Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin

Reviewer/Article Feedback Reviewer

(add request • view requests)
Shortcuts


User:LemonTwinkle

I have recently become active again on wikipedia following a 6 month hiatus, however prior to my departure I had held the rollback flag for some time (without complaint) and most of my edits pertain to counter vandalism. I have read the reviewer policy and the appropriate pages to do with vandalism and BLP. --LemonTwinkle 04:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Legoktm (talk) 00:47, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:ContinueWithCaution

I've been editing Wikipedia since 2007, I understand what is and what is not vandalism, and I am very interested in helping further the goals of the project, including monitoring and addressing pending changes. Thanks! C(u)w(t)C(c) 02:38, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:41, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:HMSSolent

I've been flushing out vandalism since a few years back, using STiki, Lupin's tool and am currently equipped with the rollback right. Unfortunately, every now and then, I would come up on pending changes that I couldn't tend to. Having the reviewer tool will be a very good help in fighting vandalism on such cases. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 04:57, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:44, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sohambanerjee1998

I am experienced user with WP:AWB rights along with experience with reverting Vandals and warning them subsequently. I am fair knowledge of wikipedia's policies and guidelines specially one regarding reviewing pending changes. I have read it carefully and thoroughly and have understood the concept of being one and think I am competent enough of to be one. I have a fair sense of vandalism and know the difference between GF and BF edits. Thus my experience of Half-an-year along with 1575 article namespace edits.

The above are two examples of my revertions. There are more. Sohambanerjee1998 07:50, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This revision I would have accepted since it links to an article, is a Good faith edit.
But this one I would have not since its an WP:UNSOURCED one as mentioned in the Edit summary. Sohambanerjee1998 07:58, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Htonl

I've been editing since 2005, I have the autopatrolled right and I'm an admin on Wikisource. I understand WP:V and the other core policies. Quite a few of my watchlisted articles are under PC protection now and I'd like to be able to accept pending changes. htonl (talk) 23:06, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:49, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Novusuna

While patrolling recent changes, I sometimes come across pages with pending changes that I'd like to be able to accept. My editing history shows a pattern of identifying and cleaning up vandalism, and I have a good understanding of Wikipedia policy. Novusuna talk 04:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:37, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alixos

I'd like to start reviewing as the next step as an editor, since I've created several articles and am involved in a couple of projects. Alixos (talk) 14:12, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. With a total of only 145 edits (only 93 to mainspace), please apply again when you have gained more experience. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:57, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:LukeSurl

I've been on Wikipedia for ages (since 2004 I think) and am aware of the various policies. I've done quite a bit of AFC reviewing already LukeSurl t c 18:11, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:33, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kkj11210

I have registered on Wikipedia a while back, but I have become very active on 2013. I have been contributing mostly to article that have contents related with Korea, and I have contributed/removed/edited/labelled/flagged a lot of articles. I have reviewed all of the relevant policies and I would like to contribute to the Korean materials as a reviewer Kkj11210 (talk) 03:59, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. If you had reviewed the relevant policies and understood them I think you would see how this request does not really make a lot of sense. the reviewer right actually has nothing to do with creating content. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:09, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tritario

I enjoy editing Wikipedia, however, I noticed that many new pages are designed to attack people, or vandalize this site. For that reason, I would like to request reviewer permissions to help me get the inappropriate content out of Wikipedia faster, and easier. My contributions so far. Tritario (talk) 19:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. You have barely 200 edits to article space and it is apparent from your request that you do not actually know what the purpose of this tool is. It has nothing to do with removing new pages, you should review WP:CSD and WP:NPP for information on that. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:06, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dsimic

I'm always reviewing edits performed to the pages on my watchlist, and I'm frequently reverting vandalisms spotted that way, and/or improving edits not having the appropriate layout, language, or simply decreasing the value of an article. I'm doing that for the protected articles too, Linux for example, so it would be useful for me to have the privilege to accept/reject pending edits to such articles. Thank you. -- Dsimic (talk) 01:12, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gaba p

Just came across this pending edit and found out about reviewing rights. I've been editing WP for quite some time now and already follow many articles undoing improper edits (unsourced, unbalanced, vandalism) so I believe I could help. Regarding that specific edit, I'd approve it but then I'd restore the statement it removes and refactor both a little bit to be more in line with WP:NPOV. Regards Gaba (talk) 01:17, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?&oldid=581562909

Leave a Reply