Archives

2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.

If you've come to this page because you got a notification saying I'm patrolling your page, then it just means that I've checked your new page meets Wikipedia standards. If it didn't, then I will have tagged the problems on the article itself.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May I please have my original contribution to edit? I received a message saying you were the one to contact to request it. Thank you, Mtwrighter (talk) 21:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)mtwrighter, 3/16/2016[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett: was the deleting admin (I'm not an admin so cannot restore it). I've pinged him so he'll see this discussion, it's up to him. I'd be fine for it to be moved to draftspace to be worked on and improved. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my friend. I've asked here for more opinions. Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:48, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is a reason why I continue to submit your article despite the reasoning behind why you declined it. The current article at the parent page is so bad it lacks sufficient sources. The draft page may not have sufficient sources either, but at least it covers the subject in detail! It's also needless to mention that the draft contains a junction list that would clutter the parent article should it be put in there. To give you an idea of what I'm talking about, check out the junction list of the aforementioned route as it passes the state of Texas. In short, it's generally better to look at the reason an article is being submitted rather than just denoting it as too long or unnecessary.

Nonetheless, thanks for reviewing the article. HeatIsCool (talk) 02:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that an article appears to exist for other states, such as U.S. Route 287 in Oklahoma & U.S. Route 287 in Texas. Guess it makes sense for me to accept it, and someone can propose a merge into U.S. Route 287 if they disagree. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:59, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@HeatIsCool: I've asked for an admin to delete the U.S. Route 287 in Colorado redirect, so that I can accept your draft. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:01, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Thanks a lot! HeatIsCool (talk) 12:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon
Dear Sir,
Last my corrections in the article MS Toyvo Antikaynen was not dangerouse. First of all I changed "Pinocchio" to "junior deck officer" where it was remained after your cut. It was necessary due to nobody understend why is "Pinocchio" after your corrections.
Next my correction - In the text already were two sentances:

• Two black balls.
• Allitle more and collision.

Nobody understand what is it and I wrote only that the ship was close to collision one time more and two black balls were hoisted as it is signal for the other ship "the ship is not under command".

I understood that nothing write about Intelligence and any way all what I described in the articles is true as I was on this ship during mentioned voyages except the last years of the ship when she was under arest. If for you I am not the source, I do not know which source you need.

In Odessa was Maritime museum of transpot ships of Black Sea Shipping companies. Due fire the exhibits mostly burned and the bibliotec and other sources are absents. Likes all other sources are in the Russia. Odessa is Ukraine and not is Russia. It is means that not necessary to call anybody from Moscow or Russia to check me as I am Ukranian or to be clear - I am half Ukranian and another half am Polac if calculate from my grandfathers and grandmothers.

The more realy sourses are the seamen's memories for the Black Sea Shipping Company as in the Company papers and others sourses you will found out nothing, only where was ship and no any details mostly.

About other activities know only crew and other services. I do not give you fully information and onmy opinion nothing dagerouse were mentioned. Any how you deleted the dangerouse part as per you opinion. I do not touch it again.

Regarding other ships: I was not crew member of the SS Nezhin, SS Karaganda, SS Metallurg Anosov but I was on last two of them and on the SS Metallurg Anosov very often when the ships back in the USSR. All what I mentioned about all the ships is true. There more I have more detailed information and information that is better do not write for anybody and I did not whrote it.

The some articles are the original in you Wikipedia: SS Nezhin, SS Karaganda, MS Sarny. And before I wrote the original one about U.S. shipbuilder. Other article SS Metallurg Anosov, SS Leninsky Komsomol, Leninsky Komsomol class of cargo ships are my the original articles in Russian and Ukranian Wikipedias. But the articles SS Leninsky Komsomol, Leninsky Komsomol class of cargo ships are summary of informations from the mentioned sources including seamen discussion in Internet.

Any article was maden using one ore more down mentioned items:

• summary of other articles and sources - it is means that it is summary of other persons original investigations as any jornalist, writer, politic use own investigations to write anything
• original own investigation mixed with above mentioned item
• copy of other source that is also investigation mostly.

The main how you will write the others investigations. For example: in the article SS Karaganda I mentioned U.S. newspapers articles. They are journalists investigations and I can not be sure in that information. It is why I copied the test and wrote from which newspaper it is. About information from my side I mentioned one crew member of the ship. I trust crew member more than any journalist. On this ship was my first voyage when I was child yet. The voyage was directly out on sea boarder of Soviet Union due to military manouvers close to the Turkey Sea territory and in this case no any civil citizens may be on board. It was in 1963 about. I was less then 1 year old.

Any way I understood yours precautions and prohibitions regarding "Intelligence activities" information.

BRGDS Грищук ЮН (talk) 15:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]