Ayo Obe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:04, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Hatchens was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Hatchens (talk) 12:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Hatchens for reviewing the draft. Did you by any chance look through the draft's talk page? I mentioned that he meets at least #1 of the SNG for actors having had significant (named) roles in multiple notable movies except you’re saying the GNG is a must. Thanks Princess of Ara_(talk) 12:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hatchens, you did a good job. The article was declined by me barely 48 hours ago and I’m not sure why they are in a haste to binge resubmit the article, I have added the article to my watchlist indefinitely. Celestina007 (talk) 13:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007, thank you for your kind words and support. The draft has been put in to my watchlist too. I haven't nominated it for CSD G11 yet, but if it's required I will not hesitate. Your opinion is must if I put any such tag on it. - Hatchens (talk) 01:14, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Princess of Ara. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Uzor Arukwe, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Princess of Ara. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Princess of Ara|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 Celestina007 (talk) 13:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits Celestina007. I knew you were going to show up as always. Princess of Ara_(talk) 13:42, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, I’m not sure I understand what you mean but I have Hatchens on my watchlist because they do a spectacular job, so when I discovered they rejected an article at AFC, I decided to take a look and was dazed that it was the same draft article I declined on the 9th of June and told you categorically that aggressive resubmissions are not a brilliant idea. This is very typical of COI editing, hence the warning. Wikipedia has no deadline so i really do wonder what the haste is. Celestina007 (talk) 14:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore I noticed your snarky remarks at the edit summary, the use of the internet slang ”LOL” to be precise as though I am joking or playing around, I’m not, Stop this sort of behavior. Celestina007 (talk) 14:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wasiu Alabi Pasuma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mushin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. As explained at WP:SIGFONT:

<font>...</font> tags were deprecated in HTML4 and are entirely obsolete in HTML5. This means that the popular browsers may drop support for them at some point. Wikipedia is already preparing for this by delinting code project-wide through Linter. When support finally is dropped, the tags will be ignored in all signatures; any properties such as color and font family will revert to their default values. For this reason, it is recommended that you use <span>...</span> tags and CSS properties instead.

I have prepared a replacement signature string for you. You are encouraged to change

[[User talk:Princess of Ara|<font face="Rude"><font color="#FF69B4">Princess of Ara</font><sub><small><font color="pink">(talk)</font></small></sub></font>]] : Princess of Ara_(talk)

to

[[User talk:Princess of Ara|<span style="font-family:Rude"><span style="color:#FF69B4">Princess of Ara</span><sub><small style="color:pink">(talk)</small></sub></span>]] : Princess of Ara_(talk)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 16:37, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Thank you! Princess of Ara_(talk) 17:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Princess of Ara, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have another member keen to increase the coverage of women from Nigeria. I see you have already created a number of interesting biographies of women and hope there will be many more. If you have not already done so, you might like to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Ipigott for the warm welcome. This essay was very much needed and helped put a lot of things into perspective. I appreciate! Princess of Ara_(talk) 09:12, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Siene Allwell-Brown. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 23:12, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

an article is closed as no consensus then the {{notability}} tag as a matter of necessity should remain there indefinitely, except you have added RS only then may the tag be removed. What you just did is border line disruptive editing. Celestina007 (talk) 23:27, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Siene Allwell-Brown, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 23:29, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]