Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Pokelova (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 1083899124 by Empire of Ohio (talk) This is not a space to discuss your opinion on the bill, it's a space to discuss the article.
Tag: Undo
Dyldyl9 (talk | contribs)
Tag: Reply
Line 30: Line 30:


It also appears like the article fails to mention that the bill is a part of a much broader attack on public education by the GOP, like the conspiracy theories surrounding [[Critical Race Theory]], as part of a push for [[School Choice]]. [[Special:Contributions/46.97.170.50|46.97.170.50]] ([[User talk:46.97.170.50|talk]]) 09:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
It also appears like the article fails to mention that the bill is a part of a much broader attack on public education by the GOP, like the conspiracy theories surrounding [[Critical Race Theory]], as part of a push for [[School Choice]]. [[Special:Contributions/46.97.170.50|46.97.170.50]] ([[User talk:46.97.170.50|talk]]) 09:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

:Not exactly sure how not allowing teachers to groom 5-9 year olds and teach divisive curriculum is an “attack on public education”
:Sounds like you’re just trying to project and stramwan [[User:Dyldyl9|Dyldyl9]] ([[User talk:Dyldyl9|talk]]) 17:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:31, 22 April 2022

WikiProject iconWiki Loves Pride
WikiProject iconThis article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2022.

Sarcasm in tone?

Anyone else feeling like the tone in the final paragraph is not encyclopedic but sarcastic? Likeanechointheforest (talk) 01:02, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which one? The "Legal Challenges" heading? 46.97.170.50 (talk) 09:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality issues

Supporters of the bill state that discussions about sexuality and gender identity should be handled by a child's parents and not by their schools; DeSantis' Press Secretary Christina Pushaw has called HB 1557 an "Anti-Grooming Bill".

This strikes me as nothing more than PR fluff, and the wikipedia article on the only source for these claims (The Christian Post) does not suggest that it's a reliable outlet anyway.

...pejoratively known by critics (primarily Democrats) as the Don't Say Gay bill. This is not encyclopedic, in fact, it reads like a bad faith partisan jab against the bill's critics. The Don't Say Gay Bill is WP:COMMONNAME, and should be treated as such.

It also appears like the article fails to mention that the bill is a part of a much broader attack on public education by the GOP, like the conspiracy theories surrounding Critical Race Theory, as part of a push for School Choice. 46.97.170.50 (talk) 09:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly sure how not allowing teachers to groom 5-9 year olds and teach divisive curriculum is an “attack on public education”
Sounds like you’re just trying to project and stramwan Dyldyl9 (talk) 17:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply