Rollback

(add request • view requests)

Please familiarize yourself with Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback before making a request. Misuse of the feature, even if unintentional or in good faith, may give cause for it to be removed.

Administrator notation templates

This template is used to answer requests for permissions, especially the rollback user right. ::{{subst:RFPR|option}} ~~~~ The second (unnamed) parameter is optional. It can be omitted or used to specify the admin when marking a request as already done or the number of edits when declining due to inexperience. Result Code Normalized code  Done ::{{subst:RFPR|d}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|done}} ~~~~  Already done by {{admin|X}} ::{{subst:RFPR|ad|X}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|alreadydone|X}} ~~~~  Revoked ::{{subst:RFPR|r}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|revoked}} ~~~~  Not done ::{{subst:RFPR|nd}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|notdone}} ~~~~  Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only {{{X}}} edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. ::{{subst:RFPR|exp|X}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|moreedits|X}} ~~~~  Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. I see you just also applied for Pending Changes Reviewer. Let's see how you get on with that first and then we'll take another look again when you've made a few more edits. ::{{subst:RFPR|rvw}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|alsorequestedreviewer}} ~~~~  Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. This is not what Rollback is for. Take a moment to read Wikipedia:Rollback and if that's what you would like to do, you can then check out the Counter Vandalism Unit to learn more. ::{{subst:RFPR|nrb}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|notrollback}} ~~~~

User:David Condrey

• David Condrey (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I've been getting more and more involved in Wikipedia and believe myself to have a solid understanding of rules and policies. David Condrey (talk) 01:59, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: extraneous header removed. —LucasThoms 02:07, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done 73.5% of your edits are automated or script assisted, or 1,357 of 1,847, most being a cleanup tool. Searching your edit summaries, I find two mentions of vandalism in all your edits. You do not demonstrate the need or the understanding of the policies surrounding rollback. Please be active in anti-vandal reverting and reapply when you get the hang of things. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 02:22, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jaydiem

• Jaydiem (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I believe that my record as a thoughtful contributor to both article edits and policy discussions demonstrates that I have a solid understanding of proper editing standards and guidelines for the English Wikipedia. I have used the "rollback" feature of Twinkle many times to revert vandalism. An examination of my contribution history will reveal that I almost always attach detailed summaries to my edits, which shows that I am conscientious about what I'm doing and recognize the importance of documenting what I've done and why I've done it. This is why I believe you can be confident that I will use the Rollback permission with both diligence and care. (Please note that I presently have a pending request for the Reviewer permission as well.) — Jaydiem (talk) 13:26, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done While you are reverting things, rollback applies to blatant vandalism. You do a fair amount of good faith reverting. I'm concerned that those good faith reverts will be hit now by the rollback button. I don't see enough reversion of blatant vandalism to grant the tools here. Please immerse yourself in anti-vandal work and familiarize yourself with WP:ROLLBACK and it's uses, and down the road I have no objection to a new request. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 02:36, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bobherry

• Bobherry (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I am very involved with fighting vandalism and reporting users to admins, therefore I believe this will help me and let me do it faster. I am very active in patrolling the recent changes and new pages. Thanks! Bobherry talk 00:50, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have 8 edits in the mainspace since the beginning of the year (but more beyond that), I wouldn't consider that active in vandalism fighting though. I see your issuing a fair amount of 4im notices and reports to AIV. Your reverts, warning and reports are legitimate from the brief scan I did. For this reason I am on the fence. I'm going to  Grant rollback for a 7 day period. I would like you to demonstrate that my faith is well founded and see active vandalism reverting. After the 7 days, I will review your contributions, and proceed from there. Any admin seeing issues can revoke it before the 7 day period. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 02:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:BloodDoll

• BloodDoll (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I am requesting the rollback right to aid in more quickly reverting instances of blatant vandalism and warning the perpetrators. I also intend to use Huggle in order to make this process faster and easier to do. At the moment, I am using RTRC and Twinkle to patrol recent changes; while certainly effective enough, the addition of rollback rights and use of Huggle would allow me to be more efficient at it. As for my qualifications to use rollback responsibly, I have been active in the CVU since I joined Wikipedia. In addition, I have been recently active in anti-vandalism work (see recent contribs), as well as active in anti-vandalism work in the past. I also have ~1,300 edits, of which I believe around 500 are mainspace. If the aforementioned is insufficient for rollback rights, please let me know what I need to accomplish before re-applying. Thank you for considering this request. BloodDoll (talk) 00:01, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Adding Reviewer as well, long term user with good record. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:14, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Matheweditking

• Matheweditking (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Reason for requesting rollback Matheweditking (talk) 09:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I am very competent. I pride myself on catching acts of vandalism.

Matheweditking (talk) 09:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done With less than 40 edits to your name, we have no way of judging your competence. Please reapply when you have a couple of hundred edits and a substantial amount of anti-vandalism work under your belt. Yunshui ^雲_水 09:33, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]