Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Khoikhoi (talk | contribs)
restore Katzstein, Frye, and Lambert; changed "four" to "several"
ChrisO~enwiki (talk | contribs)
Lambert has not been deleted, simply moved into a single paragraph and condensed to remove redundant description of what's already said in the article. Read the damn thing, please!
Line 31: Line 31:
The main source of information on the battle is the ''[[Nabonidus Chronicle]]'', one of a series of clay tablets collectively known as the [[Babylonian Chronicles]] that record the history of ancient [[Babylonia]].
The main source of information on the battle is the ''[[Nabonidus Chronicle]]'', one of a series of clay tablets collectively known as the [[Babylonian Chronicles]] that record the history of ancient [[Babylonia]].


The tablet records that ''"in the month [[Tashritu]] [27 September-27 October] Cyrus did battle at Opis on the [bank of the] Tigris among the army of [[Akkad]];"''. According to the standard treatment of the Babylonian Chronicles by [[A. Kirk Grayson|Grayson]] (1975)<ref>Grayson, A.K. ''Babylonian Historical-Literary Texts''. University of Toronto Press, 1975. ISBN 0802053157</ref> and a later translation by Glassner (2004)<ref>Glassner, Jean-Jacques. ''Mesopotamian Chronicles''. Society of Biblical Literature, 2004. ISBN 1589830903</ref><ref>Amélie Kuhrt also gives a similar translation in ''The Persian Empire: A Corpus of Sources of the Achaemenid Period'', p. 51. Routledge, 2007. ISBN 0415436281</ref>, in the aftermath of the battle Cyrus ''"carried off the plunder (and) slaughtered the people."''. An older translation by Oppenheim, quoted by a number of sources,<ref>Richard Nelson Frye, ''The History of Ancient Iran'', C.H. Beck, 1984.</ref><ref>John Elders, “Prophets, Idols, and Diggers: Scientific Proof of Bible History”, Published by Bobbs-Merrill, 1960</ref><ref>H.J. Katzenstein, "Tyre in the early Persian period", ''The Biblical Archaeologist'', Vol. 42, No. 1 (Winter, 1979).[http://www.jstor.org/pss/3209545]</ref> renders the line as ''"the inhabitants of Akkad revolted, but he massacred the confused inhabitants"'', but is unclear about who did the massacring.<ref>Oppenheim, A. Leo, in Pritchard, James B. ''Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament''. Princeton University Press, 1950</ref>.
The tablet records that ''"in the month [[Tashritu]] [27 September-27 October] Cyrus did battle at Opis on the [bank of the] Tigris
among the army of [[Akkad]];"''. There has been several translations of the continuation of the text.


Lambert (2007) translates this portion as ''"In Tishri when Cyrus did battle with the army of Akkad at Opis, on the [bank] of the Tigris. The soldiers of Akkad withdrew. He (Cyrus) took plunder and defeated the soldiers of (Akkad)"'' He argues that "'Akkad' means 'Babylonia,' but while 'the army of Akkad' is an appropriate designation for Nabonidus' troops, 'the people of Akkad' should then mean 'the people of Babylonia,' which is absurd. There was no non-Babylonian population around Opis or Sippar. A solution which makes perfect sense is to take nišu in the common meaning "men" to refer to the Babylonian army. Cyrus did battle with the Babylonian army at Opis, that army retreated, Cyrus looted their camp, then he caught up with them and defeated them."<ref name="Lambert">William G Lambert, "Notes Brèves 14 - Cyrus defeat of Nabonidus", ''Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires'' no. 1, 2007 (March)</ref>
William G. Lambert(2007)<ref name="Lambert">William G Lambert, "Notes Brèves 14 - Cyrus defeat of Nabonidus", ''Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires'' no. 1, 2007 (March)</ref> translated this portion as ''"In Tishri when Cyrus did battle with the army of Akkad at Opis, on the [bank] of the Tigris. The soldiers of Akkad withdrew. He (Cyrus) took plunder and defeated the soldiers of (Akkad)"''

According to the treatment of the Babylonian Chronicles by [[A. Kirk Grayson|Grayson]] (1975)<ref>Grayson, A.K. ''Babylonian Historical-Literary Texts''. University of Toronto Press, 1975. ISBN 0802053157</ref> and a later translation by Glassner (2004)<ref>Glassner, Jean-Jacques. ''Mesopotamian Chronicles''. Society of Biblical Literature, 2004. ISBN 1589830903</ref><ref>Amélie Kuhrt also gives a similar translation in ''The Persian Empire: A Corpus of Sources of the Achaemenid Period'', p. 51. Routledge, 2007. ISBN 0415436281</ref>, in the aftermath of the battle Cyrus ''"carried off the plunder (and) slaughtered the people."''. An older translation by Oppenheim renders the line as ''"the inhabitants of Akkad revolted, but he massacred the confused inhabitants"'', but is unclear about who did the massacring.<ref>Oppenheim, A. Leo, in Pritchard, James B. ''Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament''. Princeton University Press, 1950</ref>. Another translation quoted in the literature(for example mention by Richard Frye in 1984 and Katzstein 1979) reads<ref>Richard Nelson Frye, “The History of Ancient Iran”, C.H. Beck, 1984.</ref><ref>John Elders, “Prophets, Idols, and Diggers: Scientific Proof of Bible History”, Published by Bobbs-Merrill, 1960</ref><ref>H.J. Katzenstein, “Tyre in the early Persian period”, The Biblical Archaeologist, Vol. 42, No. 1 (Winter, 1979).[http://www.jstor.org/pss/3209545]</ref>:"''In the month of Tašrîtu, when Cyrus attacked the army of Akkad in Opis [i.e., Baghdad] on the Tigris, the inhabitants of Akkad revolted, but (Nabonidus) massacred the confused inhabitants. The fifteenth day [12 October], Sippar was seized without battle.''"

William Lambert(2007) after examination of Grayson's(1975) and Jaquest's(2004) translation believes that there are serious difficulties in context<ref name="Lambert" />. Lambert (2007) mentions:{{cquote|
The main problem is that according to the accepted translation (Grayson, Jacquest) Cyrus defeated the Babylonian army at Opis, whereupon the people of the town withdrew, Cyrus plundered(presumably the town of Opis) and slaughtered the population. The difficulty is that after defeating the Babylonian army it appears that nothing more was done about that army, but instead the local town was looted and the population slaughtered. "Akkad" means "Babylonia," but while "the army of Akkad" is an appropriate designation for Noboniduns' troops, "the people of Akkad" should then mean "the people of Babylonia," which is absurd. There was no non-Babylonian population around Opis or Sippar. A solution which makes perfect sense is to take nišu in the common meaning "men" to refer to the Babylonian army. Cyrus did battle with the Babylonian army at Opis, that army retreated, Cyrus looted their camp, then he caught up with them and defeated them}}.


The chronicle goes on to state: ''"On the fourteenth day [6 October] [[Sippar]] was captured without battle. Nabonidus fled. On the sixteenth day [12 October] Ug/[[Gubaru]], governor of [[Gutium]], and the army of Cyrus without a battle entered Babylon. Afterwards, after Nabonidus returned, he was captured in Babylon."''<ref name="Kurht-1">Kuhrt, Amélie. "Cyrus the Great of Persia: Images and Realities". ''Representations of Political Power: Case Histories from Times of Change and Dissolving Order in the Ancient Near East'', p. 185. Marlies Heinz, Marian H. Feldman (eds). Eisenbrauns, 2007. ISBN 157506135X</ref>
The chronicle goes on to state: ''"On the fourteenth day [6 October] [[Sippar]] was captured without battle. Nabonidus fled. On the sixteenth day [12 October] Ug/[[Gubaru]], governor of [[Gutium]], and the army of Cyrus without a battle entered Babylon. Afterwards, after Nabonidus returned, he was captured in Babylon."''<ref name="Kurht-1">Kuhrt, Amélie. "Cyrus the Great of Persia: Images and Realities". ''Representations of Political Power: Case Histories from Times of Change and Dissolving Order in the Ancient Near East'', p. 185. Marlies Heinz, Marian H. Feldman (eds). Eisenbrauns, 2007. ISBN 157506135X</ref>

Revision as of 23:37, 28 September 2008

Template:Totally-disputed

Battle of Opis
Part of the Wars of Cyrus the Great
DateSeptember 26, 539 BC
Location
Result Decisive Persian victory.
Territorial
changes
Mesopotamia annexed by Persia.
Belligerents
Neo-Babylonian Empire Achaemenid Empire
Commanders and leaders
Nabonidus of Babylonia,
Belshazzar of Babylonia ?,
unknown others
Cyrus the Great,
Gubaru of Babylonia,
unknown others
Strength
Unknown Light (Xenophon)?
Casualties and losses
Unknown Unknown

The Battle of Opis, fought in September 539 BC, was the second and final engagement of the war between Cyrus the Great of Persia and Nabonidus of the Neo-Babylonian Empire. It followed an earlier battle on the Tigris said to have taken place some time in February 539 BC. The battle resulted in a decisive defeat for the Babylonians and led, a few weeks later, to Cyrus's unopposed entry into the city of Babylon and his proclamation as king of Babylonia.

Location

The site of the battle was near the city of Opis on the river Tigris, located about 50 miles (80 km) from modern Baghdad. The city is thought to have been a preferred point to cross the river, which presumably was shallower or narrower there than elsewhere.[1] By taking Opis, Cyrus broke through the Median Wall defensive line north of Babylon and opened the road to the capital.[2]

Background

The motives

The battle

The main source of information on the battle is the Nabonidus Chronicle, one of a series of clay tablets collectively known as the Babylonian Chronicles that record the history of ancient Babylonia.

The tablet records that "in the month Tashritu [27 September-27 October] Cyrus did battle at Opis on the [bank of the] Tigris among the army of Akkad;". According to the standard treatment of the Babylonian Chronicles by Grayson (1975)[3] and a later translation by Glassner (2004)[4][5], in the aftermath of the battle Cyrus "carried off the plunder (and) slaughtered the people.". An older translation by Oppenheim, quoted by a number of sources,[6][7][8] renders the line as "the inhabitants of Akkad revolted, but he massacred the confused inhabitants", but is unclear about who did the massacring.[9].

Lambert (2007) translates this portion as "In Tishri when Cyrus did battle with the army of Akkad at Opis, on the [bank] of the Tigris. The soldiers of Akkad withdrew. He (Cyrus) took plunder and defeated the soldiers of (Akkad)" He argues that "'Akkad' means 'Babylonia,' but while 'the army of Akkad' is an appropriate designation for Nabonidus' troops, 'the people of Akkad' should then mean 'the people of Babylonia,' which is absurd. There was no non-Babylonian population around Opis or Sippar. A solution which makes perfect sense is to take nišu in the common meaning "men" to refer to the Babylonian army. Cyrus did battle with the Babylonian army at Opis, that army retreated, Cyrus looted their camp, then he caught up with them and defeated them."[10]

The chronicle goes on to state: "On the fourteenth day [6 October] Sippar was captured without battle. Nabonidus fled. On the sixteenth day [12 October] Ug/Gubaru, governor of Gutium, and the army of Cyrus without a battle entered Babylon. Afterwards, after Nabonidus returned, he was captured in Babylon."[11]

The other primary ancient source for Cyrus's Babylonian campaign, Herodotus, gives a completely different account. He does not mention the Battle of Opis and asserts that Cyrus subjected Babylon to a two-year siege, which only ended when the Persians diverted the course of the Euphrates to allow their army to enter the city through a floodgate.[12] However, this contradicts the accounts of the Babylonian and Persian sources, and scholars are in general agreement that Herodotus's account is an invention.[13]

Aftermath

Historians are divided about whether the description of a massacre and looting in the accepted translation of the Nabonidus Chronicle refers to an attack on the city of Opis[14] or whether it refers to the fate of the main camp of Nabonidus' broken army, assuming that the Persians captured it intact.[2] The battle and massacre are not mentioned from the later Cyrus cylinder inscription, which portrays Cyrus as liberating Babylon peacefully and with the consent of its people. Simon J. Sherwin comments that the battle at Opis "gives the lie to the idea of Cyrus as a benign liberator" and suggests that the aim of the reported massacre was "to terrorize the population" to intimidate Sippar and Babylon into surrendering without resistance.[15] Maria Brosius similarly interprets Cyrus's actions as punitive, "mak[ing] an example of a city trying to resist the Persian army".[16] Amélie Kuhrt comments that the reference to an apparent massacre and looting suggests that the battle was "probably a hard-won victory."[17]

Although later inscriptions such as the Cyrus cylinder and the Verse Account of Nabonidus portrayed the Persian conquest of Babylonia as essentially peaceful, the battle demonstrates that the existing Babylonian regime actively resisted Cyrus's invasion of Mesopotamia. It was perhaps a sign of the divisions in the regime - Nabonidus was reputedly highly unpopular among the Babylonian elite - that some Babylonian subjects appear to have welcomed the Persians. It is, however, unclear how widely the Persians were supported within Babylonia, as accounts of the invasion and Nabonidus's rule are coloured by Cyrus's subsequent propaganda.[18] The account related in the Chronicle indicates that after the battle Cyrus halted at Opis, sending his general Gubaru with an army to invest Babylon. The king did not travel to the capital until well after it had been secured, some three weeks after the battle.[14] Sherwin draws attention to Cyrus's non-participation in the taking of Babylon, suggesting that it demonstrates that Cyrus "was not expecting an easy victory".[15]

References

  1. ^ Oppenheim, A.L. "The Babylonian Evidence of Achaemenian Rule in Mesopotamia", in The Cambridge History of Iran vol. 2, p. 539. Ilya Gershevitch (ed). Cambridge University Press, 1993. ISBN 0521200911
  2. ^ a b T. Cutler Young, Jr., "The rise of the Persians to imperial power under Cyrus the Great", in The Cambridge Ancient History vol. 4, p. 39. John Boardman (ed). Cambridge University Press, 1982. ISBN 0521228042
  3. ^ Grayson, A.K. Babylonian Historical-Literary Texts. University of Toronto Press, 1975. ISBN 0802053157
  4. ^ Glassner, Jean-Jacques. Mesopotamian Chronicles. Society of Biblical Literature, 2004. ISBN 1589830903
  5. ^ Amélie Kuhrt also gives a similar translation in The Persian Empire: A Corpus of Sources of the Achaemenid Period, p. 51. Routledge, 2007. ISBN 0415436281
  6. ^ Richard Nelson Frye, The History of Ancient Iran, C.H. Beck, 1984.
  7. ^ John Elders, “Prophets, Idols, and Diggers: Scientific Proof of Bible History”, Published by Bobbs-Merrill, 1960
  8. ^ H.J. Katzenstein, "Tyre in the early Persian period", The Biblical Archaeologist, Vol. 42, No. 1 (Winter, 1979).[1]
  9. ^ Oppenheim, A. Leo, in Pritchard, James B. Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament. Princeton University Press, 1950
  10. ^ William G Lambert, "Notes Brèves 14 - Cyrus defeat of Nabonidus", Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires no. 1, 2007 (March)
  11. ^ Kuhrt, Amélie. "Cyrus the Great of Persia: Images and Realities". Representations of Political Power: Case Histories from Times of Change and Dissolving Order in the Ancient Near East, p. 185. Marlies Heinz, Marian H. Feldman (eds). Eisenbrauns, 2007. ISBN 157506135X
  12. ^ David, Paul K. 100 Decisive Battles: From Ancient Times to the Present, p. 8. Oxford University Press US, 2001. ISBN 0195143663
  13. ^ Campbell, Duncan B.; Hook, Adam. Ancient Siege Warfare: Persians, Greeks, Carthaginians and Romans 546-146 BC, p. 9. Osprey Publishing, 2005. ISBN 1841767700
  14. ^ a b Amélie Kuhrt, ibid pp. 174-175.
  15. ^ a b Sherwin, Simon J. "Old Testament monotheism and Zoroastrian influence" The God of Israel: Studies of an Inimitable Deity, p. 123. Robert P. Gordon (ed). Cambridge University Press, 2007. ISBN 0521873657
  16. ^ Brosius, Maria. The Persians, p. 11. Routledge, 2006. ISBN 0415320909.
  17. ^ Kurht, Amélie. "Usurpation, conquest and ceremonial: from Babylon to Persia." Rituals of Royalty: Power and Ceremonial in Traditional Societies, p. 48. David Cannadine, Simon Price (eds). Cambridge University Press, 1992. ISBN 0521428912
  18. ^ McIntosh, Jane. Ancient Mesopotamia, pp. 113-14. ABC-CLIO, 2005. ISBN 1576079651

Leave a Reply