Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin

Reviewer

(add request • view requests)
Shortcuts

User:Ibrahimsqureshi

I would like to request for reviewer rights. I am quite knowledgeable on Wikipedia's policies, I pay close attention to references, mostly to make sure there not bare. MY mainspace edit count: 243. I've been on Wikipedia for 6 months. If I am rejected, I understand Ibrahimsqureshi (talk) 02:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) This user has been blocked for abuse of editing privileges (although this is not regarded as a reason).--Good afternoon (talk) 03:25, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - Not enough experience, yet. Additionally, the two recent blocks coupled with copyright violation uploads show a lack of strong policy comprehensions. Tiptoety talk 03:39, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I was not blocked for abusing editing privileges, I was blocked for placing private information (location, etc.) on my former user page. I was later unblocked, and have followed Wikipedia's policies since then.--Ibrahimsqureshi (talk) 03:40, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cutest Penguin

 Not done

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Most of time I keep wonder about new topics, I am interested in monitoring articles related to India under Pending Changes Protection and I think having a reviewer right I can contribute more on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit CutestPenguin {talk • contribs} 15:51, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) I clicked on a randomly chosen one of your "featured" contributions that you list on your userpage, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College. In the version of it at the time you made this request, this small (less than 4000 characters) article contained one substantial copy-paste copyvio - making up the great majority of the "History" section - which I have now removed. It also contained a substantial quantity of wildly over-promotional material, sometimes to the point of incoherency ("295 doctors who are highly qualified in their respective fields, possessing post-graduate qualifications" - I wouldn't like to meet a doctor who does not possess a post-graduate qualification). And it contained clear evidence of WP:COI "Research activities of the highest order are under taken in all the disciplines of medicine and our institute is a centre for the research". None of this problematic material was added by you, but I am concerned as to how you would use the reviewer right if this is how you leave a short article which you have worked on extensively. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:03, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Demiurge1000: The contents you are talking about is not contributed by me, please have a look at the history of the article. Thank you! (Featured is meant for restructuring the contents as well as before and after link must be considered to compare my contribution to so called featured articles on my user page ) CutestPenguin {talk • contribs} 17:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) I think what Demiurge1000 is referring to is this passage from the reviewing policy, "The purpose of reviewing is to catch and filter out [...] obviously inappropriate edits on articles...." If you didn't notice those major problems on article that you say you have worked on extensively, why would you do any better with an article you are unfamiliar with? Looking over your contributions I think you're doing some very good things, but I also see other cases where you have improved articles in one place, but failed to notice other problems within the article. Or if not failed to notice, failed to correct. My opinion, as a non-administrator, would be maybe you should wait and concentrate on editing before you venture into reviewing. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 19:02, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for the reasons discussed above. Relative inexperience compounded with some userright-relevant concerns. --Lord Roem ~ (talk) 22:29, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Lord Roem: I think post the rejection of the request the user has made a personal attack , which I feel is against No personal attacks . I was involved in a talk page conversation with the stated user and thats when I went to the user's Talk page .Commons sibi (talk) 08:21, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

User:Ascii002

I am requesting for reviewer's right to accept or reject pending edits. — Ascii002 Let's talk! Contribs 07:26, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 09:27, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Indonesia124

I am requesting for reviewer's right to accept or reject pending edits. — User:Indonesia124 (talk) 16:50, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You only have 44 edits in total. When you have around 200 edit to articles, at least some of which demonstrate an understanding of what is and is not vandalism, your request will have a good chance of succeeding, but you simply don't have enough of a record for us to make a determination at this time. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:07, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:The Newspaper

I want to be able to accept or reject pending changes. The Newspaper (talk) 20:29, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You only have 73 edits to the mainspace (i.e. articles). When you have a bit more, at least some of which demonstrate an understanding of what is and is not vandalism, your request will have a good chance of succeeding, but you simply don't have enough of a record for us to make a determination at this time. -- Lord Roem ~ (talk) 01:10, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Allright thank you, I will try again in a few months. The Newspaper (talk) 03:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Timk70

So I can help with checking pending edits sometimes. On this wiki I don't have much edits though, but I'm an active user on de- and nl-wiki. Timk70 (talk) 00:03, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: You only have 43 edits in the mainspace here. Although you are active on Wikipedias in other languages, I suggest you edit more here on the English Wikipedia before requesting this right. We will see what the admins here have to say though. A2 17:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per above. While it's good to see that you're established on other projects, I'd like to see a bit more local activity before granting this right. Feel free to ask me personally to revisit at some point in the near future. – Juliancolton | Talk 22:18, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cooljoes

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Cooljoes (talk) 13:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)I am requesting for reviewer's right to accept or reject pending edits. - cooljoes[reply]
 Not done - sorry, you don't have anywhere near the level of experience required for this role. I'll note that this is your first edit in nearly two years, which is a bit peculiar. Thanks for volunteering nonetheless. – Juliancolton | Talk 13:07, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rijinatwiki

This would help me to accept or reject pending edits. Thanks. Rijin (talk) 11:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:07, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?&oldid=617202553

Leave a Reply