Reviewer

(add request • view requests)

User:Rijinatwiki

• Rijinatwiki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

This would help me to accept or reject pending edits. Thanks. Rijin (talk) 11:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:07, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:SkaterLife

• SkaterLife (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

This will ensure that I will be able to accept or decline pending edit wishes. ☯SkaterLife☯ talk 14:42, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: After reviewing this users talk page and 'tribs, the last thing, it seems, that this user needs is more flags. (IMHO) Mlpearc (open channel) 18:46, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiseass note - do we have clerks for these pages, now? I hadn't been told. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, it is. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:25, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. User needs significantly more editing experience before getting involved in any meta areas. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gdfusion

• Gdfusion (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Hello! I would like to help out with the pending changes. I have read the relevant WP:RG guideline, and have a good history reverting vandalism, although I don't have too many edits. Thank you! --gdfusion (talk|contrib) 01:04, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done (not yet). Welcome back to Wikipedia, your edit count is admittedly lower, but it is also rather recent, almost all your edits have been within the month. Most of the relevant policies have had some updates over time, and you should make sure you have time to review them. Keep up the productive contributions and stop back here in a month and I'll approve you. (Please link to this Diff as reference.) Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 02:16, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:KDTW Flyer

• KDTW Flyer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

would help keep pages filled with good/true information KDTW Flyer (talk) 14:57, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done You have just 51 edits and only about a month of experience. I think if you come back in a few weeks with some more article work under your belt, this won't be difficult to get. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 00:46, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hafspajen

• Hafspajen (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Realized I couldn't accept pending changes. Somebody suggested that I should apply for reviewer permission, and autopatrolled and rollback as well. Hafspajen (talk) 17:37, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Processed:

• Reviewer:  Done
• Autopatrolled:  Not done (not really needed) This is for users that create lots of new articles, has no effect on how you edit.^Talk 18:18, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Rollback:  Done. OK, please review WP:ROLLBACK for information on this.

— xaosflux ^Talk 18:18, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, that was fast! Thanks. Hafspajen (talk) 18:23, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cutest Penguin

• Cutest Penguin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

This would surely help me in contributing and reviewing pending articles. I would like to expend and review articles under WikiProject India CutestPenguin {talk • contribs} 18:59, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note. I recently declined this request for userright-relevant concerns about ten days ago. --Lord Roem ~ (talk) 16:20, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: The right was declined as per the discussion which was raised with my some edits in the article Vardhman Mahavir Medical College. One of non-admin mentioned in the discussion that he randomly clicked on above mentioned article and found me ineligible for this right, although that article was not contributed by me nor the content which he mentioned in the discussion under History section. I just tried to expend the article by restructuring and adding logo of the institution. It is my request that please consider my contributions not the comments of the NON-admin, I respect each of them since they are part of Wikipedia. I will happily keep contributing even after my request for reviewer get declined. CutestPenguin {talk • contribs} 18:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: You still haven't understood what the person meant. The person who raised the concern pointed out that you had failed to correct obvious existing errors when improving the article in question. It does not matter whether they were added by you or not. Also, non-admins' comments have the same value as the admins', when their points stand. Admins have the same rights here on Wikipedia - They just have more tools technically. (P.S. I'm not admin) Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 23:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]