Cannabis Ruderalis

Reviewer/Article Feedback Reviewer

(add requestview requests)


User:APerson241

I would like to have Reviewer rights because I want to be able to assist in the fight against vandalism even more. I have patrolled the AfC queue for a long time, and have caught many bad-quality articles. APerson241 (talk) 17:11, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) I already looked at the user logs, and APerson has done quite a bit of work fighting vandalism, but days of active editing could be edgy. Still, I think APerson deserves the permission. smileguy91talk 02:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Article space editing seems less than 500, I was reading in some NAO comments that recommended is 500. Did not want to turn this into a talk page, but was curious about how does one figure out anti vandal edits versus normal edits unless it is done through TW or STiki (I myself am requesting for reviewer permissions though)? Amit (talk) 16:01, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Just out of interest, do you know where I can find these NAO comments? APerson241 (talk!) 17:05, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry i did not mean to discourage you or anything but here is one. And more over this is just what i noticed and i dont think it is a rule or anything, it is an admins decision at the end of the day. Amit (talk) 18:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Edit experience, like I previously stated, is a bit edgy. smileguy91talk 03:17, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Article space editing seems more than 500. APerson241 (talk!) 14:01, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Looking through your edit history, I see alot of experience with AFC, which is great, but I don't see any experience with reverting vandalism, BLP violations, copyvios, etc. As per Wikipedia:Reviewing, we need to see experience in these areas. I would suggest asking for this right after you've done a couple hundred reverts, especially of instances of vandalism. INeverCry 18:43, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply