male-female bond he is to forge with the bride is assumed to be the primary one or that it carries a different sexual valence from his relationships with [Pretorius and the hermit]: all affective relationships are as easily 'friendships' as 'marriages'."[52] Indeed, his relationship with the hermit has been interpreted as a same-sex marriage that heterosexual society will not tolerate: "No mistake – this is a marriage, and a viable one ... But Whale reminds us quickly that society does not approve. The monster – the outsider – is driven from his scene of domestic pleasure by two gun-toting rubes who happen upon this startling alliance and quickly, instinctively, proceed to destroy it", writes cultural critic Gary Morris for Bright Lights Film Journal.[47] The creation of the Bride scene, Morris continues, is "Whale's reminder to the audience – his Hollywood bosses, peers, and everyone watching – of the majesty and power of the homosexual creator".[47]

Filmmaker Curtis Harrington, a friend and confidant of Whale's, dismissed this as "a younger critic’s evaluation. All artists do work that comes out of the unconscious mind and later on you can analyze it and say the symbolism may mean something, but artists don’t think that way and I would bet my life that James Whale would never have had such concepts in mind."[53] Specifically in response to the "majesty and power" reading, Harrington stated, "My opinion is that’s just pure bullshit. That’s a critical interpretation that has nothing to do with the original inspiration."[53] He concludes, "I think the closest you can come to a homosexual metaphor in his films is to identify that certain sort of camp humor."[53] Whale's companion David Lewis stated flatly that Whale's sexual orientation was "not germane" to his filmmaking, saying, "Jimmy was first and foremost an artist, and his films represent the work of an artist – not a gay artist, but an artist."[54]

Remake

In June, 2009, The Hollywood Reporter's Risky Biz Blog reported that Universal and Imagine Entertainment were in talks with Neil Burger to write and direct a remake of the film.[55] Brian Grazer and Sean Daniels will be producing, while Dirk Wittenborn would be co-writer.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Brown, Gene (1995). Movie Time: A Chronology of Hollywood and the Movie Industry from its Beginnings to the Present. New York: MacMillan. p. 124. ISBN 0-02-86042906. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: length (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help) In New York, the film premiered at the famed Roxy Theatre.
  2. ^ Curtis, p. 154
  3. ^ a b c d e Vieria, p. 80
  4. ^ Curtis, p. 234
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l MacQueen, Scott (2004). DVD commentary, Bride of Frankenstein Legacy Collection edition (DVD). Universal Studios.
  6. ^ a b c d Vieira, p. 85
  7. ^ Curtis, p. 134
  8. ^ Curtis, pp. 234–36
  9. ^ a b Newman, Kim (December 2004). "Rewind Masterpiece #18". Empire. p. 181.
  10. ^ Lennig, p. 92
  11. ^ a b Skal, p. 185
  12. ^ a b c Vieira, p. 82
  13. ^ a b Curtis, pp. 243–44
  14. ^ a b Vieira, p. 86
  15. ^ a b Gifford, p. 55
  16. ^ a b Curtis, p. 237
  17. ^ Goldman, p. 165
  18. ^ Goldman, p. 183
  19. ^ Picart, et al., p. 40
  20. ^ Picart, et al., p. 39
  21. ^ Curtis, p. 246
  22. ^ Curtis, p. 249
  23. ^ a b Mank, p. xvii
  24. ^ a b c 1634–1699: McCusker, J. J. (1997). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States: Addenda et Corrigenda (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1700–1799: McCusker, J. J. (1992). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1800–present: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. "Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–". Retrieved February 29, 2024.
  25. ^ Curtis, p. 241
  26. ^ Curtis, pp. 248–49
  27. ^ a b c Curtis, p. 250
  28. ^ a b c d Skal, pp. 187–91
  29. ^ Curtis, p. 247
  30. ^ Johnson, p. 166
  31. ^ Curtis p. 251
  32. ^ a b c Curtis, pp. 250–51
  33. ^ Variety staff (January 1, 1935). "Bride of Frankenstein". Variety. Retrieved January 6, 2008. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  34. ^ "The New Pictures". Time. April 29, 1935. Retrieved January 6, 2008. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  35. ^ Soanes, Wood (1935-05-25). "Frankenstein stalks again in Roxie play". Oakland Tribune.
  36. ^ "Lyceum screens "Monster" sequel". Winnipeg Free Press. 1935-05-24.
  37. ^ a b c F.S.N. (May 11, 1935). "Bride of Frankenstein At the Roxy". The New York Times. Retrieved February 1, 2009. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  38. ^ "Bride of Frankenstein Awards". Allmovie. Retrieved January 9, 2008. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  39. ^ "'Easy Rider' now listed on National Film Registry". CNN. November 17, 1998. Retrieved January 6, 2008. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  40. ^ "Films Selected to The National Film Registry, Library of Congress 1989-2007". Library of Congress. Retrieved January 8, 2008. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  41. ^ Graham, Bob (October 9, 1998). "`Bride' Is as Lovely as Ever". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved January 8, 2008. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  42. ^ French, Philip (December 2, 2007). "Films of the Day: The Bride of Frankenstein". The Observer. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  43. ^ Corliss, Richard. "All-Time 100 Movies". Time. Retrieved January 6, 2008. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  44. ^ James Verniere (October 27, 2008). "Creepy countdown: The Herald ranks the 10 scariest flicks in film history". Boston Herald. Retrieved October 28, 2008.
  45. ^ The Entertainment Weekly Guide to the Greatest Movies Ever Made. New York: Warner Books. 1996. pp. 99–100.
  46. ^ Skal. p. 189
  47. ^ a b c d Morris, Gary (July 1997). "Sexual Subversion: The Bride of Frankenstein". Bright Lights Film Journal (19). Retrieved January 7, 2008. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  48. ^ Curtis, p. 144
  49. ^ Skal, p. 184
  50. ^ Russo, p. 50
  51. ^ Egremont, Michael, quoted in Skal, p. 189
  52. ^ Young, p. 134
  53. ^ a b c Del Valle, David (August 7, 2008). "Curtis Harrington on James Whale". Films in Review. Retrieved February 1, 2009. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  54. ^ Quoted in Curtis, p. 144
  55. ^ June 16, 2009 in Remakes. "Bride of Frankenstein comes to life-The Hollywood Reporter: Risky Business". Riskybusinessblog.com. Retrieved 2009-06-17.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

References

  • Curtis, James (1998). James Whale: A New World of Gods and Monsters. Boston, Faber and Faber. ISBN 0571192858.
  • Gelder, Ken (2000). The Horror Reader. New York, Routledge. ISBN 041521355X.
  • Gifford, Denis (1973) Karloff: The Man, The Monster, The Movies. Film Fan Monthly.
  • Goldman, Harry (2005). Kenneth Strickfaden, Dr. Frankenstein's Electrician. McFarland. ISBN 0786420642.
  • Johnson, Tom (1997). Censored Screams: The British Ban on Hollywood Horror in the Thirties. McFarland. ISBN 0786403942.
  • Lennig, Arthur (1993). The Immortal Count: The Life and Films of Bela Lugosi. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 0813122732.
  • Mank, Gregory W. (1994). Hollywood Cauldron: Thirteen Films from the Genre's Golden Age. McFarland. ISBN 0786411120.
  • Picart, Carolyn Joan, Frank Smoot and Jayne Blodgett (2001). The Frankenstein Film Sourcebook. Greenwood Press. ISBN 0313313504.
  • Russo, Vito (1987). The Celluloid Closet: Homosexuality in the Movies (revised edition). New York, HarperCollins. ISBN 0060961325.
  • Skal, David J. (1993). The Monster Show: A Cultural History of Horror. Penguin Books. ISBN 0140240020.
  • Vieira, Mark A. (2003). Hollywood Horror: From Gothic to Cosmic. New York, Harry N. Abrams. ISBN 0810945355.
  • Young, Elizabeth. "Here Comes The Bride". Collected in Gelder, Ken (ed.) (2000). The Horror Reader. Routledge. ISBN 0415213568.

External links


Template:Universal Horror

Leave a Reply