This is a Wikipedia user talk page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Audacity.

• Welcome to Audacity's talk page.
• Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~).

This page is a free speech zone. Tell me what you really think. Do not remove comments of other users, even if you think they could be personal attacks.

User talk:Audacity/Archives

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of unicorn startup companies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DJI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have preserved the bitshares content in my sandbox if you need it. User:Jtbobwaysf/sandbox ...I think it would be good if this content would be added to Larimer's article. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 06:04, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jtbobwaysf: Cool, thanks! Will add what I can Λυδαcιτγ 06:15, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please dont add wikilinks in the sources (like you did for fortune) here [1]. It just creates a huge inbound linkfarm for the fortune article, we dont wikilink from sources. I changed it here [2]. An editor scolded me on this too long ago as well, please dont take it personally :-) Keep up the good edits! Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 19:02, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jtbobwaysf: Thanks for the comment - always appreciate editing feedback. After some research, it looks like we don't have a guideline for this at the moment. I think it would be useful to have such a guideline so I've started a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Citing_sources#Guideline_on_wikilinks_within_citations - welcome your participation. Cheers! Λυδαcιτγ 01:31, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Smallbones_(smalltalk) 01:56, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you've made 2 reversion at Bitcoin in the last 24 hours. Please self revert. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 01:56, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]