Thank you for uploading File:Bridgequeen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Why did I receive the above message, questioning who created the file? It specifically says that I created it, and the date that I created it. Why am I told that it will be deleted? When the file was uploaded, it was done according to regulations. Why do you post threats of deletion with deadlines, then post that you are on leave and will only check once or twice a month, LONG past the deadline you set?

I would like an explanation. Scotwood72 (talk) 15:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

De-lurking: The file looks like it should be OK to me. The original is presumably PD, given that Victoria died in 1901. It's hard to decide whether it's a 2-D or 3-D work, but if it's 3-D, all that means (as I understand it) is that the photographer might have a copyright interest, and that's been explicitly released. I suppose there's a theoretical possibility that the work could have been created long enough after Victoria's death to still be under copyright, in which case you'd get into freedom of panorama issues, but it seems unlikely. --Trovatore (talk) 20:11, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed that you've speedy deleted per G13 about 140 drafts in the space of four to five minutes today. You haven't made any draftspace edits and Category:G13 eligible AfC submissions is currently empty (after you only one G13 deletion has been performed by another admin). This seems to suggest you've deleted absolutely every draft that had been tagged for G13 (with the possible exception of one), and given the time spent – about one deletion every other second – it seems unlikely you perform any meaningful evaluation of the content. That's just an observation, maybe I'm simply jumping to conclusions? It's possible that for example simply all the 280 drafts were unsalvageable rubbish. – Uanfala (talk) 09:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Uanfala. This was already explained to you. -FASTILY 17:54, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you'd forgotten about that discussion or would be too embarrassed to bring it up. Well, if you insist on referring to it, then I should probably express my disbelief at the explanation given there. Maybe there's something I'm misunderstanding, but I'm really finding it difficult to imagine that an admin would open over a hundred tabs in their browser for each of the drafts eligible for deletion, then inspect them carefully with the intention of deleting at the end only the ones they don't see as promising and leaving the rest for somebody else to deal with, and that the whole exercise would then end with apparently all the drafts getting deleted and none being left for somebody else. – Uanfala (talk) 21:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you do your research before slinging bad faith accusations. Spoiler alert: I *did* leave some. I also find your antagonistic tone here and obsessive, battleground-type behavior towards everything G13-related to be troubling. A bit of friendly advice: it's great that you're passionate about something, but if you continue to conduct yourself like this, you'll inevitably face sanctions. Have a nice day. -FASTILY 22:19, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if my tone was antagonistic, that wasn't my intention. – Uanfala (talk) 23:01, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]