Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin

Rollback (add request)

Shortcuts


User:Artoasis

I have contributed regularly to BLPs, and would like to have another tool to deal with unconstructive vandalism. Thank you. Artoasis (talk) 06:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 06:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jim Sweeney

I have contributed regularly to WP:MILHIST articles and encountering more and more non-constructive edits and vandalism. I now believe I have been around Wikipedia long enough to know when and how to use this tool.Thank you. Jim Sweeney (talk) 11:27, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 16:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jamietw

I have confirmation and voice on the #cvn-wp-en counter vandalism channel and when alerted to vandalism I revert it and warn the vandal, but this process can take time and so I would like the rollback right so that I can revert the vandalism easier, I would be especially interested in using Huggle but this requires the Rollback Right. I am a reviewer on the English Wikipedia and I also have AWB rights and as such I use Auto Wiki Browser regularly, I am a New Page Patroller and as such I have knowledge of Wikipedia Policies, I also help new users and have auto voice on the English Wikipedia Help IRC Channel. Thank you, Jamietw (talk) 15:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 16:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Liveon001

I contribute quite often to articles pertaining to Armenia and the Caucasus region and occasionally encounter vandalism that should be reverted. I would like to be able to use the rollback option to do so more efficiently. Thank you. Liveon001 (talk) 03:48, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 04:00, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Socialservice

Reason for requesting rollback I have contributed regularly to Sports pages and have encountered vandalism many times.I would like to have another tool to deal with non-constructive vandalism. Thank you. Socialservice (talk) 08:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done In this edit, you used the edit summary 'rvv', which stands for "reverting vandalism" — yet the previous edits did not appear to be vandalism. It's important to distinguish between unconstructive edits made in good faith, and intentional vandalism, as the rollback tool may be used on the latter, but not the former. Read WP:VANDALISM and WP:ROLLBACK, manually revert some vandalism, use proper edit summaries, and feel free to reapply later. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 09:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Really? I never knew that. It's pretty plausible that this user didn't either. It seems a bit petty to decline him rollback on the basis of a single letter in an edit summary. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 10:06, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, there's not a lot to go on here. The user has done very little anti-vandalism work as far as I can tell, and has made similar reversions of non-vandalism edits using the undo feature [1], [2] with the default edit summary. The rollback tool can cause a moderate amount of damage if misused, which is why it's not enabled by default. It rather hurts to be called "petty" over this. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 10:16, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What you said before was petty, but what you've said now wasn't. Thanks. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 10:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose I should have made the original context clearer: that rvv was one reversion out of an available sample size of about 3. Edit summary usage is important, since it's otherwise hard to judge what's going on in an editor's mind when they make a revert. Still, I really would hate to think I was being petty towards a good faith user, and stopped only because someone else showed up. Actually, if you could do me the favor of looking over other permissions I've denied, I would greatly appreciate it. There's not much oversight in this department, and I wouldn't mind someone looking over my shoulder. I've been active here since shortly after becoming an administrator on March 26. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 10:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So will I never get this permission? But, you can revoke the permission if I misuse this feature.Socialservice (talk) 11:45, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not at all. I think if you can just assure us that you've read and understood WP:VANDALISM, that would be enough. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 18:27, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vensatry

I have been regualarly contributing to BLPs, and would like to solve problems dealing with unconstructive vandalism. Thalapathi 12:26, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
{{notdone}}. You were blocked in December for "Creating copyright violations: multiple prior warnings including copyvio, disruptive editing". Would you like to explain the circumstances of this? Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 21:31, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Thank you for explaining. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 02:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:SpeakFree

Reason for requesting rollback SpeakFree (talk) 19:21, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I often see edits that need more than just undo. Rollback would be a handy feature to have.

 Done. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 21:35, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ryan Vesey

I have requested and been granted pending change reviewer rights, I frequently patrol the recent changes section, and I often find times when I need to undo more than one edit by a single user. Ryan Vesey (talk) 03:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 03:57, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jigen III

Would like an additional tool against vandalism and to revert accidental edits I make. Thanks. Jigen III (talk) 08:49, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 09:04, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?&oldid=423304340

Leave a Reply