Please read the guide on the main page before requesting permission. In applying for AWB access, you indicate that you will abide by its terms.

Also, this page is for requesting AWB Access for this wiki (English Wikipedia) only. Other projects have their own check pages and you should ask administrators there to add you.

Please add your name to the bottom of the appropriate list (user or bot) on this page below using *{{AWBUser|your username}} ~~~~~. Enter your user name exactly as the software displays it, for example in the 'Basic information' section of your preferences. Do not use underscores instead of spaces or change the case of the first letter. Note that all usernames begin with an uppercase letter or a symbol.

If the list contains undecided entries that are over 48 hours old, please change {{noadminbacklog}} to {{adminbacklog}} at the top of this page.

Note that users with under 500 mainspace non-automated edits are rarely approved. You can check your contributions in each namespace at Toolserver. You only need to give a reason for wanting AWB access if you have fewer than 500 mainspace non-automated edits. Administrators are automatically approved and do not need to list themselves.

If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. If you will make many or fast automated edits using AWB, you may wish to use a separate (or bot) account for the purpose.

Users

• Cb6 (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) 12:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Question You have only made 458 article edits. For what do you want to use AWB for? Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:39, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• My apologies, I had thought my count was over 500 - I should have checked. I've been looking for a tool to help with list comparisons and thought AWB looked ideal. JohnHarris (talk) 13:21, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• K6ka (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) 03:38, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• 98% of edits are reverts, what would you like to do with AWB? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:37, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I have thoughts of expanding my field of work on Wikipedia, such as doing general fixes. I think I have done a few in the past, lost in my admittedly huge history of contributions where 98% of the edits are reversions of vandalism. K6ka (talk | contribs) 02:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomian (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) 20:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• How would you like to use AWB? Although you have enough edits I see quite a few I would like to fix. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:47, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I would like to patrol the new pages and fix them and add tags, if necessary, using AWB. Nomian (talk) 16:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Rabsnieder (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) 05:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Question You have only made 468 article edits. For what do you want to use AWB for? Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:57, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I am sorry. I thought it would be more than 500. I would like to use AWB to fix wiki pages which have syntex errors, other incomplete/ incorrect contents. Should I place a request again once I cross 500 mark? Rabsnieder (talk) 10:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't think that we have to wait for that, but most of your edits are updating sports statistics in tables. How would AWB help with that, sicnce that is the strong point of your editing? Posting here without reaching the 500 mark shows that instructions were not followed. But I am more interested in that you will use AWB constructively and thus prove that you can do the job yourself before putting AWB on the job to multiply the success. Can you point to some diffs of you fixing syntax? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Lzy881114 (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) 17:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• OccultZone (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) 09:13, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Kkj11210 (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) 11:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Behind The Wall Of Sleep (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) 10:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Muhammad Ali Khalid (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) 11:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bots

Please only list approved/trial approved bots here and add a link to your bot approval at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval.

• HasteurBot (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/HasteurBot 8 14:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Please assist in speedy granting the access. The bot plays a time critical role in updating {{Infobox dam}}, and right now, a number of articles are updated with new params, while another bunch is not. So some articles are currently broken. Rehman 15:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. 28bytes (talk) 03:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]