Hello! Your submission of Russia-Syria-Iran-Iraq Coalition at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Human3015^TALK  06:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can we use the shia portal talk page for coordination and help? For example help for deletion discussion and guidance etc. Nannadeem (talk) 19:34, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nannadeem: Sorry for the delay, you can use it for all what you think is related to the portal. "help for deletion discussion and guidance" are not related to the portal! Mhhossein (talk) 10:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. Nannadeem (talk) 14:51, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhhossein Would you like to see the page Mohammad-Taqi Bahjat Foumani history. If our editing receives such ending, then what best we can do! Nannadeem (talk) 17:36, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nannadeem: Per Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle you are suggested to revert the disputed content and discuss the material on the talk page if you think the removing is not valid. There's already a topic opened for this matter and you'd better join that. Mhhossein (talk) 18:37, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mhhossein this is Rmashhadi from wikifa, I wanted to thank you for making Arba'een Pilgrimage, they wanted to delete this article in wikifa but I stood up now I see you made it in enwiki, thank you man I realy appreciate it. I haven't seen you in wikifa but where ever you are and what ever you do, I wish you all the best.

take care--Rmashhadi (talk) 13:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Rmashhadi. Why did they wanted to deleted such a notable subject? That's why I don't tend to edit the Fa wiki. Btw, I put steps forward and took the article to the main page. You're welcome. Mhhossein (talk) 13:09, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You did one hell of a job, I wish you were in wikifa too there are not so many Muslims there and I feel a little bit lonely :( about deleting the page they said "It's more like a show business rather than a real thing" or something of that nature. but this wasn't the sad part, the sad part was the user that suggested to delete it I always thought he was a believer, but apparently he is not, that's why I feel lonely there.

I'm a little bit talkative, sorry for bothering you, I wish you joy in Yalda--Rmashhadi (talk) 20:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rmashhadi: That's kind of you, I just tried to do my best. I'll be there editing when it's needed (I have had some contributions there!). You did not seem talkative to me at all. Btw, I wish a nice Yalda, too. Mhhossein (talk) 21:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salam Alaykum Eid al-Milad al-Nabi Mubarak.

There are many Islamic-related articles which may become controversial between Muslims and non-Muslims or different Islamic Madhabs. Following our succesful attempts to improve the lead of Ali and current effort in Taqiya, I suggest forming a "technical group for dispute resolution" in WP:Islam. I hope this effort pave the road to solve more severe controversies such as Islamic terrorism.--Seyyed(t-c) 07:28, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seyyed: I congratulate this great Eid, too. It's a smart scheme to solutions and I support that. I saw that you had also invited some other users, hence I'd like you to invite GregKaye Nannadeem and SheriffIsInTown. Mhhossein (talk) 08:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Seyyed plz ref our discussion at talk page of [1]. Kindly go through my sandbox here [2]. I intend the italic version could be incorporated appropriately. I will act per advice (however now a days delay on my part is beyond my control). Mhhossein Thanks for referring this inferior in your efforts. Nannadeem (talk) 16:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, you may be blocked from editing. you cannot edit another editor's comments, no matter what. Yes you can respond to other's comments but editing them is not allowed, so keep your hands off my comments and feel free to write whatever you want. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:27, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have no idea of what "vandalism" is. Anyway, at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents you are trying to mislead the users by changing the sequences of the comments. Mhhossein (talk) 04:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just stay away from my comments. I will not warn you again. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I never edited your comments! I just reordered the comments based on their chronological order! Almost every body knows that users should not paste new comments 5 hours later (after older comments are made by others) above all comments. Every thing is recorded in history. Is it acceptable if I paste the newest comments above all comments? I don't think so. Mhhossein (talk) 05:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes ofc you can edit your comment whenever you wish. I (and no body else) will mind that. Feel free to try. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:19, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You did not answer my question; "Is it acceptable if I paste the newest comment above all comments 5 hours after others last comment is made?" Mhhossein (talk) 05:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did answer it, let me bold it up for you you can edit your comment whenever you wish. If you think you forgot to mention something, feel free to mention it when you remember about it. What is there to "not understand" in my answer? FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to make a page for your newest policy. Mhhossein (talk) 05:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever dude, just stay away from my comments, simple as that. This warning is for nothing else, just keep your hands off my comments as your behavior is quite irritating. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:55, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Un-Islamic Non-State is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Un-Islamic Non-State until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Un-Islamic Non-State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Times (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I don't have any objections regarding DYK. --MehrdadFR (talk) 12:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MehrdadFR: Thank you --Mhhossein (talk) 13:21, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mhhossein. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Abbo Nassour.
Message added 09:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The content was merged here (see edit summary). The consensus to merge is here. Obviously, merging this content to Names of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant would also be fine. My very best wishes (talk) 14:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My very best wishes: Thanks for your quick, comprehensive and civil response. Thanks for making creating the Rd. Mhhossein (talk) 17:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Muhammad#RFC for opening sentence in the lede Please vote. 92slim (talk) 03:42, 15 January 2016 (UTC) 92slim (talk) 03:42, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hadith of Jesus Praying Behind Mahdi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hadith of Jesus Praying Behind Mahdi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 06:11, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was obviously notable. It's kept. Mhhossein (talk) 07:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Disabled Iranian Veterans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List_of state visits to Iran#improve. Thanks. Shahin (talk) 19:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

plz add every heads of state u know who had traveled to Iran.tnxShahin (talk) 16:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

dooste aziz salam,man ta jayi ke mitunestam tamame saraan ro ezafe kardam ama khaili az kheshvarha mesle keshvarhaye arabi va afrighayio aslan nemidunam,age lotf konio ye komaki koni mamnunet mishamShahin (talk) 17:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salaam Shahin jan, agar be moredi barkhordam ezafe mikonam. Mhhossein (talk) 17:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

alalkhosoos beyne salhaye 79 ta 92 va 43 ta 60 miladiShahin (talk) 17:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Al-Shaykh Al-Mufid at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jolly Ω Janner 23:33, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 20:33, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the nominator has made some attempt to resolve close paraphrasing (diff). An update on the nomination page would be very appreciated to reduce the backlog. Thanks, Jolly Ω Janner 04:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Janner: Thanks, but as usual the nominator would better ping me when he is finished. Mhhossein (talk) 04:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mhh. I can copy-edit this, but only slowly, as am still not very well, I'm afraid. Thanks for the new year greetings you sent, and my best wishes to you for the next year on the day that you celebrate the new year, which I think is your first day of spring, isn't it? ~ P-123 (talk) 18:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have finished most of the copy-editing, but further tidying up is needed, and I will have a few queries. ~ P-123 (talk) 23:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

P-123: Thank you very much both for responding my greeting and for accepting to copy edit the article. I'm sure that you are an excellent copy editor. Yes, we celebrate the very first day of spring. Btw, I'm ready for swiftly responding your queries. Mhhossein (talk) 03:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In response to a request for a copy-edit of the article on Al-Shaykh Al-Mufid posted at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests, I have pretty much finished copy-editing the article. There are just two things I have to ask you about:

1) In the section Al-Shaykh Al-Mufid#As a theologian is the following sentence:

• Al-Mufid tried to defend the role of reason – he described it as Al-Nazar – and also disputed for the truth and put away faults with the help of argument and proofs.

Both phrases, "disputed for the truth" and "put away faults", are not clear. I suppose dispute is used in the meaning of "debate" (see definition 2 in the linked Wiktionary entry); "debate" is not the most common definition, but even if you use it with that meaning, it is not usually followed by "for", so that's a bit puzzling. I'm thinking either

• disputed with other scholars in a quest for the truth,

or

• debated the meaning of truth

or something else.

Regarding "put away faults", I'm not sure what you mean. Perhaps

• analyzed faults
• analyzed sin/sins

or something else.

2) In the section Al-Shaykh Al-Mufid#Prophecy, the last sentence is:

• Although he took care to make a distinction between an apostle and a prophet as the Quran does, he did not believe that there was a difference in their functions, which enabled him to the levels of the prophets and the apostles except in terms of their names.

The part after "which enabled him" is not clear. I have no idea what is meant, so I cannot fix it. Also, it's not really clear to what the relative pronoun "which" refers. What enabled him to [whatever]? Not believing that there was a difference? Or "their functions"? You've got to work on this sentence. I'll try to help you word the sentence once I understand what you want to say. Corinne (talk) 03:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Corinne, but as you see above, P-123 a member of WP:GOCE had already started copy editing the article. I think P-123 can answer your first question better. Regarding your second question I should tell you that something was missing and I added it. Is it clear now? Mhhossein (talk) 05:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's better. But regarding the copy-edit, you posted a request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests, and no one had indicated he or she had accepted the assignment. When an editor accepts a copy-editing assignment, s/he is supposed to add the {{Working}} template after the request and post the {{Done}} template there when finished. I had no idea another editor had accepted the assignment. I didn't look on this page until I had finished the copy-edit. I'll let P-123 take over from this point. Corinne (talk) 04:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Corinne: However, this does not make me forget your valuable work on the article. Mhhossein (talk) 10:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realise I had to put in a template after the request! I have finished copy-editing as far as I can, but have some queries:

1) I also am not sure what this sentence means: "Al-Mufid tried to defend the role of reason – he described it as Al-Nazar – and also disputed for the truth and put away faults with the help of argument and proofs." Can you put it in other words, the way we did before once with a Wiki article? Then I can copy-edit.

2) The first section, "Early life and education", refers to Hirja, and another date there has "AH". Are they the same thing?

3) In the sentence, "... which enabled him to put the Imams on the level of the prophets and the apostles except in terms of their names", is "except in terms of their names" really necessary?

4) "nass" is defined in its own Wiki article as "a known, or clear, legal injunction", not "personal designation" as in the al-Mufid article. How should this be rephrased?

5) In this article, should the name throughout be "al-Mufid", or "Al-Mufid", as in the title of the article?

6) The article says, "Al-Mufid received two Tawqees by Muhammad al-Mahdi during major occultation", but even after looking up the wiki article on "major occultation", I am still not sure what "during major occulation" means in that sentence. Could you perhaps expand the sentence, or tell me what it means and I can do that?

I think that is everything. I can finish copy-editing when I have your answers to those questions. ~ P-123 (talk) 20:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you P-123 for keeping on the job. Here's the response to your queries:

1. I read the original context from which that vague sentence (Mufid defended...) was derived. As I understood, He believed that in debates one can use arguments and proofs (can use reason or al-Nazar), while some others restricted themselves to the words of the prophets and Imams as by default true statements (Al-mufid apparently believed in both reason and words of the Imams).
2. There's no difference between them.
3. I think it's necessary, however you can take a look at the original source: "Denying any functional distinction enables him to put the Imams on a level with the prophets named in the Quran and also with the others who were called apostles, in every respect but in name."P84
4. As you see here in Nass, "In Twelver Shi'ah Islam/Ismaili, nass refers to the nomination of an Imam or Da'i al-Mutlaq by a previous Imam or Dai," which fits the context.
5. It should be Al-Mufid, when it comes at the beginning of the sentence.
6. Major Occultation is a belief by Shia which simply is about the twelfth Imam, Muhammad al-Mahdi, being absent and hidden for an unknown period (using hadiths Quranic vesres they beleive that he and Jesus will reappear at the same time to reestablish justice and peace on the earth). Meanwhile, some people with high spiritual status could make contact with him occasionally throughout the history, an act which is desired much passionately by Shia muslims and is disclosed to have happened just few times.

Could I answer your questions correctly? Mhhossein (talk) 06:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mhhossein: The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. You will notice that I archived one of the article's citations (#1) and I suggest that you archive the rest as time allows. This ensures that the article's references are available "forever" and doesn’t develop “dead links”. The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the url in your citation and paste it in the box on the archive.org site and click save. It creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new url to add to your original citation. If you look at one of the url's I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new url to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl= http etc|archivedate=18 February 2015}}. Not all websites allow archiving - CBS TV news and the NY Times are two I've come across, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use.
Kind regards, Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Twofingered Typist for your nice job on the article Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan. I also thank you for the valueable archiving tip. It's very good that I can now save the links. Mhhossein (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Fajr decade —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]