Cannabis Ruderalis


Autopatrolled

(add requestview requests)
While I haven't created 50 articles quite yet, I can be relied upon pretty well not to create nonsense. Every non-dab article I've made, with the exception of a couple questionable exercises a couple years back, has been created with adequate-to-strong sourcing, and I don't believe any of them have ever been deleted. —chaos5023 (talk) 21:27, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment)
While you have created some good content, I think there are still issues with some of your created articles. Abortion-rights movements, for example, can be tagged with several {{citation needed}} templates. Others can be considered as borderlining notability, such as Nuclear War MUD and Infinity (AberMUD). I'd recommend to get a bit more experience on the bulk of content [and correspondent quality], because concerns can still exist with your works. Although, you just only need a bit of extra polish. Regards. — ΛΧΣ21 19:50, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. I do want to point out for the record that Abortion-rights movements and Anti-abortion movements are only my creations insofar as the conclusion of WP:RFC/AAMC meant that their content no longer had an appropriate home where it was and it needed to be refactored somewhere that made sense. —chaos5023 (talk) 23:28, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good clarification. I'm sure the closing admin will take this conversation into account when approving/rejecting. Regards. — ΛΧΣ21 02:20, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done (admin decision - NAO not taken into consideration). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:52, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply