Cannabis Ruderalis

Rollback

(add requestview requests)


getting involved more in Wikipedia besides editing and creating articles. thanks for your time Jobberone (talk) 12:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment)You started fighting vandalism just today. It seems you got the grasp of what vandalism is and when to revert but I think administrators would want to see a little more out of you. Keep up the good work though.—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 516,973,998) 23:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Thanks.Jobberone (talk) 09:46, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Although I'm predominantly a content-editor, I've started to become more involved in anti-vandalism work, and there've been a few instances where having this tool would have been useful. I've been on Wikipedia for a month or so and have around 1000 edits. He to Hecuba (talk) 16:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment)You don't have a lot vandal fighting experience. Here is an edit you reverted as vandalism but I'm not quite sure what about it is vandalism. Could you explain this? In general, I would recommend using Twinkle's Rollback feature for now as it does the same thing and start fighting vandalism regularly.—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 516,974,860) 23:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think that edit was vandalism - the IP removed two sentences which rendered the rest of the paragraph essentially meaningless. I'm not really sure how that could be interpreted as a good faith edit, although I guess it could have been a test. --He to Hecuba (talk) 09:34, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I trust you've been around long enough to know not to use it except for blatant vandalism. Ks0stm (T•C•GE) 18:46, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Makes it a little easier to rvv Biologos (talk) 14:07, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneTom Morris (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not much of an editor here in en:WP but I do stalk a number of equine articles (that often face revertible page action) and am admin at fi:WP so I'm familiar with rollback standards. Pitke (talk) 10:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment)Confirmed per [1]. User is also a member of ArbCom. You may find this link helpful.—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 517,266,794) 12:31, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:57, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have been around for near on six months now. I mostly do gnomish work (cleaning up, wikifying), but also reverting vandalism (mainly using scripts; see here), and a bit of NPP. I have read WP:RBK, and figured it'd help make fighting vandalism easier (and more efficient). I'm pretty sure that i have a fair share of common sense (in there, somewhere :) ; and i feel i can put it (the rollback this time) to good and proper use (of course, if i didn't i wouldn't even be bothering to file this request). Cheers, benzband (talk) 15:43, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done --slakrtalk / 22:31, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of the BLPs on my watchlist continue to have the same vandalism and problems, for a lot of them it seems to be only me that spots it so I think this would be very useful for keeping on top of the problems RafikiSykes (talk) 16:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done --slakrtalk / 22:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Even though I retired and withdrew my rollback rights because I was angry at that time, I have decided that I want my rollback rights back. Abhijay (☎ Talk) (✐ Deeds) 17:12, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Cheers. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply