Cannabis

thcscience_admin

February 21[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 21, 2024.

Runaway (Damn Yankees song[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per CSD#G6. It's clear from the creator's contributions at the time that this was created in error. Thryduulf (talk) 22:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page once consisted of two sentences of a song description that didn't last a day before getting WP:BLAR'd into the general page for the album. The now-blocked creator had made this along with replica pages at multiple titles, including Runaway (Damn Yankees song), which is where the substantive editing took place. The history for the redirect in question, on the other hand, consists of the paste-in, the CSD notice a couple hours later, the blank-out, and a bot updating the target once the other replica was BLAR'd. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:48, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete it was an article for a few hours in 2014 and doesn't contain any content not in the correct title which as noted isn't even a separate article now. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:27, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

4th Battalion, Queen's Royal Regiment (West Surrey[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 and WP:CSD#G7. Thryduulf (talk) 22:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect was created and blanked in 2 edits, with what appears to be an exact copy of its target. The creator published 55k bytes at the wrong title, before converting it into a redirect once realizing the mistake. It doesn't seem like there's any other history worth keeping here, and this is otherwise an implausible search term for the subject. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - created in error, with no authority to delete. Go ahead and get rid of it Rickfive (talk) 22:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete it was an article for about 7 minutes in 2017 and doesn't contain any content not in the correct title and is tagged as G7. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2014 Ukraine crisis[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to 2014 in Ukraine. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 04:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to 2014 in UkraineDelete both. Given that these two similar terms now refer to distinct targets, it is evident that ambiguity exists. Consequently, readers would benefit more from search results. Another approach to resolving this ambiguity would involve disambiguation. Yorkporter (talk) 21:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Ukraine crisis goes to Russo-Ukrainian War so probably best to send them there—blindlynx 22:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bowser (character and etc.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. It's snowing! ✗plicit 14:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another bundle of pages missing ending parentheses. If in this group, these redirects either have associated titles in existence or are unable to be fixed in this way. On Wikipedia, these terms are implausible with the missing parenthesis. The views for these pages are generally zero across the board without external activity, yet all-the-while interfere with natural searches, and will not be sought normally on Wikipedia. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. - L'Mainerque - (Tea?) - 05:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 07:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Gorpik (talk) 07:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy close. Edit summaries show that these pages were created for various reasons. Some of them are the results of old pagemoves, so links will still exist in old revisions of pages. Others were created because other websites made mistakes and linked the lacking-parentheses versions. Yet others (probably a huge share) were made casually or otherwise without good reason. Most should be deleted, but not all, and we shouldn't have such a huge bundle in such a situation. Nyttend (talk) 19:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per WP:RDAB. Steel1943 (talk) 11:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all: per WP:RDAB. Nobody (talk) 11:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - As OA of several of the WP:Redirects noted above, it's *entirely* ok wth me to do whatever is decided in the final WP:CONSENSUS discussion - these WP:RDRs were made as a way of linking to Wikipedia from External Websites (like FaceBook), which drops the ending ")", this problem has been fully described and discussed on the WP:Village pump (technical) at VP-Archive204 (a Must-Read); VP-Archive180; VP-Archive162 - in any case - hope this helps in some way - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 13:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

1 Ceres in fiction[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 1#1 Ceres in fiction

Glazed ham[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 4#Glazed ham

2020 San Jose shooting[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this at the article, and the section it points to is nonexistent. There is an article for 2021 San Jose shooting, but it seems like that would be an unlikely target. I suggest deletion. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Based on the edit history, this referenced a drive-by shooting in September 2020 that was removed from the article in this May 2021 edit by an IP editor with the summary "This event (a single drive by shooting) was not historically significant enough to warrant being included in the 200 plus year history of San Jose.". The removal has gone completely unchallenged since then, so it seems very unlikely to return. Thryduulf (talk) 21:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unless it's worth merging up to a list of mass shooting incidents, in which case repoint to that list. User:Thebiguglyalien, do you have an opinion about whether it should be mentioned briefly in a list? WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    List of mass shootings in the United States in 2020#List includes three events that happened in San Jose (27 May, 15 September, 16 October). We could retarget this there, but I'm unsure how useful that would be? Thryduulf (talk) 03:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There's List of shootings in California, but it's currently a list of events that already "have a Wikipedia article". Of course, I'm of the position that the list should exist instead of most of those articles, in which case an upmerge might be appropriate. But unless that happens, I would say no. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:15, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Oven Toast Grill[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:19, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

A Phillip's appliance that is not mentioned at the target article. A previous RfD closed as no consensus, with the keep rationale being "the appliance exists and people use it". Yet, this topic still has not been mentioned at the target in the last 4 years since its closure. An otherwise confusing redirect to talk about "ovens, toasts, and grills" but have it all end up at "oven". Utopes (talk / cont) 19:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, and/or write an article about the Phillip's appliance already. Even without the existence of said appliance, WP:XY applies-- who's to say they didn't want an article about a grill? Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 20:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep because redirects are cheap, and because it's probably pointed to right page. The generic name is "oven toaster grill" or "oven toaster griller". They are popular in India. You can think of an OTG as either being a small, electric, countertop oven or as a large, fancy toaster oven. (If you're American, then the interior of a typical toaster oven might have 20–30 liters capacity, and a standard oven might have 100 liters. If you're in the UK, a standard single oven has about 60 litres interior capacity. A medium-size OTG is around 40 liters.) In other words, whether we should point it at Oven or at Toaster oven probably depends on what you think "normal" is in your personal experience, and looking at it objectively, either is reasonable. I lean towards leaving it where it is partly because Toaster oven is already a redirect to a section in Toaster, and an OTG is more than "just" a toaster. If you want to know more, then you might find these accessible explanations useful: https://www.biggerbolderbaking.com/toaster-oven-otg-baking-guide/ and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6HotmjOvrk WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Toaster Oven being redirected to Toaster isn't a problem, because Toaster actually has a section on Toaster Ovens. Oven, meanwhile, does not have a section on OTGs. Deletion as per WP:REDLINK is probably still the way to go, here, as per Alach E.-- that, or someone needs to head to Oven and write a section on the appliance in question. After all, someone looking up "Oven Toast Grill" might want to know that they are small, electric countertop ovens with a capacity of around 40 liters. Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 15:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No mention at the target. A reader interested specifically in this will be disappointed to be confronted with an article generally about ovens. This redirect creates a bad user experience, and redirects being cheap doesn't help that.—Alalch E. 00:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unless there is a mention at the target. No mention of OTG either at the target or anywhere at enwiki. The OTG dab also has no mention of this device. It was removed from the dab in 2022 for the same reason - no mention. Jay 💬 10:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

DAB page[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 2#DAB page

65th Infantry Regiment (United States and etc.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All pages in this group have received 0-1 recent pageviews according to massviews [1]. In this group, there is a complete parentheses version in existence, or not fixable in this way. On Wikipedia, these terms are implausible with the missing parenthesis, and the existence of external links (unused via pageviews), do not justify the presence of noise titles in the search bar. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment, @Utopes: (and others) - As OA of several of the WP:Redirects noted above, it's *entirely* ok wth me to do whatever is decided in the final WP:CONSENSUS discussion - these WP:RDRs were made as a way of linking to Wikipedia from External Websites (like FaceBook), which drops the ending ")", this problem has been fully described and discussed on the WP:Village pump (technical) at VP-Archive204 (a Must-Read); VP-Archive180; VP-Archive162 - in any case - hope this helps in some way - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 11:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all, including Shadrach (Beastie Boys song, inadvertently created May 18, 2012. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 07:42, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - as per nom. The one I was involved with was a page move of a newly created page. The one I created I would have moved without leaving a redirect, but did not want the article creator to be unable to find the article they had just created. Now, it serves no purpose.Onel5969 TT me 10:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - I was pinged here as I am responsible for creating one of these links 9 years ago. I don't remember making it, and can only assume I did so as it was otherwise a redlink as someone made a typo. Today I wouldn't do that, and instead would have just fixed the link directly. Damien Linnane (talk) 11:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all: per WP:RDAB, it's the External Websites problem to fix, not Wikipedias. Nobody (talk) 13:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - Unnecessary. --Picard's Facepalm • Made It So Engage! • 14:45, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - typos from old page moves or wikilink entry, no reason to keep them. Good find. -- GreenC 15:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all: exemplar WP:RDAB situations. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:16, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

IGet[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional/commercial, specific to a single product, speedy deletion criterion G11 possibly applies. Shearonink (talk) 02:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, bundling similar nominations, with all having the same rationale with a few variations. The only other comment for the general "IGet" redirect was "an apparent brand/company name for a cigarette/vaping device". Utopes (talk / cont) 08:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • its a brand of vape i dont understand why it couldn't be used as a redirect Elizzaflanagan221 (talk) 08:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: per R#D4, IGet Vape might make sense to keep as it is the company name (or IGet as the WP:COMMONNAME), but the others are purely promotional. Nobody (talk) 13:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as we have no content about this brand/company or any of the products. I have not assessed whether any/all are notable enough for an article, section and/or mention, but unless and until we do have some content to point to the redirects are misleading. Thryduulf (talk) 15:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per above rationale - 🐲 Jo the fire dragon 🐉(talk|contributions) 16:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as per nom. Damien Linnane (talk) 23:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Now looking at it, some are useless. I think we should keep iGet and iGet vape however Elizzaflanagan221 (talk) 14:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as per above, but also, as per WP:REDLINK. If the brand IS noteable enough as per Thryduulf, someone will write an article on it. Until then, we don't need it. Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 10:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_21

Leave a Reply