Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin

Rollback

(add request • view requests)

Sorry, please be aware that unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

Administrator notation templates

This template is used to answer requests for permissions, especially the rollback user right.

::{{subst:RFPR|option}} ~~~~

The second (unnamed) parameter is optional. It can be omitted or used to specify the admin when marking a request as already done or the number of edits when declining due to inexperience.
Result Code Normalized code
 Done ::{{subst:RFPR|d}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|done}} ~~~~
 Already done by {{admin|X}} ::{{subst:RFPR|ad|X}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|alreadydone|X}} ~~~~
 Revoked ::{{subst:RFPR|r}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|revoked}} ~~~~
 Not done ::{{subst:RFPR|nd}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|notdone}} ~~~~
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only {{{X}}} edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. ::{{subst:RFPR|exp|X}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|moreedits|X}} ~~~~
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. I see you just also applied for Pending Changes Reviewer. Let's see how you get on with that first and then we'll take another look again when you've made a few more edits. ::{{subst:RFPR|rvw}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|alsorequestedreviewer}} ~~~~
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. This is not what Rollback is for. Take a moment to read Wikipedia:Rollback and if that's what you would like to do, you can then check out the Counter Vandalism Unit to learn more. ::{{subst:RFPR|nrb}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|notrollback}} ~~~~
Shortcuts

User:AllenHAcNguyen

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
What I did on Wikipedia is I would have rollback rights to rollback some edits that are vandalism and would undo revision. I'm shocked with the vandal user who made edits messed up that I'm going to revert them than other rollbackers does. --Allen Talk 05:47, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only 11 edits to mainspace, I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU and when you have made 200 or so edits to articles you may wish to enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. Armbrust The Homunculus 07:11, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What I learn is rollback or revert vandalism edits on Wikipedia, so I can have rights for it after I enrolled at the Counter Vandalism Unit! --Allen Talk 07:26, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
AllenHAcNguyen: One of the largest issues with rollback, apart from not knowing what is good and what is bad, is inability to talk to another contributor about something they've messed up by mistake when having a different intention. You need to demonstrate thorough experience of talking to people about their first messy edits where undoing and moving on without talking was a (the worse) possibility. -- This is why rollback, which undoes multiple edits at once, requires bigger experience. It is not just about edit count. Gryllida (talk) 17:23, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Gryllida: That reminds me of getting rollback rights on Wikipedia if I try to revert some edits that completely messed up and actually vandalized. --Allen Talk 17:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pardon my bluntness, but it is going to be nearly impossible for you to have any advanced permissions if you cannot communicate in English. Your remarks read like you are using machine translation or something, they don't make any sense. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:31, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Beeblebrox: My worth English is good, it maybe right or impossible for me to have rollback rights on Wikipedia and however I'm not using translate (that's because the translate from another language to English is maybe nonsense or gibberish). What I did on Wikipedia is try revert some edits that is vandalism and fix the articles on difference above with undo revision. --Allen Talk 02:52, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm willing to take your word that you aren't using machine translation, but your English is so poor you might as well be. Your posts are gibberish, and if you can't recognize that I can't imagine how you could be expected to recognize vandalism from other types of editing. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's a bit harsh. While I agree with denying this request at the moment I don't think there's any reason to discourage the user from contributing. His English is rather hard to understand, but it's usually easier to read a non-native language than to speak/write it, and given quite a few examples of positive vandalism identification I'd be happy to grant the right. – Juliancolton | Talk 01:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Beeblebrox: We can all appreciate good communication and even promote it, your method is just plain rude, which caught me by surprise from such a seasoned editor, not a good day for Wikipedia. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:34, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we can all see above where Gryllida tried to tell him in a less direct way that his communication skills were lacking, and the response was...nonsense. And then I made my first remark, which was a little more direct, and the response was "My worth English is good". In other words, complete denial of the problem, while confirming it at the same time. Of course we don't expect new editors to know all of our policies and procedures before they start out, but competence in the language actually is kind of a prerequisite, not something you will just pick up as you go along. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Do ya think this could be the beginning of this users "pick up along the way" ? so let's just beat the crap out of them just in case...ignorance. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:21, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Whether it's relevant to this project or not, wikiasite:community:Message wall:Lt. Allen, he's been known to be annoying, disruptive, and incognizant on various other projects. Beeble is not the only person to suspect Allen of using a translator. From what I've been told, he's been translating from Vietnamese to English. Though when I confronted him directly about where he learned to speak English, his response was "Mol, I learned English before I was born!" (@22:02:58). I also hate to be that guy, but, from scrutiny of his past requests on other projects, this is just some weird power grab. moluɐɯ 22:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Closing, — xaosflux Talk 02:08, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

User:محمد عصام

I'm here since July 2013, I have rollback in Arabic wikipedia and wikidata, I think I have a good experience in the removal of vandalism, and I intend to use Huggle 3 here (I already use it in ar.w), with my regards MohamedTalk 20:38, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
notdone - while having rollback elsewhere does help your case, we need to see some evidence of local competence. A vast majority of your 150-ish edits are merely welcoming new users in the past few hours, with sporadic activity since 2013. Please spend a bit more time becoming established on this wiki and ask again after you've accumulated a few hundred worthwhile contributions, including multiple instances of anti-vandalism work. Also, unrelated, but please do consider toning down your signature a bit. Sorry, – Juliancolton | Talk 21:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, I'll try to be more active here MohamedTalk 21:47, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have now more than 300 Edits, I check the Recent changes page for vandals, and Rollback will greatly help me use Twinkle and Huggle, Thanks --MohamedTalk 07:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't necessarily mean for you to make a mad dash for edits and come back in 36 hours, but here we are I suppose. :) I'll defer to another admin here—your eagerness gives me some pause, and editcount notwithstanding, you've still only been editing for three days. Struck my {{notdone}} to allow for a second opinion. – Juliancolton | Talk 14:09, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, concurring with Julian's thoughts. Can always be given later when there's more of a track record. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 18:56, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cowlibob

I've been a user for some time with over 4,000 edits and a featured list. I work mainly on film articles and Indian election results. Having the ability to rollback would greatly help me to fight vandalism. Cowlibob (talk) 13:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done – Juliancolton | Talk 14:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:SkaterLife

I wish to have Rollback so I could revert vandalism faster. I mainly work on checking the Recent changes page for vandals or I add pictures to pages which don't have them. SkaterLife (talk) 14:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - you don't have quite as much experience as would make me completely comfortable (only 100 out of your 600 edits are to the mainspace; not sure what all you do with the rest of your time) but life's short. Don't make me regret it! – Juliancolton | Talk 14:38, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ascii002

I wish to have Rollback as user right to revert vandalism faster. I mainly work on biographies and this right can help me revert vandalism. — Ascii002 Let's talk! Contribs 14:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Don't make me regret this.... Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:07, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ijon

I'm doing a fair bit of patrolling using STiki and through various backlog categories. Rollback would be useful, and would also allow me to use Huggle. Ijon (talk) 00:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done --Lord Roem ~ (talk) 03:20, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:M4r51n

Get ridding of vandalism with having the rollback status is much easier. M4r51n (talk) 01:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - sorry, but you don't have quite as much experience as I normally like to see. If you're still interested after you've become a bit more established as an editor, feel free to contact me personally and I'll revisit. – Juliancolton | Talk 14:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:MarshalN20

To help me quickly revert massive vandalism. I typically work in pages were vandals show up every now and then, and have a good sense to distinguish between good faith contributions and plain vandalism.--MarshalN20 Talk 21:54, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done – Juliancolton | Talk 01:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fitzcarmalan

I have been here since July 2013. I contribute to some politically-sensitive topics where disruptive IP edits and vandalism are very common and are often difficult to revert without this right. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 10:50, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?&oldid=616507819

Leave a Reply