Please read the guide on the main page before requesting permission. In applying for AWB access, you indicate that you will abide by its terms.

Also, this page is for requesting AWB Access for this wiki (English Wikipedia) only. Other projects have their own check pages and you should ask administrators there to add you.

Please add your name to the bottom of the appropriate list (user or bot) on this page below using *{{AWBUser|your username}} ~~~~~. Enter your user name exactly as the software displays it, for example in the 'Basic information' section of your preferences. Do not use underscores instead of spaces or change the case of the first letter. Note that all usernames begin with an uppercase letter or a symbol.

If the list contains undecided entries that are over 48 hours old, please change {{noadminbacklog}} to {{adminbacklog}} at the top of this page.

Note that users with under 500 mainspace non-automated edits are rarely approved. You can check your contributions in each namespace at Toolserver. You only need to give a reason for wanting AWB access if you have fewer than 500 mainspace non-automated edits. Administrators are automatically approved and do not need to list themselves.

If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. If you will make many or fast automated edits using AWB, you may wish to use a separate (or bot) account for the purpose.

Users

• Cb6 (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) 12:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Question You have only made 458 article edits. For what do you want to use AWB for? Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:39, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• My apologies, I had thought my count was over 500 - I should have checked. I've been looking for a tool to help with list comparisons and thought AWB looked ideal. JohnHarris (talk) 13:21, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:07, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• K6ka (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) 03:38, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• 98% of edits are reverts, what would you like to do with AWB? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:37, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I have thoughts of expanding my field of work on Wikipedia, such as doing general fixes. I think I have done a few in the past, lost in my admittedly huge history of contributions where 98% of the edits are reversions of vandalism. K6ka (talk | contribs) 02:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomian (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) 20:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• How would you like to use AWB? Although you have enough edits I see quite a few I would like to fix. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:47, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I would like to patrol the new pages and fix them and add tags, if necessary, using AWB. Nomian (talk) 16:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Old Time Music Fan (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) 22:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Already done by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) in this edit. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:44, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Masssly (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) Masssly (talk) 12:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Already done by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) in this edit. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:44, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• jzana (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) (beginner) ZJ (talk) 16:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment Please read the instructions for requesting AWB access, and correct your request accordingly. Question You also have just 301 edits to articles instead of the required 500. What do you want to use AWB for? Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Cyphoidbomb (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) Hi, I have ample experience and I'm looking for ways to streamline my most time-consuming tasks. 19:39, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Since I've been watching this page, I've noticed that there are often follow-up questions, so to help paint a more thorough picture of my interest, I'm a reviewer, I have rollback rights, I am a Twinkle user, and I am aware of the responsibility required to use a tool like this. I'm interested in fixing citations, for example (I don't care much for the manual process), adding categories, and any sort of improvement of the minutia that is painful to do by hand. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:56, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Quenhitran (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) I use VisualEditor quite regularly, and the software often makes mistakes with wiki syntax (such as the "strong" HTML tag instead of '''). So I'd like to use AWB to handle with these problems. Quenhitran (talk) 06:05, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:55, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Olliechick (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) 22:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:55, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bots

Please only list approved/trial approved bots here and add a link to your bot approval at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval.